Advertisement

An anatomical study of vascular communications between anterior tibial and peroneal osseosomes and its clinical application in proximal hemiarthroplasty of radiocarpal joint following tumor excision

  • Balakrishnan Thalaivirithan Margabandu
  • J. C. Charan
  • J. Jaganmohan
Original Paper

Abstract

Background

There are speculations that the proximal third fibular osseosomes, supplied by the anterior tibial vessels cannot be reliably recruited on the peroneal vessels supplying fibular diaphyseal osseosomes. Anatomical study by the authors eschewed this speculation and paved way for an evidence-based surgery. Cadaveric dissection, dye injection, and radiological studies revealed existence of a reliable anastomotic musculoperiosteal vessel between these two osseosomes that could effectively recruit the proximal fibular osseosomes on the peroneal vessels. Also, operative tips and tricks for safeguarding these anastomotic vessels were defined by the cadaveric study. Aesthetic and functional outcomes were assessed in five clinical cases, where the fibular heads were harvested reliably on the peroneal pedicle and stable wrist joints were reconstructed following oncological excisions.

Methods

Based on the evidence from the anatomical study, five clinical cases (three males and two females) affected by stage III GCT (giant cell tumor) of distal radius underwent microvascular fibular head hemiarthroplasty following tumor excision. Average follow-up of the patients was 18 months.

Results

At the end of follow-up period, all patients had an average MSTS (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society) score of 23. Scores ranged from 21 to 25. Patients had good functional outcomes with 69% average mobility in the reconstructed wrist when compared with the opposite normal wrist. Aesthesis of the reconstructed wrists were acceptable.

Conclusion

The cadaveric study demonstrated concrete anatomical evidence of existence of an anastomotic musculoperiosteal vessel between anterior tibial and peroneal fibular osseosomes in all the specimens. Clinical study validated the safety of the vascularized proximal fibular hemiarthroplasty on peroneal pedicle. It may be a reliable method for reconstruction of the radiocarpal joint in the post-GCT distal radius excision with good aesthetic and functional outcomes.

Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic study

Keywords

Microvascular proximal fibula hemiarthroplasty of radiocarpal joint Anterior tibial fibular osseosomes Peroneal fibular osseosomes Anastomotic musculoperiosteal vessel Distal end radius GCT 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof. Sudha Seshayyan, MS (Anatomy), director of Institute of Anatomy Madras Medical College, for her support and guidance in the anatomical study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Balakrishnan Thalaivirithan Margabandu, J. C. Charan and J. Jaganmohan  declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Informed consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal.

The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published, and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity.

Ethical approval

Institutional ethical committee has approved the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Innocenti M et al (2004) Vascularized proximal fibula transfer for distal radial reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg (Am Vol) 88(7):1504–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sun F-F, Jiu Y-H (2011) Reconstruction of distal radius following excision of grade III giant cell tumor: follow up of 18 cases. Int Orthod (SICOT) 35:577–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Serafin D (1996) Atlas of microsurgical composite tissue transplantation. W.B. Saunders Company. (Chapter 53):567–569Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Menezes-Leite MC, Dautel G, Duteille F, Lascombes P (2000) Transplantation of the proximal fibula based on the anterior tibial artery: anatomical study and clinical application. Surg Radiol Anat 22:235–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mozaffarian K, Lascombes P, Dautel G (2009) Vascular basis of free transfer of proximal epiphysis and diaphysis of fibula: an anatomical study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Innocenti M, Delcroix L, Romano GF (2005) Epiphyseal transplant: harvesting technique of the proximal fibula based on the anterior tibial artery. Microsurgery 25:284–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Innocenti M, Delcroix L, Manfrini M et al (2005) Vascularized proximal fibular epiphyseal transfer for distal radial reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(suppl 1):237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taylor GI, Wilson K R, Rees MD et al (1988) The anterior tibial vessels and their role in epiphyseal and diaphyseal transfer of the fibula: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg 41:451–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Restrepo J, Katz D, Gilbert A (1980) Arterial vascularization of the proximal epiphysis and the diaphysis of the fibula. Int J Microsurg 2:48–51Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bonnel F, Lesire M, Gomis R, Allieu Y, Rabischong P (1981) Arterial vascularization of the fibula microsurgical transplant techniques. Anat Clin 3:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pho RW, Patterson MH, Kour AK et al (1988) Free vascularised epiphyseal transplantation in upper extremity reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 13:440–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Innocenti M, Ceruso M, Manfrini M, Angeloni R, Lauri G, Capanna R, Bufalini C (1998) Free vascularised growth plate transfer after bone tumor resection in children. J Reconstr Microsurg 14:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Innocenti M, Delcroix L, Romano GF, Capanna R (2007) Vascularized epiphyseal transplant. Orthop Clin North Am 38:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bianchi G, Donari D, Staals EL et al (2005) Osteo articular allograft reconstruction of distal radius after bone tumor resection. J Hand Surg Br 30:369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cheng C, Shih HN, Hsu KY et al (2001) Treatment of giant cell tumor of the distal radius. Clin Orthop Relat Res 383:221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malck F, Kruger P, Hatmi ZN et al (2006) Local control of long bone giant cell tumor using curettage, burring, and bone grafting without adjuvant therapy. Int Orthop 30:495–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kawamura K, Yajima H, Kobata Y, Murata K, Shigematsu K, Maegawa N, Takakura Y (2009) Wrist arthrodesis with vascularized fibular grafting. J Reconstr Microsurg 25(8):501–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Minami A, Kato H, Iwasaki N (2002) Vascularized fibular graft after excision of giant cell tumor of the distal radius: wrist arthroplasty versus partial wrist arthrodesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:112–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Szabo RM, Anderson KA, Chen JL (2006) Functional outcome of en bloc excision and osteoarticular allograft replacement with the Sauve-Kapandji procedure for Campanacci grade III giant cell tumor of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am 31:1340–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Natarajan MV, Chandra Bose J, Vishwanath J et al (2009) Custom prosthetic replacement for distal radial tumors. Int Orthop 33(4):1081–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Faciomaxillary SurgeryMadras Medical CollegeChennai-3India

Personalised recommendations