A field measurement study of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was performed in January 2015 in the urban areas of two of the most important cities of the Yangtze River Delta: Nanjing and Suzhou. The objectives of this study included comparing the characteristics of VOC concentrations, comparing the impacts of emissions on VOCs, using species ratios to assess air mass age, and evaluating ozone formation potential (OFP) and secondary organic aerosol formation potential (SOAP) in air masses. The VOC concentrations in Nanjing (34.6 ± 5.8 ppbv) were higher than those of Suzhou (28.1 ± 5.6 ppbv). The most abundant VOC measured was ethane (6.6 ppbv in Nanjing and 3.6 ppbv in Suzhou). Relevant analysis shows that motor vehicle emissions in Suzhou were dominant, whereas industrial emissions in Nanjing also contributed to VOCs. During rush hour, the VOC concentrations in Nanjing were the highest (35.3 ppbv). The T/B ratio (0.92–1.79) for the two sites was observed to be relatively low in the other studied cities, indicating the source impact of traffic emissions in the two sites. Indicators X/B (0.26–0.39) and X/E (0.33–0.66) also confirmed an aging air mass was transported at the two sampling sites. According to principal component factor analysis results, vehicle emissions (44.8% in Nanjing and 30.6% in Suzhou) were the most important contribution to the two sites. Industrial sites were not only likely to experience industrial emissions but were affected by traffic emissions. Using the OFP method, both sites showed the largest percentage of alkenes (59.9% in Nanjing and 62.0% in Suzhou). When comparing SOAP, both sites showed an absolute majority of aromatics (97.6% in Nanjing and 98.3% in Suzhou). To control the formation of O3 and SOA in the two sites, it is necessary to reduce the concentration of alkenes and aromatics, respectively. By CPF analysis, pollutants transported from the SE and NE have significant effects on the Nanjing site. In the Suzhou, roads and industrial parks in the SE and S of Suzhou have significant impacts on the site.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
An JL, Zhu B, Wang HL, Li YY, Lin X, Yang H (2014) Characteristics and source apportionment of VOCs measured in Nanjing of Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmos Environ 97:206–214
An JL, Zou JN, Wang JX, Lin X, Zhu B (2015) Differences in ozone photochemical characteristics between the megacity Nanjing and its suburban surroundings, Yangtze River Delta, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(24):19607–19617
Ashbaugh LL, Malm WC, Sadeh WZ (1985) A residence time probability analysis of sulphur concentrations at ground canyon national park. Atmos Environ 19:1263–1270
Atkinson R, Arey J (2003) Atmospheric degradation of volatile organic compounds. Chem Rev 103(12):4605–4638
Barletta B, Meinardi S, Rowland FS, Chan CY, Wang XM, Zou SC, Chan LY, Blake DR (2005) Volatile organic compounds in 43 Chinese cities. Atmos Environ 39(32):5979–5990
Barletta B, Meinardi S, Simpson IJ, Zou SC, Rowland FS, Blake DR (2008) Ambient mixing ratios of nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) in two major urban centers of the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region: Guangzhou and Dongguan. Atmos Environ 42:4393–4408
Cai CJ, Geng FH, Tie XX, Yu Q, An JL (2010) Characteristics and source apportionment of VOCs measured in Shanghai, China. Atmos Environ 44:5005–5014
Carter WPL (1994) Development of ozone reactivity scales for volatile organic compounds. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 44(7):881–899
Carter WPL (2010) Development of the SAPRC-07 chemical mechanism and updated ozone reactivity scales. http://www.cert.ucr.edu/~carter/SAPRC. Accessed 2 Jan 2020
Chen TY, Simpson IJ, Blake DR, Rowland FS (2001) Impact of the leakage of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) on Santiago air quality. Geophys Res Lett 28:2193–2196
Deng YY, Li J, Li YQ, Wu RR, Xie SD (2019) Characteristics of volatile organic compounds, NO2, and effects on ozone formation at a site with high ozone level in Chengdu. J Environ Sci 75:334–345
Derwent RG, Jenkin ME, Utembe SR, Shallcross DE, Murrells TP, Passant NR (2010) Secondary organic aerosol formation from a large number of reactive man-made organic compounds. Sci Total Environ 408(16):3374–3381
Geng FH, Cai C, Tie X, Yu Q, An J, Peng L, Zhou G, Xu J (2009) Analysis of VOC emissions using PCA/APCS receptor model at city of Shanghai, China. J Atmos Chem 62(3):229–247
Gentner DR, Harley RA, Miller AM, Goldstein AH (2009) Diurnal and seasonal variability of gasoline-related volatile organic compound emissions in Riverside, California. Environ Sci Technol 43:4247–4252
Guenther A, Karl T, Harley P, Wiedinmyer C, Palmer PI, Geron C (2006) Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature). Atmos Chem Phys 6:3181–3210
Guo H, Wang T, Simpson IJ, Blake DR, Yu XM, Kwok YH, Li YS (2004) Source contributions to ambient VOCs and CO at a rural site in eastern China. Atmos Environ 38(27):4551–4560
Guo H, Cheng HR, Ling ZH, Louie PKK, Ayoko GA (2011) Which emission sources are responsible for the volatile organic compounds in the atmosphere of Pearl River Delta? J Hazard Mater 188:116–124
Ho KF, Lee SC, Ho WK, Blake DR, Cheng Y, Li YS, Ho SSH, Fung K, Louie PKK, Park D (2009) Vehicular emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from a tunnel study in Hong Kong. Atmos Chem Phys 9(19):7491–7504
Johnson RA, Wichern DW (2008) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs
Kim SW, McKeen SA, Frost GA, Lee SH, Trainer M, Richter A, Angevine WA, Atlas E, Bianco L, Boersma KF, Brioude J, Burrows JP, de Gouw J, Fried A, Gleason J, Hilboll A, Mellqvist J, Peischl J, Richter D, Rivera C, Ryerson T, Lintel Hekkert S, Walega J, Warneke C, Weibring P, Williams E (2011) Evaluations of NOx and highly reactive VOC emission inventories in Texas and their implications for ozone plume simulations during the Texas Air Quality Study 2006. Atmos Chem Phys 11(22):11361–11386
Kroll JH, Seinfeld JH (2008) Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol: formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere. Atmos Environ 42:3593–3624
Kwon KD, Jo WK, Lim HJ, Jeong WS (2007) Characterization of emissions composition for selected household products available in Korea. J Hazard Mater 148:192–198
Leuchner M, Rappenglück B (2010) VOC source-receptor relationships in Houston during TexAQS-II. Atmos Environ 44:4056–4067
Liu Y, Shao M, Lu SH, Chang CC, Wang JL, Chen G (2008) Volatile organic compound (VOC) measurements in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region, China. Atmos Chem Phys 8(6):1531–1545
Lyu XP, Chen N, Guo H, Zhang WH, Wang N, Wang Y (2016) Ambient volatile organic compounds and their effect on ozone production in Wuhan, central China. Sci Total Environ 541(60):200–209
McCarthy MC, Aklilu YA, Brown SG, Lyder DA (2013) Source apportionment of volatile organic compounds measured in Edmonton, Alberta. Atmos Environ 81(2):504–516
Mo ZW, Shao M, Lu SH, Niu H, Zhou MY, Sun J (2017) Characterization of non-methane hydrocarbons and their sources in an industrialized coastal city, Yangtze River Delta, China. Sci Total Environ 593–594:641–653
Mohan Rao AM, Pandit GG, Sain P, Sharma S, Krishnamoorthy TM, Nambi KV (1997) Non-methane hydrocarbons in industry locations of Bombay. Atmos Environ 31:1077–1085
Na K, Kim YP, Moon KC, Moon I, Fung K (2001) Concentrations of volatile organic compounds in an industry area of Korea. Atmos Environ 35:2747–2756
Na K, Moon KC, Kim YP (2005) Source contribution to aromatic VOC concentration and ozone formation potential in the atmosphere of Seoul. Atmos Environ 39:5517–5524
Nelson PF, Quigley SM (1983) The m, p-xylenes: ethylbenzene ratio. A technique for estimating hydrocarbon age in ambient atmospheres. Atmos Environ 17:659–662
Ohura T, Amagai T, Fusaya M (2006) Regional assessment of ambient volatile organic compounds in an industry harbor area, Shizuoka, Japan. Atmos Environ 40:238–248
Shao P, An JL, Xin JY, Wu FK, Wang JX, Ji D, Wang Y (2016) Source apportionment of VOCs and the contribution to photochemical ozone formation during summer in the typical industrial area in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmos Res 176:64–74
Sosa ER, Humberto Bravo A, Violeta Mugica A, Pablo Sanchez A, Emma Bueno L, Krupa S (2009) Levels and source apportionment of volatile organic compounds in southwestern area of Mexico City. Environ Pollut 157(3):1038–1044
US Environmental Protection Agency (2008) Fuel trends report: gasoline 1995–2005, EPA420-R-08-002
Wang XM, Sheng GY, Fu JM, Chan CY, Lee SC, Chan LY, Wang ZS (2002) Urban roadside aromatic hydrocarbons in three cities of the Pearl River Delta, People’s Republic of China. Atmos Environ 36:5141–5148
Watson JG, Chow JC, Fujita EM (2001) Review of volatile organic compounds source apportionment by chemical mass balance. Atmos Environ 35:1567–1584
Xie Y, Berkowitz CM (2006) The use of positive matrix factorization with conditional probability function in air quality studies: an application to hydrocarbon emissions in Houston, Texas. Atmos Environ 40:3070–3091
Xu ZN, Huang X, Nie W, Chi XG, Xu Z, Zheng LF, Sun P, Ding AJ (2017) Influence of synoptic condition and holiday effects on VOCs and ozone production in the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Atmos Environ 168:112–124
This work was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Nos. 2017YFC0210003, 2016YFA0602003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 91544229), and the Qing Lan Project. The authors also thank the reviewers for their constructive and valuable comments.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
An, J., Su, X., Zhang, Y. et al. Characteristics of Volatile Organic Compounds in Nanjing and Suzhou, Two Urban Sites in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-020-00719-w