Dynamics of Biofilm Formation by Salmonella Typhimurium and Beef Processing Plant Bacteria in Mono- and Dual-Species Cultures
This study aimed to determine the impact of bacteria from a beef plant conveyor belt on the biofilm formation of Salmonella in dual-species cultures. Beef plant isolates (50) including 18 Gram-negative aerobes (GNA), 8 Gram-positive aerobes (GPA), 5 lactic acid bacteria (LAB), 9 Enterobacteriaceae (EB), and 10 generic Escherichia coli (GEC) were included for developing biofilms in mono- and co-culture with S. Typhimurium at 15 °C for 6 days. Five selected cultures in planktonic form and in biofilms were tested for susceptibility to two commonly used sanitizers (i.e. E-San and Perox-E Plus). In mono-cultures, ≥ 80, 67, 61, 20, and 13% of GEC, EB, GNA, LAB, and GPA, respectively, developed measurable biofilms after 2 days, while all co-culture pairings with S. Typhimurium achieved some level of biofilm production. The predominant effect of EB and only effect of GEC strains on the biofilm formation of S. Typhimurium was antagonistic, while that of Gram-positive bacteria was synergistic, with the effect being more prominent on day 6. The effect was highly variable for the GNA isolates. Six aerobic isolates that formed moderate/strong biofilms by day 2 greatly boosted the co-culture biofilm formation. Seven Gram-negative bacteria were antagonistic against the biofilm formation of the co-cultures. Both sanitizers completely inactivated the selected planktonic cultures, but were largely ineffective against biofilms. In conclusion, all beef plant isolates assessed formed biofilms when paired with S. Typhimurium. Aerobic biofilm formers may create a more favorable condition for Salmonella biofilm formation, while some beef plant isolates have potential as a biocontrol strategy for Salmonella biofilms.
KeywordsBiofilm Environmental microbiota Interaction Antagonism Sanitization
Technical assistance provided by Danielle St. Jean and Anita Gosh was gratefully acknowledged.
Funding for this study was provided by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada through A-base funding (A-1637 and A-1603).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.World Health Organization (2015) WHO estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases: foodborne disease burden epidemiology reference group 2007–2015. https://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/foodborne_disease/fergreport/en/. Accessed June 2018
- 4.Thomas MK, Murray R, Flockhart L, Pintar K, Fazil A, Nesbitt A, Marshall B, Tataryn J, Pollari F (2015) Estimates of foodborne illness–related hospitalizations and deaths in Canada for 30 specified pathogens and unspecified agents. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 12:820–827. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2015.1966 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.EFSA (2013) Foodborne zoonotic diseases. Salmonella. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/salmonella. Accessed 10 Oct 2018
- 10.Wang R, Bono JL, Kalchayanand N, Shackelford S, Harhay DM (2012) Biofilm formation by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 strains and their tolerance to sanitizers commonly used in the food processing environment. J. Food Prot. 75:1418–1428. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Runkel S, Wells HC, Rowley G (2013) Living with stress: A lesson from the enteric pathogen Salmonella enterica. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 83:87–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407678-5.00003-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Peng D (2016) Biofilm formation of Salmonella. In: Dhanasekaran D, Thajuddin N (eds) Microbial biofilms - importance and applications. InTech, Rijeka, pp 231–249Google Scholar
- 16.Giaouris E, Heir E, Hébraud M, Chorianopoulos N, Langsrud S, Møretrø T, Habimana O, Desvaux M, Renier S, Nychas G-J (2014) Attachment and biofilm formation by foodborne bacteria in meat processing environments: causes, implications, role of bacterial interactions and control by alternative novel methods. Meat Sci. 97:298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Chuah L-O, Shamila Syuhada A-K, Mohamad Suhaimi I, Farah Hanim T, Rusul G (2018) Genetic relatedness, antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation of Salmonella isolated from naturally contaminated poultry and their processing environment in northern Malaysia. Food Res. Int. 105:743–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Yang X, Wang H, He A, Tran F (2018) Biofilm formation and susceptibility to biocides of recurring and transient Escherichia coli isolated from meat fabrication equipment. Food Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.02.050
- 20.Wang R, Kalchayanand N, King DA, Luedtke BE, Bosilevac JM, Arthur TM (2014) Biofilm formation and sanitizer resistance of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains isolated from "high event period" meat contamination. J. Food Prot. 77:1982–1987. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Giaouris ED, Heir E, Desvaux M, Hébraud M, Møretrø T, Langsrud S, Doulgeraki A, Nychas G-J, Kacániová M, Czaczyk K, Ölmez H, Simões M (2015) Intra- and inter-species interactions within biofilms of important foodborne bacterial pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00841
- 24.Marouani-Gadri N, Augier G, Carpentier B (2009) Characterization of bacterial strains isolated from a beef-processing plant following cleaning and disinfection — influence of isolated strains on biofilm formation by Sakaï and EDL 933 E. coli O157:H7. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 133:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.04.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Lane DJ (1991) 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M (eds) Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., HobokenGoogle Scholar
- 28.Stepanović S, Vuković D, Hola V, Bonaventura GD, Djukić S, ĆIrković I, Ruzicka F (2007) Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS 115:891–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_630.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Soni KA, Oladunjoye A, Nannapaneni R, Schilling MW, Silva JL, Mikel B, Bailey RH (2013) Inhibition and inactivation of Salmonella typhimurium biofilms from polystyrene and stainless steel surfaces by essential oils and phenolic constituent carvacrol. J. Food Prot. 76:205–212. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x.Jfp-12-196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Vidal De Oliveira DC, Fernandes Júnior A, Kaneno R, Silva MG, Araújo Júnior JP, Cirone Silva NC, Mores Rall VL (2014) Ability of Salmonella spp. to produce biofilm is dependent on temperature and surface material. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 11:478–483. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2013.1710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Wang R, Kalchayanand N, Schmidt JW, Harhay DM (2013) Mixed biofilm formation by Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium enhanced bacterial resistance to sanitization due to extracellular polymeric substances. J. Food Prot. 76:1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Aliyar F, Ifigenia G, SJ N (2013) Biofilm formation of O157 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and multidrug-resistant and susceptible Salmonella typhimurium and Newport and their inactivation by sanitizers. J. Food Sci. 78:M880–M886. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Røder HL, Raghupathi PK, Herschend J, Brejnrod A, Knøchel S, Sørensen SJ, Burmølle M (2015) Interspecies interactions result in enhanced biofilm formation by co-cultures of bacteria isolated from a food processing environment. Food Microbiol. 51:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2015.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Chorianopoulos NG, Giaouris ED, Kourkoutas Y, Nychas G-JE (2010) Inhibition of the early stage of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis biofilm development on stainless steel by cell-free supernatant of a Hafnia alvei culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:2018–2022. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02093-09 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Jahid IK, Han NR, Srey S, Ha S-D (2014) Competitive interactions inside mixed-culture biofilms of Salmonella typhimurium and cultivable indigenous microorganisms on lettuce enhance microbial resistance of their sessile cells to ultraviolet C (UV-C) irradiation. Food Res. Int. 55:445–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.11.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.Jones K, Bradshaw SB (1997) Synergism in biofilm formation between Salmonella enteritidis and a nitrogen-fixing strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Appl. Microbiol. 82:663–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1997.tb03600.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Gkana EN, Giaouris ED, Doulgeraki AI, Kathariou S, Nychas G-JE (2017) Biofilm formation by Salmonella typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus on stainless steel under either mono- or dual-species multi-strain conditions and resistance of sessile communities to sub-lethal chemical disinfection. Food Control 73:838–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.09.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar