Advertisement

Urolithiasis

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 395–400 | Cite as

Predictors of spontaneous ureteral stone passage in the presence of an indwelling ureteral stent

  • Joseph M. KuebkerEmail author
  • Jennifer Robles
  • Jordan J. Kramer
  • Nicole L. Miller
  • S. Duke Herrell
  • Ryan S. Hsi
Original Paper
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

Patients presenting acutely with obstructing stones often have a ureteral stent placed as a temporizing solution. Ureteroscopy is then commonly performed in a staged fashion, but occasionally the stone is found to have passed. We aimed to identify the frequency and predictors of ureteral stone passage with a stent in place. Records were reviewed to identify patients who had a stent placed for a single ureteral stone. Subsequent ureteroscopy or CT scan was used to ascertain stone passage. Effect of age, gender, BMI, stone diameter, alpha blocker use, urinary tract infection, hydronephrosis, and stent duration on stone passage was assessed. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were met in 209 patients. Mean maximum stone diameter was 6.5 ± 2.5 mm. Passage rates for stones < 3 mm, 3–4.9 mm, 5–6.9 mm, and ≥ 7 mm were 50%, 13%, 10%, and 0%, respectively. The overall rate of passage was 8%. Stone passage was associated with smaller maximum stone diameter, more distal stone location, and longer duration of stent before ureteroscopy/CT on univariate analysis (p < 0.01). Stone diameter and stent duration remained significantly associated on multivariable analysis (p = 0.001 and p = 0.05, respectively). Our findings suggest ureteral stone passage with a concurrent ureteral stent is not a rare event as it occurred in 14% of stones less then 7 mm in maximum diameter. Stone size and duration of stent before ureteroscopy or CT were found to be independent predictors of passage. Select patients with small ureteral stones who have been stented should be considered for a trial of urine straining or repeat imaging before subsequent ureteroscopy.

Keywords

Ureteral stents Ureteral stones Nephrolithiasis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants

This study was conducted after local Institutional Review Board application and approval.

Informed consent

For this type of retrospective study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM et al (2016) Surgical management of stones: american urological association/endourological society guideline, Part II. J Urol 196:1161–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T (2016) EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:468–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Assimos D, Crisci A, Culkin D, Xue W, Roelofs A, Duvdevani M, Desai M, de la Rosette J, Group CUGS (2016) Preoperative JJ stent placement in ureteric and renal stone treatment: results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society (CROES) ureteroscopy (URS) global study. BJU Int 117:648–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baumgarten L, Desai A, Shipman S, Eun DD, Pontari MA, Mydlo JH, Reese AC (2017) Spontaneous passage of ureteral stones in patients with indwelling ureteral stents. Can J Urol 24:9024–9029Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cetti RJ, Biers S, Keoghane SR (2011) The difficult ureter: what is the incidence of pre-stenting? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93:31–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ji C, Gan W, Guo H, Lian H, Zhang S, Yang R, Zhao X (2012) A prospective trial on ureteral stenting combined with secondary ureteroscopy after an initial failed procedure. Urol Res 2012 40:593–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lamberts RW, Conti SL, Leppert JT, Elliott CS (2017) Defining the rate of negative ureteroscopy in the general population treated for upper tract urinary stone disease. J Endourol 31:266–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kreshover JE, Dickstein RJ, Rowe C, Babayan RK, Wang DS (2011) Predictors for negative ureteroscopy in the management of upper urinary tract stone disease. Urology 78:748–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leventhal EK, Rozanski TA, Crain TW, Deshon GE Jr (1995) Indwelling ureteral stents as definitive therapy for distal ureteral calculi. J Urol 153:34–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deliveliotis C, Giannakopoulos S, Louras G, Koutsokalis G, Alivizatos G, Kostakopoulos A (1996) Double-pigtail stents for distal ureteral calculi: an alternative form of definitive treatment. Urol Int 57:224–2264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fulgham PF, Assimos DG, Pearle MS, Preminger GM (2013) Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. J Urol 189:1203–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tang VC, Attwell-Heap A (2011) Computed tomography versus ureteroscopy in identification of renal tract stone with ureteral stent in situ. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93:639–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ibrahim el SH, Haley WE, Jepperson MA, Wehle MJ, Cernigliaro JG (2014) Characterization of ureteral stents by dual-energy computed tomography: clinical implications. World J Radiol 6:625–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urologic SurgeryVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations