Advertisement

Urolithiasis

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 189–199 | Cite as

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for pediatric patients with upper urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Yiwen Chen
  • Tuo Deng
  • Xiaolu Duan
  • Wei Zhu
  • Guohua ZengEmail author
Review

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in surgical treatment of pediatric patients with upper urinary stones based on the published literature. A comprehensive literature search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and CNKI was conducted to identify studies comparing outcomes of PCNL and RIRS for treating pediatric patients with upper urinary stones before May 2017. A total of 11 studies, including one randomized controlled trial, four retrospective case–control studies and six case series studies, containing 822 children with upper urinary stones were included in this systematic review. Five of 11 including studies, containing 474 children with upper urinary stones were included in a meta-analysis. Significantly shorter hospital stay and fluoroscopy time were needed by RIRS than PCNL (WMD: 1.44 days, 95% CI 0.85, 2.04; p < 0.00001) and (WMD: 72.72 s, 95% CI 52.13, 93.31; p < 0.00001). The overall complications were higher for PCNL compared with RIRS (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.02, 2.84; p = 0.04). However, the minor (Clavien I or II) and major (Clavien III–V) complications rates in the PCNL group were higher compared with RIRS group but the differences were not statistically significant, respectively (p > 0.05). RIRS also benefits from significantly less need for blood transfusion (OR 9.09, 95% CI 1.66, 49.78; p = 0.01). No significant differences were found in initial, final stone-free rate, and operative times (p > 0.05). Our analysis suggested that RIRS turns out to be a safe and feasible procedure alternative to PCNL for children with upper urinary stones in selected cases. Because of the inherent limitations of the included studies, further large sample, prospective, multi-centric and randomized control trials should be undertaken to confirm our findings.

Keywords

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy Retrograde intrarenal surgery Pediatric upper urinary stones Meta-analysis 

Abbreviations

PCNL

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

RIRS

Retrograde intrarenal surgery

SWL

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Miniperc

Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Microperc

Micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy

SMP

Super-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy

WMD

Weighted mean difference

OR

Odds ratio

CIs

95% confidence intervals

LOE

Level of evidence

RCT

Randomized controlled trial

Notes

Funding

None.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC (2004) Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in men: new insights after 14 years of follow-up. J Am Soc Nephrol 15:3225–3232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tasian GE, Ross ME, Song L et al (2016) Annual incidence of nephrolithiasis among children and adults in South Carolina from 1997 to 2012. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 11:488–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sas DJ, Hulsey TC, Shatat IF, Orak JK (2010) Increasing incidence of kidney stones in children evaluated in the emergency department. J Pediatr 157:132–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yuruk E, Tuken M, Gonultas S et al (2017) Retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of pediatric cystine stones. J Pediatr Urol 13:487.e1–487.e5Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Erkurt B, Caskurlu T, Atis G et al (2014) Treatment of renal stones with flexible ureteroscopy in preschool age children. Urolithiasis 42:241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Unsal A, Resorlu B (2011) Retrograde intrarenal surgery in infants and preschool-age children. J Pediatr Surg 46:2195–2199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanaka ST, Makari JH, Pope JC, Adams MC, Brock JW, Thomas JC (2008) Pediatric ureteroscopic management of intrarenal calculi. J Urol 180:2150–2153 (discussion 2153–2154) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krambeck AE, Gettman MT, Rohlinger AL, Lohse CM, Patterson DE, Segura JW (2006) Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup. J Urol 175:1742–1747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vlajković M, Slavković A, Radovanović M, Sirić Z, Stefanović V, Perović S (2002) Long-term functional outcome of kidneys in children with urolithiasis after ESWL treatment. Eur J Pediatr Surg 12:118–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Willis LR, Evan AP, Connors BA, Blomgren P, Fineberg NS, Lingeman JE (1999) Relationship between kidney size, renal injury, and renal impairment induced by shock wave lithotripsy. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:1753–1762Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bilen CY, Gunay M, Ozden E, Inci K, Sarikaya S, Tekgul S (2010) Tubeless mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool children: a preliminary report. J Urol 184:2498–2502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Resorlu B, Unsal A, Tepeler A et al (2012) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with moderate-size kidney stones: results of multi-institutional analysis. Urology 80:519–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bozkurt OF, Resorlu B, Yildiz Y, Can CE, Unsal A (2011) Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of 15–20 mm. J Endourol 25:1131–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saad KS, Youssif ME, Al INHS., Fahmy A, El DHAG., El-Nahas AR (2015) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for large renal stones in pediatric patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol 194:1716–1720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang W, Zhou T, Wu T et al (2015) Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole renal stones: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Endourol 29:745–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ et al (2015) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 67:125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D et al (2012) Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Web site. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025. Accessed 26 Apr 2012
  19. 19.
    Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25:603–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pelit ES, Atis G, Kati B et al (2017) Comparison of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in preschool-aged children. Urology 101:21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baş O, Dede O, Aydogmus Y et al (2016) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in moderately sized pediatric kidney stones. J Endourol 30:765–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang DD (2016) The investigation of the security and efficacy of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for pediatrics with renal and upper ureteral calculi. Dissertation, Zhengzhou UniversityGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li J, Xiao J, Chen HR et al (2016) Flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for children and infants with stones: single center experience of 92 cases. China journal of urology 37:851–854Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abu GLA, Shunaigat AN, Budair Z (2011) Retrograde intrarenal lithotripsy for small renal stones in prepubertal children. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 22:492–496Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smaldone MC, Cannon GM, Wu HY et al (2007) Is ureteroscopy first line treatment for pediatric stone disease. J Urol 178:2128–2131 (discussion 2131) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yiwen Chen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Tuo Deng
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Xiaolu Duan
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Wei Zhu
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Guohua Zeng
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery CenterThe First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Guangzhou Institute of UrologyGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.Guangdong Key Laboratory of UrologyGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations