Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 48, Issue 9, pp 1291–1306 | Cite as

Magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric adnexal masses and mimics

  • Christopher Z. LamEmail author
  • Govind B. Chavhan
Pediatric Body MRI


Evaluation of adnexal masses in children and adolescents relies on imaging for appropriate diagnosis and management. Pelvic MRI is indicated and adds value for all adnexal masses when surgery is considered or when ultrasound findings are indeterminate. Specifically, features on MR imaging can help distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, which not only influences the decision between surgery and conservative treatment, but also the type of surgery to be performed, including potential use of fertility-sparing approaches with minimally invasive techniques. Larger size, younger age, presentation with precocious puberty or virilization, restricted diffusion in a solid mass, and rapid and strong enhancement of solid components are all features concerning for malignancy. In addition, distinctive MR imaging features of adnexal masses, combined with clinical and laboratory biomarkers, might suggest a specific histological diagnosis.


Adnexal mass Adolescents Children Magnetic resonance imaging Malignancy Ovaries 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest



  1. 1.
    Rogers EM, Cubides GC, Lacy J et al (2014) Preoperative risk stratification of adnexal masses: can we predict the optimal surgical management? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 27:125–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oltmann SC, Garcia N, Barber R et al (2010) Can we preoperatively risk stratify ovarian masses for malignancy? J Pediatr Surg 45:130–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stankovic ZB, Sedlecky K, Savic D et al (2017) Ovarian preservation from tumors and torsions in girls: prospective diagnostic study. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 30:405–412CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marro A, Allen LM, Kives SL et al (2016) Simulated impact of pelvic MRI in treatment planning for pediatric adnexal masses. Pediatr Radiol 46:1249–1257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirkham YA, Lacy JA, Kives S, Allen L (2011) Characteristics and management of adnexal masses in a Canadian pediatric and adolescent population. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 33:935–943CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heo SH, Kim JW, Shin SS et al (2014) Review of ovarian tumors in children and adolescents: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 3:2039–2055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chilla B, Hauser N, Singer G et al (2011) Indeterminate adnexal masses at ultrasound: effect of MRI imaging findings on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions. Eur Radiol 21:1301–1310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV et al (2000) Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging — multivariate analysis. Radiology 214:39–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sohaib SAA, Sahdev A, Trappen PV et al (2003) Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1297–1304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anthoulakis C, Nikoloudis N (2014) Pelvic MRI as the “gold standard” in the subsequent evaluation of ultrasound-indeterminate adnexal lesions: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 132:661–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kinkel K, Lu Y, Mehdizade A et al (2005) Indeterminate ovarian mass at US: incremental value of second imaging test for characterization — meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis. Radiology 236:85–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fujii S, Kakite S, Nishihara K et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:1149–1156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katayama M, Masui T, Kobayashi S et al (2002) Diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging of ovarian tumors: is it useful to measure apparent diffusion coefficients? J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:250–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim HJ, Lee SY, Shin YR et al (2016) The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of ovarian lesions: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 11:e0149465CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Forstner R, Thomassin-Naggara I, Cunha TM et al (2017) ESUR recommendations for MR imaging of the songographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an update. Eur Radiol 27:2248–2257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meng XF, Zhu SC, Sun SJ et al (2016) Diffusion weighted imaging for the differential diagnosis of benign vs. malignant ovarian neoplasms. Oncol Lett 11:3795–3802CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yuan X, Guo L, Du W et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Medicine 96:e6659CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Cuenod CA et al (2009) Contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting benignity of complex adnexal masses. Eur Radiol 19:1544–1552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bakir B, Bakan S, Tunaci M et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted imaging of solid or predominantly solid gynaecological adnexal masses: is it useful in the differential diagnosis? Br J Radiol 84:600–611CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang P, Cui Y, Li W et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging with conventional MR imaging for differentiating complex solid and cystic ovarian tumors at 1.5 T. World J Surg Oncol 10:237CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kyriazi S, Collins DJ, Morgan VA et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted imaging of peritoneal disease for noninvasive staging of advanced ovarian cancer. Radiographics 30:1269–1285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohaghegh P, Rockall AG (2012) Imaging strategy for early ovarian cancer: characterization of adnexal masses with conventional and advanced imaging techniques. Radiographics 32:1751–1773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thomassin-Naggara I, Toussaint I, Perrot N et al (2011) Characterization of complex adnexal masses: value of adding perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging. Radiology 258:793–803CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Epelman M, Chikwava KR, Chauvin N, Servaes S (2011) Imaging of pediatric ovarian neoplasms. Pediatr Radiol 41:1085–1099CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chen VW, Ruiz B, Kileen JL et al (2003) Pathology and classification of ovarian tumors. Cancer 07:2631–2642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cass DL, Hawkins E, Brandt ML et al (2001) Surgery for ovarian masses in infants, children, and adolescents: 102 consecutive patients treated in a 15-year period. J Pediatr Surg 36:693–699CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schultz KA, Sencer SF, Messinger Y et al (2005) Pediatric ovarian tumors: a review of 67 cases. Pediatr Blood Cancer 44:167–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Park SB, Kim JK, Kim KR, Cho KS (2008) Imaging findings of complications and unusual manifestations of ovarian teratomas. Radiographics 28:969–983CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ehren I, Mahour G, Isaacs HJ (1984) Benign and malignant ovarian tumors in children and adolescents. Am J Surg 147:339–344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Caruso PA, Marsh MR, Minkowitz S, Karten G (1971) An intense clinicopathologic study of 305 teratomas of the ovary. Cancer 27:343–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yamashita Y, Hatanaka Y, Torashima M et al (1994) Mature cystic teratomas of the ovary without fat in the cystic cavity: MR features in 12 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:613–616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Hunt JL (2001) Ovarian teratomas: tumor types and imaging characteristics. Radiographics 21:475–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itoh K et al (1987) Ovarian cystic teratomas: MR imaging. Radiology 162:669–673CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sahin H, Abdullazade S, Sanci M (2017) Mature cystic teratoma of the ovary: a cutting edge overview on imaging features. Insights Imaging 8:227–241CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nakayama T, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H et al (2005) Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses: usefulness of detecting keratinoid substances in mature cystic teratomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:271–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Biskup W, Calaminus G, Schneider DT et al (2006) Teratoma with malignant transformation: experiences of the cooperative GPOH protocols MAKEI 83/86/89/96. Klin Padiatr 218:303–308CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yamaoka T, Togashi K, Koyama T et al (2003) Immature teratoma of the ovary: correlation of MR imaging and pathologic findings. Eur Radiol 13:313–319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Young JL, Wu XC, Roffers SD et al (2003) Ovarian cancer in children and young adults in the United States, 1992-1997. Cancer 97:2694–2700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tanaka YO, Kurosaki Y, Nishida M et al (1994) Ovarian dysgerminoma: MR and CT appearance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18:443–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kim SH, Kang SB (1995) Ovarian dysgerminoma: color Doppler ultrasonographic findings and comparison with CT and MR imaging findings. J Ultrasound Med 14:843–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Guerriero S, Testa AC, Timmerman D et al (2011) Imaging of gynecological disease (6): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ovarian dysgerminoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:596–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shaaban AM, Rezvani M, Elsays KM et al (2014) Ovarian malignant germ cell tumors: cellular classification and clinical and imaging features. Radiographics 34:777–801CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lack EE, Young RH, Scully RE (1992) Pathology of ovarian neoplasms in childhood and adolescence. Pathol Annu 27:281–356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Norris HJ, Jensen RD (1972) Relative frequency of ovarian neoplasms in children and adolescents. Cancer 30:713–719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Li YK, Zheng Y, Lin JB et al (2015) CT imaging of ovarian yolk sac tumor with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Sci Rep 5:11000CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Choi HJ, Moon MH, Kim SH et al (2008) Yolk sac tumor of the ovary: CT findings. Abdom Imaging 33:736–739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yamaoka T, Togashi K, Koyama T et al (2000) Yolk sac tumor of the ovary: radiologic-pathologic correlation in four cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:605–609CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Levitin A, Haller KD, Cohen HL et al (1996) Endodermal sinus tumor of the ovary: imaging evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:791–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    McCarthy S, Schwartz PE (2010) CT scan detects linear tear in ovarian yolk sac tumor. Eur J Radiol Extra 83:e73–e75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kurman RJ, Norris HJ (1976) Endodermal sinus tumor of the ovary: a clinical and pathologic analysis of 71 cases. Cancer 38:2404–2419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tsai JY, Saigo PE, Brown C, La Quaglia MP (2001) Diagnosis, pathology, staging, treatment, and outcome of epithelial ovarian neoplasia in patients age < 21 years. Cancer 91:2065–2070CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Diamond MP, Baxter JW, Peerman CG Jr, Burnett LS (1988) Occurrence of ovarian malignancy in childhood and adolescence: a community-wide evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 71:858–860PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Morowitz M, Huff D, von Allmen D (2003) Epithelial ovarian tumors in children: a retrospective analysis. J Pediatr Surg 38:331–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Jung SE, Lee JM, Rha SE et al (2002) CT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Radiographics 22:1305–1325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ghossain MA, Buy JN, Ligneres C et al (1991) Epithelial tumors of the ovary: comparison of MR and CT findings. Radiology 181:863–870CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tanaka YO, Nishida M, Kurosaki Y et al (1999) Differential diagnosis of gynaecological “stained glass” tumors on MRI. Br J Radiol 72:414–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Okada S, Ohaki Y, Inoue K et al (2005) Calcifications in mucinous and serous cystic ovarian tumors. J Nippon Med Sch 72:29–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Outwater EK, Huang AB, Dunton CJ et al (1997) Papillary projections in ovarian neoplasms: appearance on MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:689–695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ma FH, Zhao SH, Qiang JW et al (2014) MRI appearances of mucinous borderline ovarian tumors: pathological correlation. J Magn Reson Imaging 40:745–751CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Granberg S, Wikland M, Jansson I (1989) Macroscopic characterization of ovarian tumors and the relation to the histological diagnosis: criteria to be used for ultrasound evaluation. Gynecol Oncol 34:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hassen K, Ghoussain MA, Rousset P et al (2011) Characterization of papillary projections in benign versus borderline and malignant ovarian masses on conventional and color Doppler ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:1444–1449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zhao SH, Qiang JW, Zhang GF et al (2014) MRI in differentiating ovarian borderline from benign mucinous cystadenoma: pathological correlation. J Magn Reson Imaging 39:162–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Okamoto Y, Tanaka YO, Tsunoda H, Minami M (2007) Malignant or borderline mucinous cystic neoplasms have a larger number of loculi than mucinous cystadenoma: a retrospective study with MR. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:94–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Outwater EK, Wagner BJ, Mannion C et al (1998) Sex cord-stromal and steroid cell tumors of the ovary. Radiographics 18:1523–1546CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Schneider DT, Calaminus G, Wessalowski R et al (2003) Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors in children and adolescents. J Clin Oncol 21:2357–2363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Young RH, Dickersin GR, Scully RE (1984) Juvenile granulosa cell tumor of the ovary. A clinicopathological analysis of 125 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 8:575–596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Cecchetto G, Ferrari A, Bernini G et al (2011) Sex cord stromal tumors of the ovary in children: a clinicopathological report from the Italian TREP project. Pediatr Blood Cancer 56:1062–1067CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Schneider DT, Janig U, Calaminus G et al (2003) Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors — a clinicopathological study of 72 cases from the Kiel Pediatric Tumor Registry. Vichows Arch 443:549–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Jung SE, Rha SE, Lee JM et al (2005) CT and MRI findings of sex cord-stromal tumor of the ovary. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:207–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Morikawa K, Hatabu H, Togashi K et al (1997) Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary: MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:1001–1004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kitamura Y, Kanegawa K, Muraji T, Sugimura K (2000) MR imaging of juvenile granulosa cell tumor of the ovary: a case report. Pediatr Radiol 30:360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Rusterholz KR, MacDonald W (2016) An unusual case of juvenile granulomas cell tumor of the ovary. Radiol Case Rep 4:178CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Shinagare AB, Meylaerts LJ, Laury AR, Mortele KJ (2012) MRI features of ovarian fibroma and fibrothecoma with histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:296–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Chen J, Wang J, Chen X et al (2017) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging features of ovarian fibrothecoma. Oncol Lett 14:1172–1178CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Chung BM, Park SB, Lee JB et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging features of ovarian fibroma, fibrothecoma, and thecoma. Abdom Imaging 40:1263–1272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Yin B, Li W, Cui Y et al (2016) Value of diffusion-weighted imaging combined with conventional magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of thecomas/fibrothecomas and their differential diagnosis with malignant pelvic solid tumors. World J Surg Oncol 14:5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Young RH, Scully RE (1985) Ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors: a clinicopathological analysis of 207 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 9:543–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Bueno MT, Martínez-Ríos C, la Puente GA et al (2017) Pediatric imaging in DICER1 syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 47:1292–1301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Cai SQ, Zhao SH, Qiang JW et al (2013) Ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors: MRI findings and pathological correlation. J Ovarian Res 6:73CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    McCarville MB, Hill DA, Miller BE, Pratt CB (2001) Secondary ovarian neoplasms in children: imaging features with histopathologic correlation. Pediatr Radiol 31:358–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Dahmoush H, Anupindi SA, Pawel BR, Chauvin NA (2017) Multimodality imaging findings of massive ovarian edema in children. Pediatr Radiol 47:576–583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Fondin M, Rachas A, Huynh V et al (2017) Polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescents: which MR imaging-based diagnostic criteria? Radiology 285:961–970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Kim JS, Woo SK, Suh SJ, Morettin LB (1995) Sonographic diagnosis of paraovarian cysts: value of detecting a separate ipsilateral ovary. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:1441–1444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Kishimoto K, Ito K, Awaya H et al (2002) Paraovarian cyst: MR imaging features. Abdom Imaging 27:685–689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Oltmann SC, Fischer A, Barber R (2009) Cannot exclude torsion — a 15 year review. J Pediatr Surg 44:1212–1216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Oltmann SC, Fischer A, Barber R (2010) Pediatric ovarian malignancy presenting as ovarian torsion: incidence and relevance. J Pediatr Surg 45:135–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Duigenan S, Oliva E, Lee SI (2012) Ovarian torsion: diagnostic features on CT and MRI with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:W122–W131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE et al (2002) CT and MR imaging features of adnexal torsion. Radiographics 22:283–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Fujii S, Kaneda S, Kakite S et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted imaging findings of adnexal torsion: initial results. Eur J Radiol 77:330–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Kato H, Kanematsu M, Uchiyama M et al (2014) Diffusion-weighted imaging of ovarian torsion: usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for the detection of hemorrhagic infarction. Magn Reson Med Sci 13:39–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Moribata Y, Kido A, Yamaoka T et al (2015) MR imaging findings of ovarian torsion correlate with pathological hemorrhagic infarction. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 41:1433–1439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Harmon JC, Binkovitz LA, Binkovitz LE (2008) Isolated fallopian tube torsion: sonographic and CT features. Pediatr Radiol 38:175–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Narayanan S, Bandarkar A, Bulus DI (2013) Fallopian tube torsion in the pediatric age group: radiologic evaluation. J Ultrasound Med 33:1697–1704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Sakuragi M, Kido A, Himoto Y et al (2017) MRI findings of isolated tubal torsions: case series of 12 patients: MRI findings suggesting isolated tubal torsions, correlating with surgical findings. Clin Imaging 41:28–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Park BK, Kim CK, Kim B (2008) Isolated tubal torsion: specific signs on preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol 49:233–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Rezvani M, Shaaban AM (2011) Fallopian tube disease in the nonpregnant patient. Radiographics 31:527–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Kim M, Rha SE, Oh SN et al (2009) MR imaging findings of hydrosalpinx: a comprehensive review. Radiographics 29:495–507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Ha HK, Lim GY, Cha ES et al (1995) MR imaging of tubo-ovarian abscess. Acta Radiol 36:510–514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Medical ImagingUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations