Three-dimensional (3-D) printing is gaining terrain in medical education, presurgical evaluation and recently as forensic evidence in court. Physicians, including radiologists, often provide expert testimony in court cases involving children with rib fractures and other injuries concerning for child physical abuse. Effectively communicating the complexities of fractures and other skeletal findings to nonmedical personnel using standard radiology studies can be challenging, especially during medical courtroom testimony. For this reason, we printed two 3-D models of the rib cage from the chest computed tomography (CT) scans of two patients with suspected non-accidental injury. The patients also had available chest radiographs. The DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) data were 3-D reconstructed and segmented using two attenuation thresholds. We removed unwanted structures and printed them on a commercially available scanner. A pediatric radiologist, blinded to clinical data, reviewed both 3-D models, identified all rib lesions and classified them according to their healing stage. We compared the 3-D models and the chest radiograph against the chest CT as the standard of care. We convened a meeting with the Child Protection Team at out institution to get their feedback and opinions about the models. From our observations of our experts, three spontaneous interactions were observed. Instinctively, the experts picked up and grasped the models, rotating them, feeling them and angling them to better visualize the fractures from multiple angles. The experts expressed a willingness to consider using the models in court.
Child abuse Children Court Non-accidental injury Ribs Three-dimensional model Three-dimensional printing
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia has received payment for expert testimony provided by Drs. Scribano, Wood and Henry.
Bizzotto N, Tami I, Tami A et al (2016) 3D Printed models of distal radius fractures. Injury 47:976–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhu SP, Newton AW, Perez-Rossello JM, Kleinman PK (2013) Three-dimensional skull models as a problem-solving tool in suspected child abuse. Pediatr Radiol 43:575–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H et al (2010) 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier W, Warnett JM, Payne M, Williams MA (2018) Introducing 3D printed models as demonstrative evidence at criminal trials. J Forensic Sci 63:1298–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsness KA, Cha ES, Bensard DD et al (2003) The positive predictive value of rib fractures as an indicator of nonaccidental trauma in children. J Trauma 54:1107–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leventhal JM, Thomas SA, Rosenfield NS, Markowitz RI (1993) Fractures in young children. Distinguishing child abuse from unintentional injuries. Am J Dis Child 147:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayakumar P, Barry M, Ramachandran M (2010) Orthopaedic aspects of paediatric non-accidental injury. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinman PK, Schlesinger AE (1997) Mechanical factors associated with posterior rib fractures: laboratory and case studies. Pediatr Radiol 27:87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez TR, Nguyen H, Palacios W et al (2013) Retrospective evaluation and dating of non-accidental rib fractures in infants. Clin Radiol 68:e467–e471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton-Gorges SL, Stein-Wexler R, Walton JW et al (2008) Comparison of computed tomography and chest radiography in the detection of rib fractures in abused infants. Child Abuse Negl 32:659–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez TR, Lee JS, Coulter KP et al (2015) CT of the chest in suspected child abuse using submillisievert radiation dose. Pediatr Radiol 45:1072–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar