Advertisement

European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 189–192 | Cite as

Modified earlobe reconstruction technique following wide local excision of melanoma that facilitates sentinel lymph node biopsy

  • Metin NizamogluEmail author
  • Charles Loh
  • Alethea Tan
  • Mohamed Fahmy Ibrahim
  • Nabil Mopuri
  • Naguib El-Muttardi
Ideas and Innovations
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

The earlobe represents an important element in the aesthetic appearance of the entire ear. Reconstruction of the earlobe is challenging. The authors present a reconstructive option following wide excision of melanoma of the earlobe that facilitates sentinel lymph node biopsy from the neck without further incision. We report satisfactory results obtained using this technique for immediate earlobe reconstruction. We present two cases of malignant melanoma of the earlobe. Both cases were treated with a 1-cm wide local excision of melanoma scar of the ear lobe and reconstruction with double opposing local transposition flaps and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) of the neck via the skin flap incisions without further need for incision extension. This is a technique for earlobe reconstruction that provides satisfactory results that can be performed in a single stage procedure simultaneously allowing access for sentinel lymph node biopsy from the cervical, pre- and post-auricular lymph node basins. We feel this technique is an option to be considered when treating melanoma of the earlobe requiring SLNB.

Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic study.

Keywords

Melanoma Earlobe reconstruction Sentinel lymph node biopsy 

Notes

Funding

The authors declare that they did not receive any funding for this work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

Metin Nizamoglu, Charles Loh, Alethea Tan, Mohamed Fahmy Ibrahim, Nabil Mopuri, Naguib El-Muttardi declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

For this kind of study formal consent is not required.

Patient consent

The patients have given full consent to participate in this study and for use of their photographs for publication.

References

  1. 1.
    Shen W, Cui J, Chen J, Chen H, Zou J, Ji Y (2012) Inversion of the flap at the lower ear and restoration of the flap at postauricular skin for reconstruction of the earlobe. J Craniofacial Surg 23(2):560–562Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Emiroglu M, Al-Saedi M (2001) Gavello’s procedure: an old earlobe reconstruction method, revisited and touched up. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25(3):187–188Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goulão J, Alves J (2016) Total earlobe reconstruction with a superiorly based preauricular flap. An Bras Dermatol 91(3):372–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sleilati F (2006) Immediate earlobe reconstruction with double-crossed skin flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59(9):1003–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ohsumi N, Shimamoto R (1994) Earlobe reconstruction with a reversed-flow chondrocutaneous postauricular flap and a local flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 94(2):364–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yotsuyanagi T (1994) Earlobe reconstruction using a chondrocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 94(7):1073–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ziccardi VB, Lamphier J (2000) Use of keloid skin as an autograft for earlobe reconstruction after excision. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology 89(6):674–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quaba A (1988) Reconstruction of a posttraumatic ear defect using tissue expansion: 30 years after Neumann. Plast Reconstr Surg 82(3):521–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peach HS, van der Ploeg AP, Haydu LE, Stretch JR, Shannon KF, Uren RF et al (2013) The unpredictability of lymphatic drainage from the ear in melanoma patients, and its implications for management. Ann Surg Oncol 20(5):1707–1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St Andrew’s Centre for Plastic Surgery and BurnsChelmsfordUK

Personalised recommendations