Advertisement

Heat and Mass Transfer

, Volume 55, Issue 12, pp 3575–3587 | Cite as

Numerical investigation on the flow character and film cooling performance of novel merged holes structure

  • Junfei Zhou
  • Xinjun WangEmail author
  • Jun LiEmail author
  • Weitao Hou
Original
  • 87 Downloads

Abstract

In order to investigate the flow characteristics and film cooling performance of novel merged holes cooling method, merged cylindrical holes structures have been applied on a flat plate with three merging ratios under three blowing ratios. Single cylindrical hole film cooling structure is also established as a benchmark structure. The numerical results of the single cylindrical hole are validated with the experimental results available in open literatures. The discharge coefficient, aerodynamic loss, tangential velocity vectors and total vorticity distributions are studied and compared. The spanwise averaged film cooling effectiveness and adiabatic temperature contours are studied and compared. Results show that the development of the kidney vortex is impeded and the film cooling performance is promoted in merged holes cooling cases. The blowing ratio and merging ratio both affect the cooling performance of merged holes cooling cases. In this paper, the best film cooling performance is obtained at the biggest merging ratio.

Keywords

Flat plate film cooling Merged holes cooling Gas turbine Numerical simulation 

Nomenclature

Ah

cross section area of one film cooling hole (m2)

Cd

discharge coefficient of film cooling hole

D

diameter of cylindrical jet hole (m)

DMH

diameter of each circle of the merged holes structure (m)

M

blowing ratio

mass flow rate (kg·s−1)

mh

cooling air mass flow rate through one film cooling hole (kg·s−1)

P

static pressure (Pa)

Pe

static pressure at the film cooling hole exit (Pa)

Pte

total pressure at the film cooling hole outlet (Pa)

Ptmain

total pressure at the mainstream inlet (Pa)

Ptc

total pressure at the film cooling hole inlet (Pa)

S

distance between two merged cylindrical holes (m)

T

temperature (K)

Ttc

total temperature at the film cooling hole inlet (K)

Tu

turbulent intensity

TV

total vorticity

U

velocity (m·s−1)

u

velocity along x direction (m·s−1)

v

velocity along y direction (m·s−1)

w

velocity along z direction (m·s−1)

x

coordinate along the chamber axial direction (m)

y

coordinate along the jet hole axial direction (m)

y+

non-dimensional wall distance

z

coordinate along the direction normal to both the x and y directions (m)

Greek letter

β

merging ratio of the merged holes structure

θ

film cooling hole inclination angle (°)

η

film cooling effectiveness

\( \overline{\eta} \)

span averaged film cooling effectiveness

Δη

span averaged film cooling effectiveness enhancement in merged holes cooling cases

μ

dynamic viscosity (Pa·s−1)

ρ

density (kg·m−3)

Subscript

aw

adiabatic wall

c

coolant

h

one film cooling hole

in

inlet

main

mainstream air

out

mainstream channel outlet

overall

overall averaged parameter of the flat plate surface

t

parameter with total value

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Andreopoulos J, Rodi W (1984) Experimental investigation of jets in a crossflow. J Fluid Mech 138:93–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gogineni SP, Rivir RB, Pestian DJ, Goss LP (1996) PIV measurements of flat plate film cooling flows with high free stream turbulence. AIAA paper 96:0617Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldstein RJ, Eckert ERG, Burggraf F (1974) Effects of hole geometry and density on three-dimensional film cooling. Int J Heat Mass Transf 17:595–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thole K, Gritsch M, Schulz A, Wittig S Flowfield measurements for film-cooling holes with expanded exits, ASME Paper 96-GT-174Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haven BA, Yamagata DK, Kurosaka M, Yamawaki S, Maya T Anti-kidney pair of vortices in shaped holes and their influence on film cooling effectiveness, ASME Paper 97-GT-045Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bunker RS Film cooling effectiveness due to discrete holes within a transverse surface slot. ASME Paper GT2002–30178Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang X, Liu Z, Feng ZP (2015) Numerical evaluation of novel shaped holes for enhancing film cooling performance. Journal of Heat Transfer transactions of the ASME 137(7):071701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bunker RS (2005) A review of shaped hole turbine film-cooling technology. J Heat Transf 127:441–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wei JS, Zhu HR, Liu CL, Song H, Liu C, Meng T Experimental study on the film cooling characteristics of the cylindrical holes embedded in sine-wave shaped trench. ASME Paper GT2016–56856Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalghatgi P, Acharya S (2015) Improved film cooling effectiveness with a round film cooling hole embedded in a contoured crater. J Turbomach 137(10):101006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sargison JE, Guo SM, Oldfield MLG, Lock G, Rawlinson AJ (2002) A converging slot-hole film-cooling geometry—part 1: low-speed flat-plate heat transfer and loss. J Turbomach 124:453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sargison JE, Guo SM, Oldfield MLG, Lock G, Rawlinson AJ (2002) A converging slot-hole film-cooling geometry—part 2: transonic nozzle guide vane heat transfer and loss. J Turbomach 124:461–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Javadi A, Javadi K, Taeibi-Rahni M, Darbandi M (2003) A new approach to improve film cooling effectiveness using combined jets. Momentum 2:2zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Javadi K, Taeibi-Rahni M, Darbandi M (2007) Jet-into-crossflow boundary-layer control: innovation in gas turbine blade cooling. AIAA J 45(12):2910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Al-Zurfi N, Turan A, Nasser A (2016) Numerical investigation of rotation effects on anti-vortex film-cooling holes. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 96(1):133–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heidmann JD, Ekkad S (2008) A novel antivortex turbine film-cooling hole concept. J Turbomach 130(3):031020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dhungel A, Lu Y, Phillips W, Ekkad SV, Heidmann J (2009) Film cooling from a row of holes supplemented with antivortex holes. J Turbomach 131(2):021007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Soe MKK, Ting DS, Hong W (2011) Analysis of film cooling effectiveness on antivortex hole. in: 2011 international conference on consumer electronics, communications and networks, IEEE, 4763–4766Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ely MJ, Jubran BA (2009) A numerical study on improving large angle film cooling performance through the use of sister holes. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications 55(7):634–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ely MJ, Jubran B (2009) A numerical evaluation on the effect of sister holes on film cooling effectiveness and the surrounding flow field. Heat Mass Transf 45:1435–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ely MJ, Jubran B (2010) A parametric study on the effect of sister hole location on active film cooling flow control. in: ASME Turbo expo 2010: power for land, sea, and air, ASME, 1301–1311Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ely MJ, Jubran B (2012) Film cooling from short holes with sister hole influence. in: ASME Turbo expo 2012: turbine technical conference and exposition, ASME, 1185–1196Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khajehhasani S, Jubran BA Film cooling from circular and elliptical exit shaped holes with sister hole influence. ASME Paper GT2013–95138Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khajehhasani S, Jubran B Film cooling from novel sister shaped single-holes. ASME Paper GT2014-25971Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khajehhasani S, Jubran BA (2015) Numerical assessment of the film cooling through novel sister-shaped single-hole schemes. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications 67(4):414–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wu H, Cheng H, Li Y, Rong C, Ding S (2016) Effects of side hole position and blowing ratio on sister hole film cooling performance in a flat plate. Appl Therm Eng 93:718–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sun X, Zhao G, Jiang P, Peng W, Wang J (2017) Influence of hole geometry on film cooling effectiveness for a constant exit flow area. Appl Therm Eng 130:1404–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gritsch M, Schulz A, Wittig S Discharge coefficient measurements of film-cooling holes with expanded exits. ASME Paper 97-GT-165Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Colban W, Gratton A, Thole KA, Haendler M (2006) Heat transfer and film-cooling measurements on a Stator vane with fan-shaped cooling holes. J Turbomach 128(1):299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Turbomachinery, Shaanxi Engineering Laboratory of Turbomachinery and Power EquipmentXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations