Advertisement

Neuroradiology

, Volume 61, Issue 2, pp 183–193 | Cite as

Normal development of costal element ossification centers of sacral vertebrae in the fetal spine: a postmortem magnetic resonance imaging study

  • Nan Jian
  • Nan Lin
  • Mi-Mi Tian
  • Shuai Zhang
  • Guan Li
  • Hui Zhao
  • Lian-Xiang Xiao
  • Wen-Jia Liang
  • Xiang-Tao LinEmail author
Paediatric Neuroradiology

Abstract

Purpose

This postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of the fetal spine aimed to describe the timing of appearance, shape, volume, and relative positions of the S1–S3 costal element ossification centers (CEOCs).

Methods

We obtained sagittal 3D dual-echo steady-state with water excitation T2 images of the entire spine in 71 fetuses (gestational ages (GAs), 17–42 weeks). Computed tomography and histological examinations were performed on two fetal specimens (GAs, 21 and 30 weeks) to validate the MR images. The presence/absence of each sacral CEOC was recorded according to the GA. CEOC volume was measured. We analyzed the CEOC position relative to the vertebral column and ilium.

Results

The S1, S2, and S3 CEOCs first appeared at 23, 22, and 29 weeks, respectively. The S1 and S2 CEOCs could be detected in all fetuses with GAs of ≥ 30 weeks and ≥ 35 weeks, respectively, while the S3 CEOCs were variably present until term. The percentages of detection of the S1 and S2 CEOCs were significantly greater than that of the S3 CEOCs at each GA. At S1 and S2, the CEOC volume increased exponentially with GA. The relative positions of the S1 and S2 CEOCs, but not the S3 CEOCs, significantly correlated with GA (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

We have described the timeline of appearance as well as the volume and position of the S1–S3 CEOCs in the fetal spine on postmortem MRI according to GA.

Keywords

Fetal spine Costal element ossification center Sacrum 

Abbreviations

CEOC

Costal element ossification center

COC

Centrum ossification center

NAOC

Neural arch ossification center

GA

Gestational age

IVD

Intervertebral disc

3D DESS WE

Three-dimensional dual-echo steady-state with water excitation

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

CT

Computed tomography

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Code: 31371213) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (Project Code: ZR2013HM091).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Shandong University Ethics Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

234_2018_2147_MOESM1_ESM.doc (28 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 28.0 kb)
234_2018_2147_Fig8_ESM.png (421 kb)
Supplementary Fig. S1

Three-dimensional images obtained using the “ROI volume” tool in Osirix showing the a1d1 right and a2d2 left S1 costal element ossification centers in fetuses aged a1, a2 28, b1, b2 30, c1, c2 36, and d1, d2 39 weeks (PNG 420 kb)

234_2018_2147_MOESM2_ESM.tif (4.2 mb)
High Resolution Image (TIF 4345 kb)
234_2018_2147_MOESM3_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary Table S1 Distribution of the fetuses studied according to gestational age (GA) (DOCX 18 kb)
234_2018_2147_MOESM4_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary Table S2 Functions of relative positions (distance A and B) of S1 and S2 CEOCs (DOCX 15 kb)
234_2018_2147_MOESM5_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary Table S3 Multiple pairwise comparisons of the BA ratios at the S1, S2, and S3 vertebral levels for the left or right side. The statistical test selected depended on whether or not the difference between two ratios was normally distributed (DOCX 15 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Scheuer L, Black S (2000) The vertebral column. In: Scheuer L, Black S (eds) Developmental juvenile osteology. Academic Press, London, pp 171–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’Rahilly R, Müller F, Meyer DB (1990) The human vertebral column at the end of the embryonic period proper 4. The sacrococcygeal region. J Anat 168:95–111Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Francis C (1951) Appearance of centers of ossification in the human pelvis before birth. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther 65(5):778–783Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bardeen CR (1905) Studies of the development of the human skeleton. (A). The development of the lumbar, sacral and coccygeal vertebrae. (B). The curves and the proportionate regional lengths of the spinal column during the first three months of embryonic development. (C). The development of the skeleton of the posterior limb. Am J Anat 4(3):265–302.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000040302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kliewer MA, Hertzberg BS, George P, Baumeister LA, Black BL, McNally PJ, Ahearn EP, Bowie JD (1995) Fetal bifid sacrum artifact: normal developmental anatomy simulating malformation. Radiology 195(3):673–676.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.195.3.7753992 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Widjaja E, Whitby EH, Paley MN, Griffiths PD (2006) Normal fetal lumbar spine on postmortem MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(3):553–559Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Guihard-Costa A-M, Ménez F, Delezoide A-L (2002) Organ weights in human fetuses after formalin fixation: standards by gestational age and body weight. Pediatr Dev Pathol 5(6):559–578.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10024-002-0036-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chabert S, Villalobos M, Ulloa P, Salas R, Tejos C, San Martin S, Pereda J (2012) Quantitative description of the morphology and ossification center in the axial skeleton of 20-week gestation formalin-fixed human fetuses using magnetic resonance images. Prenat Diagn 32(3):252–258.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2942 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O'Rahilly R, Müller F, Meyer D (1990) The human vertebral column at the end of the embryonic period proper. 3 The thoracicolumbar region. J Anat 168:81–93Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Forseen SE, Borden NM (2015) The sacrum and coccyx. In: Forseen SE, Borden NM (eds) Imaging anatomy of the human spine: a comprehensive atlas including adjacent structures. Springer Publishing Company, New York, pp 233–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Broome DR, Hayman LA, Herrick RC, Braverman RM, Glass RB, Fahr LM (1998) Postnatal maturation of the sacrum and coccyx: MR imaging, helical CT, and conventional radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170(4):1061–1066.  https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.170.4.9530059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flecker H (1942) Time of appearance and fusion of ossification centers as observed by roentgenographic methods. AJR 47:97–159Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aoyama H, Asamoto K (2000) The developmental fate of the rostral/caudal half of a somite for vertebra and rib formation: experimental confirmation of the resegmentation theory using chick-quail chimeras. Mech Dev 99(1–2):71–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00481-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MedicineShandong UniversityJinanChina
  2. 2.CT DepartmentHeze Municipal HospitalHezeChina
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyShandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong UniversityJinanChina
  4. 4.College of RadiologyTaishan Medical UniversityTaianChina
  5. 5.Shandong Medical Imaging Research InstituteShandong UniversityJinanChina
  6. 6.School of Basic Medical ScienceShandong UniversityJinanChina

Personalised recommendations