European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 21–26 | Cite as

Breast augmentation combined with a transposed glandular flap for prevention and correction of lower pole deformities

  • Dmitry BatiukovEmail author
  • Vladimir Podgaiski
Original Paper



Lower pole deformities constitute the most complex problem encountered during and after breast augmentation. If the procedure is not accurately planned, the choice of techniques to correct lower pole deformity intraoperatively can be limited, leading to the possibility of additional scarring or the necessity of a second surgery.


Volume deficiencies of the lower pole after implant placement, such as flatness and double bubble, are indications for the proposed technique. A glandular flap is created by bisecting the lower pole of the gland and is transposed inwards and downwards to fill the deficient area. It is not necessary to fix the flap in place.


Between January 2011 and December 2014, 30 patients underwent breast augmentation or augmentation-mastopexy combined with a transposed glandular flap. A desired lower pole was achieved in all the cases. No major complications were observed.


The transposed glandular flap herein described was proven to be useful to correct volume deficiencies of the lower pole after implant placement in cases of primary and secondary cases of breast augmentation.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study


Breast augmentation Double bubble Inframammary crease Lower pole deformity Tuberous breast Glandular flap Revisional augmentation 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dmitry Batiukov and Vladimir Podgaiski declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Patient consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Ethical approval

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.



Supplementary material


(MP4 150,138 kb)


  1. 1.
    van Straalen WR, Hage JJ, Bloemena E (1995) The inframmamary ligament: myth or reality? Ann Plast Surg 35(2):237–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boutros S, Kattash M, Wienfeld A, Yuksel E, Baer S, Shenaq S (1998) The intradermal anatomy of the inframammary fold. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(4):1030–1033CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hammond D (2009) Atlas of aesthetic breast surgery. Elsevier, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Massiha H (2000) Augmentation in ptotic and densely glandular breasts: prevention, treatment and classification of double-bubble deformity. Ann Plast Surg 44:143–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spear S, Bulan E, Venturi M (2004) Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:73e–81eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hidalgo DA (2000) Breast augmentation: choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2202–2216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fisher J, Handel N (2014) Problems in breast surgery: a repair manual. CRC Press, FL 1:227--252Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Medard de Chardon V, Balaguer T, Chignon-Sicard B et al (2010) Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation, incidence, prevention and treatment. Ann Plast Surg 64:390–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de la Fuente A, del Yerro M (1992) Periareolar mastopexy with mammary implants. Aesthet Plast Surg 16:337–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rees TD, Aston SJ (1976) The tuberous breast. Clin Plast Surg 3:339–347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grolleau J-L, Lanfrey E, Lavigne B, Chavoin J-P, Costagliola M (1999) Breast base anomalies: treatment strategy for tuberous breasts, minor deformities, and asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:2040–2048CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scheepers JH, Quaba AA (1992) Tissue expansion in the treatment of tubular breast deformity. Br J Plast Surg 45:529–532CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tebbetts JB (2001) Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant–soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255–1272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meara JG, Kolker A, Bartlett G, Theile R, Mutimer K, Holmes AD (2000) Tuberous breast deformity: principles and practice. Ann Plast Surg 45:607–611CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mailard GF (1986) A Z mammaplasty with minimal scaring. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:66–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dinner MI, Dowden RV (1987) The tubular/tuberous breast syndrome. Ann Plast Surg 19:414–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Muti E (2010) Tuberous breast. Acta Medica Edizioni — Adottati, Fidenza, ParmaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Puckett CL, Concannon MJ (1990) Augmenting the narrow-based breast: the unfurling technique to prevent the double-bubble deformity. Aesthetic Plast Surg 14:15–19Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mandrekas AD, Zambacos GJ, Anastasopoulos A et al (2003) Aesthetic reconstruction of the tuberous breast deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1099–1108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ribeiro L, Canzi W, Buss A, Accorsi A Jr (1998) Tuberous breast: a new approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:42–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kolker AR, Collins MS (2015) Tuberous breast deformity: classification and treatment strategy for improving consistency in aesthetic correction. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:73–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Coleman SR, Saboeiro AP (2007) Fat grafting to the breast revisited: safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:775–785, 786-7Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bresnick SD (2016) Management of a common breast augmentation complication: treatment of the double-bubble deformity with fat grafting. Ann Plast Surg 76(1):18–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Handel N (2013) The double-bubble deformity: cause, prevention, and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(6):1434–1443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Muntan CD, Sundine MJ, Rink RD, Acland RD (2000) Inframammary fold: a histologic reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:549–556, 557Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barnett A (1990) Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation in the ptotic breast: augmentation by disruption of the extended pectoral fascia and parenchymal sweep. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:76–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shiffman MA (2005) Mammograms in cosmetic breast surgery. Indian J Plast Surg 38:100–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Miglioretti DL, Rutter CM, Geller BM et al (2004) Effects of breast augmentation on the accuracy of mammography and cancer characteristics. JAMA 291(4):442–450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lavigne E, Holowaty EJ, Pan SY et al (2013) Breast cancer detection and survival among women with cosmetic breast implants: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ 346:f2399Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brown L, Ferlo Todd J, Do Lou HM (2004) Breast implant adverse events during mammography: reports to the Food and Drug Administration. J Women's Health 13(4):371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim H, Kang BJ, Kim SH, Kim HS, Cha ES (2015) What we should know in mammography after reduction mammoplasty and mastopexy? Breast Cancer 22(4):391–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medical Center “Antes Med”MinskBelarus
  2. 2.Belorussian Medical Academy of Postgraduate EducationMinskBelarus
  3. 3.Medical Center “Chinevich and K”MinskBelarus

Personalised recommendations