MRI findings in Parinaud’s syndrome: a closer look at pineal masses
- 314 Downloads
The association between MRI findings in patients with pineal lesions and the presence or absence of Parinaud’s syndrome (PS) remains poorly described. We sought to better understand what MRI characteristics of a pineal lesion make PS more likely. Can these features predict prognosis for clinical resolution? Based on the anatomical relationship of the pineal gland and midbrain, we hypothesized that the degree of midbrain injury by a pineal mass as assessed by abutment, displacement, or intrinsic midbrain signal abnormality (IMSA) may predict PS.
We reviewed our institution’s databases to find patients with MRI evidence of an intrinsic lesion of the pineal gland. Seventy-seven patients with intrinsic pineal gland lesions, 26 with PS and 51 without PS (NPS), were identified. Data regarding clinical history were collected, and an experienced neuroradiologist reviewed all MRI studies and recorded mass size, midbrain abutment, displacement by the pineal lesion, and presence or absence of IMSA.
IMSA occurred with increased frequency in pineal lesions with PS (85%) when compared with NPS (39.2%) (p = 0.0001). Midbrain abutment, compression, and displacement occurred with similar frequencies in both groups, with no statistically significant difference. Hydrocephalus was present in 80.8% of patients with PS and 84% without PS (p = 0.75).
IMSA in a patient with an intrinsic pineal gland mass is associated with PS. Other findings such as hydrocephalus and midbrain displacement are common in patients with pineal masses both with and without PS and do not have any predictive value.
KeywordsParinaud’s syndrome Pineal mass Intrinsic midbrain signal Hydrocephalus Midbrain displacement
No (without) Parinaud’s syndrome
Intrinsic midbrain signal abnormality
Compliance with ethical standards
No funding was received for this study.
Conflict of Interest
DY receives royalties from Elsevier, personal fees from Medicolegal consulting, speaker fees from ACR and other fees from Analytical Informatics.
All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
For this type of retrospective study formal consent is not required.
- 3.Feroze KB, Patel BC (2018) Parinaud syndrome. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28722922. Accessed 20 March 2018
- 6.Miller NR, Walsh FB, Hoyt WF (2005) Walsh and Hoyt’s clinical neuro-ophthalmology, vol 2. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 13.Adams R, Victor M, Ropper A (2005) Principle of neurology, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 14.Miller NR, Subramanian P, Patel V (2015) Supranuclear and internuclear ocular motor disorders. In: Walsh & Hoyt's clinical neuro-ophthalmology: the essentials. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 325–327Google Scholar
- 15.Liu GT, Volpe NJ, Galetta SL (2010) Eye movement disorders: conjugate gaze abnormalities. In: Neuro-ophthalmology: diagnosis and management. Elsevier Health Sciences, London, pp 573–575Google Scholar