Evaluation of New Diagnostic Ratios of Naphthalenes and Fluorenes by Identifying Severely Weathered Oils Collected in Laboratory Simulations and Coastal Weathering Experiments

  • Bin HanEmail author
  • Zhuanling Song
  • Qian Li
  • Li Zheng


The composition and physical properties of spilled oil have great changes during the seriously weathering process. It brings great difficulties to the source identification of oil spill. So, the stable and trustworthy diagnostic ratios (DRs) for accurate identification of severely weathered spilled oils are very important. The explosion of Sinopec pipeline happened on November 22, 2013 at Qingdao, China. Local beaches at Jiaozhou Bay were polluted by spilled oils. We have collected original spilled oil samples from an area free from human interference near the oil leakage point after the accident. Synchronized with actual beach weathering, laboratory experiments were conducted to simulate oil weathering for 360 days by using the collected original spilled oil samples. Based on the t test and the repeatability limit method, 65 DRs of naphthalenes and fluorenes were screened. Fifteen DRs, namely, C2Nap/(C2Nap + C3Nap), C2Nap/(C2Nap + C4Nap), C2Nap/total Nap, C3Nap/(C3Nap + C4Nap), C3Nap/total Nap, C4Nap/total Nap, C2Flu/(C2Flu + C3Flu), C2Flu/total Flu, C2Nap/(C2Nap + Flu), C2Nap/(C2Nap + C1Flu), C2Nap/(C2Nap + C2Flu), C2Nap/(C2Nap + C3Flu), C3Nap/(C3Nap + Flu),C3Nap/(C3Nap + C1Flu), total Nap/(total Nap + total Flu), have maintained remarkable stability during the simulated weathering experiments and field weathering process. These stable ratios can retain the characteristics of oil source during weathering. They are very beneficial to improve the accuracy of identifying the source of severely weathered oil and can be used as an effective supplement to existing index system for source identification.



This work was financially supported by China-ASEAN Maritime Cooperation Fund: East Asia Marine Cooperation Platform, Basic Scientific Fund for National Public Research Institutes of China (2017Q05), and the project of the National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFC0503602).


  1. Adhikari PL, Wong RL, Overton EB (2017) Application of enhanced gas chromatography/triple quadrupole mass spectrometry for monitoring petroleum weathering and forensic source fingerprinting in samples impacted by the deepwater horizon oil spill. Chemosphere 184:939–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler N, Sertiä-Bionda K, Rak N (1990) Influence of weathering on oil spill identification. Int J Environ Anal Chem 39(4):381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JW, Lee RF (2006) Use of biomarkers in oil spill risk assessment in the marine environment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 12(6):1192–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker MC, Steinhoff MA, Fricano GF (2016) Integrated effects of the deepwater horizon oil spill on nearshore ecosystems. Mar Ecol Prog 576:219–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayona J, Domínguez C, Albaigés J (2015) Analytical developments for oil spill fingerprinting. Trends Environ Anal Chem 5:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brakstad O, Daling P, Faksness L, Vang S, Syslak L, Leirvik F (2014) Depletion and biodegradation of hydrocarbons in dispersions and emulsions of the Macondo 252 oil generated in an oil-on-seawater mesocosm flume basin. Mar Pollut Bull 84(1–2):125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burgherr P (2007) In-depth analysis of accidental oil spills from tankers in the context of global spill trends from all sources. J Hazard Mater 140(1):245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen J, Hansen A, Giorgio T, John M, Andersen O (2004) Integrated methodology for forensic oil spill identification. Environ Sci Technol 38(10):2912–2918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daling P, Faksness L, Hansen A, Stout S (2002) Improved and standardized methodology for oil spill fingerprinting. Environ Forensics 3(3–4):263–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doval M, Moroño A, Pazos Y, Lopez A, Madriñán M, Cabanas J (2006) Monitoring dissolved aromatic hydrocarbon in rias baixas embayments (NW Spain) after prestige oil spills: relationship with hydrography. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 67(1–2):205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duarte HO, Droguett EL (2015) Quantitative ecological risk assessment of accidental oil spills on ship routes nearby a marine national park in brazil. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 22(2):350–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fingas M (1996) The evaporation of oil spills: prediction of equations using distillation data. Spill Sci Technol Bull 3(4):191–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finlayson GR, Chilvers BL, Pearson H, White BJ, Finlayson ST, Sievwright K, Zyl N, Morgan K, Clumpner C (2018) Efficacy of seawater for washing oiled birds during an oil spill response. Mar Pollut Bull 126:137–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitzgerald T, Gohlke J (2014) Contaminant levels in gulf of Mexico reef fish after the deepwater horizon oil spill as measured by a fishermen-led testing program. Environ Sci Technol 48(3):1993–2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonnelli M, Galletti Y, Marchetti E, Mercadante L, Brogi SR, Ribotti A et al (2016) Dissolved organic matter dynamics in surface waters affected by oil spill pollution: results from the serious game exercise. Deep-Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr 133:88–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Han B, Chen J, Zheng L, Zhou T, Li J, Wang X (2015) Development of an impurity profiling method for source identification of spilled benzene series compounds by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry: toluene as a case study. J Sep Sci 38(18):3198–3204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harriman B, Zito P, Podgorski D, Tarr MA, Suflita J (2017) Impact of photooxidation and biodegradation on the fate of oil spilled during the deepwater horizon incident: advanced stages of weathering. Environ Sci Technol 51(13):7412–7421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harville EW, Shankar A, Zilversmit L, Buekens P (2017) The gulf oil spill, miscarriage, and infertility: the growth study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 27(8):1–10Google Scholar
  19. Harwell MA, Gentile JH (2014) Assessing risks to sea otters and the Exxon Valdez oil spill: new scenarios, attributable risk, and recovery. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 20(4):889–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lehr WJ, Simecek-Beatty D (2000) The relation of Langmuir circulation processes to the standard oil spill spreading, dispersion, and transport algorithms. Spill Sci Technol Bull 6(3–4):247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mizuguchi S, Gray H, Calabrese L, Haff G, Sands W, Ramsey M (2014) Repeated change-of-direction test for collegiate male soccer players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 54(4):417–423Google Scholar
  22. Morales-Caselles C, Kalman J, Micaelo C, Ferreira A, Vale C, Riba I (2008) Sediment contamination, bioavailability and toxicity of sediments affected by an acute oil spill: four years after the sinking of the tanker prestige (2002). Chemosphere 71(7):1207–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morales-Caselles C, Yunker MB, Ross PS (2017) Identification of spilled oil from the MV Marathassa (Vancouver, Canada 2015) using alkyl PAH isomer ratios. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 73(1):118–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nelson R, Kile B, Plata D, Sylva S, LiXu Reddy C (2006) Tracking the weathering of an oil spill with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. Environ Forensics 7(1):33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pérezcadahía B, Laffon B, Pásaro E, Méndez J (2004) Evaluation of PAH bioaccumulation and DNA damage in mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) exposed to spilled prestige crude oil. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 138(4):453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sergejeva M, Laanearu J, Tabri K (2017) On parameterization of emulsification and heat exchange in the hydraulic modelling of oil spill from a damaged tanker in winter conditions. In: International conference on marine structures, pp 43–50Google Scholar
  27. Sidiras D, Batzias F, Konstantinou I, Tsapatsis M (2014) Simulation of autohydrolysis effect on adsorptivity of wheat st raw in the case of oil spill cleaning. Chem Eng Res Des 92(9):1781–1791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sun P, Gao Z, Cui W (2007) Development and application of oil spill identification techniques. Ocean Publishing House, Beijing, pp 105–114Google Scholar
  29. Sun P, Bao M, Li G, Wang X, Zhao Y, Zhou Q, Cao L (2009a) Fingerprinting and source identification of an oil spill in China Bohai Sea by gas chromatography-flame ionization detection and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry coupled with multi-statistical analyses. J Chromatogr A 1216(5):830–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sun P, Gao Z, Zhao Y, Wang X, Cao X, Li G (2009b) Evaluation of the oil spill accident in Bohai sea, China. Environ Forensics 10(4):308–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tronczyński J, Munschy C, HéasMoisan K et al (2004) Contamination of the bay of biscay by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, (pahs) following the t/v “Erika” oil spill. Aquat Living Res 17(3):243–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang Z, Fingas M (2003) Development of oil hydrocarbon fingerprinting and identification techniques. Mar Pollut Bull 47:423–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang Z, Fingas M, Page D (1999) Oil spill identification. J Chromatogr A 843(1–2):369–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang Z, Li K, Fingas M, Sigouin L, Ménard L (2002) Characterization and source identification of hydrocarbons in water samples using multiple analytical techniques. J Chromatogr A 971(1–2):173–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang Z, Yang C, Yang Z, Brown C, Hollebone BP, Stout SA (2016) 4 - petroleum biomarker fingerprinting for oil spill characterization and source identification. Stand Handb Oil Spill Environ Forensics 7(2):131–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilson RR, Perham C, French-Mccay DP, Balouskus R (2018) Potential impacts of offshore oil spills on polar bears in the Chukchi Sea. Environ Pollut 235:652–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Marine Bioactive Substances and Modern Analytical Technology, First Institute of OceanographyState Oceanic AdministrationQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental ScienceQingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations