UK medical students’ perspectives on practical prescribing teaching and learning provisions: a cross-sectional survey
- 46 Downloads
To determine medical students’ perspectives on the provision for the teaching and learning of processes that lead to and include the writing of a clear, safe and legal prescription (practical prescribing) in UK medical schools.
We designed a cross-sectional survey of UK medical students in years three, four and five. Students were asked about their experiences and views of practical prescribing teaching and learning they had encountered on their medical course.
A total of 1023 medical students responded (7% response rate), from 25 UK medical schools: 22%, 37% and 41% in the third, fourth and final years, respectively. Teaching of practical prescribing was widespread, with 94.3% of final year (n = 396, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 92–97%), 86.8% of fourth year (n = 328, CI = 83–90%) and 73.8% of third year (n = 166, CI = 67–80%) students reporting they had received it. Availability of this teaching appeared to vary by medical school. Self-directed learning was the most frequently reported mode of delivery (90.9%, n = 809). Validated pre-prescribing and simulation were perceived by students in each year group as the most effective methods. Clinical pharmacologists, clinical pharmacists and junior doctors were perceived by the students as being the most effective professional groups at teaching practical prescribing.
UK medical students reported a variety of methods utilised in the teaching and learning of practical prescribing. However, methods they perceived to be very effective (simulation and pre-prescribing) do not appear to be widely available or are only reserved for the final year of study. Combining such methods with involvement of professional groups perceived to be most effective should be explored.
KeywordsPrescribing Medical students Medical education Pharmacology
The authors are grateful to the medical students that filled in the questionnaire. We also appreciate the efforts of the prescribing course leaders who circulated the questionnaires to the students and Department of Medical Education, Brighton and Sussex Medical School staff and students who validated the questionnaires.
Contribution of authors
MK, SW, IH and MO contributed to the conception and design of the study. MK collected the data. MK undertook the analysis under the supervision of SW and MO, and prepared a preliminary draft of the paper. All authors contributed to the critical revision of the paper and approved the final manuscript for submission. All authors have agreed to be accountable for the accuracy and integrity of the work.
This study was funded by the Brighton and Sussex Medical School.
Compliance with ethical standards
The Research Governance and Ethics Committee at Brighton and Sussex Medical School granted ethical approval for the study (reference 14/015/OKO).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.British Pharmacological Society. Ten principles of good prescribing. Available at https://www.bps.ac.uk/education-engagement/teaching-pharmacology/ten-principles-of-good-prescribing. Accessed 29 March 2019
- 2.Dornan T, Ashcroft D, Heathfield H, Lewis P, Miles J, Taylor D, Tully M, Wass V An in depth investigation into causes of prescribing errors by foundation trainees in relation to their medical education. EQUIP study. A report for the GMC 2009 (Online). Available at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/FINAL_Report_prevalence_and_causes_of_prescribing_errors.pdf_28935150.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2018)
- 3.Avery T, Barber N, Ghaleb M, Franklin B, Armstrong S, Crowe S, Dhillon S, Freyer A, Howard R, Pezzolesi C, Serumaga B, Swanwick G, Talabi O Investigating the prevalence and causes of prescribing errors in general practice: The PRACtICe Study (PRevalence And Causes of prescrIbing errors in general practiCe). A report for the GMC 2012 (Online). Available at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/Investigating_the_prevalence_and_causes_of_prescribing_errors_in_general_practice___The_PRACtICe_study_Reoprt_May_2012_48605085.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2018
- 4.The third WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge: Medication Without Harm. Available at https://www.who.int/patientsafety/medication-safety/en/. Accessed 29 March 2019
- 5.European Medicines Agency (2013) Medication-errors workshop report (EMA/144458/2013). Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Report/2013/05/WC500143163.pdf. Accessed 29 March 2019
- 6.Illing J, Morrow G, Kergon C, Burford B, Spencer J, Peile E, Davies C, Baldauf B, Allen M, Johnson N, Morrison J, Donaldson M, Whitelaw M, Field M (2008) How prepared are medical graduates to begin practice? A comparison of three diverse UK medical schools. Available at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/FINAL_How_prepared_are_medical_graduates_to_begin_practice_September_08.pdf_29697834.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2018
- 10.Trowler V (2010) Student engagement literature review. (Online). The Higher Education Academy. Available at https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/studentengagementliteraturereview_1.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2018
- 11.GMC outcomes for graduates 2018. Available at https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/dc11326-outcomes-for-graduates-2018_pdf-75040796.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2018
- 15.Brinkman DJ, Tichelaar J, Okorie M, Bissell L, Christiaens T, Likic R, Mačìulaitis R, Costa J, Sanz EJ, Tamba BI, Maxwell SR, Richir MC, van Agtmael M, for the Education Working Group of the European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (EACPT) (2017) Pharmacology and therapeutics education in the European Union needs harmonization and modernization: a cross-sectional survey among 185 medical schools in 27 countries. Clin Pharmacol Ther 102(5):815–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Greenway D (2013) Shape of training: securing the future of excellent patient care. Available at www.shapeoftraining.co.uk. Accessed 30 Dec 2018