Advertisement

European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

, Volume 74, Issue 12, pp 1567–1574 | Cite as

Clopidogrel utilization in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus: should we determine CYP2C19*2 genotype?

  • Saoussen Chouchene
  • Rym Dabboubi
  • Haythem Raddaoui
  • Hela Abroug
  • Khaldoun Ben Hamda
  • Sondess Hadj Fredj
  • Fatma Abderrazak
  • Mayssa Gaaloul
  • Marwa Rezek
  • Fadoua Neffeti
  • Ilhem Hellara
  • Mouna Sassi
  • Linda Khefacha
  • Asma Sriha
  • Semir Nouira
  • Mohamed Fadhel Najjar
  • Faouzi Maatouk
  • Taieb Messaoud
  • Mohsen Hassine
Pharmacogenetics
  • 97 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Clopidogrel non-responsiveness is multifactorial; several genetic and non-genetic factors may contribute to impaired platelet inhibition. The goal of this study is to determine the effect of the cytochrome P450 CYP2C19*2 polymorphism on the platelet response to clopidogrel in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods

We conducted an observational study in patients with coronary artery disease and consequent exposure to clopidogrel therapy (75 mg/day for at least 7 consecutive days). We have analyzed two groups of patients: group I (DM patients) and group II (non-diabetes mellitus patients). Platelet reactivity was assessed by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and high on clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) ≥ 208. Genotyping for CYP2C19*2 polymorphism was performed by PCR-RFLP.

Results

We have included 150 subjects (76 DM and 74 non-diabetes mellitus patients). The carriage of CYP2C19*2 allele, in DM patients, was significantly associated to HPR (odds ratio (OR) 4.437, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.134 to 17.359; p = 0.032). Furthermore, 8.4% of the variability in percent inhibition by clopidogrel could be attributed to CYP2C19*2 carrier status. However, in non-diabetes mellitus patients, there was no significant difference in platelet response to clopidogrel according to the presence or absence of CYP2C19*2 allele carriage (OR 1.260, 95% CI 0.288 to 5.522; p = 0.759).

Conclusions

Our study suggests that the carriage of CYP2C19*2 polymorphism, in DM patients, might be a potential predictor of persisting HPR in these high-risk individuals.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials.gov NCT03373552 (Registered 13 December 2017)

Keywords

Clopidogrel Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19 Coronary artery disease Diabetes mellitus 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to all patients who participated in this study.

Contributions of authors

SC designed the study, performed data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. HR, MG, and MR included the patients. RD and SHF performed genetic analysis and reviewed the manuscript. HA and AS conducted the statistical analysis. FA, FN, IH, MS, and LK supervised results. SN, KBH, FM, MFN, TM, and MH revised critically the intellectual content of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Research at our center and all subjects gave informed consent for study participation.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

228_2018_2530_MOESM1_ESM.docx (52 kb)
Table S1 is supplementary data associated with this article, in the online version. (DOCX 52 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA et al (2016) 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention, 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 2014 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, and 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Circulation 134:e123–e155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Costa F, Jeppsson A, Jüni P, Kastrati A, Kolh P, Mauri L, Montalescot G, Neumann FJ, Petricevic M, Roffi M, Steg PG, Windecker S, Zamorano JL, Levine GN, ESC Scientific Document Group, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), ESC National Cardiac Societies (2018) 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 39(3):213–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Angiolillo DJ, Rollini F, Storey RF, Bhatt DL, James S, Schneider DJ, Sibbing D, So DYF, Trenk D, Alexopoulos D, Gurbel PA, Hochholzer W, de Luca L, Bonello L, Aradi D, Cuisset T, Tantry US, Wang TY, Valgimigli M, Waksman R, Mehran R, Montalescot G, Franchi F, Price MJ (2017) International expert consensus on switching platelet P2Y12 receptor-inhibiting therapies. Circulation 136(20):1955–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, Fox KK (2001) Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 345:494–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen ZM, Jiang LX, Chen YP, Xie JX, Pan HC, Peto R, Collins R, Liu LS, COMMIT (ClOpidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial) collaborative group (2005) Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomized placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 366:1607–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sabatine MS, Cannon CP, Gibson CM, López-Sendón JL, Montalescot G, Theroux P, Claeys MJ, Cools F, Hill KA, Skene AM, McCabe C, Braunwald E, CLARITY-TIMI 28 Investigators (2005) Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 352(12):1179–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tran H, Mehta S, Eikelboom J (2006) Clinical update on the therapeutic use of clopidogrel: treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Vasc Health Risk Manag 2(4):379–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Viveros ME, Areán C, Gutiérrez S, Vázquez S, Cardiel MH, Taboada A, Marín G, Solorio R, García N (2016) Evaluation of clopidogrel response variability and identification of the CYP2C19 polymorphism in Mexican patients. Arch Cardiol Mex 86(4):297–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Serebruany VL, Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Malinin AI, Bhatt DL, Topol EJ (2005) Variability in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel among 544 individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:246–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vila PM, Zafar MU, Badimon JJ (2009) Platelet reactivity and nonresponse to dual antiplatelet therapy: a review. Platelets 20(8):531–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stuckey TD, Kirtane AJ, Brodie BR, Witzenbichler B, Litherland C, Weisz G, Rinaldi MJ, Neumann FJ, Metzger DC, Henry TD, Cox DA, Duffy PL, Mazzaferri el Jr, Gurbel PA, Mehran R, Généreux P, Ben-Yehuda O, Simonton CA, Stone GW, ADAPT-DES Investigators (2017) Impact of aspirin and clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness in patients treated with drug-eluting stents: 2-year results of a prospective, multicenter registry study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10(16):1607–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Erathi HV, Durgaprasad R, Velam V, Pvgk S, Rodda M, C K, Kanavath SN (2018) Evaluation of On-Clopidogrel platelet reactivity overtime, SYNTAX SCORE, genetic polymorphisms and their relationship to one year clinical outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing PCI. Minerva Cardioangiol 66(1):16–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tang XF, Han YL, Zhang JH, Wang J, Yao Y, He C, Xu B, Gao Z, Qiao SB, Chen J, Wu Y, Chen JL, Gao RL, Yang YJ, Yuan JQ (2016) CYP2C19 genotyping combined with on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events in Chinese patients with percutaneous coronary intervention. Thromb Res 147:108–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Notarangelo MF, Bontardelli F, Merlini PA (2013) Genetic and nongenetic factors influencing the response to clopidogrel. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 14(Suppl 1):S1–S7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khalil BM, Shahin MH, Solayman MHM, Langaee T, Schaalan MF, Gong Y, Hammad LN, al-Mesallamy HO, Hamdy NM, el-Hammady WA, Johnson JA (2016) Genetic and nongenetic factors affecting clopidogrel response in the Egyptian population. Clin Transl Sci 9(1):23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hernandez-Suarez DF, Scott SA, Tomey MI, Melin K, Lopez-Candales A, Buckley CE, Duconge J (2017) Clinical determinants of clopidogrel responsiveness in a heterogeneous cohort of Puerto Rican Hispanics. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 11(9):235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tam ZY, Ng SP, Tan LQ et al (2017) Metabolite profiling in identifying metabolic biomarkers in older people with late-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sci Rep 7(1):4392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tumpa D, High SC, Lawrence EW et al (2012) Concordance of changes in metabolic pathways based on plasma metabolomics and skeletal muscle transcriptomics in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 61(5):1004–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thebault JJ, Kieffer G, Lowe GD et al (1999) Repeated-dose pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel in healthy subjects. Semin Thromb Hemost 25(Suppl 2):9–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    American Diabetes Association (2014) Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 37(Suppl 1):S81–S90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Price MJ, Angiolillo DJ, Teirstein PS, Lillie E, Manoukian SV, Berger PB, Tanguay JF, Cannon CP, Topol EJ (2011) Platelet reactivity and cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a time-dependent analysis of the gauging responsiveness with a VerifyNow P2Y12 assay: impact on thrombosis and safety (GRAVITAS) trial. Circulation 124(10):1132–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aradi D, Kirtane A, Bonello L, Gurbel PA, Tantry US, Huber K, Freynhofer MK, ten Berg J, Janssen P, Angiolillo DJ, Siller-Matula JM, Marcucci R, Patti G, Mangiacapra F, Valgimigli M, Morel O, Palmerini T, Price MJ, Cuisset T, Kastrati A, Stone GW, Sibbing D (2015) Bleeding and stent thrombosis on P2Y12-inhibitors: collaborative analysis on the role of platelet reactivity for risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J 36(27):1762–1771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Luo Y, Li J, Liu X, Xu J, Ye Z, Yao Y, Liu X, Lai Y (2016) Combination of P2Y12 reaction unit and percentage of platelet inhibition assessed by VerifyNowP2Y12 assay is a useful predictor of long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Thromb Res 139:114–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miller SA, Dyk DD, Polesky HF (1988) A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res 16(3):1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hulot JS, Bura A, Villard E, Azizi M, Remones V, Goyenvalle C, Aiach M, Lechat P, Gaussem P (2006) Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism is a major determinant of clopidogrel responsiveness in healthy subjects. Blood 108(7):2244–2247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Geisler T, Schaeffeler E, Dippon J, Winter S, Buse V, Bischofs C, Zuern C, Moerike K, Gawaz M, Schwab M (2008) CYP2C19 and nongenetic factors predict poor responsiveness to clopidogrel loading dose after coronary stent implantation. Pharmacogenomics 9(9):1251–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abdelhedi R, Bouayed NA, Alfadhli S, Abid L, Rebai A, Kharrat N (2015) Characterization of drug-metabolizing enzymes CYP2C9, CYP2C19 polymorphisms in Tunisian, Kuwaiti and Bahraini populations. J Genet 94(4):765–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Verdoia M, Pergolini P, Rolla R, Nardin M, Schaffer A, Barbieri L, Marino P, Bellomo G, Suryapranata H, de Luca G (2016) Advanced age and high-residual platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor. J Thromb Haemost 14(1):57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gremmel T, Steiner S, Seidinger D, Koppensteiner R, Panzer S, Kopp CW (2013) Obesity is associated with poor response to clopidogrel and an increased susceptibility to protease activated receptor-1 mediated platelet activation. Transl Res 161(5):421–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Morel O, Kessler L, Ohlmann P, Bareiss P (2010) Diabetes and the platelet: toward new therapeutic paradigms for diabetic atherothrombosis. Atherosclerosis 212(2):367–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Giusti B, Gori AM, Marcucci R, Saracini C, Sestini I, Paniccia R, Valente S, Antoniucci D, Abbate R, Gensini GF (2007) Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism, but not CYP3A4 IVS10 + 12G/A and P2Y12 T744C polymorphisms, is associated with response variability to dual antiplatelet treatment in high-risk vascular patients. Pharmacogenet Genomics 17(12):1057–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Frère C, Cuisset T, Morange PE (2008) Effect of cytochrome P450 polymorphisms on platelet reactivity after treatement with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 101:1088–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Trenk D, Hochholzer W, Fromm MF, Chialda LE, Pahl A, Valina CM, Stratz C, Schmiebusch P, Bestehorn HP, Büttner HJ, Neumann FJ (2008) Cytochrome P450 2C19 681G>A polymorphism and high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity associated with adverse 1-year clinical outcome of elective percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting or bare-metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(20):1925–1934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD, Shen L, Walker JR, Simon T, Antman EM, Braunwald E, Sabatine MS (2010) Genetic variants in ABCB1 and CYP2C19 and cardiovascular outcomes after treatment with clopidogrel and prasugrel in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial: a pharmacogenetic analysis. Lancet 376(9749):1312–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hulot JS, Wuerzner G, Bachelot-Loza C (2009) Effect of an increased clopidogrel maintenance dose or lansoprazole co-administration on the antiplatelet response to clopidogrel in CYP2C19-genotyped healthy subjects. J Thromb Haemost 8:610–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Scott SA, Sangkuhl K, Stein CM, Hulot JS, Mega JL, Roden DM, Klein TE, Sabatine MS, Johnson JA, Shuldiner AR, Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (2013) Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guidelines for CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel therapy: 2013 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther 94(3):317–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wallentin L, James S, Storey RF, Armstrong M, Barratt BJ, Horrow J, Husted S, Katus H, Steg PG, Shah SH, Becker RC (2010) Effect of CYP2C19 and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on outcomes of treatment with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes: a genetic substudy of the PLATO trial. Lancet 376(9749):1320–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Paré G, Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Anand SS, Connolly SJ, Hirsh J, Simonsen K, Bhatt DL, Fox KAA, Eikelboom JW (2010) Effects of CYP2C19 genotype on outcomes of clopidogrel treatment. N Engl J Med 363(18):1704–1714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bauer T, Bouman HJ, Werkum JW, Ford NF, Berg JM, Taubert D (2011) Impact of CYP2C19 variant genotypes on clinical efficacy of antiplatelet treatment with clopidogrel: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 343:d4588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mangiacapra F, Patti G, Peace A, Gatto L, Vizzi V, Ricottini E, D'Ambrosio A, Muller O, Barbato E, di Sciascio G (2010) Comparison of platelet reactivity and periprocedural outcomes in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus and treated with clopidogrel and percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 106(5):619–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mijovic R, Kovacevic N, Zarkov M, Stosic Z, Cabarkapa V, Mitic G (2015) Reticulated platelets and antiplatelet therapy response in diabetic patients. J Thromb Thrombolysis 40(2):203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Drouet L, Bal dit Sollier C, Henry P (2010) Antiplatelet agents and diabetes mellitus. Ann Cardiol Angeiol 59(Suppl 2):S56–S64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Xie X, Ma YT, Yang YN, Li XM, Zheng YY, Ma X, Fu ZY, Ba·Bayinsilema, Li Y, Yu ZX, Chen Y, Chen BD, Liu F, Huang Y, Liu C, Baituola G (2013) Personalized antiplatelet therapy according to CYP2C19 genotype after percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized control trial. Int J Cardiol 168(4):3736–3740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cavallari LH, Lee CR, Beitelshees AL, Cooper-DeHoff R, Duarte JD, Voora D, Kimmel SE, McDonough C, Gong Y, Dave CV, Pratt VM, Alestock TD, Anderson RD, Alsip J, Ardati AK, Brott BC, Brown L, Chumnumwat S, Clare-Salzler MJ, Coons JC, Denny JC, Dillon C, Elsey AR, Hamadeh IS, Harada S, Hillegass WB, Hines L, Horenstein RB, Howell LA, Jeng LJB, Kelemen MD, Lee YM, Magvanjav O, Montasser M, Nelson DR, Nutescu EA, Nwaba DC, Pakyz RE, Palmer K, Peterson JF, Pollin TI, Quinn AH, Robinson SW, Schub J, Skaar TC, Smith DM, Sriramoju VB, Starostik P, Stys TP, Stevenson JM, Varunok N, Vesely MR, Wake DT, Weck KE, Weitzel KW, Wilke RA, Willig J, Zhao RY, Kreutz RP, Stouffer GA, Empey PE, Limdi NA, Shuldiner AR, Winterstein AG, Johnson JA, IGNITE Network (2018) Multisite investigation of outcomes with implementation of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 11(2):181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sibbing D, Koch W, Gebhard D, Schuster T, Braun S, Stegherr J, Morath T, Schomig A, von Beckerath N, Kastrati A (2010) Cytochrome 2C19*17 allelic variant, platelet aggregation, bleeding events, and stent thrombosis in clopidogrel-treated patients with coronary stent placement. Circulation 121(4):512–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tarkiainen EK, Holmberg MT, Tornio A, Neuvonen M, Neuvonen PJ, Backman JT, Niemi M (2015) Carboxylesterase 1 c.428G>A single nucleotide variation increases the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel by reducing its hydrolysis in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther 97(6):650–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saoussen Chouchene
    • 1
  • Rym Dabboubi
    • 2
  • Haythem Raddaoui
    • 3
  • Hela Abroug
    • 4
  • Khaldoun Ben Hamda
    • 3
  • Sondess Hadj Fredj
    • 2
  • Fatma Abderrazak
    • 1
  • Mayssa Gaaloul
    • 1
  • Marwa Rezek
    • 1
  • Fadoua Neffeti
    • 5
  • Ilhem Hellara
    • 5
  • Mouna Sassi
    • 6
  • Linda Khefacha
    • 6
  • Asma Sriha
    • 4
  • Semir Nouira
    • 7
  • Mohamed Fadhel Najjar
    • 5
  • Faouzi Maatouk
    • 3
  • Taieb Messaoud
    • 2
  • Mohsen Hassine
    • 1
  1. 1.Hematology DepartmentFattouma Bourguiba University HospitalMonastirTunisia
  2. 2.Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Laboratory (LR00SP03), Children’s Hospital Bechir HamzaTunisTunisia
  3. 3.Cardiology DepartmentFattouma Bourguiba University HospitalMonastirTunisia
  4. 4.Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine DepartmentFattouma Bourguiba University HospitalMonastirTunisia
  5. 5.Biochemistry DepartmentFattouma Bourguiba University HospitalMonastirTunisia
  6. 6.Biology Department, Maternity and Neonatal Medicine CenterFattouma Bourguiba University HospitalMonastirTunisia
  7. 7.Research Laboratory (LR12SP18)University of MonastirMonastirTunisia

Personalised recommendations