Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 151–152 | Cite as

Diagnostic efficacy of single-pass split-bolus multidetector computed tomography in pediatric oncology: a valid alternative to a standard monophasic protocol

  • Michele ScialpiEmail author
  • Raffaele Schiavone
Letter to the Editor


  1. 1.
    Toma P (2017) Monophasic computed tomography for pediatric oncology using a split-bolus protocol: an unnecessary complication? Pediatr Radiol 47(3):366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scialpi M, Schiavone R, D’Andrea A et al (2015) Single-phase whole-body 64-MDCT split-bolus protocol for pediatric oncology: diagnostic efficacy and dose radiation. Anticancer Res 35:3041–3048Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scialpi M, Palumbo B, Pierotti L et al (2014) Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions by split-bolus multidetector-row CT: diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose in oncologic patients. Anticancer Res 34:4335–4344Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL et al (1995) Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. Radiology 195:353–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bae KT (2010) Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing in CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology 256:32–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thomas KE, Mann EH, Padfield N et al (2015) Dual bolus intravenous contrast injection technique for multiregion paediatric body CT. Eur Radiol 25:1014–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, S. Maria della Misericordia HospitalPerugia UniversityPerugiaItaly
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyAOU Meyer Pediatric HospitalFirenzeItaly

Personalised recommendations