Advertisement

Intracutaneous sterile water injection for pain relief during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: comparison with diclofenac sodium

  • Abdullah GulEmail author
  • Murat Gul
Original Paper

Abstract

Various analgesic applications can be used during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for pain relief and maximal success rate. Intracutaneous sterile water injection (ISWI) has been shown to be effective in several types of pain, but a gap exists about its use during SWL. In this paper, we aimed to evaluate the effect of ISWI during SWL and compare that with diclofenac sodium injection used commonly to provide ideal patient contentment. Patients with kidney stone were randomized to have either ISWI therapy or intramuscular non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug (diclofenac sodium) injection. Using a syringe, 2–3 ml of sterile water was administered to the triangle area bounded by the 12th costal margin, the iliac crest and the vertebral spine in prone position. Visual analog scale (VAS) was employed to record pain scores of patients. Other parameters including stone size, SWL duration, total shock waves given, used energy and the necessity of rescue analgesia were also noted. A total of 524 patients were recruited, of those 216 patients were treated with ISWI and 308 patients had diclofenac sodium injections. The characteristics of the patients and shockwave therapy did not differ significantly between the two groups. Although the mean VAS scores prior to SWL and at every voltage increment during the procedure did not differ, more patients in the diclofenac sodium injection group required rescue analgesia with significantly greater side effects. ISWI is found to be as effective as the diclofenac sodium injection for pain management during SWL with lower adverse event rates.

Keywords

Kidney stone Pain Renal colic Shockwave lithotripsy Sterile water injection 

Notes

Author contributions

All the research was done by the authors.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Neither Author Gul A. nor Author Gul M. has any conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

Our study followed the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee.

References

  1. 1.
    Chaussy C, Brendel W, Schmiedt E (1980) Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet 2(8207):1265–1268Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aboumarzouk OM, Hasan R, Tasleem A, Mariappan M, Hutton R, Fitzpatrick J et al (2017) Analgesia for patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol 43(3):394–406Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Waqas M, Butt A, Ayaz Khan M, Khan I, Saqib IU, Hussain T et al (2017) Comparison of different analgesia drug regimens for pain control during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones: a randomized control study. Cureus. 9(4):e1195Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gupta NP, Kumar A (2008) Analgesia for pain control during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: current status. Indian J Urol 24(2):155–158Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mezentsev VA (2009) Meta-analysis of the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs vs. opioids for SWL using modern electromagnetic lithotripters. Int Braz J Urol 35(3):293–297 (discussion 8) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ozcan S, Yilmaz E, Buyukkocak U, Basar H, Apan A (2002) Comparison of three analgesics for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 36(4):281–285Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tu J, Matula TJ, Bailey MR, Crum LA (2007) Evaluation of a shock wave induced cavitation activity both in vitro and in vivo. Phys Med Biol 52(19):5933–5944Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee N, Webster J, Beckmann M, Gibbons K, Smith T, Stapleton H et al (2013) Comparison of a single vs a four intradermal sterile water injection for relief of lower back pain for women in labour: a randomised controlled trial. Midwifery. 29(6):585–591Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Derry S, Straube S, Moore RA, Hancock H, Collins SL (2012) Intracutaneous or subcutaneous sterile water injection compared with blinded controls for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD009107Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xue P, Tu C, Wang K, Wang X, Fang Y (2013) Intracutaneous sterile water injection versus oral paracetamol for renal colic during pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urol Nephrol 45(2):321–325Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ahmadnia H, Younesi Rostami M (2004) Treatment of renal colic using intracutaneous injection of sterile water. Urol J 1(3):200–203Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iguchi M, Katoh Y, Koike H, Hayashi T, Nakamura M (2002) Randomized trial of trigger point injection for renal colic. Int J Urol 9(9):475–479Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dettori J (2010) The random allocation process: two things you need to know. Evid Based Spine Care J 1(3):7–9Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reichelt O, Zermann DH, Wunderlich H, Janitzky V, Schubert J (1999) Effective analgesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Urology 54(3):433–436Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bianchi G, Marega D, Knez R, Bucci S, Trombetta C (2018) Comparison of an electromagnetic and an electrohydraulic lithotripter: efficacy, pain and complications. Arch İtal Urol Androl 90(3):169–171Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bhojani N, Mandeville JA, Hameed TA, Soergel TM, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr et al (2015) Lithotripter outcomes in a community practice setting: comparison of an electromagnetic and an electrohydraulic lithotripter. J Urol 193(3):875–879Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matin SF, Yost A, Streem SB (2001) Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: a comparative study of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic units. J Urol 166(6):2053–2056Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bierkens AF, Maes RM, Hendrikx JM, Erdos AF, de Vries JD, Debruyne FM (1991) The use of local anesthesia in second generation extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: eutectic mixture of local anesthetics. J Urol 146(2):287–289Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hutton EK, Kasperink M, Rutten M, Reitsma A, Wainman B (2009) Sterile water injection for labour pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BJOG 116(9):1158–1166Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Byrn C, Olsson I, Falkheden L, Lindh M, Hosterey U, Fogelberg M et al (1993) Subcutaneous sterile water injections for chronic neck and shoulder pain following whiplash injuries. Lancet 341(8843):449–452Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wreje U, Brorsson B (1995) A multicenter randomized controlled trial of injections of sterile water and saline for chronic myofascial pain syndromes. Pain 61(3):441–444Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sand T, Bovim G, Helde G (1992) Intracutaneous sterile water injections do not relieve pain in cervicogenic headache. Acta Neurol Scand 86(5):526–528Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Melzack R (1996) Gate control theory: on the evolution of pain concepts. Pain forum. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Le Bars D, Dickenson AH, Besson JM (1979) Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC). I. Effects on dorsal horn convergent neurones in the rat. Pain 6(3):283–304Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hosseininejad SM, Emami Zeydi A (2015) Can intracutaneous sterile water injection be used as a possible treatment for acute renal colic pain in the emergency department? A short literature review. Urol Ann 7(1):130–132Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kararmaz A, Kaya S, Karaman H, Turhanoglu S (2004) Effect of the frequency of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on analgesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res 32(6):411–415Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bahasadri S, Ahmadi-Abhari S, Dehghani-Nik M, Habibi GR (2006) Subcutaneous sterile water injection for labour pain: a randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 46(2):102–106Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyUniversity of Health Science, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research HospitalBursaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of UrologyAksaray University School of MedicineAksarayTurkey
  3. 3.Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Section 5701, Copenhagen University Hospital RigshospitaletUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations