Advertisement

Distribution and Bioavailability of Trace Metals in Shallow Sediments from Grand Lake, Oklahoma

  • Shane Morrison
  • Steve Nikolai
  • Darrell Townsend
  • Jason Belden
Article

Abstract

The Tri-State Mining District (TSMD) is a historic mining area containing the Tar Creek superfund site and is the source for sediment-bound metals in Grand Lake. Despite elevated concentrations of cadmium, lead, and zinc, no evidence of sediment toxicity has been observed during previous investigations; however, these studies were limited to lake transects with mostly deep-water sediments. The purpose of this study was to assess whether TSMD-specific sediment toxicity thresholds (STTs), developed for small streams and tributaries draining the TSMD, are predictive of biological effects within the greater lake body. Investigations focused on determining trace metal distribution within the northern reaches of Grand Lake, emphasizing shallow water areas (≤ 6-m depth), and the effects of sediment disturbance on trace metal bioavailability and toxicity to two freshwater invertebrates. No significant mortality or differences in growth occurred under natural or disturbed sediment conditions for either aquatic invertebrate despite using some sediments that exceeded both McDonald general sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) and TSMD-specific STTs. Although the simulated disturbance event (i.e., vigorously aerating sediments for 30 days before toxicity tests) was sufficient to increase trace metal water concentrations and detection frequencies, no changes in overall sediment load, bioavailability, or toxicity were observed following a 10-day exposure duration. These results suggest that TSMD-specific STTs could be used to evaluate Grand Lake sediments that could potentially be disturbed by boat traffic, wave action, and dredging associated with dock construction as opposed to the more conservative general-SQGs.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors claim no conflict of interest for this research. This project was partially funded by a student fellowship through the Grand River Dam Authority and was conducted in conjunction with the Oklahoma State University Water Quality Research Laboratory. This manuscript was improved based on the comments of two anonymous reviewers.

Supplementary material

244_2018_559_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (739 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 738 kb)

References

  1. Atkinson CA, Jolley DF, Simpson SL (2007) Effect of overlying water pH, dissolved oxygen, salinity and sediment disturbances on metal release and sequestration from metal contaminated marine sediments. Chemosphere 69:1428–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Besser JM, Brumbaugh WG, Hardesty DK, Hughes JP, Ingersoll CG (2009) Assessment of metal-contaminated sediments from the Southeast Missouri (SEMO) mining district using sediment toxicity tests with amphipods and freshwater mussels. US Geological Survey, Columbia Environmental Research Center, Columbia Missouri. Administrative Report 08-NRDAR-02Google Scholar
  3. Burks SL, Wilhm J (1995) Diagnostic and feasibility study of Grand Lake O’ the Cherokees: Phase 1 of a Clean Lakes ProjectGoogle Scholar
  4. Calmano E, Hong J, Forstner U (1993) Binding and mobilization of heavy metals in contaminated sediments affected by pH and redox potential. Water Sci Technol 28:223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell PGC (1995) Interactions between trace metals and organisms: critique of the free-ion activity model. In: Tessier A, Turner DT (eds) Metal speciation and bioavailability in aqautic systems. Wiley, London, pp 45–102Google Scholar
  6. Chapman PM, Wang F, Janssen C, Persoone G, Allen HE (1998) Ecotoxicology of metals in aquatic sediments: binding and release, bioavailability, risk assessment and remediation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:2221–2243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Toro DM, Allen HE, Bergman H, Meyer JS, Paquin PR, Santore RC (2001) Biotic ligand model of the acute toxicity of metals. 1. Technical basis. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2383–2396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eggleton J, Thomas KV (2004) A review of factors affecting the release and bioavailability of contaminants during sediment disturbance events. Environ Int 30:973–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Finney DJ (1971) Probit analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Garvin EM, Bridge CF, Garvin MS (2017) Screening level assessment of metal concentrations in streambed sediments and floodplain soils within the Grand Lake watershed in Northeastern Oklahoma, USA. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 72:349–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harbaugh JW (1957) Mississippian bioherms in Northeastern Oklahoma. Bull Am Assoc Pet Geol 41(11):2530–2544Google Scholar
  12. Horowitz AJ, Stephens VC (2008) The effects of land use on fluvial sediment chemistry for the conterminous US—results from the first cycle of the NAWQA program: trace and major elements, phosphorus, carbon and sulfur. Sci Total Environ 400:290–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ingersoll CG, Wang N, Hayward JMR, Jones JR, Jones SB, Ireland DS (2005) A field assessment of long-term laboratory sediment toxicity tests with the amphipod Hyalella azteca. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:2853–2870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ingersoll CG, Ivey CD, Brumbaugh WG, Besser JM, Kemble NE (2009) Toxicity of sediments from the Grand Lake O’ the Cherokees with the amphipod Hyalella azteca. Administrative Report CERC-8335-FY09-20-01Google Scholar
  15. Ingersoll CG, Kunz JL, Hughes JP et al (2015) Relative Sensitivity of an amphipod Hyalella azteca, a midge Chironomus dilutes, and a unionid mussel Lampsilis siliquoidea to a toxic sediment. Environ Toxicol Chem 34:1134–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Landrum PF, Lydy MJ, Eadie BJ (2013) Dynamics of contaminant accumulation in benthos: route to understanding exposure to organic contaminants. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:1209–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacDonald DD, Ingersoll CG, Berger TA (2000) Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39:20–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacDonald DD, Smorong DE, Ingersoll CG et al (2009) Development and evaluation of sediment and pore-water toxicity thresholds to support sediment quality assessments in the Tri-State Mining District (TSMD). Missouri, OklahomaGoogle Scholar
  19. McCormick CA, Burks SL (1987) Bioavailability and toxicity of extracts from acid-mine-waste-contaminated sediments. Proc Okla Acad Sci 67:31–37Google Scholar
  20. OECD, guidelines for the testing of chemicals No. 233. 2010. Sediment-water chironomid life-cycle toxicity test using spiked water or spiked sedimentGoogle Scholar
  21. Paquin PR, Gorsuch JW, Apte S et al (2002) The biotic ligand model: a historical overview. Comp Biochem Phys C 133:3–35Google Scholar
  22. Reichenberg F, Mayer P (2006) Two complementary sides of bioavailability: accessibility and chemical activity of organic contaminants in sediments and soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:1239–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (1999) Field sampling guidance document: Sediment Sampling. US EPA Region IX, Richmond, CA. SOP #1215, Revision 1Google Scholar
  24. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2000) Methods for measuring the toxicity and bioaccumulation of sediment-associated contaminants with freshwater invertebrates. 2nd edn. (EPA-600/R-99/064)Google Scholar
  25. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2002) Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms. 5th edn. (EPA-821-R-02-012)Google Scholar
  26. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2007a) Method 3051A: Microwave assisted acid digestion of sediments, sludges, soils, and oils. US EPA SW-846 Chapt. 3.8, Revision 1Google Scholar
  27. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2007b) Method 6010C: Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry. US EPA SW-846 Chapt. 3.9, Revision 3Google Scholar
  28. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2017) National Recommended Water Quality Criteria—Aquatic Life Criteria Table. Accessed Online: November 2017. https://www.epa.gov/wqc

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shane Morrison
    • 1
  • Steve Nikolai
    • 2
  • Darrell Townsend
    • 2
  • Jason Belden
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Integrative BiologyOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA
  2. 2.Grand River Dam AuthorityVinitaUSA

Personalised recommendations