The Relative Abundance and Transcriptional Activity of Marine Sponge-Associated Microorganisms Emphasizing Groups Involved in Sulfur Cycle
During the last decades, our knowledge about the activity of sponge-associated microorganisms and their contribution to biogeochemical cycling has gradually increased. Functional groups involved in carbon and nitrogen metabolism are well documented, whereas knowledge about microorganisms involved in the sulfur cycle is still limited. Both sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation has been detected in the cold water sponge Geodia barretti from Korsfjord in Norway, and with specimens from this site, the present study aims to identify extant versus active sponge-associated microbiota with focus on sulfur metabolism. Comparative analysis of small subunit ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene (DNA) and transcript (complementary DNA (cDNA)) libraries revealed profound differences. The transcript library was predominated by Chloroflexi despite their low abundance in the gene library. An opposite result was found for Acidobacteria. Proteobacteria were detected in both libraries with representatives of the Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria related to clades with presumably thiotrophic bacteria from sponges and other marine invertebrates. Sequences that clustered with sponge-associated Deltaproteobacteria were remotely related to cultivated sulfate-reducing bacteria. The microbes involved in sulfur cycling were identified by the functional gene aprA (adenosine-5′-phosphosulfate reductase) and its transcript. Of the aprA sequences (DNA and cDNA), 87 % affiliated with sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. They clustered with Alphaproteobacteria and with clades of deep-branching Gammaproteobacteria. The remaining sequences clustered with sulfate-reducing Archaea of the phylum Euryarchaeota. These results indicate an active role of yet uncharacterized Bacteria and Archaea in the sponge’s sulfur cycle.
KeywordsMicrobiome Marine sponge Geodia barretti Sulfur cycling 16S rRNA aprA Genes Transcripts
We gratefully acknowledge Dagmar Woebken for providing the Poribacteria sequences, the crew on the research vessel “Hans Brattstrøm” for help with sampling, Elinor Bartle for correcting the manuscript, and Anders Lanzén for help with quality checks on the sequences. This work was supported by the Norwegian Research Council through the Centre for Geobiology (project 179560), and partly funded by the Norwegian Academy of Science and Statoil (VISTA project: 6146).
- 3.Hoffmann F, Radax R, Woebken D, Holtappels M, Lavik G, Rapp HT, Schlãppy ML, Schleper C, Kuypers MMM (2009) Complex nitrogen cycling in the sponge Geodia barretti. Environ Microbiol 11:2228–2243Google Scholar
- 6.Hentschel U, Fieseler L, Wehrl M, Gernert C, Steinert M, Hacker J, Horn M (2003) Microbial diversity of marine sponges. In: Müller, WEG (ed) Marine molecular biotechnology. Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 59–88Google Scholar
- 19.Arellano S, Lee O, Lafi F, Yang J, Wang Y, Young C, Qian P-Y (2013) Deep sequencing of Myxilla (Ectyomyxilla) methanophila, an epibiotic sponge on cold-seep tubeworms, reveals methylotrophic, thiotrophic, and putative hydrocarbon-degrading microbial associations. Microb Ecol 65:450–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Becker PT, Samadi S, Zbinden M, Hoyoux C, Compère P, De Ridder C (2009) First insights into the gut microflora associated with an echinoid from wood falls environments. Cah Biol Mar 50:343–352Google Scholar
- 33.Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:9Google Scholar
- 37.Hall T (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98Google Scholar
- 40.Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing MOTHUR: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 45.Felsenstein J (2013) PHYLIP-phylogeny inference package (version 3.69). Department of Genomic Sciences, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- 47.Schmitt S, Tsai P, Bell J, Fromont J, Ilan M, Lindquist N, Perez T, Rodrigo A, Schupp PJ, Vacelet J, Webster N, Hentschel U, Taylor MW (2012) Assessing the complex sponge microbiota: core, variable and species-specific bacterial communities in marine sponges. ISME J 6:564–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 49.Kaesler-Neumann I (2013) Investigation of sponge-associated bacteria from marine cold-water sponges. Dissertation, Technische Universität, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 52.Blazejak A, Kuever J, Erséus C, Amann R, Dubilier N (2006) Phylogeny of 16S rRNA, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, and adenosine 5-phosphosulfate reductase genes from Gamma-and Alphaproteobacterial symbionts in gutless marine worms (Oligochaeta) from Bermuda and the Bahamas. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5527–5536CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 59.Swan BK, Martinez-Garcia M, Preston CM, Sczyrba A, Woyke T, Lamy D, Reinthaler T, Poulton NJ, Masland EDP, Gomez ML, Sieracki ME, DeLong EF, Herndl GJ, Stepanauskas R (2011) Potential for chemolithoautotrophy among ubiquitous bacteria lineages in the dark ocean. Science 333:1296–1300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar