Advertisement

Systematic review of interventions to improve safety and quality of anticoagulant prescribing for therapeutic indications for hospital inpatients

  • Andrew FrazerEmail author
  • James Rowland
  • Alison Mudge
  • Michael Barras
  • Jennifer Martin
  • Peter Donovan
Review
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Anticoagulation-associated adverse drug events are common in hospitalised patients and result in morbidity, mortality, increased length of hospital stay and higher costs of care. Many are preventable. We reviewed the literature to identify and assess interventions intended to improve safety or quality anticoagulant prescribing.

Methods

A systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Pretty Darn Quick-Evidence and Health Systems Evidence was undertaken to identify controlled studies assessing system-level interventions to improve prescribing of oral or parenteral therapeutic anticoagulation for any indication in hospitalised adults. Data were extracted for safety and quality outcomes, with studies grouped by intervention type for meta-analysis and narrative review.

Results

Of 10,640 records screened, 19 trials evaluating 12,742 participants were included for analysis. No study specifically evaluated prescribing of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) or direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Our findings suggest that physician-led anticoagulation consultation services may reduce bleeding rates in high-risk patients. On meta-analysis, decision supported warfarin dosing resulted in higher proportion of time with international normalised ratio in therapeutic range (p = 0.0007). Studies of other clinical decision support systems and heparin monitoring systems did not demonstrate improved safety, and quality findings were inconsistent. Systematic education and feedback programs were not efficacious.

Conclusions

There is currently insufficient high-quality evidence to recommend any reviewed intervention, though several warrant closer evaluation. Adequately powered controlled trials assessing safety outcomes and evidence-based quality markers in high-risk patient groups and studies of interventions to improve safety of LMWH and DOAC prescribing are needed.

Keywords

Prescribing Medication safety Patient safety Systematic review Anticoagulants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly appreciate the assistance of Sue Sacre and Jasmin Monaghan (Graphic Designers at Clinical Multimedia, The Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital) with reformatting of images for publication.

Authors’ contributions

All authors have made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data. All were involved with drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content and have given final approval of the version published. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Supplementary material

228_2019_2752_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (38 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 37 kb)
228_2019_2752_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (90 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 90 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    van Walraven C, Austin PC, Oake N, Wells P, Mamdani M, Forster AJ (2007) The effect of hospitalization on oral anticoagulation control: a population-based study. Thromb Res 119(6):705–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Henriksen JN, Nielsen LP, Hellebek A, Poulsen BK (2017) Medication errors involving anticoagulants: data from the Danish patient safety database. Pharmacol Res Perspect 5(3):e00307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Classen DC, Jaser L, Budnitz DS (2010) Adverse drug events among hospitalized Medicare patients: epidemiology and national estimates from a new approach to surveillance. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 36(1):12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Piazza G, Nguyen TN, Cios D, Labreche M, Hohlfelder B, Fanikos J, Fiumara K, Goldhaber SZ (2011) Anticoagulation-associated adverse drug events. Am J Med 124(12):1136–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison BT, Newby L, Hamilton JD (1995) The quality in Australian health care study. Med J Aust 163(9):458–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eckman MH, Levine HJ, Salem DN, Pauker SG (1998) Making decisions about antithrombotic therapy in heart disease: decision analytic and cost-effectiveness issues. Chest 114(5 Suppl):699S–714SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conway SE, Hwang AY, Ponte CD, Gums JG (2017) Laboratory and clinical monitoring of direct acting Oral anticoagulants: what clinicians need to know. Pharmacotherapy 37(2):236–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duplaga BA, Rivers CW, Nutescu E (2001) Dosing and monitoring of low-molecular-weight heparins in special populations. Pharmacotherapy 21(2):218–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hirsh J, Warkentin TE, Raschke R, Granger C, Ohman EM, Dalen JE (1998) Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing considerations, monitoring, efficacy, and safety. Chest 114(5 Suppl):489S–510SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoffmann P, Keller F (2012) Increased major bleeding risk in patients with kidney dysfunction receiving enoxaparin: a meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 68(5):757–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    DeCarolis DD, Thorson JG, Clairmont MA, Leuthner AM, Rector TS, Johnson GJ (2012) Enoxaparin outcomes in patients with moderate renal impairment. Arch Intern Med 172(22):1713–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    LaPointe NM, Chen AY, Alexander KP, Roe MT, Pollack CV Jr, Lytle BL et al (2007) Enoxaparin dosing and associated risk of in-hospital bleeding and death in patients with non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Arch Intern Med 167(14):1539–1544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zaidenstein R, Eyal S, Efrati S, Akivison L, Michowitz MK, Nagornov V et al (2002) Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients treated with cardiovascular drugs and anticoagulants. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 11(3):235–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spector WD, Limcangco R, Furukawa MF, Encinosa WE (2017) The marginal costs of adverse drug events associated with exposures to anticoagulants and hypoglycemic agents during hospitalization. Med Care 55(9):856–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    The Joint Commission (2019) National Patient Safety Goals Effective January 2019: Hospital Accreditation Program. https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/NPSG_Chapter_HAP_Jan2019.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2019
  16. 16.
    ACSQHC (2018)Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care: Annual Report 2017–2018. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ACSQHC_Annual_Report_2017-2018.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2019
  17. 17.
    Aronson JK (2012) Balanced prescribing – principles and challenges. Br J Clin Pharmacol 74(4):566–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fennerty A, Dolben J, Thomas P, Backhouse G, Bentley DP, Campbell IA, Routledge PA (1984) Flexible induction dose regimen for warfarin and prediction of maintenance dose. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 288(6426):1268–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zimmermann AT, Jeffries WS, McElroy H, Horowitz JD (2003) Utility of a weight-based heparin nomogram for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Intern Med J 33(1–2):18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tran H, Joseph J, Young L, McRae S, Curnow J, Nandurkar H, Wood P, McLintock C (2014) New oral anticoagulants: a practical guide on prescription, laboratory testing and peri-procedural/bleeding management. Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Intern Med J 44(6):525–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smythe MA, Priziola J, Dobesh PP, Wirth D, Cuker A (2016) Wittkowsky AK (2016) guidance for the practical management of the heparin anticoagulants in the treatment of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis 41(1):165–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Witt DM, Clark NP, Kaatz S, Schnurr T, Ansell JE Guidance for the practical management of warfarin therapy in the treatment of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis 41(1):187–205Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kew GS, Tan M, Lim TW (2015) Poor adherence to anticoagulation guidelines in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated in a tertiary cardiology unit. Heart Asia 7(1):18–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McBride D, Bruggenjurgen B, Roll S, Willich SN (2007) Anticoagulation treatment for the reduction of stroke in atrial fibrillation: a cohort study to examine the gap between guidelines and routine medical practice. J Thromb Thrombolysis 24(1):65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wan D, Healey JS, Simpson CS (2018) The guideline-policy gap in direct-acting Oral anticoagulants usage in atrial fibrillation: evidence, Practice, and public policy considerations. Can J Cardiol 34(11):1412–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bradley G (1998) An audit of anticoagulant guidelines: the relative influence of education, presentation and complexity of guidelines on compliance. J Clin Eff 3(2):84–89Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maynard G, Humber D, Jenkins I (2014) Multidisciplinary initiative to improve inpatient anticoagulation and management of venous thromboembolism. Am J Health Syst Pharm 71(4):305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schurr JW, Stevens CA, Bane A, Luppi C, Culbreth SE, Miller AL, Connors JM, Sylvester KW (2018) Description and evaluation of the implementation of a weight-based, nurse-driven heparin nomogram in a tertiary Academic Medical Center. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 24(2):248–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Enriquez JR, de Lemos JA, Parikh SV, Simon DN, Thomas LE, Wang TY et al Modest Associations Between Electronic Health Record Use and Acute Myocardial Infarction Quality of Care and Outcomes: Results From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 8(6):576–585Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Oyen LJ, Nishimura RA, Ou NN, Armon JJ, Zhou M (2005) Effectiveness of a computerized system for intravenous heparin administration: using information technology to improve patient care and patient safety. The Am Heart Hosp J 3(2):75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nieuwlaat R, Connolly SJ, Mackay JA, Weise-Kelly L, Navarro T, Wilczynski NL et al (2011) Computerized clinical decision support systems for therapeutic drug monitoring and dosing: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci 6:90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269 W64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    United Nations (2018) World economic situation and prospects 2018, UN, New York https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/publication/WESP2018_Full_Web-1.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2019
  34. 34.
    Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care group (2017) What study designs can be considered for inclusion in an EPOC review and what should they be called? EPOC resources for review authors. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services. http://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors. Accessed 12 Jan 2019
  35. 35.
    Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care group (2013) Data collection form. EPOC Resources for review authors. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services. http://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc-specific-resources-review-authors. Accessed 12 Jan 2019
  36. 36.
    Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care group (2017) Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. EPOC Resources for review authors. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services. http://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors. Accessed 12 Jan 2019
  37. 37.
    Cochrane Collaboration (2014) Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Higgins JPT, Green S (editors) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration www.handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 12 Jan 2019
  39. 39.
    Chenella FC, Klotz TA, Gill MA (1983) Comparison of physician and pharmacist management of anticoagulant therapy of inpatients. Am J Hosp Pharm 40(10):1642–1645Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Landefeld CS, Anderson PA (1992) Guideline-based consultation to prevent anticoagulant-related bleeding. A randomized, controlled trial in a teaching hospital. Ann Intern Med 116(10):829–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ageno W, Johnson J, Nowacki B, Turpie AG (2000) A computer generated induction system for hospitalized patients starting on oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost 83(6):849–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Carter BL, Taylor JW, Becker A (1987) Evaluation of three dosage-prediction methods for initial in-hospital stabilization of warfarin therapy. Clin Pharm 6(1):37–45Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kimmel SE, French B, Kasner SE, Johnson JA, Anderson JL, Gage BF, Rosenberg YD, Eby CS, Madigan RA, McBane R, Abdel-Rahman SZ, Stevens SM, Yale S, Mohler ER III, Fang MC, Shah V, Horenstein RB, Limdi NA, Muldowney JA III, Gujral J, Delafontaine P, Desnick RJ, Ortel TL, Billett HH, Pendleton RC, Geller NL, Halperin JL, Goldhaber SZ, Caldwell MD, Califf RM, Ellenberg JH, COAG Investigators (2013) A pharmacogenetic versus a clinical algorithm for warfarin dosing. N Engl J Med 369(24):2283–2293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mitra R, Marciello MA, Brain C, Ahangar B, Burke DT (2005) Efficacy of computer-aided dosing of warfarin among patients in a rehabilitation hospital. Am J Phys Med Rehabili 84(6):423–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ovesen L, Lyduch S, Ott P (1989) A simple technique for predicting maintenance dosage of warfarin - is it better than empirical dosing? Eur J Clin Pharmacol 37(6):573–576Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vadher B, Patterson DL, Leaning M (1997) Evaluation of a decision support system for initiation and control of oral anticoagulation in a randomised trial. BMJ 314(7089):1252–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    White RH, Hong R, Venook AP, Daschbach MM, Murray W, Mungall DR, Coleman RW (1987) Initiation of warfarin therapy: comparison of physician dosing with computer-assisted dosing. J Gen Intern Med 2(3):141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Becker R, Ball S, Eisenberg P, Borzak S, Held A, Spencer F et al (1999) A randomized, multicenter trial of weight-adjusted intravenous heparin dose titration and point-of-care coagulation monitoring in hospitalized patients with active thromboembolic disease. Antithrombotic therapy consortium investigators. Am Heart J 137(1):59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Panigada M, E Iapichino G, Brioni M, Panarello G, Protti A, Grasselli G et al (2018) Thromboelastography-based anticoagulation management during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a safety and feasibility pilot study. Ann Intensive Care 8(1):7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rosborough T (1999) Monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy with antifactor Xa activity results in fewer monitoring tests and dosage changes than monitoring with the activated partial thromboplastin time. Pharmacotherapy 19(6):760–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Silbernagel G, Spirk D, Hager A, Baumgartner I, Kucher N (2016) Electronic alert system for improving stroke prevention among hospitalized Oral-anticoagulation-Naïve patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. J Am Heart Assoc 5(7):e003776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Strom BL, Schinnar R, Bilker W, Hennessy S, Leonard CE, Pifer E (2010) Randomized clinical trial of a customized electronic alert requiring an affirmative response compared to a control group receiving a commercial passive CPOE alert: NSAID--warfarin co-prescribing as a test case. J Am Med Inform Assoc 17(4):411–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Strom B, Schinnar R, Aberra F, Bilker W, Hennessy S, Leonard C et al (2010) Unintended effects of a computerized physician order entry nearly hard-stop alert to prevent a drug interaction: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 170(17):1578–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schillig J, Kaatz S, Hudson M, Krol G, Szandzik E, Kalus J (2011) Clinical and safety impact of an inpatient pharmacist-directed anticoagulation service. J Hosp Med 6(6):322–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Weir CJ, Lees KR, MacWalter RS, Muir KW, Wallesch CW, McLelland EV, Hendry A, PRISM Study Group (2003) Cluster-randomized, controlled trial of computer-based decision support for selecting long-term anti-thrombotic therapy after acute ischaemic stroke. QJM 96(2):143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Garrouste-Orgeas M, Soufir L, Tabah A, Schwebel C, Vesin A, Adrie C, Thuong M, Timsit JF, Outcomerea Study Group (2012) A multifaceted program for improving quality of care in intensive care units: IATROREF study. Crit Care Med 40(2):468–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hayes R, Bratzler D, Armour B, Moore L, Murray C, Stevens BR, Radford M, Fitzgerald D, Elward K, Ballard DJ (2001) Comparison of an enhanced versus a written feedback model on the management of Medicare inpatients with venous thrombosis. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 27(3):155–168Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Middeldorp S, Prins MH, Hutten BA (2014) Duration of treatment with vitamin K antagonists in symptomatic venous thromboembolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD001367Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chai-Adisaksopha C, Crowther M, Isayama T, Lim W (2014) The impact of bleeding complications in patients receiving target-specific oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood 124(15):2450–2458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lee T, Davis E, Kielly J (2016) Clinical impact of a pharmacist-led inpatient anticoagulation service: a review of the literature. Integr Pharm Res Pract 5:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kershaw B, White RH, Mungall D, Van Houten J, Brettfeld S (1994) Computer-assisted dosing of heparin. Management with a pharmacy-based anticoagulation service. Arch Intern Med 154(9):1005–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Pawloski SJ, Kersh PL (1992) Therapeutic heparin monitoring service in a small community hospital. Hosp Pharm 27(8):703–706 23Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bloomfield HE, Taylor BC, Krause A, Reddy P, Greer N, MacDonald R et al (2011) Safe and effective anticoagulation in the outpatient setting: a systematic review of the evidence. United States Department of Veteran Affairs, Washington DC. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK54599/. Accessed 14 Jan 2019
  64. 64.
    Davey P, Marwick CA, Scott CL, Charani E, McNeil K, Brown E et al (2017) Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003543Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Reynolds MW, Fahrbach K, Hauch O, Wygant G, Estok R, Cella C, Nalysnyk L (2004) Warfarin anticoagulation and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Chest 126(6):1938–1945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Cannegieter SC, Rosendaal FR, Wintzen AR, van der Meer FJ, Vandenbroucke JP, Briet E (1995) Optimal oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical heart valves. N Engl J Med 333(1):11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Raschke R, Reilly B, Guidry J, Fontana J, Srinivas S (1993) The weight-based heparin dosing nomogram compared with a "standard care" nomogram. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 119(9):874–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Nuckols TK, Smith-Spangler C, Morton SC, Asch SM, Patel VM, Anderson LJ, Deichsel EL, Shekelle PG (2014) The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 3:56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ranji SR, Rennke S, Wachter RM (2014) Computerised provider order entry combined with clinical decision support systems to improve medication safety: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf 23(9):773–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Campbell EM, Sittig DF, Ash JS, Guappone KP, Dykstra RH (2006) Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 13(5):547–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Slikkerveer M, van de Plas A, Driessen JHM, Wijngaard R, de Vries F, Olie R et al (2017) Prescribing errors with low-molecular-weight heparins. J Patient Saf.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000417
  72. 72.
    Pattullo CS, Barras M, Tai B, McKean M, Donovan P (2016) New oral anticoagulants: appropriateness of prescribing in real-world setting. Intern Med J 46(7):812–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Moudallel S, Steurbaut S, Cornu P, Dupont A (2018) Appropriateness of DOAC prescribing before and during hospital admission and analysis of determinants for inappropriate prescribing. Front Pharmacol 9:1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Steinberg BA, Shrader P, Pieper K, Thomas L, Allen LA, Ansell J et al (2018) Frequency and outcomes of reduced dose non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants: results from ORBIT-AF II (the outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrillation II). J Am Heart Assoc 7(4):e007633CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Internal Medicine and Aged CareThe Royal Brisbane and Women’s HospitalHerstonAustralia
  2. 2.University of Queensland School of PharmacyWoolloongabbaAustralia
  3. 3.Chair of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Newcastle School of Medicine and Public HealthUniversity DriveCallaghanAustralia
  4. 4.Director of Clinical PharmacologyThe Royal Brisbane and Women’s HospitalHerstonAustralia

Personalised recommendations