Contraction of skin flaps: re-examining the scientific basis
- 4 Downloads
Contraction in a skin flap is unavoidable after it is raised because of its elastic content and despite the best of planning a flap may fall short which may lead to some necrosis. This study was conducted to ascertain the extent of contraction of flaps and the factors that might influence this contraction.
This prospective study included 25 patients who underwent reconstructions of defects with different types of skin and fascio-cutaneous (FC) flaps. Clinical data including age; sex; body mass index; site/type of flap; and the flap’s surface area, thickness, and its contraction in relation with the relaxed skin tension lines (RSTL) were recorded and analyzed. The outcome of the success or failure of the flap was ascertained by clinical examination.
There were 20 males and 5 female patients and their age ranged from 10 to 67 years. Mean flap contraction was 20.01% in skin flaps and 20.38% in FC flaps; overall mean contraction was 20.19%. Flaps retracted more when constructed parallel to RSTL, in females and in patients with high BMI. Age did not affect the contraction.
Skin flaps can be stretched to a certain extent, but not up to pre-flap area without compromising the blood supply. Therefore, adequate allowance should be provided to avoid stretching, and subsequent necrosis and dehiscence. The most practical way of providing this allowance is by planning in reverse which flap size is always bigger than the defect, therefore providing margins for flap contraction.
Level of evidence
Level IV, risk/prognostic study
KeywordsSkin flap Contraction Shrinkage Surface area Volume
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Pawan Agarwal, Prachir Mukati, and D. Sharma declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Institutional ethical committee approval taken.
Obtained from patients and their parents in case of minors.
- 4.Samhita S (1907) An English translation of the Sushruta Samhita (English translation by Kaviraj Kunja Lal Bhishagratna). Calcutta, West Bengal, India: the Bharat Mihir PressGoogle Scholar
- 5.Gillies HD (1920) Plastic surgery of the face based on selected cases of war injuries of the face including burns, with original illustrations. Oxford Medical Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 7.Santoni-Rugiu P, Sykes PJ (2007) A history of plastic surgery. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 8.Morrison EJ, Morrison AJ (2015) Basic skin flaps and blood supply. In Farhadieh RD, Neil W. Bulstrode NW, Cugno S. (Eds) Plastic and reconstructive surgery: approaches and techniques; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp 12–21Google Scholar
- 16.Patterson TJS (1971)The effect of tension on the survival of skin flaps. Trans 5th Intl Cong Plast Reconstr Surg. Butterworth, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- 24.Thomas JR (2010) Advanced therapy in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (Eds) Malley JO, Wonsiewicz CC. USA Shelton Connecticut: People’s medical publishing houseGoogle Scholar
- 25.Rudolph R, Ballantyne D (1990) Plastic surgery. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 221–274Google Scholar
- 30.Fawcett DW (1986) A textbook of histology, eleventh ed. W.B. Saunders Company, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar