Advertisement

Kinetics of the pulsed vacuum osmotic dehydration of green fig (Ficus carica L.)

  • Ronaldo Elias de Mello JrEmail author
  • Jefferson Luiz Gomes Corrêa
  • Francemir José Lopes
  • Amanda Umbelina de Souza
  • Kênia Cristine Ribeiro da Silva
Original
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

The fig (Ficus carica L.) is a fruit native to the Mediterranean region. However, it has spread worldwide. Osmotic dehydration is used to reduce the moisture content in food, preserving its main characteristics. This study aimed to obtain the kinetics of the water loss, solid gain and water activity of green figs that were cut transversely and osmotically dehydrated in different sucrose solutions (40, 50 and 60 °Brix). The osmotic dehydration occurred at 40 °C, with a vacuum pulse of 74 mmHg in the first 5 min of the process in a total time of 240 min. The ratio of sample:solution was kept constant at 1:10 (weight/weight). Periodically, the samples were weighed to calculate the kinetics of water loss, solid gain, and water activity. The increase in the concentration of the sucrose solution from 40 to 60 °Brix promoted a percentage increase of water loss from 8.14 ± 0.80 to 12.80 ± 0.50%, of solid gain (0.89 ± 0.31 to 1.42 ± 0.70%), and the reduction of water activity (0.93 ± 0.02 to 0.91 ± 0.01). The mathematical models of Peleg and Azuara were tested for fitting the kinetics of water loss and solid gain. Both the mathematical models of Peleg and Azuara presented good fitness to the experimental data. However, the latter was more adequate (higher r2 and lower error), with predicted equilibrium conditions closer to the experimental values.

Keywords

Water loss Solid gain Water activity Mathematical models Drying Fruit 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG). Thanks also to the Department of Agricultural Development of São Sebastião do Paraíso and the Tozzi Food Industry for the financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Şahin U, Öztürk HK (2016) Effects of pulsed vacuum osmotic dehydration (PVOD) on drying kinetics of figs (Ficus carica L). Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 36:104–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Solomon A, Golbowicz S, Yablowicz Z, Grossman S, Bergaman M, Gottlieb H (2006) Antioxidant activities and anthocyanin content of fresh fruits of common fig (Ficus carica L.). J Agric Food Chem 50:7717–7723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Verbric R, Colaric M, Stampar F (2008) Phenolic acids and flavonoids of fig fruit (Ficus carica L .) in the northern Mediterranean region. Food Chem 106(1):153–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roussos PA (2011) Phytochemicals and antioxidant capacity of orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck cv. Salustiana) juice produced under organic and integrated farming system in Greece. Sci Hortic 129(2):253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Silva MAC, Silva ZE, Mariani VC (2012) Mass transfer during the osmotic dehydration of west Indian cherry. Int J Food Sci Technol 45(2):246–252Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chauan OP, Singh A, Raju PS, Bawa AS (2011) Effects of osmotic agents on color, textural, structural, thermal, and sensory properties of apple slices. Int J Food Prop 14:1037–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Corrêa JLG, Pereira LM, Vieira GS, Hubinger MD (2010) Mass transfer kinetics of pulsed vacuum osmotic dehydration of guavas. Int J Food Eng 6(4):498–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fito P (1994) Modelling of vacuum osmotic dehydration of food. Int J Food Eng 22(1–4):313–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Corrêa JLG, Ernesto DB, José GLF, Andrade RS (2014) Optimisation of vacuum pulsed osmotic dehydration of blanched pumpkin. Int J Food Sci Technol 49:2008–2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garcia CC, Mauro MA, Kimura M (2007) Kinetics of osmotic dehydration and air-drying of pumpkins (Cucurbita moschata). Int J Food Eng 82:284–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Naikwadi PM, Chavan UD, Pawar VD, Amarowicz R (2010) Studies on dehydration of figs using different sugar syrup treatments. Int J Food Sci Technol 47(4):442–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Szadzińska J, Kowalski SJ, Stasiak M (2016) Microwave and ultrasound enhancement of convective drying of strawberries: experimental and modeling efficiency. Int J Heat Mass Transf 103:1065–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Corzo O, Bracho N, Rodríguez J (2012) Comparison of Peleg and Azuara et al. models in the modeling mass transfer during pile salting of goat sheets. Int J Food Sci Technol 46(2):448–452Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhao W, Cheng Y, Jiang H, Wang H, Li W (2017) Modeling and experiments for transient diffusion coefficients in the desorption of methane through coal powders. Int J Heat Mass Transf 110:845–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang C, Xu R, Song Y, Jiang P (2017) Study on water droplet flash evaporation in vacuum spray cooling. Int J Heat Mass Transf 112:279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ilie F (2018) Diffusion and mass transfer mechanisms during frictional selective transfer. Int J Heat Mass Transf 116:1260–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen L, Xia S, Sun F (2018) Entropy generation minimization for isothermal crystallization processes with a generalized mass diffusion law. Int J Heat Mass Transf 116:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    El-Aquar AA, Murr FEX (2003) Estudo e modelagem da cinética de desidratação osmótica do mamão formosa (Carica papaya L.). Cienc Tecnol Aliment 23(1):69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Azuara E, Cortés R, Garcia HS, Beristain CI (1992) Kinetic model for osmotic dehydration and its relationship with Fick’s second law. Int J Food Sci Technol 27(4):409–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peleg M (1993) Assessment of a semi-empirical four parameter general model for sigmoid moisture sorption isotherms. J Food Process Eng 16(1):21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Corzo O, Bracho N (2006) Application of Peleg model to study mass transfer during osmotic dehydration of sardine sheets. J Food Eng 75:533–541Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Atarés L, Chiralt A, Gonzáles-Martínez C (2008) Effect of solute on osmotic dehydration and rehydration of vacuum impregnated apple cylinders (cv. Granny Smith). J Food Eng 89:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gonçalves EM, Pinheiro J, Abreu M, Brandão TRS, Silva CLM (2007) Modelling the kinetics of peroxidase inactivation, colour and texture changes of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima L.) during blanching. J Food Eng 81:693–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Silva KS, Caetano LC, Garcia CC, Romero JT, Santos AB, Mauro MA (2011) Osmotic dehydration process for low temperature blanched pumpkin. J Food Eng 105:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Viana AD, Corrêa JLG, Justus A (2014) Optimisation of the pulsed vacuum osmotic dehydration of cladodes of fodder palm. Int J Food Sci Technol 49:726–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Corrêa JLG, Justus A, Oliveira LF, Alves JG (2015) Osmotic dehydration of tomato assisted by ultrasound, evaluation of the liquid media on mass transfer and product quality. Int J Food Eng 11(4):2008–2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Crank J (1995) The mathematics of diffusion. In: 2nd. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Assis FR, Morais RMSC, Morais AMMB (2016) Mass transfer in osmotic dehydration of food products: comparison between mathematical models. Food Eng Rev 8(2):116–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Khin MM, Zhou W, Perera CO (2006) A study of the mass transfer in osmotic dehydration of coated potato cubes. J Food Eng 77:84–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Silva JM, Cantu MG, Rodrigues V, Mazutti MA (2013) Influence of osmotic pre-treatment on convective drying kinetics of figs. Int J Food Eng 9(2):187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Piga A, Pinna I, Ozer KB, Agabbio M, Aksoy U (2004) Hot air dehydration of figs (Ficus carica L.): drying kinetics and quality loss. Int J Food Sci Technol 39:793–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Arreola SI, Rosas ME (2007) Aplicación de vacío en la deshidratación osmótica de higos (Ficus carica). Inf Tecnol 18(2):43–48.32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vasconcelos JIL, Andrade SAC, Maciel MIS, Guerra NB, Vasconcelos MAS (2012) Osmotic dehydration of the Indian fig (Opuntia ficus indica) with binary and ternary solutions. Int J Food Sci Technol 47(11):2359–2365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kotovicz V, Ellendersen LSN, Clarinso MM, Masson ML (2014) Influence of process conditions on the kinetics of the osmotic dehydration of yacon (Polymnia sonchifolia) in fructose solution. J Food Process Preserv 38:1385–1397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fu N, Chen XD (2011) Towards a maximal cell survival in convective thermal drying processes. Food Res Int 44(5):1127–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronaldo Elias de Mello Jr
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jefferson Luiz Gomes Corrêa
    • 1
  • Francemir José Lopes
    • 1
  • Amanda Umbelina de Souza
    • 1
  • Kênia Cristine Ribeiro da Silva
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food ScienceFederal University of LavrasLavrasBrazil

Personalised recommendations