This report aims to summarize and evaluate the efficacy and experience of reintervention for children with postoperative pulmonary venous restenosis. Clinical data from 61 patients with postoperative pulmonary venous restenosis who underwent reintervention at Shanghai Children’s Medical Center (SCMC) from September 2009 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients comprised 38 boys and 23 girls, with a mean age of 15.4 ± 12.6 months (2-83 months) and a mean weight of 8.1 ± 3.4 kg (3.7–18.5 kg). The mean pulmonary venous velocity was 2.31 ± 0.47 m/s (1.86–3.22 m/s). Primary disease included 48 cases of total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage, nine cases of partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage, and four cases of primary pulmonary venous stenosis. The reintervention procedures included 34 cases using the sutureless technique, ten cases using bovine pericardium enlargement, three cases using blunt enlargement, four cases of balloon dilatation, one case using stent implantation and nine cases involving more than two surgical methods. The early postoperative pulmonary venous velocity was 1.16 ± 0.20 m/s. There were five in-hospital deaths, resulting in a mortality rate of 8.2%. Fifty-six survivors were followed for 52.8 ± 46.5 months (6–103 months) with no delayed deaths. Echocardiography showed pulmonary venous anastomosis and diameter growth after reintervention, exhibiting a mean growth speed of 0.026 ± 0.013 cm/month (p < 0.05) and a mean velocity of 1.24 ± 0.26 m/s; five patients experienced varying degrees of pulmonary venous obstruction (> 1.6 m/s), but did not require reoperation. Postoperative pulmonary venous restenosis is a common complication after surgery for pulmonary venous malformations. Reintervention should be performed in the early period of pulmonary venous obstruction. Growth of pulmonary venous anastomoses was observed after performing the sutureless technique, bovine pericardium enlargement and blunt enlargement. Although balloon dilatation has a good effect in the early postoperative period, its restenosis rate is high, and strict mid- to long-term follow-up is needed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC1308103).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no interests to disclose.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Hancock Friesen CL, Zurakowski D, Thiagarajan RR et al (2005) Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: an analysis of current management strategies in a single institution. Ann Thorac Surg 79(2):596–606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kelle AM, Backer CL, Gossett JG et al (2010) Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: results of surgical repair of 100 patients at a single institution. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139(6):1387–1394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Alsoufi B (2014) Modified primary sutureless repair technique of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection. World J Congenit Heart Surg 5(2):302–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guocheng Shi, Zhongqun Zhu, Huiwen Chen et al (2015) Surgical repair for primary pulmonary vein stenosis: single-institution, midterm follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150(1):181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshimura N, Fukahara K, Yamashita A et al (2014) Current topics in surgery for isolated total anomalous pulmonary venous connection. Surg Today 44(12):2221–2226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Mueller C, Dave H, Prêtre R (2013) Primary correction of total anomalous pulmonary venous return with a modified sutureless technique. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 43(3):635–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Said Sameh M, Burkhart Harold M, Dearani Joseph A et al (2011) Outcome of caval division techniques for partial anomalous pulmonary venous connections to the superior vena cava. Ann Thorac Surg 92(3):980–984CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Naimo Phillip S, Yves d’Udekem, Brizard Christian P et al (2015) Outcomes of repair of left partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection in children. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 21(2):254–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Mauro Lo Rito, Tamadhir Gazzaz, Wilder Travis J et al (2016) PV stenosis: severity and location predict survival after surgical repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151(3):657–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David Kalfa, Emre Belli, Emile Bacha et al (2017) Primary PV Stenosis: outcomes, risk factors, and severity score in a multicentric study. Ann Thorac Surg 104(1):182–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hörer J, Neuray C, Vogt M et al (2013) What to expect after repair of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: data from 193 patients and 2902 patient years. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 44(5):800–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyoung Song Mi, Jung Bae Eun, In Jeong Soo et al (2013) Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of primary pulmonary vein stenosis or atresia in children. Ann Thorac Surg 95(1):229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guocheng Shi, Zhongqun Zhu, Jimei Chen et al (2017) Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: the current management strategies in a pediatric cohort of 768 patients. Circulation 135(1):48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hideyuki Kato, Yana FuYaqin, Jiaquan Zhu et al (2014) PV stenosis and the pathophysiology of “upstream” PVs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148(1):245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rong Liufu, Guocheng Shi, Superior Zhu Fang et al (2018) Approach for supracardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous connection. Ann Thorac Surg 105(5):1429–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yong MS, Griffiths S, Robertson T et al (2018) Outcomes of the Warden procedure for partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage in children. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 27:422–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Lacour-Gayet F, Zoghbi J, Serraf AE et al (1999) Surgical management of progressive pulmonary venous obstruction after repair of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117(4):679–687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Michielon G, Di DR, Pasquini L et al (2002) Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: long-term appraisal with evolving technical solutions. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 22(2):184–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Seale AN, Uemura H, Webber SA et al (2013) Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: outcome of postoperative pulmonary venous obstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145(5):1255–1262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Balasubramanian S, Marshall AC, Gauvreau K et al (2012) Outcomes after stent implantation for the treatment of congenital and postoperative PV stenosis in children. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 5(1):109–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Lacour-Gayet F, Rey C, Planché C (1996) PV stenosis. Description of a sutureless surgical procedure using the pericardium in situ. Arch Des Malad Du Coeur Et Des Vaisseaux 89(5):633–636Google Scholar
Viola N, Caldarone CA (2011) Surgical repair of post-repair PV stenosis using “sutureless” techniques. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 16(2):112–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas YL, Jongbloed MRM, Hartog WCED et al (2009) PV and atrial wall pathology in human total anomalous pulmonary venous connection. Int J Cardiol 134(3):302–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Mueller C, Dave H, Prêtre R (2013) Primary correction of total anomalous pulmonary venous return with a modified sutureless technique. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 43(3):635–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanagawa B, Alghamdi AA, Dragulescu A et al (2011) Primary sutureless repair for “simple” total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: midterm results in a single institution. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141(6):1346–1354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kanter Kirk R, Kirshbom Paul M, Kogon Brian E (2014) Surgical repair of pulmonary venous stenosis: a word of caution. Ann Thorac Surg 98(5):1687–1691 (discussion 1687–1692)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar