Advertisement

European Biophysics Journal

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 267–275 | Cite as

Discrimination of leukemic Jurkat cells from normal lymphocytes via novo label-free cytometry based on fluctuation of image gray values

  • Ishay Wohl
  • Naomi Zurgil
  • Yaron Hakuk
  • Maria Sobolev
  • Mordechai DeutschEmail author
Original Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

We introduce a simple, label-free cytometry technique, based on the spatio-temporal fluctuation analysis of pixel gray levels of a cell image utilizing the Gray Level Information Entropy (GLIE) function. In this study, the difference in GLIE random fluctuations and its biophysical etiology in a comparison cell model of leukemic Jurkat cells and human healthy donor lymphocytes was explored. A combination of common bright field microscopy and a unique imaging dish wherein cells are individually held untethered in a picoliter volume matrix of optical chambers was used. Random GLIE fluctuations were found to be greater in malignant Jurkat cells than in benign lymphocytes, while these fluctuations correlate with intracellular vesicle Mean Square Displacement (MSD) values and are inhibited by myosin-2 and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) inhibitors. These results suggest that the incoherent active forces acting on the cytoskeleton which cause mechanical dissipative fluctuation of the cytoskeletal and related intracellular content are the biophysical cellular mechanism behind the GLIE random fluctuation results. Analysis of the results in Jurkat cells and normal lymphocytes suggests the possible potential of this simple and automated label-free cytometry to identify malignancy, particularly in a diagnostic setup of multiple cell examination.

Keywords

Biological optics Image analysis Digital imaging Microscopy Fourier transforms 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was endowed by the Bequest of Moshe-Shimon and Judith Weisbrodt.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no known conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Supplementary material

249_2019_1351_MOESM1_ESM.docx (800 kb)
Supplementary file1 (DOCX 799 kb)

References

  1. Amin HM, Yang Y, Shen Y, Estey EH, Giles FJ, Pierce SA, Kantarjian HM, O’Brien SM, Jilani I, Albitar M (2005) Having a higher blast percentage in circulation than bone marrow: clinical implications in myelodysplastic syndrome and acute lymphoid and myeloid leukemias. Leukemia 19:1567–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arber DA, Borowitz MJ, Cessna M, Etzell J, Foucar K, Hasserjian RP, Rizzo JD, Theil K, Wang SA, Smith AT, Rumble RB, Thomas NE, Vardiman JW (2016) Initial diagnostic workup of acute leukemia. Arch Pathol Lab Med.  https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0504-CP Google Scholar
  3. Boiteux A, Goldbeter A, Hess B (1975) Control of oscillating glycolysis of yeast by stochastic, periodic, and steady source of substrate: a model and experimental study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72(10):3829–3833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brangwynne CP, Koenderink GH, MacKintosh FC (2009) Intracellular transport by active diffusion. Trends Cell Biol 19(9):423–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corbin EA, Kong F, Lim CT, King WP, Bashir R (2015) Biophysical properties of human breast cancer cells measured using silicon MEMS resonators and atomic force microscopy. Lab Chip 15:839–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ (2004) Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat Rev Cancer 4:891–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guck J, Schinkinger S, Lincoln B, Wottawah F, Ebert S, Romeyke M, Lenz D, Erickson HM, Ananthakrishnan R, Mitchell D, Käs J, Ulvick S, Bilby C (2005) Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. Biophys J 88(5):3689–3698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guo M, Ehrlicher AJ, Jensen MH, Renz M, Moore JR, Goldman RD, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Mackintosh FC, Weitz DA (2014) Probing the stochastic, motor-driven properties of the cytoplasm using force spectrum microscopy. Cell 158:822–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hudder A, Nathanson L, Deutscher P (2003) Organization of mammalian cytoplasm. Mol Cell Biol 23(24):9318–9326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hunger SP, Mullighan CG (2015) acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. N Engl J Med 373:1541–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lau AW, Hoffman BD, Davies A, Crocker JC, Lubensky TC (2003) Microrheology, stress fluctuations and active behavior of living cells. Phys Rev Lett 91(19):198101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lekka M (2016) Discrimination between normal and cancerous cells using AFM. BioNanoSci 6:65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. MacKintosh FC, Levine AJ (2008) Non-equilibrium mechanics and dynamics of motor-activated gels. Phys Rev Lett 100:018104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pacini N, Borziani F (2014) Cancer stem cell theory and the Warburg Effect, Two sides of the same Coin? Int J Mol Sci 15:8893–8930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Poplack DG (1989) Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Chapter 43). New Directions in Cancer Treatment. Springer, Berlin, pp 546–551Google Scholar
  16. Pui C-H, Evans WE (1998) Acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 339:605–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ravid-Hermesh O, Zurgil N, Shafran Y, Sobolev M, Galmidi M, Badihi Y, Israel LL, Lellouche JP, Lellouche E, Michaeli S, Deutsch M (2014) Real-time quantification of protein expression and translocation at individual cell resolution using imaging-dish-based live cell array. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:7085–7101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saks V, Beraud N, Wallimann T (2008) Metabolic compartmentation—a system level property of muscle cells. Int J Mol Sci 9(5):751–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Seyfried TN, Shelton LM (2010) Cancer as a metabolic disease. Nutr Metab 7:7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sunray M, Zurgil N, Shafran Y, Deutsch M (2002) Determination of individual cell Michaelis-Menten constants. Cytometry 47:8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Suresh S (2007) Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Biomater 3(4):413–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wohl I, Zurgil N, Hakuk Y, Sobolev M, Galmidi M, Deutsch M (2015) In situ label-free static cytometry by monitoring spatiotemporal fluctuations of image gray values. J Biomed Opt 20(10):105013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wohl I, Zurgil N, Hakuk Y, Sobolev M, Deutsch M (2016) In situ evaluation of physiological activity and mitochondrial dysfunction via novo label-free measures based on fluctuation of image gray values. J Anal Bioanal Tech 7:2Google Scholar
  24. Wohl I, Zurgil N, Hakuk Y, Sobolev M, Deutsch M (2017) Fluctuation of information entropy measures in cell image. Entropy 019:565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang J-H, Yang L, Qu Z, Weiss JN (2008) Glycolytic oscillations in isolated rabbit ventricular myocytes. J Biol Chem 283(52):36321–36327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zheng J (2012) Energy metabolism of cancer: Glycolysis versus oxidative phosphorylation (Review). Oncol Lett 4:1151–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Biophysical Societies' Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Biophysical Interdisciplinary Schottenstein Center for the Research and Technology of the Cellome, Physics DepartmentBar Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations