, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 387–393 | Cite as

Tonsillar pulsatility before and after surgical decompression for children with Chiari malformation type 1: an application for true fast imaging with steady state precession

  • Alireza RadmaneshEmail author
  • Jacob K. Greenberg
  • Arindam Chatterjee
  • Matthew D. Smyth
  • David D. LimbrickJr.
  • Aseem Sharma
Paediatric Neuroradiology



We hypothesize that surgical decompression for Chiari malformation type 1 (CM-1) is associated with statistically significant decrease in tonsillar pulsatility and that the degree of pulsatility can be reliably assessed regardless of the experience level of the reader.


An Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant retrospective study was performed on 22 children with CM-1 (8 males; mean age 11.4 years) who had cardiac-gated true-FISP sequence and phase-contrast cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow imaging as parts of routine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging before and after surgical decompression. The surgical technique (decompression with or without duraplasty) was recorded for each patient. Three independent radiologists with different experience levels assessed tonsillar pulsatility qualitatively and quantitatively and assessed peritonsillar CSF flow qualitatively. Results were analyzed. To evaluate reliability, Fleiss kappa for multiple raters on categorical variables and intra-class correlation for agreement in pulsatility ratings were calculated.


After surgical decompression, the degree of tonsillar pulsatility appreciably decreased, confirmed by t test, both qualitatively (p values <0.001, <0.001, and 0.045 for three readers) and quantitatively (amount of decrease/p value for three readers 0.7 mm/<0.001, 0.7 mm/<0.001, and 0.5 mm/0.022). There was a better agreement among the readers in quantitative assessment of tonsillar pulsatility (kappa 0.753–0.834), compared to qualitative assessment of pulsatility (kappa 0.472–0.496) and qualitative assessment of flow (kappa 0.056 to 0.203). Posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty led to a larger decrease in tonsillar pulsatility, compared to posterior fossa decompression alone.


Tonsillar pulsatility in CM-1 is significantly reduced after surgical decompression. Quantitative assessment of tonsillar pulsatility was more reliable across readers than qualitative assessments of tonsillar pulsatility or CSF flow.


Chiari malformation Cerebellar tonsil TrueFISP Flow imaging Posterior fossa decompression 



This study was supported by the Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences grants UL1 TR000448 and TL1 TR000449 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. This study was also supported in part through philanthropic funding provided by the Park-Reeves Syringomyelia Research Consortium, the O’Keefe family, and Mateo Dalla Fontana. The authors would like to thank Michael Wallendorf from the Department of Biostatistics at the Washington University in St. Louis for his significant contributions to this manuscript.

Ethical standards and patient consent

We declare that all human and animal studies have been approved by the Institutional Review Board and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. We declare that IRB no. 201102012 waived informed consent for this retrospective study.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material


(MP4 310 kb)


(MP4 700 kb)


  1. 1.
    Heiss JD, Suffredini G, Bakhtian KD, Sarntinoranont M, Oldfield EH (2012) Normalization of hindbrain morphology after decompression of Chiari malformation type I. J Neurosurg 117(5):942–946. doi: 10.3171/2012.8.jns111476 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhadelia RA, Bogdan AR, Wolpert SM, Lev S, Appignani BA, Heilman CB (1995) Cerebrospinal fluid flow waveforms: analysis in patients with Chiari I malformation by means of gated phase-contrast MR imaging velocity measurements. Radiology 196(1):195–202. doi: 10.1148/radiology.196.1.7784567 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wetjen NM, Heiss JD, Oldfield EH (2008) Time course of syringomyelia resolution following decompression of Chiari malformation Type I. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1(2):118–123. doi: 10.3171/ped/2008/1/2/118 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hekman KE, Aliaga L, Straus D, Luther A, Chen J, Sampat A, Frim D (2012) Positive and negative predictors for good outcome after decompressive surgery for Chiari malformation type 1 as scored on the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale. Neurol Res 34(7):694–700. doi: 10.1179/1743132812y.0000000066 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heiss JD, Patronas N, DeVroom HL, Shawker T, Ennis R, Kammerer W, Eidsath A, Talbot T, Morris J, Eskioglu E, Oldfield EH (1999) Elucidating the pathophysiology of syringomyelia. J Neurosurg 91(4):553–562. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.91.4.0553 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McGirt MJ, Nimjee SM, Floyd J, Bulsara KR, George TM (2005) Correlation of cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics and headache in Chiari I malformation. Neurosurgery 56(4):716–721, discussion 716–721CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McGirt MJ, Nimjee SM, Fuchs HE, George TM (2006) Relationship of cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging with outcome after decompression for Chiari I malformations. Neurosurgery 59(1):140–146. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000219841.73999.b3, discussion 140–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pujol J, Roig C, Capdevila A, Pou A, Marti-Vilalta JL, Kulisevsky J, Escartin A, Zannoli G (1995) Motion of the cerebellar tonsils in Chiari type I malformation studied by cine phase-contrast MRI. Neurology 45(9):1746–1753CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oldfield EH, Muraszko K, Shawker TH, Patronas NJ (1994) Pathophysiology of syringomyelia associated with Chiari I malformation of the cerebellar tonsils. Implications for diagnosis and treatment. J Neurosurg 80(1):3–15. doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.80.1.0003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cousins J, Haughton V (2009) Motion of the cerebellar tonsils in the foramen magnum during the cardiac cycle. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(8):1587–1588. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1507 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hentschel S, Mardal KA, Lovgren AE, Linge S, Haughton V (2010) Characterization of cyclic CSF flow in the foramen magnum and upper cervical spinal canal with MR flow imaging and computational fluid dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31(6):997–1002. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1995 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reubelt D, Small LC, Hoffmann MH, Kapapa T, Schmitz BL (2009) MR imaging and quantification of the movement of the lamina terminalis depending on the CSF dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(1):199–202. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1306 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sharma A, Parsons MS, Pilgram TK (2012) Balanced steady-state free-precession MR imaging for measuring pulsatile motion of cerebellar tonsils during the cardiac cycle: a reliability study. Neuroradiology 54(2):133–138. doi: 10.1007/s00234-011-0861-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sharma A, Moran K, Smyth M, Limbrick D, Pilgram T (2011) Assessment of tonsillar pulsatility in patients with and without tonsillar ectopia using cardiac-gated balanced steady-state precession MR imaging. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, Seattle, WA, 2011Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haacke EM, Wielopolski PA, Tkach JA, Modic MT (1990) Steady-state free precession imaging in the presence of motion: application for improved visualization of the cerebrospinal fluid. Radiology 175(2):545–552. doi: 10.1148/radiology.175.2.2326480 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aliaga L, Hekman KE, Yassari R, Straus D, Luther G, Chen J, Sampat A, Frim D (2012) A novel scoring system for assessing Chiari malformation type I treatment outcomes. Neurosurgery 70(3):656–664. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31823200a6, discussion 664–655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yarbrough CK, Greenberg JK, Smyth MD, Leonard JR, Park TS, Limbrick DD Jr (2014) External validation of the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale. J Neurosurg Pediatr 13(6):679–684. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.peds13503 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kundel HL, Polansky M (2003) Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 228(2):303–308. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2282011860 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hofmann E, Warmuth-Metz M, Bendszus M, Solymosi L (2000) Phase-contrast MR imaging of the cervical CSF and spinal cord: volumetric motion analysis in patients with Chiari I malformation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21(1):151–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alperin N, Loftus JR, Oliu CJ, Bagci A, Lee SH, Ertl-Wagner B, Green B, Sekula R (2014) MRI measures of posterior cranial fossa morphology and CSF physiology in Chiari malformation type I. Neurosurgery. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000000507 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bunck AC, Kroeger JR, Juettner A, Brentrup A, Fiedler B, Crelier GR, Martin BA, Heindel W, Maintz D, Schwindt W, Niederstadt T (2012) Magnetic resonance 4D flow analysis of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in Chiari I malformation with and without syringomyelia. Eur Radiol 22(9):1860–1870. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2457-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Durham SR, Fjeld-Olenec K (2008) Comparison of posterior fossa decompression with and without duraplasty for the surgical treatment of Chiari malformation type I in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2(1):42–49. doi: 10.3171/ped/2008/2/7/042 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shaffer N, Martin B, Loth F (2011) Cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in type I Chiari malformation. Neurol Res 33(3):247–260. doi: 10.1179/016164111x12962202723805 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yiallourou TI, Kroger JR, Stergiopulos N, Maintz D, Martin BA, Bunck AC (2012) Comparison of 4D phase-contrast MRI flow measurements to computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebrospinal fluid motion in the cervical spine. PLoS One 7(12):e52284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052284 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alireza Radmanesh
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jacob K. Greenberg
    • 3
  • Arindam Chatterjee
    • 2
  • Matthew D. Smyth
    • 3
  • David D. LimbrickJr.
    • 3
  • Aseem Sharma
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Biomedical ImagingUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Mallinckrodt Institute of RadiologyWashington University School of MedicineSt LouisUSA
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgeryWashington University School of MedicineSt LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations