Gut and Whole-Body Microbiota of the Honey Bee Separate Thriving and Non-thriving Hives
The recent worldwide decline of honey bee colonies is a major ecological problem which also threatens pollinated crop production. Several interacting stressors such as environmental pressures and pathogens are suspected. Recently, the gut microbiota has emerged as a critical factor affecting bee health and fitness. We profiled the bacterial communities associated with the gut and whole body of worker bees to assess whether non-thriving colonies could be separated from thriving hives based on their microbial signature. The microbiota of thriving colonies was characterised by higher diversity and higher relative abundance of bacterial taxa involved in sugar degradation that were previously associated with healthy bees (e.g. Commensalibacter sp. and Bartonella apis). In contrast, the microbiota of non-thriving bees was depleted in health-associated species (e.g. Lactobacillus apis), and bacterial taxa associated with disease states (e.g. Gilliamella apicola) and pollen degradation (e.g. G. apicola and Bifidobacterium asteroides) were present in higher abundance compared to thriving colonies. Gut and whole-body microbiota shared a similar dominant core but their comparison showed differences in composition and relative abundance. More differences in taxon relative abundance between gut and whole body were observed in non-thriving bees, suggesting that microbiota associated with other bee organs might also be different. Thus, microbiota profiling could be used as a diagnostic tool in beekeeping practices to predict hive health and guide hive management.
KeywordsHoney bee Apis mellifera Microbiota 16S rRNA sequencing
We thank the beekeeper for allowing us to collect honey bee workers and for his assistance in conducting this survey. Work in PWOT’s lab was supported in part by Science Foundation Ireland through a Centre award to the APC Microbiome Ireland (SFI/12/RC/2273).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 9.Goulson D, Nicholls E, Botias C, Rotheray EL (2015) Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science (80- ) 347:1255957–1255957 . https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255957
- 26.Anderson KE, Sheehan TH, Mott BM, Maes P, Snyder L, Schwan MR, Walton A, Jones BM, Corby-Harris V (2013) Microbial ecology of the hive and pollination landscape: bacterial associates from floral nectar, the alimentary tract and stored food of honey bees (Apis mellifera). PLoS One 8:e83125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Cox-Foster DL, Conlan S, Holmes EC, Palacios G, Evans JD, Moran NA, Quan PL, Briese T, Hornig M, Geiser DM, Martinson V, vanEngelsdorp D, Kalkstein AL, Drysdale A, Hui J, Zhai J, Cui L, Hutchison SK, Simons JF, Egholm M, Pettis JS, Lipkin WI (2007) A metagenomic survey of microbes in honey bee colony collapse disorder. Science 318:283–287. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1146498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Erban T, Ledvinka O, Kamler M, Nesvorna M, Hortova B, Tyl J, Titera D, Markovic M, Hubert J (2017) Honeybee (Apis mellifera)-associated bacterial community affected by American foulbrood: detection of Paenibacillus larvae via microbiome analysis. Sci. Rep. 7:5084. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05076-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7:335–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7537–7541. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01541-09 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Pedrós-Alió C (2012) The rare bacterial biosphere. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 4:449–466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100948 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Mockler BK, Kwong WK, Moran NA, Koch H (2018) Microbiome structure influences infection by the parasite Crithidia bombi in bumble bees. Appl Environ Microbiol AEM.02335–17 . https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02335-17
- 48.Alberoni D, Baffoni L, Gaggìa F, Ryan PM, Murphy K, Ross PR, Stanton C, di Gioia D (2018) Impact of beneficial bacteria supplementation on the gut microbiota, colony development and productivity of Apis mellifera L. Benef Microbes 9:269–278. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2017.0061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Hubert J, Bicianova M, Ledvinka O, Kamler M, Lester PJ, Nesvorna M, Kopecky J, Erban T (2017) Changes in the bacteriome of honey bees associated with the parasite Varroa destructor, and pathogens Nosema and Lotmaria passim. Microb. Ecol. 73:685–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-016-0869-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 56.Shade A, Peter H, Allison SD, Baho DL, Berga M, Bürgmann H, Huber DH, Langenheder S, Lennon JT, Martiny JBH, Matulich KL, Schmidt TM, Handelsman J (2012) Fundamentals of microbial community resistance and resilience. Front. Microbiol. 3:417. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 69.Corby-Harris V, Snyder LA, Schwan MR, Maes P, McFrederick QS, Anderson KE (2014) Origin and effect of alpha 2.2 Acetobacteraceae in honey bee larvae and description of Parasaccharibacter apium gen. nov., sp. nov. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80:7460–7472. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02043-14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar