Advertisement

Marine Biology

, 167:18 | Cite as

Geographic variation in life-history traits of the long-lived monacanthid Meuschenia scaber (Monacanthidae)

  • V. ViscontiEmail author
  • E. D. L. Trip
  • M. H. Griffiths
  • Kendall D. Clements
Original Paper

Abstract

Demography and life-history characteristics of reef fishes may vary as a consequence of ecological and environmental factors that lead to changes among populations. We evaluated variation in life-history traits in the leatherjacket Meuschenia scaber (Monacanthidae) through age-based analysis of 2112 fish collected from three locations in New Zealand distributed along an 8° latitudinal and 5 °C SST gradients. Meuschenia scaber showed distinct differences in age structure, growth patterns, maximum size and age, sex ratio and mortality across this latitudinal gradient. At warmer lower latitudes (Hauraki Gulf) the population displayed significantly greater mean adult body size (Lmax) and asymptotic length (L) in comparison with the other two locations. Fish from Tasman Bay (mid-range latitude) had a longer life span (Tmax) and a maximum age of 19 years, which represents the longest-lived monacanthid documented to date. Fish from Pegasus Bay (cooler higher latitude) showed a slower initial growth than lower latitude counterparts. The difference in maximum age between the sexes declined clinally from 7 years in the Hauraki Gulf to 3 years in Tasman Bay and 1 year in Pegasus Bay. Meuschenia scaber females tended to display heavier and larger body size than males at all three locations. Sex ratios varied among populations and with depth, suggesting females in the Hauraki Gulf and Tasman Bay may move into deeper water with age. Given the increasing global exploitation of monacanthids in multispecies fisheries and their long-living nature, our results provide valuable age-based demographic information essential for future conservation, monitoring and management programs.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank P. Caiger, P. Browne and B. Doak for their assistance in the field and J.H. Choat for his comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by the Ministry for Primary Industries and University of Auckland Partnership Postgraduate Scholarships Fund. Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not MPI.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This study was supported by the Ministry for Primary Industries and University of Auckland Partnership postgraduate Scholarships Fund. Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not MPI.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for sampling were followed in the current study. All fish samples were collected in accordance with the University of Auckland Animal Ethics Committee approvals 001047 and 001676.

Supplementary material

227_2019_3628_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (167 kb)
Collection of aged otoliths (n = 6) showing ageing criteria (PDF 166 kb)

References

  1. Allen MS (2014) Variability is in the mesh-size of the sorter: Harataonga Beach and spatio-temporal patterning in northern Maori fisheries. J Pac Archaeol 5:21–38Google Scholar
  2. Anderson A (1997) Uniformity and regional variation in marine fish catches from prehistoric New Zealand. Asian Perspect 36(1):1–26Google Scholar
  3. Arendt JD (2011) Size-fecundity relationships, growth trajectories, and the temperature-size rule for ectotherms. Evolution 65:43–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arkhipkin A, Laptikhovsky V (2013) From gelatinous to muscle food chain: rock cod Patagonotothen ramsayi recycles coelenterate and tunicate resources on the Patagonian Shelf. J Fish Biol 83:1210–1220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson D (1994) Temperature and organism size—a biological law for ectotherms? Adv Ecol Res 25:1–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ayling A (1981) The role of biological disturbance in temperate subtidal encrusting communities. Ecology 62:830–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beentjes M, MacGibbon D, Lyon W (2015) Inshore trawl survey of Canterbury Bight and Pegasus Bay, April–June 2014 (KAH1402). N Z Fish Assess Rep 2015(14):136Google Scholar
  8. Behrens MD, Lafferty KD (2007) Temperature and diet effects on omnivorous fish performance: implications for the latitudinal diversity gradient in herbivorous fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64(6):867–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Behrens MD, Lafferty KD (2012) Geographic variation in the diet of Opaleye (Girella nigricans) with respect to temperature and habitat. PLoS One 7(9):e45901PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berumen ML, Trip E, Pratchett MS, Choat JH (2012) Differences in demographic traits of four butterflyfish species between two reefs of the Great Barrier Reef separated by 1,200 km. Coral Reefs 31:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beverton RJH (1992) Patterns of reproductive strategy parameters in some marine teleost fishes. J Fish Biol 41:137–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown JH (1995) Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Calder WA (1984) Size, function, and life history. Courier Corporation, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Caselle JE, Hamilton SL, Schroeder DM, Love MS, Standish JD, Rosales-Casian JA, Sosa-Nishizaki O (2011) Geographic variation in density, demography, and life history traits of a harvested, sex-changing, temperate reef fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 68:288–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapman DG, Robson DS (1960) The analysis of a catch curve. Biometrics 16:354–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Choat JH, Robertson DR (2002) Age-based studies Coral reef fishes: dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 57–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Choat JH, Robertson DR, Ackerman J, Posada JM (2003) An age-based demographic analysis of the Caribbean stoplight parrotfish Sparisoma viride. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 246:265–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Conover D (1992) Seasonality and the scheduling of life history at different latitudes. J Fish Biol 41:161–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DeMartini EE, Friedlander AM, Holzwarth SR (2005) Size at sex change in protogynous labroids, prey body size distributions, and apex predator densities at NW Hawaiian atolls. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 297:259–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Everson AR, Williams H, Ito B (1989) Maturation and reproduction in two Hawaiian eteline snappers, uku, Aprion virescens, and onaga, Etelis coruscans. Fish Bull 87:877–888Google Scholar
  21. Floeter SR, Behrens MD, Ferreira CEL, Paddack MJ, Horn MH (2005) Geographical gradients of marine herbivorous fishes: patterns and processes. Mar Biol 147(6):1435–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Francis R (1988) Are growth parameters estimated from tagging and age–length data comparable? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45:936–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Francis MP (1993) Checklist of the coastal fishes of Lord Howe, Norfolk, and Kermadec Islands, southwest Pacific Ocean. Pac Sci 47:136–170Google Scholar
  24. Francis MP (1996) Geographic distribution of marine reef fishes in the New Zealand region. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 30:35–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Götz A, Kerwath SE, Attwood CG, Sauer WH (2008) Effects of fishing on population structure and life history of roman Chrysoblephus laticeps (Sparidae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 362:245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Griffiths MH (2002) Life history of South African snoek, Thyrsites atun (Pisces: Gempylidae): a pelagic predator of the Benguela ecosystem. Fish Bull 100(4):690–710Google Scholar
  27. Grimes CB (1987) Reproductive biology of the Lutjanidae: a review. In: Polovina JJ, Ralston S (eds) Tropical snappers and groupers. Biology and fisheries management. Westview Press, Boulder and LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Grimes CB, Huntsman GR (1980) Reproductive biology of the vermilion snapper, Rhomboplites aurorubens, from North Carolina and South Carolina. Fish Bull 78:137–146Google Scholar
  29. Grove-Jones RP, Burnell AF (1991) Fisheries biology of the ocean jacket (Monacanthidae: Nelusetta Ayraudi) in the Eastern Waters of the Great Australian Bight, South Australia: Final Report to the Fishing Industry Research and Development Council, Grant No. DFS01Z: South Australian Department of FisheriesGoogle Scholar
  30. Guerra Campos A, Bashirullah A (1975) Biología del pargo Lutjanus griseus (Linn.) de la Isla de Cubagua, Venezuela, 2: Maduración sexual y fecundidad. Bol Inst Oceanogr Venezuela 14:109–116Google Scholar
  31. Gust N, Choat J, Ackerman J (2002) Demographic plasticity in tropical reef fishes. Mar Biol 140(5):1039–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haddon M (2001) Modelling and quantitative methods in fisheries. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamilton S, Caselle J, Standish J, Schroeder D, Love M, Rosales-Casian J, Sosa-Nishizaki O (2007) Size-selective harvesting alters life histories of a temperate sex-changing fish. Ecol Appl 17:2268–2280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamilton SL, Caselle JE, Lantz CA, Egloff TL, Kondo E, Newsome SD, Loke-Smith K, Pondella DJ II, Young KA, Lowe CG (2011) Extensive geographic and ontogenetic variation characterizes the trophic ecology of a temperate reef fish on southern California (USA) rocky reefs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 429:227–244PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hawkins JP, Roberts CM (2004) Effects of fishing on sex-changing Caribbean parrotfishes. Biol Conserv 115:213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoenig JM (1983) Empirical use of longevity data to estimate mortality rates. Fish Bull 82:898–903Google Scholar
  37. Hutchins JB, Swainston R (1986) Sea fishes of southern Australia: complete field guide for anglers and divers. Swainston, PerthGoogle Scholar
  38. Janssen J, Harbison G (1981) Fish in Salps: the association of Squaretails (Tetragonurus Spp.) With Pelagic Tunicates1. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 61:917–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jennings S, Beverton R (1991) Intraspecific variation in the life history tactics of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus L.) stocks. ICES J Mar Sci 48:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kelly M (2015) Splendid sponges: a guide to the sponges of New Zealand. NIWA, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim A, Bae H, Kim H, Oh C (2016) Age and growth of filefish, Thamnaconus modestus (Günther, 1877) off the Jeju Island of Korea. Ocean Sci J 51:355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kimura DK (1980) Likelihood methods for the von Bertalanffy growth curve. Fish Bull 77:765–776Google Scholar
  43. Kingsford M, Milicich M (1987) Presettlement phase of Parika scaber (Pisces: Monacanthidae): a temperate reef fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 36:65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. LaBarbera M (1989) Analyzing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:97–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Law R (2000) Fishing, selection, and phenotypic evolution. ICES J Mar Sci 57:659–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Le Cren ED (1951) The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). J Anim Ecol 20(2):201–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lindholm R (1984) Observations on the chinaman leatherjacket Nelusetta ayraudi (Quoy and Gaimard) in the Great Australian Bight. Mar Freshw Res 35:597–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mancera-Rodríguez NJ, Castro-Hernández JJ (2004) Age and growth of Stephanolepis hispidus (Linnaeus, 1766) (Pisces: Monacanthidae), in the Canary Islands area. Fish Res 66:381–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Miller M, Stewart J (2009) The commercial fishery for ocean leatherjackets (Nelusetta ayraudi, Monacanthidae) in New South Wales, Australia. Asian Fish Sci 22:257–264Google Scholar
  50. Miller M, Stewart J, West RJ (2010) Using otoliths to estimate age and growth of a large Australian endemic monocanthid, Nelusetta ayraudi (Quoy and Gaimard, 1824). Environ Biol Fish 88:263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ministry for Primary Industries (2013) Fisheries assessment plenary, May 2013: stock assessments and yield estimates, vol 3. Compiled by the Fisheries Science Group, Ministry for Primary Industries, pp 1–1357Google Scholar
  52. Ministry for Primary Industries (2017) Leatherjacket (LEA), pp 660–669, In: Fisheries assessment plenary, May 2017: stock assessments and stock status. Compiled by the Fisheries Science Group, Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, New Zealand, p 1596Google Scholar
  53. Musick JA (1999) Criteria to define extinction risk in marine fishes: the American Fisheries Society initiative. Fisheries 24:6–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Page M, Kelly M (2016) Awesome ascidians: a guide to the sea squirts of New Zealand. NIWA, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  55. Pears RJ (2005) Comparative demography and assemblage structure of serranid fishes: implications for conservation and fisheries management. PhD Dissertation, James Cook UniversityGoogle Scholar
  56. Poynter MR (1980) The distribution and abundance of a temperate reef fish Parika scaber (Monacanthidae) with emphasis on recruitment, plus aspects of feeding ecology and growth. PhD Thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  57. Randall JE, Hartman W (1968) Sponge-feeding fishes of the West Indies. Mar Biol 1:216–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reshetnikov YS, Claro R (1976) Cycles of biological processes in tropical fishes with reference to Lutjanus synagris. J Ichthyol 16:711–723Google Scholar
  59. Robertson DR, Ackerman J, Choat JH, Posada JM, Pitt J (2005) Ocean surgeonfish Acanthurus bahianus. I. The geography of demography. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 295:229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Russell BC (1983) The food and feeding habits of rocky reef fish of north- eastern New Zealand. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 17:121–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stearns SC, Koella JC (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in life-history traits: predictions of reaction norms for age and size at maturity. Evolution 40:893–913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stevenson ML, MacGibbon DJ (2015) Inshore trawl survey of the west coast South Island and Tasman and Golden Bays, March–April 2015 (KAH1503) New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2015/67. 94 pGoogle Scholar
  63. Trip E, Choat JH, Wilson DT, Robertson DR (2008) Inter-oceanic analysis of demographic variation in a widely distributed Indo-Pacific coral reef fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 373:97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Trip EL, Clements KD, Raubenheimer D, Choat JH (2014) Temperature-related variation in growth rate, size, maturation and life span in a marine herbivorous fish over a latitudinal gradient. J Anim Ecol 83:866–875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Visconti V, Trip ED, Griffiths MH, Clements KD (2018a) Reproductive biology of the leatherjacket, Meuschenia scaber (Monacanthidae) (Forster 1801) in the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 52(1):82–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Visconti V, Trip ED, Griffiths MH, Clements KD (2018b) Life-history traits of the leatherjacket Meuschenia scaber, a long-lived monacanthid. J Fish Biol 92(2):470–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wulff JL (1994) Sponge feeding by Caribbean angelfishes, trunkfishes, and filefishes. In: van Soest RWM, van Kempen TMG, Braekman JC (eds) Sponges in time and space. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 265–271Google Scholar
  68. Yamahira K, Conover DO (2002) Intra-vs. interspecific latitudinal variation in growth: adaptation to temperature or seasonality? Ecology 83:1252–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yearsley GK, Ward RD, Last PR (1999) Australian seafood handbook: an identification guide to domestic species. CSIRO, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  70. Zeldis JR, Willis KJ (2015) Biogeographic and trophic drivers of mesozooplankton distribution on the northeast continental shelf and in Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 49(1):69–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft LaboratorySuffolkUK
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.Nelson Marlborough Institute of TechnologyNelsonNew Zealand
  4. 4.Institute for Applied EcologyAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand
  5. 5.Ministry for Primary IndustriesWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations