Advertisement

Tissue-engineered aneurysm models for in vitro assessment of neurovascular devices

  • Tiffany W. Shen
  • Brandon Puccini
  • Kristen Temnyk
  • Scott Herting
  • Kristen O’Halloran CardinalEmail author
Interventional Neuroradiology
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Preclinical testing of neurovascular devices is crucial for successful device design and is commonly performed using in vivo organisms such as the rabbit elastase-induced aneurysm model; however, simple in vitro models may help further refine this testing paradigm. The purpose of the current work was to evaluate, and further develop, tissue-engineered blood vessel mimics (BVMs) as simple, early-stage models to assess neurovascular devices in vitro prior to animal or clinical use.

Methods

The first part of this work used standard straight-vessel BVMs to evaluate flow diverters at 1, 3, and 5 days post-deployment. The second part developed custom aneurysm-shaped scaffolds to create aneurysm BVMs. Aneurysm scaffolds were characterized based on overall dimensions and microstructural features and then used for cell deposition and vessel cultivation.

Results

It was feasible to deploy flow diverters within standard BVMs and cellular linings could withstand and respond to implanted devices, with increasing cell coverage over time. This provided the motivation and foundation for the second phase of work, where methods were successfully developed to create saccular, fusiform, and blister aneurysm scaffolds using a wax molding process. Results demonstrated appropriate fiber morphology within different aneurysm shapes, consistent cell deposition, and successful cultivation of aneurysm BVMs.

Conclusion

It is feasible to use tissue-engineered BVMs for assessing cellular responses to flow diverters, and to create custom aneurysm BVMs. This supports future use of these models for simple, early-stage in vitro testing of flow diverters and other neurovascular devices.

Keywords

Intracranial aneurysm In vitro techniques Feasibility studies Flow diverters Tissue engineering Biological assays 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Medtronic Neurovascular and Marc Dawson for providing the flow diverters.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. KOC has received funding from Medtronic Neurovascular and Stryker Neurovascular.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Wong JH, Tymianski R, Radovanovic I, Tymianski M (2015) Minimally invasive microsurgery for cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 46(9):2699–2706.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Writing Group M, Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, Das SR, de Ferranti S, Despres JP, Fullerton HJ, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Isasi CR, Jimenez MC, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Liu S, Mackey RH, Magid DJ, DK MG, Mohler ER 3rd, Moy CS, Muntner P, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Reeves MJ, Rodriguez CJ, Rosamond W, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Woo D, Yeh RW, Turner MB, American Heart Association Statistics C, Stroke Statistics S (2016) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 133(4):e38–e360.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    (2012) What you should know about cerebral aneurysms. Accessed May 2017Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maurice-Williams RS, Lafuente J (2003) Intracranial aneurysm surgery and its future. J R Soc Med 96(11):540–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Altes TA, Cloft HJ, Short JG, DeGast A, Do HM, Helm GA, Kallmes DF (2000) 1999 ARRS Executive Council Award. Creation of saccular aneurysms in the rabbit: a model suitable for testing endovascular devices. American Roentgen Ray Society. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(2):349–354.  https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cloft HJ, Altes TA, Marx WF, Raible RJ, Hudson SB, Helm GA, Mandell JW, Jensen ME, Dion JE, Kallmes DF (1999) Endovascular creation of an in vivo bifurcation aneurysm model in rabbits. Radiology 213(1):223–228.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc15223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Oliveira IA (2012) Main models of experimental saccular aneurysm in animals. In: Murai Y (ed) Aneurysm. IntechOpen, pp 43–64.  https://doi.org/10.5772/50310
  8. 8.
    Ding YH, Dai D, Lewis DA, Danielson MA, Kadirvel R, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF (2006) Long-term patency of elastase-induced aneurysm model in rabbits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(1):139–141Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fujiwara NH, Kallmes DF (2002) Healing response in elastase-induced rabbit aneurysms after embolization with a new platinum coil system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23(7):1137–1144Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kallmes DF, Fujiwara NH, Berr SS, Helm GA, Cloft HJ (2002) Elastase-induced saccular aneurysms in rabbits: a dose-escalation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23(2):295–298Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kallmes DF, Ding YH, Dai D, Kadirvel R, Lewis DA, Cloft HJ (2009) A second-generation, endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(6):1153–1158.  https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1530 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim BM, Kim DJ, Kim DI (2016) A new flow-diverter (the FloWise): in-vivo evaluation in an elastase-induced rabbit aneurysm model. Korean J Radiol 17(1):151–158.  https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.1.151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sadasivan C, Cesar L, Seong J, Wakhloo AK, Lieber BB (2009) Treatment of rabbit elastase-induced aneurysm models by flow diverters: development of quantifiable indexes of device performance using digital subtraction angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28(7):1117–1125.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2008.2012162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gailloud P, Pray JR, Muster M, Piotin M, Fasel JH, Rufenacht DA (1997) An in vitro anatomic model of the human cerebral arteries with saccular arterial aneurysms. Surg Radiol Anat 19(2):119–121Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sugiu K, Tokunaga K, Sasahara W, Watanabe K, Nishida A, Katsumata A, Kusaka N, Date I, Ohmoto T, Rufenacht DA (2004) Training in neurovascular intervention usefulness of in-vitro model and clinical practice. Interv Neuroradiol 10(Suppl 1):107–112.  https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199040100S118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nowicki KW, Hosaka K, He Y, McFetridge PS, Scott EW, Hoh BL (2014) Novel high-throughput in vitro model for identifying hemodynamic-induced inflammatory mediators of cerebral aneurysm formation. Hypertension 64(6):1306–1313.  https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03775 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Uzarski JS, Scott EW, McFetridge PS (2013) Adaptation of endothelial cells to physiologically-modeled, variable shear stress. PLoS One 8(2):e57004.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mannino RG, Myers DR, Ahn B, Wang Y, Margo R, Gole H, Lin AS, Guldberg RE, Giddens DP, Timmins LH, Lam WA (2015) Do-it-yourself in vitro vasculature that recapitulates in vivo geometries for investigating endothelial-blood cell interactions. Sci Rep 5:12401.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Touroo JS, Williams SK (2012) A tissue-engineered aneurysm model for evaluation of endovascular devices. J Biomed Mater Res A 100(12):3189–3196.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bonnema GT, Cardinal KO, Williams SK, Barton JK (2009) A concentric three element radial scanning optical coherence tomography endoscope. J Biophotonics 2(6–7):353–356.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.200910024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cardinal KO, Bonnema GT, Hofer H, Barton JK, Williams SK (2006) Tissue-engineered vascular grafts as in vitro blood vessel mimics for the evaluation of endothelialization of intravascular devices. Tissue Eng 12(12):3431–3438.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.3431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gibbons MC, Foley MA, Cardinal KO (2013) Thinking inside the box: keeping tissue-engineered constructs in vitro for use as preclinical models. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 19(1):14–30.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2012.0305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Herting S, diBartolomeo A, Pipes T, Kunz S, Temnyk K, T J, Ur S, Cardinal KO (2016) Human umbilical versus coronary cell sources for tissue-engineered blood vessel mimics. Appl In Vitro Toxicol 2(3):175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Punchard MA, O’Cearbhaill ED, Mackle JN, McHugh PE, Smith TJ, Stenson-Cox C, Barron V (2009) Evaluation of human endothelial cells post stent deployment in a cardiovascular simulator in vitro. Ann Biomed Eng 37(7):1322–1330.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9701-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Touroo JS, Dale JR, Williams SK (2013) Bioengineering human blood vessel mimics for medical device testing using serum-free conditions and scaffold variations. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 19(4):307–315.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2012.0311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beck J, Rohde S, el Beltagy M, Zimmermann M, Berkefeld J, Seifert V, Raabe A (2003) Difference in configuration of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms determined by biplanar digital subtraction angiography. Acta Neurochir 145(10):861–865; discussion 865.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-003-0124-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Forget TR Jr, Benitez R, Veznedaroglu E, Sharan A, Mitchell W, Silva M, Rosenwasser RH (2001) A review of size and location of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 49(6):1322–1325 discussion 1325–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Raghavan ML, Ma B, Harbaugh RE (2005) Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. J Neurosurg 102(2):355–362.  https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Seibert B, Tummala RP, Chow R, Faridar A, Mousavi SA, Divani AA (2011) Intracranial aneurysms: review of current treatment options and outcomes. Front Neurol 2:45.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2011.00045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weir B, Disney L, Karrison T (2002) Sizes of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms in relation to their sites and the ages of patients. J Neurosurg 96(1):64–70.  https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2002.96.1.0064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zheng Y, Xu F, Ren J, Xu Q, Liu Y, Tian Y, Leng B (2016) Assessment of intracranial aneurysm rupture based on morphology parameters and anatomical locations. J Neurointerv Surg 8:1240–1246.  https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pipes T (2014) Characterizing the reproducibility of the properties of electrospun poly (D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds for tissue-engineered blood vessel mimics. Cal PolyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering DepartmentCal PolySan Luis ObispoUSA
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentCal PolySan Luis ObispoUSA

Personalised recommendations