Heat and mass transfer performance of wet air flowing around circular and elliptic tube in plate fin heat exchangers for air cooling
- 64 Downloads
Fin and tube heat exchangers are widely used in air conditioning. In this study the effect of tube shape on air-side heat and mass performance was experimentally and numerically investigated under typical operating condition, varying both dry bulb temperature and air flow velocity. The experimental results showed that the dry-bulb temperature has little impact on sensible heat transfer rate, whereas the mass transfer rate increased with the increase of dry-bulb temperature. Compared with circular tube, the heat transfer coefficient of elliptic tube is about 66% higher and the dehumidifying coefficient is around 21% higher. However, the difference of the dehumidifying coefficient between two tube shapes shrinks towards equality when the dry bulb temperature reaches to 28 °C. To further discuss the heat transfer mechanism of circular and elliptic tube heat exchangers, three-dimensional numerical simulations were conducted based on the experiments. The results showed that the heat and mass transfer performance was closely related to the tube shape. When wet air flowed around elliptic tube, the streamline shape served to make the flow and temperature field uniform. The flow boundary layer as well as temperature boundary layer was thinned, especially on the upstream and downstream of tubes, so the influence of wake was reduced and the water vapor was efficiently removed. This results in improvement of the heat and mass transfer performance in the wake region of each tube. For the same heat duty, the plate fin heat exchanger with elliptic tube is more compact than that with circular tube.
Constant coefficient [−]
Specific heat of fluid [kJ·kg−1·K−1]
Computational Fluid Dynamics
Absolute humidity [kg·kg−1·dry air]
Hydraulic diameter [m]
Volumetric flow rate [m3·h−1]
Maximum mass velocity based on the minimum flow area [kg·m−2·s−1]
Heat transfer coefficient of air [W·K−1·m−2]
Mass transfer coefficient of air [kg·s−1·m−2]
Streamwise length of heat exchanger [m]
Thermal heat [kW]
latent heat [kJ·kg−1]
This Project is supported by Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51606047) and Guangzhou City High School “Yangcheng Scholar” Project (No. 1201581559).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work.
- 3.Admiraal KM, Bullard CW (1995) Experimental validation of heat exchanger models for refrigerator/freezers. ASHRAE Trans 101(1):34–43Google Scholar
- 19.Xi G, Ebisu T, Torikoshi K (1997) Differences in simulation with twoand three-dimensional models for finned tube heat exchangers, In: Transport phenomena in thermal science and process engineering, Kyoto, Japan: 755–760Google Scholar
- 29.ANSYS ICEM CFD, https://www.ansys.com/products/platform/ansys-meshing
- 30.ANSYS Fluent, https://www.ansys.com/products/fluids/ansys-fluent
- 31.Ansys Fluent 13.0, theory guide, pressure-velocity couplingGoogle Scholar