Advertisement

Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 48, Issue 8, pp 1096–1100 | Cite as

Utility of immediate postoperative hip MRI in developmental hip dysplasia: closed vs. open reduction

  • Siddharth P. Jadhav
  • Snehal R. More
  • Vinitha Shenava
  • Wei Zhang
  • J. Herman Kan
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hips is being increasingly used to confirm hip reduction after surgery and spica cast placement for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

Objective

To review a single institutional experience with post-spica MRI in children undergoing closed or open hip reduction and describe the utility of MRI in directing the need for re-intervention.

Materials and methods

Seventy-four patients (52 female, 22 male) who underwent post-spica hip MRI over a 6-year period were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred and seven hips were included. Data reviewed included age at intervention, gender, type of intervention performed, MRI findings, the need for re-intervention and the interval between interventions. Gender was compared between the closed and open reduction groups via the Fisher exact test. Age at the first procedure was compared via the Wilcoxon rank test. Rates of re-intervention after closed and open reduction were calculated and the reasons for re-intervention were reviewed.

Results

The mean age at the time of the first intervention was 16.4 months (range: 4 to 63 months). Mean age for the closed reduction group was 10.5 months (range: 4–24 months) and for the open reduction group was 23.7 months (range: 5–63 months), which was significant (P-value <0.0001). Of the 52 hips that underwent closed reduction, 16 (31%) needed re-intervention. Of the 55 hips that underwent open reduction, MRI was useful in deciding re-intervention in only 1 (2%). This patient had prior multiple failed closed and open reductions at an outside institute.

Conclusion

Post intervention hip spica MRI is useful in determining the need for re-intervention after closed hip reduction, but its role after open reduction is questionable.

Keywords

Children Closed reduction Developmental dysplasia of hip Hip Magnetic resonance imaging Open reduction Spica cast 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

Dr. J. Herman Kan has received royalties from Elsevier and Springer and a stipend from the National Institutes of Health as a grant reviewer.

References

  1. 1.
    Nemeth BA, Narotam V (2012) Developmental dysplasia of the hip. Pediatr Rev 33:553–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson ND, Wood BP, Jackman KV (1998) Complex infantile and congenital hip dislocation: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 168:151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bos C, Bloem J (1989) Treatment of dislocation of the hip, detected in early childhood, based on magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71-A:1523–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jaramillo D, Villegas-Medina OL, Doty DK et al (1996) Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging demonstrates abduction-caused hip ischemia and its reversal in piglets. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:879–887CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jaremko JL, Wang CC, Dulai S (2014) Reliability of indices measured on infant hip MRI at time of spica cast application for dysplasia. Hip Int 24:405–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bulut M, Gurger M, Belhan O et al (2013) Management of developmental dysplasia of the hip in less than 24 months old children. Indian J Orthop 47:578–584CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Desai AA, Martus JE, Schoenecker J, Kan JH (2011) Spica MRI after closed reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Pediatr Radiol 41:525–529CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosenbaum DG, Servaes S, Bogner EA et al (2016) MR imaging in postreduction assessment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: goals and obstacles. Radiographics 36:840–854CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duffy CM, Taylor FN, Coleman L et al (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of surgical management in developmental dysplasia of the hip in childhood. J Pediatr Orthop 22:92–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jaramillo D, Villegas-Medina O, Laor T et al (1998) Gadolinium enhanced MR imaging of pediatric patients after reduction of dysplastic hips: assessment of femoral head position, factors impeding reduction, and femoral head ischemia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1633–1637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tiderius C, Jaramillo D, Connolly S et al (2009) Post-closed reduction perfusion magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of avascular necrosis in developmental hip dysplasia: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop 29:14–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laor T, Roy DR, Mehlman CT (2000) Limited magnetic resonance imaging examination after surgical reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 20:572–574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siddharth P. Jadhav
    • 1
  • Snehal R. More
    • 2
  • Vinitha Shenava
    • 3
  • Wei Zhang
    • 4
  • J. Herman Kan
    • 1
  1. 1.E.B. Singleton Department of Pediatric RadiologyTexas Children’s HospitalHoustonUSA
  2. 2.vRadEden PrairieUSA
  3. 3.Department of OrthopedicsTexas Children’s HospitalHoustonUSA
  4. 4.Outcomes and Impact Services, Texas Children’s HospitalBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations