Prediction of high proliferative index in pituitary macroadenomas using MRI-based radiomics and machine learning
- 208 Downloads
Pituitary adenomas are among the most frequent intracranial tumors. They may exhibit clinically aggressive behavior, with recurrent disease and resistance to multimodal therapy. The ki-67 labeling index represents a proliferative marker which correlates with pituitary adenoma aggressiveness. Aim of our study was to assess the accuracy of machine learning analysis of texture-derived parameters from pituitary adenomas preoperative MRI for the prediction of ki-67 proliferation index class.
A total of 89 patients who underwent an endoscopic endonasal procedure for pituitary adenoma removal with available ki-67 labeling index were included. From T2w MR images, 1128 quantitative imaging features were extracted. To select the most informative features, different supervised feature selection methods were employed. Subsequently, a k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) classifier was employed to predict macroadenoma high or low proliferation index. Algorithm validation was performed with a train-test approach.
Of the 12 subsets derived from feature selection, the best performing one was constituted by the 4 highest correlating parameters at Pearson’s test. These all showed very good (ICC ≥ 0.85) inter-observer reproducibility. The overall accuracy of the k-NN in the test group was of 91.67% (33/36) of correctly classified patients.
Machine learning analysis of texture-derived parameters from preoperative T2 MRI has proven to be effective for the prediction of pituitary macroadenomas ki-67 proliferation index class. This might aid the surgical strategy making a more accurate preoperative lesion classification and allow for a more focused and cost-effective follow-up and long-term management.
KeywordsMachine learning Magnetic resonance imaging Pituitary adenoma
No funding was received for this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Requirement for informed consent was waived by the local IRB.
- 2.Trouillas J, Roy P, Sturm N et al (2013) A new prognostic clinicopathological classification of pituitary adenomas: a multicentric case-control study of 410 patients with 8 years post-operative follow-up. Acta Neuropathol 126:123–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-013-1084-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Stanzione A, Cuocolo R, Cocozza S, Romeo V, Persico F, Fusco F, Longo N, Brunetti A, Imbriaco M (2019) Detection of extraprostatic extension of cancer on biparametric MRI combining texture analysis and machine learning: preliminary results. Acad Radiol:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.12.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Romeo V, Maurea S, Cuocolo R, Petretta M, Mainenti PP, Verde F, Coppola M, Dell’Aversana S, Brunetti A (2018) Characterization of adrenal lesions on unenhanced MRI using texture analysis: a machine-learning approach. J Magn Reson Imaging 48:198–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25954 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Cuocolo R, Stanzione A, Ponsiglione A, Romeo V, Verde F, Creta M, la Rocca R, Longo N, Pace L, Imbriaco M (2019) Clinically significant prostate cancer detection on MRI: a radiomic shape features study. Eur J Radiol 116:144–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.05.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Romeo V, Ricciardi C, Cuocolo R, Stanzione A, Verde F, Sarno L, Improta G, Mainenti PP, D’Armiento M, Brunetti A, Maurea S (2019) Machine learning analysis of MRI-derived texture features to predict placenta accreta spectrum in patients with placenta previa. Magn Reson Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.017
- 16.de Notaris M, Solari D, Cavallo LM, D’Enza AI, Enseñat J, Berenguer J, Ferrer E, Prats-Galino A, Cappabianca P (2012) The “suprasellar notch,” or the tuberculum sellae as seen from below: definition, features, and clinical implications from an endoscopic endonasal perspective. J Neurosurg 116:622–629. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.11.JNS111162 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, et al (2005) Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg FocusGoogle Scholar
- 18.Solari D, Cavallo LM, Cappabianca P (2014) Surgical approach to pituitary tumors. Handb Clin Neurol 124:291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59602-4.00019-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, de Divitiis O, Messina A, de Divitiis E (2008) Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery. In: Pickard JD, Akalan N, Di Rocco C et al (eds) Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery. Springer Vienna, Vienna, pp 151–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C, Hosny A, Aucoin N, Narayan V, Beets-Tan RGH, Fillion-Robin JC, Pieper S, Aerts HJWL (2017) Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res 77:e104–e107. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Leijenaar RTH, Nalbantov G, Carvalho S, van Elmpt WJC, Troost EGC, Boellaard R, Aerts HJWL, Gillies RJ, Lambin P (2015) The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis. Sci Rep 5:11075. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11075 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 29.Eibe F, Hall MA, Witten IH (2016) The WEKA Workbench. Online Appendix for “Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques,” Fourth Edi. Morgan KaufmannGoogle Scholar
- 30.Juntu J, Sijbers J, De Backer S et al (2010) Machine learning study of several classifiers trained with texture analysis features to differentiate benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors in T1-MRI images. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:680–689. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22095 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Thapar K, Kovacs K, Scheithauer BW, Stefaneanu L, Horvath E, Peter J. P, Murray D, Laws ER Jr (1996) Proliferative activity and invasiveness among pituitary adenomas and carcinomas: an analysis using the MIB-1 antibody. Neurosurgery 38:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199601000-00024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 46.Sanei Taheri M, Kimia F, Mehrnahad M, Saligheh Rad H, Haghighatkhah H, Moradi A, Kazerooni AF, Alviri M, Absalan A (2019) Accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging-magnetic resonance in differentiating functional from non-functional pituitary macro-adenoma and classification of tumor consistency. Neuroradiol J 32:74–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1971400918809825 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 48.Zeynalova A, Kocak B, Durmaz ES, Comunoglu N, Ozcan K, Ozcan G, Turk O, Tanriover N, Kocer N, Kizilkilic O, Islak C (2019) Preoperative evaluation of tumour consistency in pituitary macroadenomas: a machine learning-based histogram analysis on conventional T2-weighted MRI. Neuroradiology 61:767–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02211-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 50.Kocak B, Durmaz ES, Kadioglu P, Polat Korkmaz O, Comunoglu N, Tanriover N, Kocer N, Islak C, Kizilkilic O (2019) Predicting response to somatostatin analogues in acromegaly: machine learning-based high-dimensional quantitative texture analysis on T2-weighted MRI. Eur Radiol 29:2731–2739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5876-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar