Advertisement

Pediatric Cardiology

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 287–290 | Cite as

Pericardial Effusion in a Preterm Infant Resulting from Umbilical Venous Catheter Placement

  • Tricia L. Thomson
  • Marc Levine
  • Jonathan K. MuraskasEmail author
  • Chawki El-Zein
Case Report

Abstract

Pericardial effusion in neonates is a rare occurrence associated with malpositioning of central venous catheters. This report describes a case of pericardial effusion in which echocardiographic determination of line position, typically considered one of the most reliable means of placement verification, was misleading. The infant ultimately did well after pericardiocentesis, with complete resolution of symptoms and no further complications.

Keywords

Pericardial effusion Umbilical venous catheter 

Supplementary material

Movie 1

Echo images revealing a large pericardial effusion along with what was thought to be the umbilical venous catheter crossing through the foramen ovale and perforating the left atrium. It was later determined that this actually represented a fibrin sheath (MOV 2468 kb)

Movie 2

Echo images revealing resolution of the pericardial effusion and partial resolution of the fibrin sheath. However, the fibrin sheath is still visible crossing the foramen ovale into the left atrium (MOV 2586 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ades A, Sable C, Cummings S, Cross R, Markle B, Martin G (2003) Echocardiographic evaluation of umbilical venous catheter placement. J Perinatol 23:24–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beardsall K, White DK, Pinto EM, Kelsall AWR (2003) Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade as complications of neonatal long lines: are they really a problem? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 88:F292–F295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cartwright DW (2004) Central venous lines in neonates: a study of 2, 186 catheters. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 89:F504–F508CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Das Narla L, Hom M, Lofland GK, Moskowitz WB (1991) Evaluation of umbilical catheter and tube placement in premature infants. RadioGraphics 11:849–863Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kabra NS, Kumar M, Shah SS (2005) Multiple- versus single-lumen umbilical venous catheters for newborn infants. Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews Issue 3, art. no.:CD004498Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nowlen TT, Rosenthal GI, Johnson GI, Tom DJ, Vargo TA (2002) Pericardial effusion and tamponade in infants with central catheters. Pediatrics 110:137–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sehgal A, Cook V, Dunn M (2007) Pericardial effusion associated with an appropriately placed umbilical venous catheter. J Perinatol 27:317–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wirrell EC, Pelausa EO, Allen AC, Stinson DA, Hanna BD (1993) Massive pericardial effusion as a cause for sudden deterioration of a very low birthweight infant. J Perinatol 10:419–422Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tricia L. Thomson
    • 1
  • Marc Levine
    • 2
  • Jonathan K. Muraskas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chawki El-Zein
    • 3
  1. 1.Departments of Pediatrics and NeonatologyLoyola University Medical CenterMaywoodUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Pediatrics and CardiologyLoyola University Medical CenterMaywoodUSA
  3. 3.Departments of Pediatrics and Cardiovascular SurgeryHope Children’s HospitalOak LawnUSA

Personalised recommendations