Advertisement

Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Runoff Water and Wastewater Sampled at a Firefighter Training Area

  • Xavier DauchyEmail author
  • Virginie Boiteux
  • Adeline Colin
  • Cristina Bach
  • Christophe Rosin
  • Jean-François Munoz
Article

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are key ingredients of firefighting foams designed to suppress fires involving flammable and combustible liquids. Such foams are used by firefighters during fire training at dedicated sites. Because PFASs are very persistent chemicals, substantial soil and groundwater contamination has been observed in the vicinity of firefighter training areas. However, very few data are available on PFAS contamination of wastewater and runoff water on such sites. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of more than 50 PFASs in 43 water samples (effluent from a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), lagoon, runoff water, and wastewater drained from firefighter training areas) collected from a large firefighter training site, using target and suspect screening. A comparison of the PFAS classes analyzed revealed the overwhelming contribution of fluorotelomers. This indicates that the PFAS emission from the use of firefighting foams cannot be monitored only by measuring perfluoroalkyl acids. Based on the PFAS concentrations measured through target screening, the PFAS mass discharged into the river receiving WWTP effluent and the lagoon was on average 387 ± 183 kg and 56 ± 15 kg per year respectively. Due to the unavailability of standards, it was impossible to take into account the PFASs detected with suspect screening. The present study emphasizes that, above and beyond soil and groundwater contamination, such sites also contribute to the PFAS burden of surface water.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the managers of the firefighter training site and the French Ministry of Health (DGS 216) for supporting this study. We are grateful to Delphine Libby-Claybrough for helpful insights on the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

244_2018_585_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 1339 kb)

References

  1. 2006/122/EC (2006) Regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (perfluorooctane sulfonates). In: Council EPaT (ed)Google Scholar
  2. Anderson RH, Long GC, Porter RC, Anderson JK (2016) Occurrence of select perfluoroalkyl substances at U.S. Air Force aqueous film-forming foam release sites other than fire-training areas: field-validation of critical fate and transport properties. Chemosphere 150(Supplement C):678–685.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arias EV, Mallavarapu M, Naidu R (2014) Identification of the source of PFOS and PFOA contamination at a military air base site. Environ Monit Assess 187(1):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4111-0 Google Scholar
  4. Arvaniti OS, Andersen HR, Thomaidis NS, Stasinakis AS (2014) Sorption of perfluorinated compounds onto different types of sewage sludge and assessment of its importance during wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 111:405–411.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bach C, Dauchy X, Boiteux V et al (2017) The impact of two fluoropolymer manufacturing facilities on downstream contamination of a river and drinking water resources with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24(5):4916–4925.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8243-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Backe WJ, Day TC, Field JA (2013) Zwitterionic, cationic, and anionic fluorinated chemicals in aqueous film forming foam formulations and groundwater from U.S. military bases by nonaqueous large-volume injection HPLC-MS/MS. Environ Sci Technol 47(10):5226–5234.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es3034999 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baduel C, Paxman CJ, Mueller JF (2015) Perfluoroalkyl substances in a firefighting training ground (FTG), distribution and potential future release. J Hazard Mater 296:46–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baduel C, Mueller JF, Rotander A, Corfield J, Gomez-Ramos M-J (2017) Discovery of novel per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) at a fire fighting training ground and preliminary investigation of their fate and mobility. Chemosphere 185(Supplement C):1030–1038.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barzen-Hanson KA, Roberts SC, Choyke S et al (2017) Discovery of 40 classes of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in historical aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) and AFFF-impacted groundwater. Environ Sci Technol 51(4):2047–2057.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05843 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhavsar SP, Fowler C, Day S et al (2016) High levels, partitioning and fish consumption based water guidelines of perfluoroalkyl acids downstream of a former firefighting training facility in Canada. Environ Int 94:415–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blum A, Balan SA, Scheringer M et al (2015) The madrid statement on poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). Environ Health Perspect 123(5):A107–A111.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509934 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boiteux V, Bach C, Sagres V et al (2016) Analysis of 29 per- and polyfluorinated compounds in water, sediment, soil and sludge by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Int J Environ Anal Chem 96(8):705–728.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2016.1196683 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buck RC, Franklin J, Berger U et al (2011) Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment: terminology, classification, and origins. Integr Environ Assess Manag 7(4):513–541.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dauchy X, Boiteux V, Bach C et al (2017a) Mass flows and fate of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in the wastewater treatment plant of a fluorochemical manufacturing facility. Sci Total Environ 576:549–558.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dauchy X, Boiteux V, Bach C, Rosin C, Munoz J-F (2017b) Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in firefighting foam concentrates and water samples collected near sites impacted by the use of these foams. Chemosphere 183:53–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dauchy X, Boiteux V, Colin A et al (2019) Deep seepage of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances through the soil of a firefighter training site and subsequent groundwater contamination. Chemosphere 214:729–737.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Vries P, Slijkerman DME, Kwadijk CJAF et al (2017) The toxic exposure of flamingos to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from firefighting foam applications in Bonaire. Mar Pollut Bull.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.017 Google Scholar
  18. Dobraca D, Israel L, McNeel S et al (2015) Biomonitoring in California firefighters: metals and perfluorinated chemicals. J Occup Environ Med 57(1):88–97.  https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000000307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Filipovic M, Woldegiorgis A, Norström K, Bibi M, Lindberg M, Österås A-H (2015) Historical usage of aqueous film forming foam: a case study of the widespread distribution of perfluoroalkyl acids from a military airport to groundwater, lakes, soils and fish. Chemosphere 129:39–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gewurtz SB, Bhavsar SP, Petro S et al (2014) High levels of perfluoroalkyl acids in sport fish species downstream of a firefighting training facility at Hamilton International Airport, Ontario, Canada. Environ Int 67:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Houtz EF, Higgins CP, Field JA, Sedlak DL (2013) Persistence of perfluoroalkyl acid precursors in AFFF-impacted groundwater and soil. Environ Sci Technol 47(15):8187–8195.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es4018877 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kärrman A, Elgh-Dalgren K, Lafossas C, Moskeland T (2011) Environmental levels and distribution of structural isomers of perfluoroalkyl acids after aqueous fire-fighting foam (AFFF) contamination. Environ Chem 8(4):372–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kissa E (2001) Fluorinated surfactants and repellents, vol 97. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Kwadijk CJAF, Kotterman M, Koelmans AA (2014) Partitioning of perfluorooctanesulfonate and perfluorohexanesulfonate in the aquatic environment after an accidental release of aqueous film forming foam at Schiphol Amsterdam Airport. Environ Toxicol Chem 33(8):1761–1765.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGuire ME, Schaefer C, Richards T et al (2014) Evidence of remediation-induced alteration of subsurface poly- and perfluoroalkyl substance distribution at a former firefighter training area. Environ Sci Technol 48(12):6644–6652.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es5006187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moody CA, Field JA (2000) Perfluorinated surfactants and the environmental implications of their use in fire-fighting foams. Environ Sci Technol 34(18):3864–3870.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es991359u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moody CA, Martin JW, Kwan WC, Muir DCG, Mabury SA (2002) Monitoring perfluorinated surfactants in biota and surface water samples following an accidental release of fire-fighting foam into Etobicoke Creek. Environ Sci Technol 36(4):545–551.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es011001+ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oakes KD, Benskin JP, Martin JW et al (2010) Biomonitoring of perfluorochemicals and toxicity to the downstream fish community of Etobicoke Creek following deployment of aqueous film-forming foam. Aquat Toxicol 98(2):120–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paul AG, Jones KC, Sweetman AJ (2009) A first global production, emission, and environmental inventory for perfluorooctane sulfonate. Environ Sci Technol 43(2):386–392.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es802216n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Place BJ, Field JA (2012) Identification of novel fluorochemicals in aqueous film-forming foams used by the US military. Environ Sci Technol 46(13):7120–7127.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es301465n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Prevedouros K, Cousins IT, Buck RC, Korzeniowski SH (2006) Sources, fate and transport of perfluorocarboxylates. Environ Sci Technol 40(1):32–44.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es0512475 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Renner R (2001) Growing concern over perfluorinated chemicals. Environ Sci Technol 35(7):154A–160A.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es012317k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scheffey JL, Hanauska CP (2002) Status report on environmental concerns related to aqueous film forming foam (AFFF), pp 1–13Google Scholar
  34. Scheringer M, Trier X, Cousins IT et al (2014) Helsingør statement on poly- and perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs). Chemosphere 114:337–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schultz MM, Barofsky DF, Field JA (2004) Quantitative determination of fluorotelomer sulfonates in groundwater by LC MS/MS. Environ Sci Technol 38(6):1828–1835.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es035031j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. SFT (2008) Screening of polyfluorinated organic compounds at four fire training facilities in Norway. Norvegian Pollution Control Authority, Oslo, pp 1–88Google Scholar
  37. Taniyasu S, Yamashita N, Yamazaki E et al (2015) Contamination profiles of perfluorinated chemicals in the inland and coastal waters of Japan following the use of fire-fighting foams. In: American Chemical Society symposium series, vol 1206, pp 221–244Google Scholar
  38. Weber R, Bantz I, Klumbies M, Valentin I, Fantke P (2010) PFOS and PFC pollution from use of fire fighting foam in a major fire in Düsseldorf/Germany—human exposure and regulatory actions. Organohalogen Compd 72:1005–1008Google Scholar
  39. Weber AK, Barber LB, LeBlanc DR, Sunderland EM, Vecitis CD (2017) Geochemical and hydrologic factors controlling subsurface transport of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Environ Sci Technol 51(8):4269–4279.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nancy Laboratory for Hydrology, Water Chemistry DepartmentANSESNancyFrance

Personalised recommendations