Advertisement

Thermal and hydraulic performance of a heat exchanger working with carbon-water nanofluid

  • M. M. SarafrazEmail author
  • M. Silakhori
  • S. A. Madani
  • M. V. Kiamahalleh
  • O. Pourmehran
Original
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

In the present paper, the heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics of a copper-made heat exchanger were experimentally studied. The configuration of the heat exchanger was a double pipe and carbon-water nanofluid was utilised as a heat-exchanging medium within the heat exchanger. Experiments were conducted at volume fractions 0.1–1% and Reynolds number 800–10500. Plausible effect of various parameters including the nanofluid flow rate, nanoparticles’ volumetric concentration and film temperature on the overall heat transfer coefficient (HTC) were investigated. Results showed that carbon/water nanofluid can offer a great potential for cooling applications. It was found that the flow rate of nanofluid; concentration and temperature of nanofluid can enhance the HTC. Interestingly, the presence of carbon nanoparticles within the base fluid resulted in the augmentation of pressure drop. This was because of the enhancement in friction factor parameter between layers of the base fluid and the augmentation in fluid viscosity, which is attributed to the presence of nano-carbons, which increased the pressure drop. Significant improvement in overall HTC was registered (44% enhancement) achieved at vol.% =1. The penalty of 14% was reported for the pressure drop at vol.% = 1, which offers a trade-off between the increase in the value of HTC and augmentation in the value of pressure drop. The maximum value for thermal hydraulic performance of the system was 42.2% at Reynolds number 10200 and vol.% = 1.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors of the article declare that there is no conflict of interest between the authors or any third parties including institutions.

References

  1. 1.
    Farajollahi B, Etemad SG, Hojjat M (2010) Heat transfer of nanofluids in a shell and tube heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53:12–17CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohammed HA, Bhaskaran G, Shuaib NH, Saidur R (2011) Heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics in microchannels heat exchanger using nanofluids: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:1502–1512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li Q, Xuan Y (2002) Convective heat transfer and flow characteristics of Cu-water nanofluid. Science in China Series E: Technolgical Science 45:408–416Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reddy MCS, Rao VV (2014) Experimental investigation of heat transfer coefficient and friction factor of ethylene glycol water based TiO2 nanofluid in double pipe heat exchanger with and without helical coil inserts. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 50:68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pandey SD, Nema VK (2012) Experimental analysis of heat transfer and friction factor of nanofluid as a coolant in a corrugated plate heat exchanger. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 38:248–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghozatloo A, Rashidi A, Shariaty-Niassar M (2014) Convective heat transfer enhancement of graphene nanofluids in shell and tube heat exchanger. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 53:136–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zamzamian A, Oskouie SN, Doosthoseini A, Joneidi A, Pazouki M (2011) Experimental investigation of forced convective heat transfer coefficient in nanofluids of Al2O3/EG and CuO/EG in a double pipe and plate heat exchangers under turbulent flow. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 35:495–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garoosi F, Hoseininejad F, Rashidi MM (2016) Numerical study of heat transfer performance of nanofluids in a heat exchanger. Appl Therm Eng 105:436–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. M. Sarafraz, Iskander Tlili, Mohammad Abdul Baseer, Mohammad Reza Safaei, (2019) Potential of Solar Collectors for Clean Thermal Energy Production in Smart Cities using Nanofluids: Experimental Assessment and Efficiency Improvement. Applied Sciences 9 (9):1877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Salari, S. M. Peyghambarzadeh, M. M. Sarafraz, F. Hormozi, V. Nikkhah, (2017) Thermal behavior of aqueous iron oxide nano-fluid as a coolant on a flat disc heater under the pool boiling condition. Heat and Mass Transfer 53 (1):265-275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.M. Sarafraz, H. Arya, M. Saeedi, D. Ahmadi, (2018) Flow boiling heat transfer to MgO-therminol 66 heat transfer fluid: Experimental assessment and correlation development. Applied Thermal Engineering 138:552-562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.M. Sarafraz, M. Arjomandi, (2018) Thermal performance analysis of a microchannel heat sink cooling with copper oxide-indium (CuO/In) nano-suspensions at high-temperatures. Applied Thermal Engineering 137:700-709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M.M. Sarafraz, H. Arya, M. Arjomandi, (2018) Thermal and hydraulic analysis of a rectangular microchannel with gallium-copper oxide nano-suspension. Journal of Molecular Liquids 263:382-389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M.M. Sarafraz, M. Arjomandi, (2018) Demonstration of plausible application of gallium nano-suspension in microchannel solar thermal receiver: Experimental assessment of thermo-hydraulic performance of microchannel. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 94:39-46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.M. Sarafraz, S.M. Peyghambarzadeh, (2012) Influence of thermodynamic models on the prediction of pool boiling heat transfer coefficient of dilute binary mixtures. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 39 (8):1303-1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elham Salari, Mohsen Peyghambarzadeh, Mohammad Mohsen Sarafraz, Faramarz Hormozi, (2016) Boiling Heat Transfer of Alumina Nano-Fluids: Role of Nanoparticle Deposition on the Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient. Periodica Polytechnica Chemical Engineering 60 (4):252-258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Choi SUS, Zhang ZG, Yu W, Lockwood FE, Grulke EA (2001) Anomalous thermal conductivity enhancement in nanotube suspensions. Appl Phys Lett 79:2252–2254.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1408272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hwang YJ, Ahn YC, Shin HS, Lee CG, Kim GT, Park HS, Lee JK (2006) Investigation on characteristics of thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids. Curr Appl Phys 6:1068–1071.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2005.07.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aravind SSJ, Baskar P, Baby TT, Sabareesh RK, Das S, Ramaprabhu S (2011) Investigation of Structural Stability, Dispersion, Viscosity, and Conductive Heat Transfer Properties of Functionalized Carbon Nanotube Based Nanofluids. J Phys Chem C 115:16737–16744.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp201672p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Duangthongsuk W, Wongwises S (2008) Effect of thermophysical properties models on the predicting of the convective heat transfer coefficient for low concentration nanofluid. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 35:1320–1326.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2008.07.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Das SK, Putra N, Roetzel W (2003) Pool boiling characteristics of nano-fluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46:851–862.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(02)00348-4 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tiwari AK, Ghosh P, Sarkar J (2013) Heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of CeO2/water nanofluid in plate heat exchanger. Appl Therm Eng 57:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Darzi AAR, Farhadi M, Sedighi K (2013) Heat transfer and flow characteristics of Al2O3–water nanofluid in a double tube heat exchanger. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 47:105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ryzhkov II, Minakov AV (2014) The effect of nanoparticle diffusion and thermophoresis on convective heat transfer of nanofluid in a circular tube. Int J Heat Mass Transf 77:956–969.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.05.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ho CJ, Lin YJ (2014) Turbulent forced convection effectiveness of alumina–water nanofluid in a circular tube with elevated inlet fluid temperatures: An experimental study. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 57:247–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2014.08.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bahiraei M, Hangi M (2013) Investigating the efficacy of magnetic nanofluid as a coolant in double-pipe heat exchanger in the presence of magnetic field. Energy Convers Manag 76:1125–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wu Z, Wang L, Sundén B (2013) Pressure drop and convective heat transfer of water and nanofluids in a double-pipe helical heat exchanger. Appl Therm Eng 60:266–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chandra Sekhara Reddy M, Vasudeva Rao V (2014) Experimental investigation of heat transfer coefficient and friction factor of ethylene glycol water based TiO2 nanofluid in double pipe heat exchanger with and without helical coil inserts. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 50:68–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2013.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sarafraz MM, Hormozi F (2014) Scale formation and subcooled flow boiling heat transfer of CuO–water nanofluid inside the vertical annulus. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 52:205–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sarafraz MM, Hormozi F (2014) Convective boiling and particulate fouling of stabilized CuO-ethylene glycol nanofluids inside the annular heat exchanger. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 53:116–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2014.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sarafraz M, Peyghambarzadeh S, Alavi Fazel S, Vaeli N (2013) Nucleate pool boiling heat transfer of binary nano mixtures under atmospheric pressure around a smooth horizontal cylinderGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sarafraz MM, Hormozi F, Peyghambarzadeh SM, Vaeli N (2015) Upward Flow Boiling to DI-Water and Cuo Nanofluids Inside the Concentric Annuli. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics 8Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sarafraz MM, Nikkhah V, Madani SA, Jafarian M, Hormozi F (2017) Low-frequency vibration for fouling mitigation and intensification of thermal performance of a plate heat exchanger working with CuO/water nanofluid. Appl Therm Eng 121:388–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sarafraz MM (2013) Experimental investigation on pool boiling heat transfer to formic acid, propanol and 2-butanol pure liquids under the atmospheric pressureGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nikkhah V, Sarafraz MM, Hormozi F (2015) Application of spherical copper oxide (II) water nano-fluid as a potential coolant in a boiling annular heat exchanger. Chem Biochem Eng Q 29:405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Arya A, Sarafraz MM, Shahmiri S, Madani SAH, Nikkhah V, Nakhjavani SM (2018) Thermal performance analysis of a flat heat pipe working with carbon nanotube-water nanofluid for cooling of a high heat flux heater. Heat Mass Transf 54:985–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sarafraz MM, Nikkhah V, Nakhjavani M, Arya A (2018) Thermal performance of a heat sink microchannel working with biologically produced silver-water nanofluid: experimental assessment. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 91:509–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sahin B, Gültekin GG, Manay E, Karagoz S (2013) Experimental investigation of heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of Al2O3–water nanofluid. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 50:21–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.04.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang J, Zhu J, Zhang X, Chen Y (2013) Heat transfer and pressure drop of nanofluids containing carbon nanotubes in laminar flows. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 44:716–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fazeli SA, Hashemi SMH, Zirakzadeh H, Ashjaee M (2012) Experimental and numerical investigation of heat transfer in a miniature heat sink utilizing silica nanofluid. Superlattice Microst 51:247–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    M.M. Sarafraz, J. Hart, E. Shrestha, H. Arya, M. Arjomandi, (2019) Experimental thermal energy assessment of a liquid metal eutectic in a microchannel heat exchanger equipped with a (10 Hz/50 Hz) resonator. Applied Thermal Engineering 148:578-590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    M.M. Sarafraz, M.R. Safaei, (2019) Diurnal thermal evaluation of an evacuated tube solar collector (ETSC) charged with graphene nanoplatelets-methanol nano-suspension. Renewable Energy 142:364-372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Moffat RJ (1988) Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 1:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kline SJ, McClintock F (1953) Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments. Mech Eng 75:3–8Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    El Bécaye Maïga S, Tam Nguyen C, Galanis N, Roy G, Maré T, Coqueux M (2006) Heat transfer enhancement in turbulent tube flow using Al2O3 nanoparticle suspension. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow 16:275–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sarafraz MM (2012) Nucleate pool boiling of aqueous solution of citric acid on a smoothed horizontal cylinder. Heat Mass Transf 48:611–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sarafraz MM, Peyghambarzadeh SM (2012) Nucleate pool boiling heat transfer to Al2O3-water and TiO2-water nanofluids on horizontal smooth tubes with dissimilar homogeneous materials. Chem Biochem Eng Q 26:199–206Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sarafraz MM, Peyghambarzadeh SM, Alavifazel SA (2012) Enhancement of nucleate pool boiling heat transfer to dilute binary mixtures using endothermic chemical reactions around the smoothed horizontal cylinder. Heat Mass Transf 48:1755–1765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Peyghambarzadeh SM, Sarafraz MM, Vaeli N, Ameri E, Vatani A, Jamialahmadi M (2013) Forced convective and subcooled flow boiling heat transfer to pure water and n-heptane in an annular heat exchanger. Ann Nucl Energy 53:401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. M. Sarafraz
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Silakhori
    • 1
  • S. A. Madani
    • 2
  • M. V. Kiamahalleh
    • 3
  • O. Pourmehran
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical Engineering and Advanced Material Research CentreUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations