Advertisement

Impact of Long-Term Exposure to 17α-Ethinylestradiol in the Live-Bearing Fish Heterandria formosa

  • Latonya M. JacksonEmail author
  • Paul L. Klerks
Article

Abstract

17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) is a potent synthetic estrogen that is routinely detected in aquatic ecosystems and exhibits estrogenic activity. Acute and chronic toxicity have been described for oviparous and ovoviviparous fish species; however, no information is available on the impacts of EE2 on viviparous, matrotrophic fish despite their ecological importance. The present study investigated the consequences of long-term EE2 exposure in the least killifish (Heterandria formosa). Effects on growth, time-to-sexual maturity, fecundity, and offspring survival were examined in an 8-month, life-cycle experiment. Starting as 0–6-day-old fish, least killifish were continuously exposed to EE2 at nominal concentrations of 0, 5, or 25 ng/L (measured concentrations averaged 0, 4.3, and 21.5 ng/L respectively). In the F0 generation, EE2-exposure did not affect survival but resulted in increased time-to-sexual maturity and a sex-dependent effect on size; female standard length was reduced while male standard length was increased. This caused the ordinarily larger females and smaller males to become more similar in size. Condition factor was reduced for both sexes. Fecundity was reduced by 50% and 75% at 5 and 25 ng/L EE2-exposure respectively. Continued EE2-exposure in the F1 generation resulted in significantly reduced survival. These results suggest that despite their matrotrophic development, these fish experience delayed development and reduced reproductive success from EE2-exposure and that effects appear to intensify in the second generation.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly appreciate the editorial comments from S. Duke-Sylvester, B. Felgenhauer, P. Leberg, and J. McLachlan, and the logistical support provided by J. Adeyemi, S. Volt, J. Hill, E. Blankson, A. Cazan, A. Oguma, A. Kascak, A. Pant, Q. Jackson, L. Carrier, and the staff of the UL Lafayette Ecology Center.

Supplementary material

244_2019_600_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (474 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 473 kb)

References

  1. Abramoff M, Magalhaes P, Ram S (2004) Image processing with image. J Biophotonics 11:36–42Google Scholar
  2. Al-Ansari A, Saleem A, Kimpe L, Sherry J, McMaster M, Trudeau V, Blais J (2010) Bioaccumulation of the pharmaceutical 17α-ethinylestradiol in shorthead redhorse suckers (Moxostoma macrolepidotum) from the St. Clair River, Canada. Environ Pollut 158:2566–2571Google Scholar
  3. Balch G, Mackenzie C, Metcalfe C (2004) Alterations to gonadal development and reproductive success in Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) exposed to 17α-ethinylestradiol. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:782–791Google Scholar
  4. Barel-Cohen K, Shore L, Shemesh M, Wenzel A, Mueller J, Kronfeld-Schor N (2006) Monitoring of natural and synthetic hormones in a polluted river. J Environ Manag 78:16–23Google Scholar
  5. Belfroid A, Van der Horst A, Vethaak A, Schafer A, Rijs G, Wegener J, Cofino W (1999) Analysis and occurrence of estrogenic hormones and their glucuronides in surface water and waste water in The Netherlands. Sci Total Environ 225:101–108Google Scholar
  6. Belk M, Lydeard C (1994) Effect of Gambusia holbrooki on a similar-sized, syntopic Poeciliid, Heterandria formosa: competitor or predator? Copeia 1994:296–302Google Scholar
  7. Bergman Å, Heindel J, Jobling S, Kidd K, Zoeller R (2012) State-of-the-science of endocrine disrupting chemicals, 2012: an assessment of the state of the science of endocrine disruptors prepared by a group of experts for the United Nations Environment Programme and World Health Organization. Toxicol Lett 211:S3Google Scholar
  8. Bhandari R, Saal F, Tillitt D (2015) Transgenerational effects from early developmental exposures to bisphenol A or 17α-ethinylestradiol in medaka, Oryzias latipes. Sci Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09303 Google Scholar
  9. Bizarro C, Ros O, Vallejo A, Prieto A, Etxebarria N, Cajaraville M, Ortiz-Zarragoitia M (2014) Intersex condition and molecular markers of endocrine disruption in relation with burdens of emerging pollutants in thicklip grey mullets (Chelon labrosus) from Basque estuaries (South-East Bay of Biscay). Mar Environ Res 96:19–28Google Scholar
  10. Blackwell B, Brown M, Willis D (2000) Relative weight (Wr) status and current use in Fisheries assessment and management. Rev Fish Sci 8:1–44Google Scholar
  11. Buchberger W (2007) Novel analytical procedures for screening of drug residues in water, waste water, sediment and sludge. Anal Chim Acta 593:129–139Google Scholar
  12. Cargouet M, Perdiz D, Mouatassim-Souali A, Tamisier-Karolak S, Levi Y (2004) Assessment of river contamination by estrogenic compounds in Paris area (France). Sci Total Environ 324:55–66Google Scholar
  13. Chen C, When T, Wang G, Cheng H, Lin Y, Lien G (2010) High estrogen concentrations in receiving river discharg from a concentrated livestock feedlot. Sci Total Environ 408:3223–3230Google Scholar
  14. Cheong R, Henrich S, Farr J, Travis J (1984) Variation in fecundity and its relationship to body size in a population of the least killifish, Heterandria formosa (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Copeia 3:720–726Google Scholar
  15. Christiansen L, Winther-Nelsen M, Helweg C (2002) Feminization of fish: the effect of estrogenic compounds and their fate in sewage treatment plants and nature (Environmental Project No. 720-2002). Danish Environmental Protection Agency, København, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  16. Clouzot L, Marrot B, Doumenq P, Roce N (2008) 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol: an endocrine disrupter of great concern. Analytical methods and removal processes applied to water purification. A review. Environ Progr Sustain Energy 27:383–396Google Scholar
  17. Constanz G (1989) Reproductive biology of the poeciliid fishes. In: Meffe GK, Snelson FF Jr (eds) Englewood Cliffs. Prentice Hall, NJGoogle Scholar
  18. Desbrow C, Routledge E, Brighty G, Sumpter J, Waldock M (1998) Identification of estrogenic chemicals in STW effluent. 1. Chemical fractionation and in vitro biological screening. Environ Sci Technol 32:1549–1557Google Scholar
  19. Diaz-Cruz S, Barcelo’ D (2004) Occurrence and analysis of selected pharmaceuticals and metabolites as contaminants present in wastewaters, sludge and sediments. Handb Environ Chem 5:227–260Google Scholar
  20. Duong C et al (2010) Estrogenic chemicals and estrogenicity in river waters of South Korea and seven Asian countries. Chemosphere 78:286–293Google Scholar
  21. Dziewecyznski T, Hebert O (2013) The effects of short-term exposure to an endocrine disrupter on behavioural consistency in male juvenile and adult Siamese fishting fish. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 64:316–326Google Scholar
  22. Faulk C, Fuiman L, Thomas P (1999) Parental exposure to ortho, paradichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane impairs survival skills of Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus) larvae. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:254–262Google Scholar
  23. Fonseca A, Cardoso M, Esteves V (2013) Determination of estrogens in raw and treated wastewater by high-performance liquid chromatograpy: ultraviolet detection. J Environ Anal Toxicol 4:203Google Scholar
  24. Foran C, Peterson B, Benson W (2002) Transgenerational and developmental exposure of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) to ethinylestradiol results in endocrine and reproductive differences in the response to ethinylestradiol as adults. J Toxicol Sci 68:389–402Google Scholar
  25. Fraser E, Renton R (1940) Observation on the breeding and development of the viviparous fish Heterandria formosa. Q J Microsc Sci 81:479–520Google Scholar
  26. Gadd J, Tremblay L, Northcott G (2010) Steroid estrogens, conjugated estrogens and estrogenic activity in farm dairy shed effluents. Environ Pollut 158:730–736Google Scholar
  27. Gennotte V et al (2015) Brief exposure of embryos to steroids or aromatase inhibitor induces sex reversal in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). J Exp Zool 323A:31–38Google Scholar
  28. Gibson R, Smith M, Spary C, Tyler C, Hill A (2005) Mixtures of estrogenic contaminates in the bile of fish exposed to wastewater treatment works effluents. Environ Sci Technol 39:2461–2471Google Scholar
  29. Hardman J, Limbird L, Molinoff P, Ruddon R, Goodman A (1996) Goodman and Gilman’s: the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. Toxicol Lett 86:1–55Google Scholar
  30. Hemming J, Turner P, Brooks B, Waller W, LaPoint T (2002) Assessment of toxicity reduction in wastewater effluent flowing through a treatment wetland using Pimephales promelas, Ceriodaphnia dubia, and Vibrio fischeri. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 42:9–16Google Scholar
  31. Jackson L, Felgenhauer B, Klerks P (2018) Feminization, altered gonadal development, and liver damage in least killifish (Heterandria formosa) exposed to sublethal concentrations of 17α-ethinylestradiol. Ecotox Environ Safe 170:331–337Google Scholar
  32. Johnson A (2010) Natural variations in flow are critical in determining concentrations fo point source contaminants in rivers; as estrogen example. Environ Sci Technol 44:7865–7870Google Scholar
  33. Johnson A, Sumpter P (2014) Putting pharmaceuticals into the wider context of challenges to fish populations in rivers. Phil Trans R Soc B.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0581 Google Scholar
  34. Jurgens M, Holthaus K, Johnson A, Smith J (2002) The potential for estradiol and ethynylestradiol degradation in English rivers. EnvironToxicol Chem 21:480–488Google Scholar
  35. Kah O, Dufour S (2011) Conserved and divergent features of reproductive neuroendocrinology in teleost fishes. In: Norris D, Lopez K (eds) Hormones and reproduction of vertebrates. Academic Press, London, pp 15–42Google Scholar
  36. Kidd K, Blanchfield P, Mills K, Palace V, Evans R, Lazorchak J, Flick R (2007) Collapse of a fish population after exposure to a synthetic estrogen. PNAS 104:8897–8901Google Scholar
  37. Kitamura S, Ogata H, Takashima F (1994) Activities of F-type prostaglandins as releaser sex pheromones in cobitide loach. Misgurnus anguillicaudatus Comp Biochem Physiol A 107:161–169Google Scholar
  38. Kolpin D, Furlong E, Meyer M, Thurman E, Zaugg S, Barber L, Buxton H (2002) Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in US streams, 1999–2000: a national reconnaissance. Environ Sci Technol 36:1202–1211Google Scholar
  39. Kostich M, Flick R, Martinson J (2013) Comparing predicted estrogen concentrations with measurements in U.S. waters. Environ Pollut 178:271–277Google Scholar
  40. Kristensen T, Baatrup E, Bayley M (2005) 17α-ethinylestradiol reduces the competitive reproductive fitness of the male guppy (Poecilia reticulate). Biol Reprod 72:150–156Google Scholar
  41. Kunz P, Kienle C, Carere M, Homazava N, Kase R (2015) In vitro bioassays to screen for endocrine active pharmaceuticals in surface and waste waters. JPBA 106:107–115Google Scholar
  42. Lange R et al (2001) Effects of the synthetic estrogen 17α-ethinylestradiol on the life-cycle of the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Environ Toxicol Chem 20:1216–1227Google Scholar
  43. Lange A, Paull G, Hamilton P, Iguchi T, Tyler C (2011) Implications of persistent exposure to treated wastewater effluent for breeding in wild roach (Rutilus rutilus) populations. Environ Sci Technol 45:1673–1679Google Scholar
  44. Langer R (2009) Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of low-dose hormone therapy in managing menopausal symptoms. J Am Board Fam Med 22:563–573Google Scholar
  45. Larsson D, Adolfsson-Erici M, Parkkonen J, Petterson M, Berg A, Olsson P, Forlin L (1999) Ethynylestradiol: an undesired fish contraceptive. Aquat Toxicol 454:91–97Google Scholar
  46. Lavelle C, Sorensen P (2011) Behavioral responses of adult male and female fathead minnows to a model estrogenic effluent and its effects on exposure regime and reproductive success. Aquat Toxicol 101:521–528Google Scholar
  47. Lazorchak J, McCormick F, Henry T, Herlihy A (2003) Contamination of fish in streams of the Mid-Atlantic Region: an approach to regional indicator selection and wildlife assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:545–553Google Scholar
  48. Lei B, Huang S, Zhou Y, Wang D, Wang Z (2009) Levels of six estrogens in water and sediment from three rivers in Tianjin area, China. Chemosphere 76:36–42Google Scholar
  49. Liu J, Wang R, Huang B, Lin C, Zhou J, Pan X (2012a) Biological effects and bioaccumulation of steroidal and phenolic endocrine disrupting chemicals in high-back crucian carp exposed to wastewater treatment plant effluents. Environ Pollut 162:325–331Google Scholar
  50. Liu S, Ying G, Zhou L, Zhang R, Chen Z, Lai H (2012b) Steroids in typical swine farm and their release into the environment. Water Res 45:3754–3768Google Scholar
  51. Martin S, Hitch A, Purcell K, Klerks P, Leberg P (2009) Life history variation along a salinity gradient in coastal marshes. Aquat Biol 8:15–28Google Scholar
  52. Montgomery T, Brown A, Gendelman H, Ota M, Clottfelter E (2012) Exposure to 17α-ethinylestradiol decreases motility and ATP in sperm of male fighting fish Betta splendens. Environ Toxicol 29:243–252Google Scholar
  53. Nash J, Van der Ven L, Brion F, Maack G, Stahlschmidt-Allner P, Tyler C (2004) Long-term exposure to environmental concentrations of the pharmaceutical ethynylestradiol causes reproductive failure in fish. Environ Health Perspect 112:1725–1733Google Scholar
  54. Nehemia A, Maganira J, Rumisha C (2012) Length-weight relationship and condition factor of talapia species grown in marine and fresh water ponds. Agric Biol J North Am 3:117–124Google Scholar
  55. Nelson E, Do H, Lewis R, Carr S (2011) Diurnal variability of pharmaceutical, personal care product, estrogen and alkylphenol concentrations in effluent from a tertiary wastewater treatment facility. Environ Sci Technol 45:1228–1234Google Scholar
  56. Pojana G, Gomiero A, Jonkers N, Marcomini A (2007) Natural and synthetic endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in water, sediment and biota of a coastal lagoon. Environ Int 33:929–936Google Scholar
  57. Reznick D, Callahan H, Llauredo R (1996) Maternal effects on offspring quality in poeciliid fishes. Am Zool 36:147–156Google Scholar
  58. Rolland R (2000) Ecoepidemiology of the effects of pollution on reproduction and survival of early life stages in teleosts. Fish Fish 1:41–72Google Scholar
  59. Rosen D, Bailey R (1963) The poeciliid fishes (Cyprinodontiformes), their structure, zoo-geography, and systematics. B Am Mus Nat Hist 126:1–176Google Scholar
  60. Rosen D, Gordon M (1953) Functional anatomy and evolution of male genitalia in poeciliid fishes. Zoologica 38:1–47Google Scholar
  61. Saaristo M, Craft J, Lehtonen K, Lindstrom K (2009) Sand goby (Pomatoschistus minutus) males exposed to endocrine disrupting chemical fail in nest and mate competition. Horm Behav 56:315–321Google Scholar
  62. Salla R et al (2016) Impact of an environmental relevant concentration of 17α-ethinylestradiol on the cardiac function of bullfrog tadpoles. Chemosphere 144:1862–1868Google Scholar
  63. Sarat M, Rambabu C (2012) A validated simultaneous RP-HPLC method for determination of desogestrel and ethinyl estradiol tablets. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 4:115–119Google Scholar
  64. Scholz S, Gutzeit H (2000) 17-a-ethynylestradiol affects reproduction, sexual differentiation and aromatase gene expression of the medaka (Oryzias latipes). Aquat Toxicol 50:363–373Google Scholar
  65. Schultz I, Skillman A, Nicolas J, Cyr D, Nagler J (2003) Short-term exposure to 17a-ethynylestradiol decreases the fertility of sexually maturing male rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1272–1280Google Scholar
  66. Schwindt A, Winkelman D, Keteles K, Murphy M, Vajda A (2014) An environmental oestrogen disrupts fish population dynamics through direct and transgenerational effects on survival and fecundity. J Appl Ecol 51:582–591Google Scholar
  67. Scrimshaw N (1944) Embryonic growth in the viviparous poeciliid, Heterandria formosa. Biol Bull 87:37–51Google Scholar
  68. Segner H, Navas J, Schafers C, Wenzel A (2003) Potencies of estrogenic compounds in in vitro screening assays and in life cycle tests with zebrafish in vivo. Ecotox Environ Safe 54:315–322Google Scholar
  69. Shifren J, Schiff I (2010) Role of hormone therapy in the management of menopause. Obstet Gynecol 115:839–855Google Scholar
  70. Silva P et al (2012) Testing the effects of ethinylestradiol and of an environmentally relevant mixture of xenoestrogens as found in the Douro River (Portugal) on the maturatioin of fish gonads: a stereological study using the zebrafish (Danio rerio) as model. Aquat Toxicol 124–125:1–10Google Scholar
  71. Snyder S, Keith T, Verbrugge D, Snyder E, Gross T, Kannan K, Giesy J (1999) Analytical methods for detection of selected estrogenic compounds in aqueous mixtures. Environ Sci Technol 33:2814–2820Google Scholar
  72. Sole’ M, Raldua D, Piferrer F, Barcelo’ D, Porte C (2003) Feminization of wild carp, Cyprinus carpio, in a polluted environment: plasma steroid hormones, gonadal morphology and xenobiotic metabolizing system. Comp Biochem Phys C 136:145–156Google Scholar
  73. Sorensen P, Goetz F (1993) Pheromonal and reproductive function of F-prostaglandins and their metabolites in teleost fish. J Lipid Mediators 6:385–393Google Scholar
  74. Stacey N, Peter R (1979) Central action of prostaglandins in spawning behavior of female goldfish. Physiol Behav 22:1191–1196Google Scholar
  75. Sumpter J (2005) Endocrine disrupters in the aquatic environment: an overview. Acta Hydroch Hydrob 33:9–16Google Scholar
  76. Sun L, Yong W, Chu X, Lin J (2009) Simultaneous determination fo 15 steroidal oral contraceptives in water using splid-phase disk extraction followed by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1216:5416–5423Google Scholar
  77. Tamschick S et al (2016) Sex reversal assessments reveal different vulnerability to endocrine disruption between deeply diverged anuran lineages. Sci Reg.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23825 Google Scholar
  78. Ternes T, Stumpf M, Mueller J, Haberer K, Wilken R, Servos M (1999) Behavior and occurrence of estrogens in municipal sewage treatment plants-I. Investigations in Germany, Canada and Brazil. Sci Total Environ 225:81–90Google Scholar
  79. Teta C, Naik Y (2016) Vitellogenin induction and reduced fecundity in zebrafish exposed to effluents from the city of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. Chemosphere 167:282–290Google Scholar
  80. Travis J, Farr J, Henrich S, Cheong R (1987) Testing theories of clutch overlap with the reproductive ecology of Heterandria formosa. Ecology 68:611–623Google Scholar
  81. Trexler J, Travis J, Trexler M (1990) Phenotypic plasticity in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna (Pisces: Poeciliidae). II. Laboratory experiment. Evolution 44:157–167Google Scholar
  82. Trudeau V, Metcalfe C, Mimeault C, Moon T (2005) Pharmaceuticals in the environment: drugged fish? Biochem Mol Biol Fishes 6:475–493Google Scholar
  83. Turner C (1937) Reproductive cycles and superfetation in poeciliid fishes. Biol Bull 72:145–164Google Scholar
  84. Van Aerle R, Nolanusan M, Jobling S, Christiansen L, Sumpter J, Tyler C (2001) Sexual disruption in a second species of wild cyprinid fish (the gudgeon, Gobio gobio) in United Kingdom freshwaters. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2841–2847Google Scholar
  85. Van den Belt K, Verheyen R, Witters H (2003) Effects of 17a-ethinylestradiol in a partial life-cycle test with zebrafish (Danio rerio): effects on growth, gonads and female reproductive success. Sci Total Environ 309:127–137Google Scholar
  86. Versonnen B, Arijs K, Verslycke T, Lema W, Janssen C (2003) In vitro and in vivo estrogenicity and toxicity of o-, m-, and p-dichlorobenzene. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:329–335Google Scholar
  87. Vieno N, Harkki H, Tuhkanen T, Kronberg L (2007) Occurrence of pharmaceuticals in river water and their elimination in a pilot-scale drinking water treatment plant. Environ Sci Technol 41:5077–5084Google Scholar
  88. Wang L et al (2011) Assessing estrogenic activity in surface water and sediment of the Liao River systems in northeast China using combined chemical and biological tools. Environ Pollut 159:148–156Google Scholar
  89. Williams R (2005) Human pharmaceuticals: assessing the impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Alan Press/ACG Publishing, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  90. World Health Organization (WHO) (2012) State of the science of endocrine disrupting chemicals- 2012. World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  91. Xu J, Wu L, Chen W, Jiang P, Chang A (2009) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in runoff from a potato field irrigated with treated wastewater in Southern California. J Health Sci 55:306–310Google Scholar
  92. Yan Z, Lu G, Liu J, Jin S (2012) An integrated assessment of estrogenic contamination and feminization risk in fish in Taihu Lake, China. Ecotox Environ Safe 84:334–340Google Scholar
  93. Yang Y, Gray J, Furlong E, Davis J, ReVello R, Borch T (2012) Steroid hormone runofff from agricultural test plots applied with municipal biosolids. Environ Sci Technol 45:2746–2754Google Scholar
  94. Ying G, Rai K, Ying-Jun R (2002) Occurrence and fate of hormone steroids in the environment. Environ Int 28:545–551Google Scholar
  95. Ying G, Kookana R, Kumar A, Mortimer M (2009) Occurrence and implications of estrogens and xenoestrogens in sewage effluents and receiving waters from South East Queensland. Sci Total Environ 407:5147–5155Google Scholar
  96. Zhang Z, Feng Y, Gao P, Wang C, Ren N (2011) Occurrence and removal efficiencies of eight EDCs and estrogenicity in a STP. J Environ Monit 13:1366–1373Google Scholar
  97. Zou Y, Zhang K, Zhou S (2013) Determination of estrogenic steroids and microbial and photochemical degradation of 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) in lake surface water: a case study. Environ Sci Process Impacts 15:1529–1535Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of Louisiana at LafayetteLafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations