Advertisement

European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 369–378 | Cite as

Management of nipple-areola complex ischemia after breast reduction: A systematic literature review and algorithm proposal

  • Alexandre Vairinho
  • Kevin Serror
  • Antoine De Runz
  • Warren Noel
  • Marc Chaouat
  • Maurice Mimoun
  • David Boccara
Review
  • 196 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Rare and dreaded, necrosis of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) is one of the major complications of breast reduction surgery. Our objective was to establish a management algorithm summarizing the different possible treatments reported in the literature.

Methods

The data extracted from the articles selected for this literature review covered surgical techniques, frequency of NAC necrosis, type of necrosis, and management proposed for women who have had this surgery for macromastia.

Results

In the 54 articles finally selected, the mean frequency of NAC necrosis was 5.1%. The risk factors for necrosis were the weight of the tissue resected, smoking, obesity, the surgical technique used, and stretch marks. The treatments proposed were listed according to four categories of issues: patient-specific susceptibility, type of breast, surgical technique, and its technical performance.

Conclusions

No consensus exists about the management of NAC necrosis, which remains a complication feared by surgeons. We propose a management algorithm that simplifies the therapeutic indications.

Level of Evidence: Not ratable

Keywords

Necrosis NAC Necrosis nipple-areola complex Breast reduction Outcomes Reduction mammoplasty Reduction mammaplasty Complications 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

A. Vairinho, K. Serror, A. De Runz, W. Noel, M. Chaouat, M. Mimoun, and D. Boccara declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Robert G, Duhamel A, Alet JM, Pelissier P, Pinsolle V (2014) Complications of breast reduction about 715 breasts. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 59(2):97–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Colen SR (2001) Breast reduction with use of the free nipple graft technique. Aesthet Surg J 21(3):261–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O'Dey DM, Prescher A, Pallua N (2007) Vascular reliability of nipple-areola complex-bearing pedicles: an anatomical microdissection study. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(4):1167–1177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Runz A, Zuily S, Gosset J, Wahl D, Simon E (2013) Particular catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome, on the sole surgical site after breast reduction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(11):e321–e324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bouhassira J, Haddad K, Burin des Roziers B, Achouche J, Cartier S (2015) Lactation after breast plastic surgery: literature review. Ann Chir Plast Esthét 60(1):54–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Colombo G, Garlaschi A, Stifanese R, Giunta G, Ruvolo V (2015) Necrosis of the nipple-areola complex in breast reduction. Our personal way to solve problem. Ann Ital Chir 86(2):156–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roth AC, Zook EG, Brown R, Zamboni WA (1996) Nipple-areolar perfusion and reduction mammaplasty: correlation of laser Doppler readings with surgical complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 97(2):381–386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cardenas-Camarena L (2009) Reduction mammoplasty with superolateral dermoglandular pedicle details of 15 years of experience. Ann Plast Surg 63(3):255–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blondeel PN, Hamdi M (2003) The latero-central glandular pedicle technique for breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 56(4):348–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nahabedian MY, Mofid MM (2002) Viability and sensation of the nipple-areolar complex after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 49(1):24–31; discussion 31-2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mandrekas AD, Zambacos GJ, Anastasopoulos A, Hapsas DA (1996) Reduction mammaplasty with the inferior pedicle technique: early and late complications in 371 patients. Br J Plast Surg 49(7):442–446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Setälä L, Papp A, Joukainen S, Martikainen R, Berg L, Mustonen P, Härmä M (2009) Obesity and complications in breast reduction surgery: are restrictions justified? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62(2):195–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O'Grady KF, Thoma A, Dal Cin A (2005) A comparison of complication rates in large and small inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(3):736–742CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    DeFazio MV, Fan KL, Avashia YJ, Tashiro J, Ovadia S, Husain T, Camison L, Panthaki ZJ, Salgado CJ, Thaller SR (2012) Inferior pedicle breast reduction: a retrospective review of technical modifications influencing patient safety, operative efficiency, and postoperative outcomes. Am J Surg 204(5):e7–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scott GR, Carson CL, Borah GL (2005) Maximizing outcomes in breast reduction surgery: a review of 518 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(6):1633–1639; discussion 1640-1CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brown AP, Hill C, Khan K (2000) Outcome of reduction mammaplasty—a patients’ perspective. Br J Plast Surg 53(7):584–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O'Blenes CA, Delbridge CL, Miller BJ, Pantelis A, Morris SF (2006) Prospective study of outcomes after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(2):351–358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guo K, Sun J, Qiao Q, Guo N, Guo L (2012) Safety, efficacy, and modifications of the dermal bra technique for reduction mammaplasty and ptosis correction: a 10-year retrospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(6):1237–1245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lugo LM, Prada M, Kohanzadeh S, Mesa JM, Long JN, de la Torre J (2013) Surgical outcomes of gigantomastia breast reduction superomedial pedicle technique: a 12-year retrospective study. Ann Plast Surg 70(5):533–537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cunningham BL, Gear AJ, Kerrigan CL et al (2005) Analysis of breast reduction complications derived from the BRAVO study. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(6):1597–1604CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zubowski R, Zins JE, Foray-Kaplon A, Yetman RJ, Lucas AR, Papay FA, Heil D, Hutton D (2000) Relationship of obesity and specimen weight to complications in reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(5):998–1003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schumacher HHA (2005) Breast reduction and smoking. Ann Plast Surg 54(2):117–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bikhchandani J, Varma SK, Henderson HP (2007) Is it justified to refuse breast reduction to smokers? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60(9):1050–1054CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krueger JK, Rohrich RJ (2001) Clearing the smoke: the scientific rationale for tobacco abstention with plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(4):1063–1073CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chang DW, Reece GP, Wang B, Robb GL, Miller MJ, Evans GRD, Langstein HN, Kroll SS (2000) Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(7):2374–2380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reinbold C, Rausky J, Binder JP, Revol M (2015) Urinary cotinine testing as pre-operative assessment of patients undergoing free flap surgery. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 60(1):e51–e57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    van Deventer PV, Page BJ, Graewe FR (2008) The safety of pedicles in breast reduction and mastopexy procedures. Aesthec Plast Surg 32(2):307–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Calderon W, Eulufi A, Borel C, Léniz P, Calderon D (2006) Total nipple-areola complex necrosis in inferior pedicle breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(1):292–293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hallock GG, Cusenz BJ (1986) Salvage of the congested nipple during reduction mammoplasty. Aesthec Plast Surg 10(3):143–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stolier AJ, Levine EA (2013) Reducing the risk of nipple necrosis: technical observations in 340 nipple-sparing mastectomies. Breast J 19(2):173–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Freeman M, Carney M, Matatov T, Vemula R, Babycos C (2015) Leech (Hirudo medicinalis) therapy for the treatment of nipple-areolar complex congestion following breast reduction. Eplasty 15:ic45PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lewin R, Göransson M, Elander A, Thorarinsson A, Lundberg J, Lidén M (2014) Risk factors for complications after breast reduction surgery. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 48(1):10–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    O'Dey DM, Baltes P, Bozkurt A, Pallua N (2011) Importance of the suprasternal notch to nipple distance (SSN:N) for vascular complications of the nipple areola complex (NAC) in the superior pedicle vertical mammaplasty: a retrospective analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(10):1278–1283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Basaran K, Saydam FA, Ersin I, Yazar M, Aygit AC (2014) The free-nipple breast-reduction technique performed with transfer of the nipple-areola complex over the superior or superomedial pedicles. Aesthet Plast Surg 38(4):718–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Herlin C, Bertheuil N, Bekara F, Boissiere F, Sinna R, Chaput B. Leech therapy in flap salvage: systematic review and practical recommendations. ANNPLA-1232; No. of Pages 13Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gorgu M, Ayhan M, Aytug Z, Aksungur E, Demirdover C (2007) Maximizing breast projection with combined free nipple graft reduction mammaplasty and back-folded dermaglandular inferior pedicle. Breast J 13(3):226–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fischer JP, Cleveland EC, Shang EK, Nelson JA, Serletti JM (2014) Complications following reduction mammaplasty: a review of 3538 cases from the 2005-2010 NSQIP data sets. Aesthet Surg J 34(1):66–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chauhan A, Sharma MM, Kumar K (2016) Evaluation of surgical outcomes of oncoplasty breast surgery in locally advanced breast cancer and comparison with conventional breast conservation surgery. Indian J Surg Oncol 7(4):413–419CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chauhan A, Sharma MM (2016) Evaluation of surgical outcomes following oncoplastic breast surgery in early breast cancer and comparison with conventional breast conservation surgery. Med J Armed Forces India 72(1):12–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tenofsky PL, Dowell P, Topalovski T, Helmer SD (2014) Surgical, oncologic, and cosmetic differences between oncoplastic and nononcoplastic breast conserving surgery in breast cancer patients. Am J Surg 207(3):398–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandre Vairinho
    • 1
  • Kevin Serror
    • 1
  • Antoine De Runz
    • 1
  • Warren Noel
    • 1
  • Marc Chaouat
    • 1
  • Maurice Mimoun
    • 1
  • David Boccara
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Burn SurgeryHospital Saint-LouisParisFrance

Personalised recommendations