Advertisement

Bioreactivity and Microbiome of Biodeposits from Filter-Feeding Bivalves

  • Anna E. Murphy
  • Rebecca Kolkmeyer
  • Bongkuen Song
  • Iris C. Anderson
  • Jennifer Bowen
Microbiology of Aquatic Systems

Abstract

Bivalves serve an important ecosystem function in delivering organic matter from pelagic to benthic zones and are important in mediating eutrophication. However, the fate of this organic matter (i.e., biodeposits) is an important consideration when assessing the ecological roles of these organisms in coastal ecosystems. In addition to environmental conditions, the processing of biodeposits is dependent on its composition and the metabolic capacity of the associated microbial community. The objectives of this study were to compare the biological reactivity, potential denitrification rates, and microbial communities of biodeposits sourced from different bivalve species: hard clam (Mercenaria mercenaria), eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica), and ribbed mussel (Geukensia demissa). To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate and compare the microbiome of bivalve biodeposits using high-throughput sequencing and provide important insight into the mechanisms by which bivalves may alter sediment microbial communities and benthic biogeochemical cycles. We show that clam biodeposits had significantly higher bioreactivity compared to mussel and oyster biodeposits, as reflected in higher dissolved inorganic carbon and ammonium production rates in controlled incubations. Potential denitrification rates were also significantly higher for clam biodeposits compared to oyster and mussel biodeposits. The microbial communities associated with the biodeposits were significantly different across bivalve species, with significantly greater abundances of Alteromonadales, Chitinophagales, Rhodobacterales, and Thiotrichales associated with the clam biodeposits. These bioreactivity and microbial differences across bivalve species are likely due to differences in bivalve physiology and feeding behavior and should be considered when evaluating the effects of bivalves on water quality and ecosystem function.

Keywords

Microbiome Biodeposits Denitrification Bivalves Bioreactivity Lability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Jennifer Stanhope and Hunter Walker at VIMS for the logistical and laboratory support. Discussions with Ashley Smyth and Lisa Kellogg greatly improved this research effort. This work was supported by the VIMS Research Experiences for Undergraduates program through grants awarded from the National Science Foundation (grant # NSF OCE 1062882) to Linda Schaffner and Rochelle Seitz, Virginia Sea Grant (NA10OAR4170085, #R/71515W) awarded to A. Murphy, grant #NSF OCE 1233801 awarded to BK Song, and NSF Virginia Coast Reserve Long Term Ecological Research (LTER 0080381, 0621014).

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arfken A, Song B, Bowman JS, Piehler M (2017) Denitrification potential of the eastern oyster microbiome using a 16S rRNA gene based metabolic inference approach. PLoS One 12:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bilkovic DM, Mitchell MM, Isdell RE, Schliep M, Smyth AR (2017) Mutualism between ribbed mussels and cordgrass enhances salt marsh nitrogen removal. Ecosphere 8Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Black et al. (2017) Effect of freshwater mussels on the vertical distribution of anaerobic ammonia oxidizers and other nitrogen-transforming microorganisms in upper Mississippi river sediment. PeerJ 5:e3536.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3536
  5. 5.
    Bricelj VM, Malouf RE (1984) Influence of algal and suspended sediment concentrations on the feeding physiology of the hard clam Mercenaria mercenaria. Mar Biol 84:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bricker SB, Rice KC, Bricker OP (2014) From headwaters to coast: influence of human activities on water quality of the Potomac River estuary. Aquat Geochem 20:291–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP (2016) DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, Fierer N, Knight R (2011) Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:4516–4522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dame RF (2011) Ecology of marine bivalves: an ecosystem approach, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis Group; Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eren AM, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML (2013) Correction: a filtering method to generate high quality short reads using Illumina paired-end technology. PLoS One 8(6).  https://doi.org/10.1371/annotation/afa5c40d-c604-46ae-84c4-82cb92193a5e
  11. 11.
    Fabiano M, Danovaro R, Olivari E, Misic C (1994) Decomposition of faecal matter and somatic tissue of Mytilus galloprovincialis: changes in organic matter composition and microbial succession. Mar Biol 119:375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fahrbach M, Kuever J, Remesch M, Huber BE, Kämpfer P, Dott W, Hollender J (2008) Steroidobacter denitrificans gen. nov., sp. nov., a steroidal hormone-degrading gammaproteobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:2215–2223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feinman SG, Farah YR, Bauer JM, Bowen JL (2018) The influence of oyster farming on sediment bacterial communities. Estuar Coasts 41:800–814Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Green DS, Boots B, Crowe TP (2012) Effects of non-indigenous oysters on microbial diversity and ecosystem functioning. PLoS One 7:1–10Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grenz C, Hermin MN, Baudinet D, Daumas R (1990) In situ biochemical and bacterial variation of sediments enriched with mussel biodeposits. Hydrobiologia 207:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hahnke RL, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Garcïa-Lopez M, Mukherjee S, Huntemann M, Ivanova NN, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Klenk HP, Goker M (2016) Genome-based taxonomic classification of Bacteroidetes. Front Microbiol 7Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haven DS, Morales-Alamo R (1966) Aspects of biodeposition by oysters and other invertebrate filter feeders. Limnol Oceanogr 11:487–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hudson K, Murray TJ (2016) Virginia shellfish aquaculture situation and outlook report: results of the 2015 Virginia shellfish aquaculture crop reporting survey. VIMS marine resource report No. 2016-4. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary.  https://doi.org/10.21220/V5BD8N
  19. 19.
    Jones CM, Stres B, Rosenquist M, Hallin S (2008) Phylogenetic analysis of nitrite, nitric oxide, and nitrous oxide respiratory enzymes reveal a complex evolutionary history for denitrification. Mol Biol Evol 25:1955–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kana TM, Darkangelo C, Hunt MD, Oldham JB, Bennett GE, Cornwell JC (1994) Membrane inlet mass spectrometer for rapid high-precision determination of N2, O2, and Ar in environmental water samples. Anal Chem 66:4166–4170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kellogg ML, Cornwell JC, Owens MS, Paynter KT (2013) Denitrification and nutrient assimilation on a restored oyster reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 480:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kellogg ML, Smyth AR, Luckenbach MW, Carmichael RH, Brown BL, Cornwell JC, Piehler MF, Owens MS, Dalrymple DJ, Higgins CB (2014) Use of oysters to mitigate eutrophication in coastal waters. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 151:156–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    King GM, Judd C, Kuske CR, Smith C (2012) Analysis of stomach and gut microbiomes of the Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) from Coastal Louisiana, USA. PLoS ONE 7(12):e51475.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051475
  24. 24.
    Knepel K, Bogren K (2001) Determination of orthophosphate by flow injection analysis. QuikChem Method 31-115-01-1-H. Lachat Instruments, Milwaukee, WIGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koop-Jakobsen K, Giblin AE (2010) The effect of increased nitrate loading on nitrate reduction via denitrification and DNRA in salt marsh sediments. Limnol Oceanogr 55:789–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Koroleff F (1983) Total and organic nitrogen. In: Grasshoff K, Ehrhardt M, Kremling K (eds) Methods of seawater analysis. Verlag-Chemie, Weinheim, pp 162–169Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lau KWK, Ng CY, Ren J, Lau SCL, Qian P, Wong P, Lau TC, Wu M (2005) Owenweeksia hongkongensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel marine bacterium of the phylum “Bacteroidetes”. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1051–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee K, Choo YJ, Giovannoni SJ, Cho JC (2007) Maritimibacter alkaliphilus gen. nov., sp. nov., a genome-sequenced marine bacterium of the Roseobacter clade in the order Rhodobacterales. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:1653–1658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee PO, McLellan SL, Graham LE, Young EB (2015) Invasive dreissenid mussels and benthic algae in Lake Michigan: characterizing effects on sediment bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 91:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li Z, Nicolae V V, Akileh R, Liu T, Virginia W (2017) A Brief Review of Oyster-associated Microbiota. Microbiol Res J Int 20:1–14Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liao N (2001) Determination of ammonia in brackish or sewater by flow injection analysis. QuikChem Method 31-107-06-1-B. Lachat Instruments, Milwaukee, WIGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lim S, Chang DH, Kim BC (2016) Whole-genome sequence of Sunxiuqinia dokdonensis DH1T, isolated from deep sub-seafloor sediment in Dokdo Island. Genom Data 9:95–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lohner RN, Sigler V, Mayer CM, Balogh C (2007) A comparison of the benthic bacterial communities within and surrounding Dreissena clusters in lakes. Microb Ecol 54:469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lokmer A, Kuenzel S, Baines JF, Wegner KM (2016) The role of tissue-specific microbiota in initial establishment success of Pacific oysters. Environ Microbiol 18:970–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Matsen FA, Kodner RB, Armbrust EV (2010) pplacer: linear time maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic placement of sequences onto a fixed reference tree. BMC Bioinformatics 11:538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    McMurdie PJ, Holmes S (2013) Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e61217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Murphy AE, Anderson IC, Luckenbach MW (2015) Enhanced nutrient regeneration at commercial hard clam (Mercenaria mercenaria) beds and the role of macroalgae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 530:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Murphy AE, Anderson IC, Smyth AR, Song B, Luckenbach MW (2016) Microbial nitrogen processing in hard clam (Mercenaria mercenaria) aquaculture sediments: the relative importance of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA). Limnol Oceanogr 61:1589–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Murphy AE, Nizzoli D, Bartoli M, Smyth AR, Castaldelli G, Anderson IC (2018) Variation in benthic metabolism and nitrogen cycling across clam aquaculture sites. Mar Pollut Bull 127:524–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Neubauer SC, Anderson IC (2003) Transport of dissolved inorganic carbon from a tidal freshwater marsh to the York River estuary. Limnol Oceanogr 48:299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Newell RIE, Cornwell JC, Owens MS (2002) Influence of simulated bivalve biodeposition and microphytobenthos on sediment nitrogen dynamics: a laboratory study. Limnol Oceanogr 47:1367–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nizzoli D, Welsh DT, Fano EA, Viaroli P (2006) Impact of clam and mussel farming on benthic metabolism and nitrogen cycling, with emphasis on nitrate reduction pathways. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 315:151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Novais A, Souza AT, Ilarri M, Pascoal C, Sousa R (2016) Effects of the invasive clam Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774) on an estuarine microbial community. Sci Total Environ 566–567:1168–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rice DL (1982) The Detritus Nitrogen Problem : New Observations and Perspectives from Organic Geochemistry. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 9:153–162Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Riisgård H (1988) Efficiency of particle retention and filtration rate in 6 species of Northeast American bivalves. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 45:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Semedo M, Song B, Sparrer T, Phillips R (2018) Antibiotic effects on microbial communities responsible for denitrification and N2O production in grassland soils. Front Microbiol 9:2121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Simons AL, Churches N, Nuzhdin S (2018) High turnover of faecal microbiome from algal feedstock experimental manipulations in the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas). Microb Biotechnol 11:848–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Smaal AC, Prins TC (1993) The uptake of organic matter and the release of inorganic nutrients by bivalve suspension feeder beds. In: Dame RF (ed) Bivalve filter feeders. Nato ASI Series (Series G: Ecological Sciences). Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Smith P, Bogren K (2001) Determination of nitrate and/or nitrite in brackish or seawater by flow injection analysis colorimetry. QuikChem Method 31-107-04-1-E. Lachat Instruments, Milwaukee, WIGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Smyth AR, Murphy AE, Anderson IC, Song B (2018) Differential effects of bivalves on sediment nitrogen cycling in a shallow coastal bay. Estuar Coasts 41:1147–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sun C, Fu GY, Zhang CY, Hu J, Xu L, Wang RJ, Su Y, Han SB, Yu XY, Cheng H, Zhang XQ, Huo YY, Xu XW, Wu M (2016) Isolation and complete genome sequence of Algibacter alginolytica sp. nov., a novel seaweed-degrading Bacteroidetes bacterium with diverse putative polysaccharide utilization loci. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:2975–2987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tenore KR, Dunstan WM (1973) Comparison of feeding and biodeposition of three bivalves at different food levels. Mar Biol 21:190–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Thamdrup B, Dalsgaard T (2002) Production of N2 through anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to nitrate reduction in marine sediments production of N2 through anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to nitrate reduction in marine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1312–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Trabal Fernández N, Mazón-Suástegui JM, Vázquez-Juárez R, Ascencio-Valle F, Romero J (2014) Changes in the composition and diversity of the bacterial microbiota associated with oysters (Crassostrea corteziensis, Crassostrea gigas and Crassostrea sikamea) during commercial production, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 88(1):69–83.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12270
  56. 56.
    Wang G, Tang M, Li T, Dai S, Wu H, Chen C, He H, Fan J, Xiang W, Li X (2015) Wenzhouxiangella marina gen. nov, sp. nov, a marine bacterium from the culture broth of Picochlorum sp. 122, and proposal of Wenzhouxiangellaceae fam. nov. in the order Chromatiales. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, Int J Gen Mol Microbiol 107:1625–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ward JE, Shumway SE (2004) Separating the grain from the chaff: particle selection in suspension- and deposit-feeding bivalves. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 300(1–2):83–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine Science CenterNortheastern UniversityNahantUSA
  2. 2.College of William & MaryVirginia Institute of Marine ScienceGloucester PointUSA
  3. 3.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations