Advertisement

European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 439–445 | Cite as

Total breast reconstruction with fat graft after serial expander deflation: a case series

  • Giacomo Datta
  • Antongiulio MangiaEmail author
  • Fulvio Antonino Nicolò
  • Maria Piera Mano
  • Stefano Bruschi
  • Maria Grazia Baù
  • Alessandra Surace
Original Paper
  • 87 Downloads

Abstract

Fat graft popularity has increased over the last few decades, finding a widespread pattern of application in oncological reconstruction, wound therapy and cosmetic surgery. Recently, the fat graft has been used for breast volume replacement after skin modelling by conventional tissue expanders positioned during mastectomy or after forced removal of prostheses due to complications. Our purpose was to assess fat grafting feasibility and safety, indicating its low rate of complications. We retrospectively analysed 7 patients treated with autologous fat grafts after oncological surgery for breast cancer. Patients not eligible for implant reconstruction and patients who refused implants were included. We analysed age, BMI (Body Mass Index), expansion rate and grafting data (session numbers, injected volume in each session and complication rates). Clinical examinations were performed every 6 months for 1 year after complete reconstruction to evaluate adipose tissue reabsorption and, eventually, further required fat grafting sessions. The aesthetic outcomes were excellent in all of the patients in our series. According to patient surveys, the satisfaction rate was very high. The filled expanders’ final volumes varied from 270 to 630 mL (average: 420 mL). The number of fat grafting sessions ranged between 2 and 3 (average 2.43), and the injected grafting volume during each session varied from 35 to 300 ml (average 175.43 ml). Expander deflation during each surgery session varied from 50 to 270 ml (average 100.63). No complications were reported. Our technique is useful and innovative and leads to good aesthetic results with shorter hospital recovery and low complications rates, compared to major reconstructive surgery. Moreover, the oncological safety appears to be uncompromised. Therapeutic, IV.

Keywords

Fat graft Reconstructive surgery Prosthetic implants Autologous tissue 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Giacomo Datta, Antongiulio Mangia, Nino Nicolò, Maria Piera Mano, Stefano Bruschi, Maria Grazia Baù, Alessandra Surace, declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All of the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all of the individual participants included in the study.

Financial disclosure statement

None of the authors have anything to disclose. No funding was received for this article.

Patient consent

Patients provided written consent for the use of their images.

References

  1. 1.
    Mioton LM, Smetona JT, Hanwright PJ, Seth AK, Wang E, Bilimoria KY, Gaido J, Fine NA, Kim JYS (2013) Comparing thirty-day outcomes in prosthetic and autologous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 13,082 patients? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(7):917–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elliott LF, Beegle PH, Hartrampf CR Jr (1990) The lateral transverse thigh free flap: an alternative for autogenous-tissue breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 85(2):169e78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Veiga DF, Neto MS, Ferreira LM et al (2004) Quality of life after pedicled TRAM flap delayed breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 57:252e7Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC (2002) Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(7):2265–2274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manconi A, De Lorenzi F, Chahuan B et al (2017) Total breast reconstruction with fat grafting after internal expansion and expander removal. Ann Plast Surg 78(4):392–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yoshimura K, Coleman SR (2015) Complications of fat grafting: how they occur and how to find, avoid and treat them. Clin Plast Surg 42(3):383–388 ixCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerber B, Marx M, Untch M, Faridi A (2015) Breast reconstruction following cancer treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int 112(35–36):593–600Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Datta G, Carlucci S, Bussone R (2009) Star and comet incisions for skin-sparing mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62(11):e528–e530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sullivan SR, Fletcher DR, Isom CD, Isik FF (2008) True incidence of all complications following immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(1):19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Veber M, Tourasse C, Toussoun G, Moutran M, Mojallal A, Delay E (2011) Radiographic findings after breast augmentation by autologous fat transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(3):1289–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mandrekas AD, Assimakopoulos GI, Mastorakos DP, Pantzalis K (1994) Fat necrosis following breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 47:560–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Choices N Breast implants—complications—NHS choices. Department of HealthGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lymperopoulos NS, Sofos S, Constantinides J, Koshy O, Graham K (2013) Blood loss and transfusion rates in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Introducing a new predictor. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66:1659–1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Benediktsson K, Perbeck L (2006) Capsular contracture around saline-filled and textured subcutaneously-placed implants in irradiated and non-irradiated breast cancer patients: five years of monitoring of a prospective trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cunningham BL, Lokeh A, Gutowski KA (2000) Saline filled breast implant safety and efficacy: a multicenter retrospective review. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2143–2149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA (2006) A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:757–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B, Manson PN (2003) Infectious complications following breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:467–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chang DW, Reece GP, Wang B, Robb GL, Miller MJ, Evans GRD, Langstein HN, Kroll SS (2000) Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2374–2380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Czerny V (1895) Plastischer Ersatz der Brustdruse durch ein Lipom. Zentralbl Chir 27:72Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rodby KA, Kaptein YE, Roring J, Jacobs RJ, Kang V, Quinn KP, Antony AK (2016) Evaluating autologous lipofilling for parry-Romberg syndrome-associated defects: a systematic literature review and case report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 53(3):339–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bircoll M (1987) Cosmetic breast augmentation utilizing autologous fat and liposuction techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 79:267e271Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Report on autologous fat transplantation, ASPRS Ad-Hoc committee on new procedures, Plast Surg Nurs 1987 (7) (September 30, 1987) 140e141Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Coleman SR (1997) Facial recontouring with lipostructure. Clin Plast Surg 24:347e367Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kroll SS (2000) Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:576–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryUniversity of Turin (Italy)TurinItaly
  2. 2.Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of Turin (Italy)TurinItaly
  3. 3.Department of Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, AOU Città della Salute e della ScienzaUniversity of Turin (Italy)TurinItaly
  4. 4.Department of GynecologyUniversity of Turin (Italy)TurinItaly

Personalised recommendations