Advertisement

Pediatric Cardiology

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 738–743 | Cite as

Diagnostic Effect of the Single BP Cut-Offs for Identifying Elevated BP and Hypertension in Adolescents Aged 13–17 Years

  • Qin Liu
  • Yaping Hou
  • Liu Yang
  • Min Zhao
  • Shengxu Li
  • Bo XiEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

In contrast to the percentile-based definitions of elevated blood pressure (BP) and hypertension for children and adolescents of all ages in the 2004 fourth report, the 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) BP guideline recommends a change to single BP cut-offs for clinical diagnosis (120/< 80–129/< 80 mmHg for elevated BP and ≥ 130/80 mmHg for hypertension) in adolescents aged 13 years and older, and it also recommends researchers using the percentile-based definitions for more precise BP classification. The aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic effect of the single BP cut-offs for identifying adolescent abnormal BP as compared to the 2017 AAP percentile table by sex, age, and height. Data were from 8287 adolescents aged 13–17 years in NHANES 1999–2016 and 1659 adolescents aged 13–17 years in NHANES III (1988–1994). Compared to the 2017 AAP percentile table, the single BP thresholds performed well for identifying elevated BP in adolescents in NHANES 1999–2016/NHANES III, with high values of area under the curve 0.93/0.95, sensitivity 86.7%/89.9%, specificity 100%/100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100%/100%, negative predictive value (NPV) 98.2%/98.8%, and kappa coefficient 0.92/0.94. The results were similar for identifying hypertension in the two datasets, with especially high PPV 100%/100% and NPV 99.2%/99.2%. However, the sensitivity values of the simple method for identifying hypertension were not satisfactory among girls, younger adolescents, and Hispanic adolescents in both datasets. In conclusion, the single BP cut-offs in general performed similarly well for identifying abnormal BP as compared to 2017 AAP percentile table, but not well in some subgroups.

Keywords

High blood pressure Simple method Diagnosis Adolescents 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Center for Health Statistic of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for sharing NHANES data.

Author Contributions

BX: conception and design, interpretation of data, and revised it critically for important intellectual content; QL: interpretation of data, and drafting the article; YPH, LY analysis of data, and revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content; MZ, SL: interpretation of data, and revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

Ethical Approval

The study has been approved by institutional committee of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from both the participants and their parents or guardians.

References

  1. 1.
    Xi B, Bovet P, Hong YM, Zong XN, Chiolero A, Kim HS, Zhang T, Zhao M (2016) Recent blood pressure trends in adolescents from China, Korea, Seychelles and the United States of America, 1997–2012. J Hypertens 34(10):1948–1958.  https://doi.org/10.1097/Hjh.0000000000001058 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Noubiap JJ, Essouma M, Bigna JJ, Jingi AM, Aminde LN, Nansseu JR (2017) Prevalence of elevated blood pressure in children and adolescents in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health 2(8):E375–E386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brady TM (2017) Obesity-related hypertension in children. Front Pediatr 5:197  https://doi.org/10.3389/Fped.2017.00197 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kollias A, Dafni M, Poulidakis E, Ntineri A, Stergiou GS (2014) Out-of-office blood pressure and target organ damage in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hyperten 32(12):2315–2331.  https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Magnussen CG, Smith KJ (2016) Pediatric blood pressure and adult preclinical markers of cardiovascular disease. Clin Med Insights Blood Disord 9:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.4137/Cmbd.S18887 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents (2004) The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 114(2):555–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kavey REW, Daniels SR, Lauer RM, Atkins DL, Hayman LL, Taubert K (2003) American heart association guidelines for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease beginning in childhood. Circulation 107(11):1562–1566.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.Cir.0000061521.15730.6e CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flynn JT, Kaelber DC, Baker-Smith CM, Blowey D, Carroll AE, Daniels SR, de Ferranti SD, Dionne JM, Falkner B, Flinn SK, Gidding SS, Goodwin C, Leu MG, Powers ME, Rea C, Samuels J, Simasek M, Thaker VV, Urbina EM (2017) Clinical practice guideline for screening and management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 140(3):e20171904.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-1904 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McQuillan GM, McLean JE, Chiappa M, Corporation H, Lukacs SL (2015) National health and nutrition examination survey biospecimen program: NHANES III (1988–1994) and NHANES 1999–2014. Vital Health Stat 170:1–22Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden C, Guo SS, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Mei Z, Wei R, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson CL (2002) 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital and health statistics Series 11, Data from the national health survey 246:1–190Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xi B, Zhang T, Li SX, Harville E, Bazzano L, He J, Chen W (2017) Can pediatric hypertension criteria be simplified?: a prediction analysis of subclinical cardiovascular outcomes from the bogalusa heart study. Hypertension 69(4):691–696.  https://doi.org/10.1161/Hypertensionaha.116.08782 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xi B, Zong XN, Kelishadi R, Hong YM, Khadilkar A, Steffen LM, Nawarycz T, Krzywinska-Wiewiorowska M, Aounallah-Skhiri H, Bovet P, Chiolero A, Pan H, Litwin M, Poh BK, Sung RYT, So HK, Schwandt P, Haas GM, Neuhauser HK, Marinov L, Galcheva SV, Motlagh ME, Kim HS, Khadilkar V, Krzyzaniak A, Ben Romdhane H, Heshmat R, Chiplonkar S, Stawinska-Witoszynska B, El Ati J, Qorbani M, Kajale N, Traissac P, Ostrowska-Nawarycz L, Ardalan G, Parthasarathy L, Zhao M, Zhang T, International Child Blood Pressure References Establishment Consortium (2016) Establishing international blood pressure references among nonoverweight children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years. Circulation 133(4):398–408.  https://doi.org/10.1161/Circulationaha.115.017936 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qin Liu
    • 1
  • Yaping Hou
    • 2
  • Liu Yang
    • 2
  • Min Zhao
    • 3
  • Shengxu Li
    • 4
  • Bo Xi
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of UltrasoundChildren’s Hospital of the Capital Institute of PediatricsBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology, School of Public HealthShandong UniversityJinanChina
  3. 3.Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public HealthShandong UniversityJinanChina
  4. 4.Children’s Minnesota Research InstituteChildren’s Hospitals and ClinicsMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations