Marine Biology

, Volume 161, Issue 12, pp 2735–2751 | Cite as

Pelagic Sargassum community change over a 40-year period: temporal and spatial variability

  • C. L. Huffard
  • S. von Thun
  • A. D. Sherman
  • K. Sealey
  • K. L. SmithJr.
Open Access
Original Paper

Abstract

Pelagic forms of the brown algae (Phaeophyceae) Sargassum spp. and their conspicuous rafts are defining characteristics of the Sargasso Sea in the western North Atlantic. Given rising temperatures and acidity in the surface ocean, we hypothesized that macrofauna associated with Sargassum in the Sargasso Sea have changed with respect to species composition, diversity, evenness, and sessile epibiota coverage since studies were conducted 40 years ago. Sargassum communities were sampled along a transect through the Sargasso Sea in 2011 and 2012 and compared to samples collected in the Sargasso Sea, Gulf Stream, and south of the subtropical convergence zone from 1966 to 1975. Mobile macrofauna communities exhibited changes in community structure and declines in diversity and evenness within a 6-month time period (August 2011–February 2012). Equivalent declines in diversity and evenness were recorded in the same region (Sargasso Sea, 25°–29°N) in 1972–1973. Recent community structures were unlike any documented historically, whether compared to sites of the same latitude range within the Sargasso Sea, or the broader historical dataset of sites ranging across the Sargasso Sea, Gulf Stream, and south of the subtropical convergence zone. Recent samples also recorded low coverage by sessile epibionts, both calcifying forms and hydroids. The diversity and species composition of macrofauna communities associated with Sargassum might be inherently unstable. While several biological and oceanographic factors might have contributed to these observations, including a decline in pH, increase in summer temperatures, and changes in the abundance and distribution of Sargassum seaweed in the area, it is not currently possible to attribute direct causal links.

Introduction

Pelagic forms of the brown algae (Phaeophyceae) Sargassum are a defining characteristic of the Sargasso Sea. Ranging from approximately 20°–40°N and 30°–75°W (Butler et al. 1983; Coston-Clements et al. 1991; Laffoley et al. 2011), the Sargasso Sea is bordered by the Gulf Stream to the west, north equatorial current to the south, and weak circulation to the east (Siegel et al. 2001). Although this floating ecosystem is located in the center of the oligotrophic North Atlantic Gyre (Coston-Clements et al. 1991), it has higher concentrations of metazooplankton (Riemann et al. 2011) and phosphorous (Culliney 1970) than the surrounding waters. The Sargasso Sea is bisected by the subtropical convergence zone (STCZ), a frontal region which is often associated with increased productivity (Andersen et al. 2011). Sargassum floating on the surface ranges in size from fist-sized clumps to massive rafts tens of meters in diameter (Marmorino et al. 2011) forming contiguous features possibly extending 100 miles or more (Carr 1986).

Two floating species of Sargassum, S. natans and S. fluitans, have dominated algal collections in the Sargasso Sea (Parr 1939; Fine 1970; Niermann 1986). Both species have buoyant, gas-filled bladders and are considered pelagic in origin, reproducing by vegetative fragmentation (Butler et al. 1983). Sargassum macroalgal rafts provide important feeding and spawning grounds for pelagic fishes (Casazza and Ross 2008) and seabirds (Trott et al. 2010) and are a high-productivity ecosystem along open-ocean (oligotrophic) migratory paths of endangered humpback whales and sea turtles (Trott et al. 2010). Sargassum rafts have been designated as “essential fish habitat,” a status that impacts international management recommendations for the Sargasso Sea (South Atlantic Fishery Management Council 2002).

The first comprehensive studies of Sargassum abundance in the Sargasso Sea were conducted between 1933 and 1935 (Parr 1939). More than 40 years later, another quantitative study of Sargassum was conducted in overlapping areas between 1977 and 1981 (Stoner and Greening 1984). Stoner reported a major decrease in Sargassum compared to the 1930s study and attributed this decline to either natural or anthropogenic causes. Subsequent recalculations found that there was no significant decline in Sargassum biomass except in two sampling events in the southwestern Sargasso Sea (Butler and Stoner 1984). Recently, satellite imagery has revealed that the distribution and abundance of Sargassum features in the Atlantic are highly variable over space and time (Gower and King 2011; Gower et al. 2013). In 2011, ocean-scale buildup of Sargassum biomass was 200-fold higher than the previous 8-year average (Gower and King 2011).

Diverse assemblages of organisms are associated with Sargassum rafts, including both attached epibionts and mobile fauna, ranging from microbiota to fishes (Winge 1923; Carpenter 1970; Fine 1970; Ryland 1974; Butler et al. 1983). Coston-Clements et al. (1991) reported over 100 species of fishes and four sea turtle species associated with pelagic Sargassum and Trott et al. (2010) reported a total of over 145 invertebrate species. Numerous sponges, fungi, bacteria, diatoms, and protists have also been reported (Thiel and Gutow 2005a). Among these counts, ten fish and invertebrate taxa are currently considered endemic to Sargassum (Coston-Clements et al. 1991; Laffoley et al. 2011). Sargassum associates in the Sargasso Sea have been documented to be more abundant than in the Gulf Stream (Stoner and Greening 1984) and possibly more diverse than in some other areas with Sargassum rafts, such as the East China Sea (Abé et al. 2013), New Zealand (Kingsford and Choat 1985), coastal Ireland (Norton and Benson 1983), and Iceland (Ingólfsson 1995).

Rising concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide are resulting in global warming and increased acidity of the ocean (Feely et al. 2004; Orr et al. 2005; Doney et al. 2009), including in the Sargasso Sea (Bates et al. 2012, 2014). These changing conditions might affect Sargassum and associated biota. Ocean acidification and the concomitant decrease in carbonate saturation have been correlated to reduced formation rates of calcareous skeletal structures of some pelagic fauna such as mollusks and foraminifera (Fabry et al. 2008; Bednaršek et al. 2014). Decreasing pH has also been related to decreased reproduction and increased mortality in crustaceans including copepods, euphausiids, and decapods (e.g., Yamada and Ikeda 1999; Watanabe et al. 2006; Metzger et al. 2007). By contrast, elevated concentrations of CO2 can stimulate the growth of coastal macroalgae, including Phaeophyceae (Wu et al. 2008). Photosynthetic activity by phytoplankton and brown algae can buffer the boundary layer from low-pH conditions (Wootton et al. 2008; Saderne and Wahl 2012). Taken together, these findings suggest that Sargassum seaweed might fare better than its faunal associates as the impacts of climate change progress, influencing the community living within Sargassum rafts.

Here, we present a structural study of the Sargassum community conducted between Bermuda and the Bahamas in winter and summer months in 2011 and 2012 and compare these observations to historical sample data reported from the same area between 1966 and 1975 (Weis 1968; Fine 1970; Butler et al. 1983). Given rising sea surface temperatures (SST) and acidity in the surface of ocean, including the Sargasso Sea (Bates et al. 2012, 2014), we hypothesized that the diverse biotic community associated with Sargassum has changed in macrofauna species composition, diversity, and evenness measures when compared to studies conducted 40 years ago. Globally, the magnitude and direction of biogeographic range shifts correspond with that of temperature change (Pinsky et al. 2013), which is northward in the Sargasso Sea (Friedland et al. 2007). Compared to demersal species, pelagic animals are predicted to experience a greater magnitude in range change in response to surface warming (Cheung et al. 2009). As such, we further predicted that the mobile macrofauna community structure (MMCS) of samples from 2011 and 2012 would be similar to those historic samples collected from more southern sites, signaling a northward shift of rafting community associates.

Materials and methods

Terminology

We use three terms to refer to varying sizes of floating Sargassum biomass. “Clumps” refer to individual strands or small entangled groups of individual strands that vary from fist to dinner-plate size (9–28 cm diameter). “Rafts” refer to a larger aggregation of many clumps, forming a contiguous habitat (meters in extent). A windrow of floating Sargassum formed by Langmuir circulation would be an example of an elongate raft. We choose to use this term over the synonymous terms “patch” and “mat” because of its prevalence in the ecological literature about floating, or “rafting” communities (Thiel and Gutow 2005a, b; Gibson et al. 2006; Macreadie et al. 2011). We use the term “features” when discussing floating masses of Sargassum large enough to be detected by the satellite MERIS (Gower and King 2011). “Stations” refer to sampling locations. During each cruise, one sample was recorded from each station and used to assess faunal communities.

Area of investigation

All sampling stations we analyzed are shown in Fig. 1. Our sampling strategy was designed to address fundamental questions concerning variability in Sargassum communities over time and space. We sampled along a transect of stations representative of the central portion of the Sargasso Sea, from Bermuda in the north to the Bahama Islands in the south (Fig. 1; Stations 1, 3, 5, and 6). This transect covered a broad region studied in historical sampling of the Sargassum community (Butler et al. 1983; Fine 1970). Our Sta. 1 was located near the long-term time series Hydrostation S (32°N 64°W, shown in Fig. 1 as a green triangle; Bates et al. 2012; Bates et al. 2014). Three cruises on M/Y Lone Ranger were conducted over a 13-month period including winter and summer months—February 2011, August 2011, and February 2012—to capture weather extremes that might influence this surface ocean community. Due to weather and failed political clearances, we were only able to sample all four stations during two of the three cruises (February 2011 and February 2012). Mobile macrofauna samples from February 2011 and epibiota samples from August 2011 were compromised after collection and are not reported.
Fig. 1

Study area map: stations of recent sample stations (small yellow boxes, stations numbered 1, 3, 5, and 6) and historical sample stations (Weis 1968; Fine 1970; Butler et al. 1983) including Hydrostation S in green. Samples used for direct comparison across time series in Sargasso Sea, 25°–29°N (“restricted block”) depicted by white triangles inside larger white box. Additional historical stations included in broader analysis of all samples shown as orange triangles. Long time-series records of sea surface temperature and pCO2 recorded in vicinity of Hydrostation S. Map prepared in ArcMap 10.1

A total of 88 historical sample datasets were analyzed in addition to the recent samples from 2011 and 2012. For brevity, all historical “samples” mentioned throughout refer to the published sample data. We did not have access to the original samples themselves. This total includes 41 samples from Hydrostation S and excludes historical data based on samples with displacement volume (DV) <70 ML (see Statistical analysis of mobile fauna communities section below). These stations extended from the continental margin off Nova Scotia to the Windward Islands. Historical sampling dates (ranging from 1966–1975), geographic coordinates of stations, and references for historical sample data are provided in Online Resource 1.

Diversity was found to vary by latitude range in historical samples (see Statistical analysis of mobile fauna communities section below). Thus, direct comparisons between recent and historical macrofauna communities were restricted to samples from those stations located within the Sargasso Sea and between 25° and 29°N. We refer to these stations as the “restricted block” (Fig. 1—white triangles in white box). Data based on samples from the restricted block were used to compare MMCS, diversity, evenness, and Multivariate Dispersion Index (MDI) documented in 2011 and 2012 [N = 6 (Sta. 3, 5, 6 sampled in 2011 and again in 2012)] to those documented in 1972 (N = 2) and 1973 (N = 14).

Oceanographic conditions (SST and pCO2)

Sea surface temperature (SST) was recorded during recent cruises by a hull-mounted flow-through Seabird SBE45 thermosalinograph. Recent temperatures represent the SST at the time collections were made. Long-term trends in SST and pCO2 at Hydrostation S were available through the Bermuda Atlantic Time series Program (Bates et al. 2012, 2014). These time series data were smoothed to deconvolve seasonality from long-term trends using a negative exponential model (0.7 sampling proportion) in SigmaPlot. Temperature data were available for only 12 other historical stations. We used regression analysis to examine possible correlations between SST and diversity.

Sampling method

All recent samples were collected from a small boat launched from M/Y Lone Ranger to minimize any impact of the large ship on sampling, especially of the mobile species, which can exhibit an escape response. We used standard methods for monitoring mobile macrofauna in the Sargasso Sea (Butler et al. 1983). Sargassum clumps were collected in dip nets with a 0.25-m2 mouth opening and 505-µm mesh netting. This mesh size is considered sufficient for capturing small macrofauna such as amphipods and gastropods (Tanaka and Leite 1998). Although this method can underestimate fishes (Moser et al. 1998), fishes were included in analyses of diversity, evenness, and community structure because they were nevertheless detected in both recent and historical samples. The dip-netted clumps were placed in 19-L plastic buckets with seawater and then transferred within 30 min to the ship. Each recent sample analyzed here was the combined collection of approximately 103 mL total DV of clumps, collected from a station over the course of 1–2 days. Historical sampling of mobile fauna used this same incremental collection approach, but typically attained lower total DV for each sample. Mobile species in Sargassum clump samples were immediately sorted to major taxa at SST. The few specimens of Sargassum fish, Histrio histrio, we encountered were quickly photographed and then released back into the surface waters. The residual sample water from each sorting effort, along with a subsequent freshwater rinse, was then filtered through 420-µm screens, and the retained material was preserved for later sorting. Six small aliquots of Sargassum, 500–900 mL DV from different individual plants in the full sample, were preserved for later analysis of the attached biota in each sample. The mobile taxa samples, screened material, and Sargassum aliquots were preserved in 5 % buffered formalin.

In the laboratory, mobile fauna were sorted, identified to lowest taxon possible, and counted for the samples from August 2011 and February 2012. We compared the diversity and community structure of distinct taxa; however, we could not identify all organisms to the same taxonomic level. Percent coverage by epibiota (attached, sessile growth) on Sargassum was assessed in the laboratory using standard photogrammetric techniques (adapted from Bohnsack 1979; see Epibiotapercent cover below) for samples from February 2011 and February 2012.

Statistical analysis of mobile fauna communities

Using Chao1 analysis (Chao et al. 2009), we verified that sufficient sampling was conducted in 2011 and 2012 to detect >95 % of mobile animal groups predicted to exist at sampling stations at the time of collections. The test statistic SChao1 is calculated using the abundance and richness of fauna sampled in relation to the number of taxa represented by only one or two individuals. It can be considered a proxy for understanding sample completeness.

As reported by Fine (1970) for their samples, we found no relationship between sample volume and the number of animal groups detected for the historical station with the largest number of surveys (Hydrostation S: n = 41 replicates, DV range 71–1,357 mL, DV vs. number of animal groups detected r2 = 0.0918, F1,39 = 3.9418, P > 0.05). This finding suggested that 70 mL was sufficient for capturing the diversity of mobile macrofauna in those historical samples. Based on Chao1 analysis, historical samples with DV <50 mL were estimated to have captured <85 % of animal groups predicted to be present. Thus, we conservatively eliminated from analyses the nine historical samples with a DV of <70 mL, leaving a historical sample size of 88. Displacement volumes for recent samples were much greater than those for historical samples included in analyses, except for Weis (1968), which had a very large sample volume [recent samples: 12.0 ± 2.5 L standard deviation (SD); historical samples except for Weis = 0.3 ± 0.2 L S.D.; Weis 28.3 L].

Analyses of diversity, evenness, MMCS, and MDI were conducted based on treatments of untransformed abundance data in Primer-6 (Clarke and Warwick 2001). Both historical and recent abundance data were standardized to a sample volume of 103 mL, the approximate volume sampled at each station in 2011 and 2012. The DIVERSE routine delivered Shannon diversity (H′ loge) and Pielou’s evenness (J′). Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) plots of MMCS were based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity indices of square-root-transformed abundance data. At least one thousand starts were performed to generate MDS plots, and ANOSIM was used to test for differences in MMCS. RELATE was used to examine cyclicity, and MDI was used to compare degrees of variability between sample groups. The SIMPROF function was performed as part of CLUSTER analyses generated by Primer-6 to examine differences in MMCS of different test groups.

Production and biomass vary considerably along transects in the Sargasso Sea (Riemann et al. 2011), which can complicate statistical testing. Therefore, we divided mobile macrofauna datasets into test groups (latitude range, geographic group, and season) and assessed variability between these groups using historical data. Latitude ranges were 10°–19°N; 20°–24°N; 25°–29°N, and 30°–45°N. One range (25°–29°N) likely encompassed STCZ activity (Riemann et al. 2011), which can have elevated animal abundance and productivity (Andersen et al. 2011). The following geographic groups were used: Gulf Stream, Sargasso Sea, south of the Sargasso Sea, north of the Sargasso Sea, and eastern Sargasso Sea. Seasons were divided as follows: winter (December–February), spring (March–May), summer (June–August), fall (September–November). Preliminary analysis of historical mobile macrofauna abundance and diversity at stations within the Sargasso Sea revealed that the Shannon H′ loge diversity index differed by latitude group (Kruskal–Wallis test, H3 = 16.48, P = 0.0009; H′ loge≤24°N = 1.6 ± 0.25; H′ loge25°–29°N = 1.6 ± 0.26; H′ loge 30°–45°N = 1.8 ± 0.25; H′ loge30–45°N > H′ loge10°–24°N post hoc Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney, U = 224, N1 = 14, N2 = 58, P = 0.0048), but not season (Kruskal–Wallis test, H3 = 4.152, P = 0.2455). Therefore, when comparing diversity and evenness of historical and recent samples, we grouped data across all seasons, but separated them by latitude range and geographic area.

Using StatXact-4 and Microsoft Excel, we performed Kruskal–Wallis and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests to examine differences in mean diversity and evenness across groups, followed by post hoc Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney U tests to examine pairwise differences (Siegel 1956). Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney U tests are nonparametric and appropriate for comparisons of groups that have small and/or unequal sample sizes, with non-normal distributions (Siegel, 1956). For pairwise comparisons with small sample sizes (n1 < 8), we calculated Mann–Whitney U tests by hand using the table of critical values in Siegel (1956).

Epibiota percent cover

Six strands of Sargassum ~50 cm long were chosen haphazardly from each preserved aliquot in February 2011 and February 2012. For each of these subsamples (n = 6 per aliquot), we noted the presence or absence of six growth zones described by Ryland (1974). These zones are apical growing tip (zone A), subapical developing blades (zone B), developing bladders (zone C), mature bladders (zone D), mature growth with spots (zone E), and senescent dark brown (zone F). Growth zone E is an advanced growth stage, more prominent in senescent Sargassum, while F represents a more senescent growth stage than E. Each strand was placed in a tray and photographed from directly above using a Nikon D200 digital camera mounted on a tripod. Images were cropped so that each photograph represented a single growth zone. Using Image J (Rasband 2012), the macro “Drawrandomdots.txt” (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/macros/DrawRandomDots.txt) was used to overlay at least 250 random dots on each image so that at least 25 dots fell onto the 2-dimensional images of the bladder, stem, and leaf, respectively. We recorded the taxa visible under these dots to estimate percent coverage by epibiota. For epibiont growth forms that projected from the Sargassum, such as Lepas barnacles or hydroids, we counted the dots that fell where the epibiont attached to the weed, not the projecting portion.

Historical descriptions of epibionts were based on different methods or were qualitative where available for samples in the restricted block, precluding statistical comparisons of sessile Sargassum associates across time periods.

Mobile macrofauna trophic groups

Mobile macrofauna were placed into trophic groups (predators of mobile fauna, predators of sessile fauna, herbivores, and detritivores) according to published food web relationships, feeding observations, and gut content analyses (designations and references in Online Resource 2). Where data were not available for a particular taxon, the trophic group of congeners or the next highest taxonomic level was used. Where trophic group reports were inconsistent, the highest level reported was used. Only those trophic groups representing at least 1 % of all samples were included. As such, salps (which filter feed on plankton) and parasites were excluded.

Results

Oceanographic conditions (SST and pCO2)

SST at recent sampling stations ranged from 21.3 °C in February 2011 to 29.6 °C in August 2011 (Fig. 2a). At Hydrostation S, year-round SST has not risen significantly since 1969 (r2 = 0.0003, F1,489 = 0.1382, P = 0.7102; Fig. 2b). However, summer SST at Hydrostation S has increased slightly and gradually since 1969 (r2 = 0.2098, F1,35 = 10.5561, P = 0026; Fig. 2c). Similarly, pCO2 at this station has increased steadily since 1984 [r2 = 0.1566, F1,378 = 71.1882, P < 0001; Fig. 2d; Bates et al. 2012, 2014]. We found no relationship between SST and Shannon H′ loge diversity index among the samples for which we had both of these values (N = 5 recent sites, 12 historical sites; r2 = 0.0049, F1,15 = 0.0745, P = 0.7887).
Fig. 2

Sea surface temperature and pCO2, a Sea surface temperature at recent survey stations at time of sampling, b time series sea surface temperature (black line) and long-term trend (red line) collected at Hydrostation S (32°N, 64°W, near recent Station 1), c Summer sea surface temperature (black dots) and long-term trend (red line) at Hydrostation S, d pCO2 (black line) and long-term trend (red line) at Hydrostation S. Smoothing in b and d performed using negative exponential model and 0.7 sampling proportion. Data for panels bd available through the Bermuda Atlantic Time Series program (Bates et al. 2012; Bates et al. 2014)

Mobile macrofauna community structure and diversity: recent surveys

In August 2011 and February 2012, we detected a total of 23 distinct taxa: eight distinct amphipods, one copepod, three decapods, two brachyurans, one tanaid, one polychaete, one snail, two nudibranchs, one pycnogonid, and three fishes. Total abundance varied greatly between samples (Table 1), ranging from 738 individuals collected at Sta. 6 in February 2012 to 9,586 individuals collected at Sta. 3 that same month. The decapod Latreutes fucorum was consistently the most abundant mobile macrofauna species encountered. We detected six out of ten species thought to be endemic to the Sargasso Sea, denoted by an asterisk in Table 1.
Table 1

Abundance (individuals L−1) of mobile macrofauna associated with Sargassum at four sample stations of recent study

Organism

Stations Aug 2011

Stations Feb 2012

1

3

5

6

1

3

5

6

Annelida: Phyllodocida

 Platyneries dumerilli

0

0

0

0.6

0

0

0

Crustacea: Amphipoda

 Ampithoe sp. A

0

0

0

30.0

11.5

0.9

1.3

 Ampithoe sp. B

0

0

0

3.6

5.9

0.8

1.2

 Ampithoe longimana

0

0

0

0.1

0.6

0

0.2

 *Biancolinabrassicacephala

0.1

0.1

0

0

0

0

0

 Hyale

0

0.9

0

3.1

1.4

0.1

0

 Deutella

0

0.1

3.6

0

0.3

0

0.1

 *Sunamphitoe pelagica

0

0

0

26.6

9.5

0.7

0

 Unidentified amphipod

0.4

1.1

0.6

29.1

5.3

0.8

0.3

Crustacea: Copepoda

 Unidentified copepod

0

0.5

0.2

0.1

0

0

0

Crustacea: Decapoda

 Hippolyte coerulescens

1.8

5.4

14.9

5.2

1.5

0.9

0.3

 *Latreutes fucorum

124.1

195.6

214.3

472.9

908.3

112.7

67.5

 Leander tenicornis

8

11.7

9.6

7.8

9.4

3.8

1.1

 *Planes minutus

3.7

10.9

2.1

0.4

1.5

0.9

0.7

 Portunus sayi

2.9

23.3

17.7

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.1

Crustacea: Tanaidacea

 Tanaid

0

0

0.1

0

0

0

0

Arthropoda: Pycnogonida

 Pycnogonid

0

0

0

0.1

0

0

0

Mollusca: Caenogastropoda

 *Litiopa melanostoma

2.2

0.5

14.3

0

0

1.2

0.6

Mollusca: Nudibranchia

 Corambe obscura

0

0

0

2.8

1.5

0.2

0

 *Scyllaea pelagica

0

0

0

8.0

1.8

0.1

0.5

Chordata: Teleostei

 Histrio histrio

0.2

0.5

0.1

0.5

0

0

0

 Diodon

0

0

0.1

0

0

0

0

 Other fish

0.9

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total no. of individuals sampled (standardized to 10L sample)

1,443

2,506

2,776

5,909

9,586

1,232

738

Number of taxffoley

10

12

12

17

14

13

12

Original sample displacement volume exceeded 10 L for each station. Asterisks denote possible Sargassum community endemics (Laffoley et al. 2011)

For each recent cruise to the Sargasso Sea, MMCS did not cluster by station, and samples from Feb 2012 did not cluster by time period (Aug. 2011 and Feb. 2012; Table 1; ANOSIM Global R = 0.296, P = 17.1 %, Fig. 3a). For recent samples in the 25°–29°N restricted block (from Stations 3, 5, and 6), diversity and evenness at each station differed between the two cruises (diversity: Mann–Whitney U test U = 9, N1 = 3, N2 = 3, P = 0.05; evenness: Mann–Whitney U = 9, N1 = 3, N2 = 3, P = 0.05). Shannon H′ loge diversity index averaged 0.8 ± 0.2 SD for the samples collected in Aug 2011 and 0.4 ± 0.09 SD in Feb 2012 (Fig. 3b). Pielou’s J′ evenness averaged 0.3 ± 0.05 SD in Aug 2011, and 0.2 ± 0.04 SD in and Feb 2012 (Fig. 3c) for those sites. Station 1 was not included in these diversity and evenness summaries because it lies north of the 25°–29°N block.
Fig. 3

Mobile macrofauna community composition (MMCS) similarity, diversity, and evenness for Sargasso Sea stations examined, Aug 2011 and Feb 2012. a Cluster diagram showing percent similarity between samples. MMCS >48 % similar across sampling periods. Red lines denote statistically significant clustering according to the Simprof test, b Shannon diversity by recent cruise date. Station 1 (black dot) lies north of Sargasso Sea, 25°–29°N restricted block c) Pielou’s evenness index by recent cruise date. Station 1 (black dot) lies north of Sargasso Sea, 25°–29°N restricted block

Mobile macrofauna: comparison of historical and recent samples from the restricted block

Mobile macrofauna community structures documented in the restricted block in 2011 and 2012 were unlike those previously documented by historical cruises to the same area (ANOSIM Global R = 0.917, P = 0.01 %; Recent samples were <13 % similar to any of these historical samples; SIMPROF Pi = 14.09, P = 0.1 %; Fig. 4a). Diversity and evenness were significantly lower in Aug 2011 and Feb 2012 compared with the same measures from samples collected in 1972 and 1973 (diversity: Kruskal–Wallis H3 = 14.8, P = 0.002; evenness: Kruskal–Wallis H3 = 15.5, P = 0.0014; Fig. 4b, c, all groups were significantly different as determined by post hoc Mann–Whitney tests, with successive reductions between each sampling period). A measure of variability, the Multivariate Dispersion Index (MDI), was not significantly different for recent and historical samples from the restricted block (1.07 vs 1.00, respectively). Three flatworms, three nudibranchs, one isopod, two copepods, two decapods, and two pycnogonids were recorded in historical samples from the restricted block, but not in recent samples. By contrast, recent samples recorded seven amphipods and one tanaid that were not identified in historical samples in this area. However, this result could stem in part from improved taxonomic resolution of small crustaceans that did not appear to be present in historical samples. Because recent and historical dipnet collections of fishes could have yielded a biased subsample of the Sargassum community (Moser et al. 1998), we do not interpret the presence/absence of fishes.
Fig. 4

Recent and historical (Butler et al. 1983) samples of mobile fauna associated with Sargassum in Sargasso Sea, between 25° and 29°N (“restricted block” identified by white triangles in Fig. 1). a Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling plot of mobile fauna communities, with similarity cluster overlays. All diversity (b) and evenness (c) groups significantly different from each other based on pairwise Mann–Whitney U tests

Mobile macrofauna: comparison of historical and recent samples from all latitudes and ecological groups

Recently sampled MMCS were also unlike any sample from the broader historical dataset, including those from samples from as far south as the Caribbean (orange and white triangles in Fig. 1; ANOSIM Global R = 0.606, P = 0.001 %). Recent MMCS were <19 % similar to any single historical sample MMCS (SIMPROF Pi = 6.9, P = 0.1 %), and <15 % similar to any historical sample in the Sargasso Sea (SIMPROF Pi = 5.69, P = 0.1 %; Fig. 5). The MMCS at historical stations in southern latitudes and those from recent stations were significantly different and did not indicate a northward latitudinal shift of species assemblages. Seasonal cyclicity in MMCS was once evident at Sta. S based on historical samples from 1972 and 1973, and in both those years communities returned to approximately the starting community compositions by the end of the year (Online Resource 2 panel a; RELATE test for cyclicity ρ = 0.23, P = 0.01 %). Our recent sample from Station 1 near Hydrostation S was far outside the range of historical variability at Hydrostation S (Online Resource 2 panel b).
Fig. 5

Multi-dimensional scaling plots of Sargassum-associated mobile macrofauna community structures documented in August 2011 and February 2012 (open shapes, legends designated with an “R”) compared with communities documented in historical samples collected between 1966 and 1975 (Weis 1968; Fine 1970; Butler et al. 1983), all geographic and latitude groups (both orange andwhite triangles in Fig. 1), labeled by a geographic group, b latitude group, c season, and d year

Epibiota percent cover

Each aliquot of Sargassum was identified, >95 % being S. natans. Six sessile taxa were documented growing attached to Sargassum. A total of 69.3 ± 22.9 % SD (N = 333 subsamples) of the plant in Feb 2011 and 78.5 ± 18.1 % SD (N = 335 subsamples) of the plant in February 2012 was free of epibiont coverage (Table 2). Although average coverage by all epibiont taxa was lower in Feb 2012 than Feb 2011, there was no significant difference between these groups (all pairwise tests P > 0.2). For each aliquot, we recorded the presence or absence of each growth zone (A–F of Ryland 1974). All growth stages were represented in Sargassum from all sampling stations. All growth zones were equivalently present during Feb 2011 (ANOVA, F(5,25) = 2.366, P > 0.08). During Feb 2012 (ANOVA F(5,30) = 2.797, P < 0.035), growth zone E was significantly less common among aliquots than growth zones B and F (Wilcoxon Signed Rank P = 0.03 for each comparison).
Table 2

Total coverage of epibiota growth on Sargassum in Feb 2011 (1) and Feb 2012 (3), and percent cover ± standard deviation for Sargassum growth zones and plant parts averaged across sampling periods

Epibiota

Total % cover ± SD

Zone mean % cover ± SD

Plant part mean % cover ± SD

Crustose coralline algae (Melabersia)

(1) 9.5 ± 13.4

(3) 7.4 ± 12.5

A

4.2

Bladder

6.7

  

B

8.3

Leaf

9.4

  

C

41.7

Stem

9.2

  

D

10.8

  
  

E

8.5

  
  

F

8.1

  

Macroalgae (Dictyota)

(1) 0.0 ± 0.5

(3) 0.0 ± 0.0

A

0.0

Bladder

0.0

  

B

0.0

Leaf

0.0

  

C

0.0

Stem

0.1

  

D

0.0

  
  

E

0.0

  
  

F

0.1

  

Bryozoa (Membranipora spp.)

(1) 10.7 ± 17.0

(3) 5.5 ± 13.4

A

3.8

Bladder

6.2

  

B

5.0

Leaf

5.6

  

C

26.6

Stem

1.24

  

D

8.8

  
  

E

11.0

  
  

F

14.2

  

Cnidaria (Clytia noliformis, Obelia dichotoma and Plumularia sp.)

(1) 9.1 ± 8.5

(3) 7.3 ± 7.7

A

10.9

Bladder

4.7

  

B

9.4

Leaf

9.0

  

C

12.4

Stem

10.9

  

D

8.3

  
  

E

7.3

  
  

F

5.6

  

Nereididae (Spirorbus)

(1) 0.7 ± 2.4

(3) 0.6 ± 2.1

A

0.4

Bladder

0.6

  

B

0.4

Leaf

0.3

  

C

0.6

Stem

1.0

  

D

0.5

  
  

E

0.7

  
  

F

0.3

  

Peduculata (Lepas pectinata)

(1) 0.7 ± 2.3

(3) 0.7 ± 2.8

A

1.1

Bladder

0.3

  

B

1.0

Leaf

0.4

  

C

1.3

Stem

1.5

  

D

0.5

  
  

E

0.8

  
  

F

0.4

  

No coverage

(1) 69.3 ± 22.9

(3) 78.5 ± 18.1

    
  

A

79.6

Bladder

81.6

  

B

75.9

Leaf

75.3

  

C

17.4

Stem

64.9

  

D

71.1

  
  

E

71.7

  
  

F

70.4

  

Trophic groups: historical and recent comparison

Recent samples were dominated by mobile macrofauna that are predators of other mobile macrofauna (Fig. 6; Online Resource 3), a pattern dominated by relatively high abundance of the decapod crustacean Latreutes fucorum compared to the other organisms of known trophic group. By contrast, historical sites to the south had a higher relative representation of epibiont predators and detritivores, and historical sites to the north had a higher relative representation of herbivores and detritivores. We were unable to define the diet of Litiopa melanostoma, a gastropod that was common in historical datasets.
Fig. 6

Trophic groups of mobile macrofauna associated with Sargassum in recent and historical samples. Relative fraction of all individuals in each sample represented by each trophic group, an average of all samples in each latitude block ± standard deviation error bars. Groups specified by an R represent recent surveys. The other/unknown category includes parasites and taxa for which diets were unknown. Trophic category designations and citations in Online Resource 3

Discussion

Oceanographic conditions (SST and pCO2)

The Sargasso Sea has undergone seasonal and long-term changes in oceanographic characteristics that might have influenced floating Sargassum and its rafting communities. In the past 30–40 years, the summer SST and mean pCO2 have increased steadily at Hydrostation S near Bermuda, in close proximity to Station 1 (Fig. 2c, d; Bates et al. 1998, 2012, 2014; Steinberg et al. 2012). Over time, there has also been a northward shift in a key isotherm (22.5 °C) in the Sargasso Sea (Friedland et al. 2007) and a slight increase in wind speed and wave height during extreme weather events (Young et al. 2011). If the trends experienced at Hydrostation S are representative of those experienced by the broader Sargasso Sea, then our sampling periods took place during two variable years in the Sargasso Sea’s temperature history. Our survey in February 2011 took place during the second coolest February since 1970. The survey in August 2011 took place during a period of average summer SST. Finally, the survey in February 2012 took place during one of the top 6 warmest February months since 1970. All of our samples were from waters 21 °C or warmer.

Mobile macrofauna community structure and diversity: recent surveys

Our result suggested a lack of site-specific community structure at the time of sampling, as well as inconsistent clustering by cruises in 2011 and 2012. We documented variation in mobile macrofauna assemblages and declines in diversity, evenness, and abundance within a six-month time period between August 2011 and February 2012 (Fig. 3b, c; Table 1). More than half of the animal groups documented in one of these sampling periods were not documented in the other (Table 1). These differences can be attributed to changes in the amphipod community, the addition of two nudibranchs in 2012, and isolated counts of taxa documented in low numbers (Table 1).

Mobile macrofauna: comparison of historical and recent samples from the restricted block

As hypothesized, recently sampled mobile macrofauna communities associated with Sargassum in the restricted block (Sargasso Sea 25°–29°N) deviated significantly from those communities documented historically in the same area. However, the MMCS were variable across both recent and historical sample groups, exhibiting statistically similar inter-sample variability over the 1972–1973 and 2011–2012 time periods, respectively (similar MDI, 35 vs 40 % similarity, respectively; Fig. 4a). Significant declines in diversity and evenness were also documented between 1972 and 1973 (Fig. 4b, c), similar in magnitude to the declines from 2011 to 2012.

Mobile macrofauna: comparison of historical and recent samples in all latitudes and ecological groups

At the basin-wide scale, the Sargassum mobile macrofauna community appears to have exhibited a fair degree of variability over time and space. Recent MMCS were unlike any historical communities we analyzed, whether compared to sites of the same latitude and geographic region (Fig. 4a), or the broader historical dataset including sites across the Sargasso Sea, Gulf Stream, south of the subtropical convergence zone, and in northern latitudes (Fig. 5). Fine (1970) observed considerable changes in species dominance between samples and concluded each raft reflected a separate community, with separate colonization events. In the late 1960s, Sargassum in the Gulf Stream and Sargasso Sea supported similar mobile macrofauna communities (Fine 1970), a pattern that was not observed 10 years later (Stoner and Greening 1984). Samples from these two historic collections shared only two of their respective top five most abundant species. Each recent sampling period reported here shared two of the top five most abundant taxa with those documented by Stoner and Greening (1984), but exhibited no overlap with Fine’s samples from the Sargasso Sea (Fine 1970). The Sargassum mobile macrofauna communities sampled near Hydrostation S exhibited seasonal cyclicity in the 1970s and appeared to return to a starting community composition each year (Online Resource 2, panel a). By contrast, communities we sampled near this site in 2012 fell very far outside this cyclical pattern (Online Resource 2, panel b). Clarkin et al. (2012) concluded that organisms inhabiting floating habitats of the Irish coast represented a random subsample of the broader rafting community there. More refined sampling is required before we can evaluate the impact of recruitment on spatiotemporal patterns of rafting animal MMCS and diversity in the Sargasso Sea.

Epibiota percent cover

Our samples recorded low coverage by epibionts, including calcifying bryozoans, Spirorbus, Lepas, and crustose coralline algae, but also cnidarians (primarily hydroids), which are non-calcifying. Bryozoans, crustose coralline algae, and cnidarians each exhibited average coverage of approximately 10 % or less. Spirorbus and Lepas demonstrated much lower coverage (>1 % coverage; Table 2). Although others have found a positive correlation between Sargassum age and epibiont coverage (Ryland 1974; Stoner and Greening 1984), this relationship does not appear to explain our results. In February 2012, epibiont coverage was low (total avg. coverage 21 %) despite an abundance of an advanced algal growth stage, Stage F, which indicates senescent seaweed. Our finding of Sargassum bearing the full range of growth stages but low epibiont coverage conflicts with previous reports (Ryland 1974; Stoner and Greening 1984). Additionally, our findings cannot be explained by variation in SST. Epibiont coverages in February 2011 and February 2012 were equally low, even though the Sargasso Sea was especially cool and warm during these times, respectively.

Although differences in methods do not allow for direct statistical comparison, coverage by calcifying bryozoans in our samples was low compared to coverage in samples quantified from the Sargasso Sea in the late 1970s (Niermann 1986). Niermann recorded a substantial portion of bladders with greater than 75 % surface area covered by bryozoans, more so north of the 21 °C isotherm than to the south (22–38 % of bladders with >75 % coverage to the north vs. 4–10 % of bladders with >75 % coverage to the south; Niermann 1986). By contrast, none of the bladders in our samples had such extensive bryozoan growth, or even coverage by all epibiont forms combined. All of our samples came from waters warmer than 21 °C and had considerably less coverage than those collected from southern sites in 1979 (Niermann 1986). We are unable to compare our values for Spirorbus, Lepas, and hydroids to other historical accounts, which were either qualitative assessments of “rare” to “common,” or presented as presence–absence data (Weis 1968; Butler et al. 1983; Calder 1995).

Trophic groups: historical and recent comparison

The feeding ecology of Sargasso Sea macrofaunal communities has been generalized as being dominated by suspension feeders, then grazers and browsers, followed by predators, and detritus feeders (Thiel and Gutow 2005b). Our observations differed from this simplified pattern. We observed low coverage by sessile filter feeders, an especially high fraction of the predator Latreutes fucorum, loss of several soft-bodied predators of sessile fauna, and low numbers of grazers and detritivores (Fig. 6). As found previously, we documented macrofauna living in Sargassum that share food sources; most of the species appear to be generalists with many food sources (Butler et al. 1983). While preliminary, our observations might reflect a combination of bottom-up and top-down influences on mid-level consumers. Half of the mobile macrofauna present in historic Sargasso Sea samples but absent from our samples (Table 3) are soft-bodied nudibranchs and flatworms that prey on sessile fauna (epibiota). While flatworms can be generalist predators and scavengers (Jennings 1957), many nudibranchs have species-specific feeding morphologies and ecologies [as with nudibranchs feeding on kelp epibionts (Lambert 1991)]. The epibiont community we observed recently might have been insufficient to support a diversity of predators. Concurrently, the disproportionally high abundance of Latreutes fucorum, which can prey on mobile macrofauna (Butler et al. 1983), could suggest top-down control of mid-level consumers, herbivores, and/or detritivores. Amphipods can exert indirect impacts on community composition and invertebrate species richness through selective grazing activity and modification of their macroalgal habitat (Duffy and Hay 2000). However, we do not know how the changes in amphipod species composition might have impacted our observations.
Table 3

Presence (+) or absence (−) of mobile macrofauna associated with Sargassum in recent and historical samples in the restricted block (Sargasso Sea, 25°–29°N) and historical samples outside this restricted block

 

Recent: Sargasso Sea 25°–29°N

Historic: Sargasso Sea 25°–29°N

Historic: outside Sargasso Sea 25°–29°N

Annelida: Polychaeta

 Polychaeta

+

+

 Spionid worm

+

Annelida: Phyllodocida

 Myrianida

+

 Platynereis dumerilii

+

+

+

Arthropoda

 Ostracod

+

Crustacea: Amphipoda

 Amphipod unidentified

+

 Ampithoe A

+

 Ampithoe B

+

 Ampithoe longimana

+

 Biancolina spp.

+

+

+

 Deutella incerta

+

 Gammarus

+

 Hyale

+

 Luconacia

+

 Sunamphitoe pelagica

+

+

+

Crustacea: Copepoda

 Copepod unidentified

+

+

 Dactylopusia tisboides

+

 Scutellidium longicauda

+

Crustacea: Decapoda

 Hemiaegina minuta

+

+

 Hippolyte coerulescens

+

+

+

 Latreutes fucorum

+

+

+

 Leander tenuicornis

+

+

+

 Planes minutus

+

+

+

 Portunus sayi

+

+

+

 Tozeuma carolinense

+

 Shrimp

+

+

Crustacea: Isopoda

 Carpiasminutus

+

+

 Cirolana

+

 Grapsicepon

+

 Idotea metallica

+

 Probopyrinella latreuticola

+

 Isopod unidentified

+

+

 Parasitic isopod unidentified

+

+

Crustacea: Tanaidacea

 Tanaid

+

+

Arthropoda: Pycnogonida

 Anoplodactylus petiolatus

+

+

 Endeis spinosa

+

+

 Pycnagonid unidentified

+

Mollusca: Caenogastropoda

 Bittium

+

 Janthina janthina

+

 Litiopa melanostoma

+

+

+

 Rissoa

+

 Gastropod unidentified

+

Mollusca: Nudibranchia

 Corambe obscura

+

+

 Cuthona

+

 Doto pygmaea

+

+

 Fiona pinnata

+

 Scyllaea pelagica

+

+

+

 Spurilla neapolitana

+

+

 Nudibranch B

+

 Nudibranch D

+

+

 Nudibranch unidentified

+

Platyhelminthes

 Acerotisa notulata

+

+

 *Chatziplana grubei

+

+

 Gnesioceros sargassicola

+

+

 Polycladus

+

 Flatworm unidentified

+

Xenacoelomorpha: Acoela

 Heterochaerus sargassi

+

Nemertea

 Nematoda

+

Echinodermata

 Ophioridae

+

Chordata: Thaliacea

 Salpa

+

Chordata: Teleostei

 Balistes

+

 Caranx

+

 Diodon

+

 Histrio histrio

+

+

+

 Stephanolepis hispidus

+

 Syngnathus typhle

+

 Fish unidentified

+

Sipuncula

 Sipunculid larva

+

Possible losses from the restricted block in bold. An asterisk denotes possible loss of Sargasso Sea endemic from this region

Conclusions

Sargassum features that are visible by satellite appear to circulate seasonally, and occasionally exhibit high inter-annual variation in estimated biomass and circulation patterns. Typically, this habitat appears to be advected from a source in the Gulf of Mexico each spring, through the Florida Strait to the Gulf Stream in the summer, and then circulates with prevailing currents to pass northeast of the Bahamas in February (Gower and King 2011). However, the latitude at which Sargassum features can be found during each calendar month varies (Gower and King 2011). Given the very different circulation histories of the Sargassum habitats sampled in 2011 and 2012, we were not surprised to see variability in macrofauna communities over time and space. In these years, the distribution, abundance, and/or circulation patterns of Sargassum features in the Atlantic were anomalous compared to the 2003–2010 period and exceed variability of those factors in living human memory (Gower and King 2011; Gower et al. 2013; Smetacek and Zingone 2013). In 2010, Sargassum biomass was very low, perhaps because of adverse effects caused by pollution from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and cleanup efforts in the Gulf of Mexico (Powers et al. 2013). In 2011, the major source of Sargassum was a region offshore of the Amazon rather than the Gulf Stream and unprecedented masses washed ashore in the Caribbean or drifted eastward at low latitudes all the way to Africa (Gower et al. 2013). The majority of that Sargassum biomass never appeared to reach the Sargasso Sea region, having never met with the Gulf Stream and circulated northward accordingly (Gower et al. 2013). By the time of our second sampling (August, 2011), high Sargassum biomass was situated in the Caribbean, but very little was visible in our study area to the north (Gower et al. 2013). These seasonal and yearly differences in advection of the Sargassum would contribute to variation in recruitment source populations and temperatures experienced by the inhabiting macrofauna and epibiota (Butler et al. 1983). Offshore rafting communities can be depauperate compared to their coastal counterparts (Ingólfsson 1995). As such, conclusions drawn from one time or geographic area in the Sargasso Sea might not necessarily offer valid comparisons for another region or time (Riemann et al. 2011). These characteristics might confound our ability to evaluate changes in Sargassum macrofauna communities over time. Therefore, large-scale oceanographic circulation could have significant implications for understanding Sargassum community variation in both long- and short-term cycles.

From theoretical predictions to empirical evidence, surface warming and increased pCO2 are associated with a host of changes capable of influencing marine populations at a broad scale (Friedland et al. 2007; Pinsky et al. 2013), especially rafting communities (Macreadie et al. 2011). Contrary to our original hypothesis, we did not observe a northward shift of mobile macrofauna communities. On the whole, the MMCS for recent samples from the 25°–29°N latitude block were significantly different from MMCS of historic samples from farther south. Range shifts in response to warming are not uniform in their magnitude and direction (Stefansdottir et al. 2010; Pinsky et al. 2013), an aspect that confounds our ability to detect distributional shifts of entire communities. Although our samples are limited, SST alone does not appear to be a primary variable influencing diversity. We found no correlation between Shannon H′ and SST. Likewise, we did not see a loss of mobile macrofauna biased toward calcifying forms. When interpreted together with the broader literature about climate change impacts on marine life (Friedland et al. 2007; Pinsky et al. 2013), our results support the idea that different species, and entire animal communities, can vary in their sensitivity to pH (Martin et al. 2008; Rodolfo-Metalpa et al. 2010) and response to ocean warming (Stefansdottir et al. 2010; Pinsky et al. 2013).

However, it is possible that increasingly acidic conditions of the Sargasso Sea have contributed to our observed reduction in coverage by epibionts, especially bryozoans such as Membranipora, which is lightly calcified (Banta et al. 1995). Calcifying animals might experience difficulty building exoskeletons and shells, and attaching to Sargassum in lower pH sea water, as seen in other studies (Martin et al. 2008). Sargassum with low epibiont coverage, and its associates, might experience increased UV exposure because of reduced overgrowth and reduced localized supply of nutrients from epibiont waste excretion (Thiel and Gutow 2005b; Rothäusler et al. 2012). If low coverage also contributes to reduced sinking rates, because clumps do not sink from being overgrown and weighed down (Rothäusler et al. 2012), then the rate of food supply of Sargassum to the deep sea would also be reduced. Fish and invertebrate scavengers in the Sargasso Sea’s deep waters (> 5,000 m) consume fallen Sargassum and epibiota and could be impacted by changes in surface Sargassum communities (Fleury and Drazen 2013).

The diversity and species composition of macrofauna communities associated with Sargassum might be inherently unstable. Diversity, evenness, and MMCS of rafting communities in the Sargasso Sea showed little consistency over time or space. In some marine communities, stability has been attributed to a lack of local stressors (e.g., Elahi et al. 2013), a trait that does not apply to the Sargasso Sea. Local and basin-wide stressors include increasing wind disturbances, SST, acidification (Bates et al. 1998, 2012, 2014; Friedland et al. 2007; Steinberg et al. 2012), large shifts in phytoplankton communities and nutrient cycling (Morán et al. 2010; Steinberg et al. 2012), widening geographic range of tropical species (Piontkovski and Castellani 2009), and increasing ship traffic (Trott et al. 2010). Fisheries have significantly altered the abundance of fishes and whales in the Sargasso Sea (Hallett, 2011). The same currents that transport Sargassum and larval recruits might also serve to concentrate pollutants known to occur in the region (Trott et al. 2010), including hydrocarbons (Butler et al. 1983), heavy metals (Johnson and Braman 1975), plastics (Carpenter and Smith 1972), and oil spill cleanup chemicals (Powers et al. 2013). By 2050, the Sargasso Sea is predicted to experience a moderate increase in species turnover rate due to range shifts in response to warming [Cheung et al. 2009; “turnover rate” is considered “The number of species eliminated and replaced per unit time” as defined by MacArthur and Wilson (1967)]. While macrofauna communities sampled throughout the Sargasso Sea in 2011 and 2012 had deviated significantly from those inhabiting that region in the 1970s, only long-term sampling can reveal whether they might (1) return to original assemblages, (2) sustain alternate community compositions, or (3) continue to undergo major change. Regular monitoring of the Sargassum community, at minimum every decade, is necessary to determine whether our results signal a long-term decline in this ecosystem, or low points in naturally variable diversity.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank John Ryan, Jim Gower, Benjamin Holt, Stephanie King, and Erika Young for their support in providing satellite imagery of the Sargasso Sea. Kaitlin Baird, Stephanie Bush, Lars Gutow, and an anonymous reviewer provided helpful comments on this manuscript. This study was made possible through the support of the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. We thank the Schmidt Ocean Institute for support of this project and for providing M/Y Lone Ranger as a research platform on three Sargasso Sea cruises. This study would not have been possible without the excellent cooperation of the ship’s captain, Bernd Buchner, and his crew on M/Y Lone Ranger. Logistical support and Hydrostation S data provided by Rod Johnson at BIOS are gratefully acknowledged. Many scientists, technicians, and students contributed greatly to the study both at sea and in the lab. Special thanks to J. Drazen, D. Graves, C. Buchner, and M. Risi for sorting many Sargassum samples on deck. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. K. Sealey acknowledges support from University of Miami, College of Arts and Science, and the Moore Foundation. Identification of amphipods was facilitated with help from Dr. James Thomas, Nova-Southeastern University Oceanographic Center. The assistance of Elan Portner and Dwayne Carney in sorting fauna is acknowledged and appreciated.

Supplementary material

227_2014_2539_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (160 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 160 kb)
227_2014_2539_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (126 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 126 kb)
227_2014_2539_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (203 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 203 kb)

References

  1. Abé H, Komatsu T, Kokubu Y, Natheer A, Rothäusler EA, Shishido H, Yoshizawa S, Ajisaka T (2013) Invertebrate fauna associated with floating Sargassum horneri (Fucales: Sargassaceae) in the East China Sea. Spec Divers 18:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen NG, Nielsen TG, Jakobsen HH, Munk P, Riemann L (2011) Distribution and production of plankton communities in the subtropical convergence zone of the Sargasso Sea. II. Protozooplankton and copepods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 426:71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banta WC, Perez FM, Santagata S (1995) A setigerous collar in Membranipora chesapeakensis n. sp. (Bryozoa): implications for the evolution of Cheilostomes from Ctenostomes. Invertebr Biol 114:83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates NR, Takahashi T, Chipman DW, Knap AH (1998) Variability of pCO2 on diel to seasonal timescales in the Sargasso Sea near Bermuda. J Geophys Res C (1978–2012) 103:15567–15585Google Scholar
  5. Bates NR, Best MHP, Neely K, Garley R, Dickson AG, Johnson RJ (2012) Detecting anthropogenic carbon dioxide uptake and ocean acidification in the North Atlantic Ocean. Biogeosci Discuss 9:2509–2522. doi:10.5194/bg-9-2509-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates N, Astor Y, Church M, Currie K, Dore J, Gonaález-Dávila M, Lorenzoni L, Muller-Karger F, Olafsson J, Santa-Casiano M (2014) A time-series view of changing ocean chemistry due to ocean uptake of anthropogenic CO2 and ocean acidification. Oceanography 27:126–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bednaršek N, Feely RA, Reum JCP, Peterson B, Menkel J, Alin SR, Hales B (2014) Limacina helicina shell dissolution as an indicator of declining habitat suitability owing to ocean acidification in the California Current Ecosystem. Proc R Soc B 1785:20140123. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.01231471-2954 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bohnsack JA (1979) Photographic quantitative sampling of hard-bottom benthic communities. Bull Mar Sci 29:242–252Google Scholar
  9. Butler JN, Stoner AW (1984) Pelagic Sargassum: has its biomass changed in the last 50 years? Deep Sea Res Oceanogr A 31:1259–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler JN, Morris BF, Cadwallader J, Stoner AW (1983) Studies of Sargassum and the Sargassum community. Bermuda Biological Station for Research St Georges 22Google Scholar
  11. Calder DR (1995) Hydroid assemblages on holopelagic Sargassum from the Sargasso Sea at Bermuda. Bull Mar Sci 56:537–546Google Scholar
  12. Carpenter EJ (1970) Diatoms attached to floating Sargassum in the western Sargasso Sea. Phycologia 9:269–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carpenter EJ, Smith KL (1972) Plastics on the Sargasso Sea surface. Science 175:1240–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carr A (1986) New perspectives on the pelagic stage of sea turtle development. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Memo. NMFS-SEFC-190Google Scholar
  15. Casazza TL, Ross SW (2008) Fishes associated with pelagic Sargassum and open water lacking Sargassum in the Gulf Stream off North Carolina. Fish Bull 106:348–363Google Scholar
  16. Chao A, Colwell RK, Lin C-W, Gotelli NJ (2009) Sufficient sampling for asymptotic minimum species richness estimators. Ecology 90:1125–1133. doi:10.1890/07-2147.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheung WWL, Lam VWY, Sarmiento JL, Kearney K, Watson R, Pauly D (2009) Projecting global marine biodiversity impacts under climate change scenarios. Fish Fish 10:235–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  19. Clarkin E, Maggs CA, Allcock AL, Johnson MP (2012) Environment, not characteristics of individual algal rafts, affects composition of rafting invertebrate assemblages in Irish coastal waters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 470:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coston-Clements L, Settle LR, Hoss DE, Cross FA (1991) Utilization of the Sargassum habitat by marine invertebrates and vertebrates: a review. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-296Google Scholar
  21. Culliney JL (1970) Measurements of reactive phosphorus associated with pelagic Sargassum in the northwest Sargasso Sea. Limnol Oceanogr 1970:304–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doney SC, Fabry VJ, Feely RA, Kleypas JA (2009) Ocean acidification: the other CO2 problem. Ann Rev Mar Sci 169–192. doi:10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834
  23. Duffy JE, Hay ME (2000) Strong impacts of grazing amphipods on the organization of a benthic community. Ecol Monogr 70:237–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elahi R, Birkeland C, Sebens KP, Turner KR, Dwyer TR (2013) Limited change in the diversity and structure of subtidal communities over four decades. Mar Biol 160:3209–3219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fabry VJ, Seibel BA, Feely RA, Orr JC (2008) Impacts of ocean acidification on marine fauna and ecosystem processes. J Cons 65:414–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Feely RA, Sabine CL, Lee K, Berelson W, Kleypas J, Fabry VJ, Millero FJ (2004) Impact of anthropogenic CO2 on the CaCO3 system in the oceans. Science 305:362–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fine ML (1970) Faunal variation on pelagic Sargassum. Mar Biol 7:112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fleury AG, Drazen JC (2013) Abyssal scavenging communities attracted to Sargassum and fish in the Sargasso Sea. Deep Sea Res Oceanogr A 72:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Friedland KD, Miller MJ, Knights B (2007) Oceanic changes in the Sargasso Sea and declines in recruitment of the European eel. J Conserv 64:519–530Google Scholar
  30. Gibson RN, Atkinson RJA, Gordon JDM (2006) The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. III. Biogeographical and evolutionary consequences. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 44:323–429Google Scholar
  31. Gower JFR, King SA (2011) Distribution of floating Sargassum in the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean mapped using MERIS. Int J Remote Sens 32:1917–1929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gower JFR, Young E, King S (2013) Satellite images suggest a new Sargassum source region in 2011. Remote Sens Lett 4:764–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hallett, J (2011) The Sargasso Sea: a history of exploration and exploitation. Masters Thesis, University of York, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  34. Ingólfsson A (1995) Floating clumps of seaweed around Iceland: natural microcosms and a means of dispersal for shore fauna. Mar Biol 122:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jennings JB (1957) Studies on feeding, digestion, and food storage in free-living flatworms (Platyhelminthes: Turbellaria). Biol Bull 112:63–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson DL, Braman RS (1975) The speciation of arsenic and the content of germanium and mercury in members of the pelagic Sargassum community. Deep Sea Res Oceanogr Abstr 22:503–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kingsford MJ, Choat JH (1985) The fauna associated with drift algae captured with a plankton-mesh purse seine net. Limnol Oceanogr 30:618–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Laffoley DA, Roe HSJ, Angel MV, Ardron J, Bates NR, Boyd IL, Brooke S, Buck KN, Carlson CA, Causey B, Conte MH, Christiansen S, Cleary J, Donnelly J, Earle SA, Edwards R, Gjerde KM, Giovannoni SJ, Gulick S, Gollock M, Hallett J, Halpin P, Hanel R, Hemphill A, Johnson RJ, Knap AH, Lomas MW, McKenna SA, Miller MJ, Miller PI, Ming FW, Moffitt R, Nelson NB, Parson L, Peters AJ, Pitt J, Rouja P, Roberts J, Roberts J, Seigel DA, Siuda ANS, Steinberg DK, Stevenson A, Sumaila VR, Swartz W, Thorrold S, Trott TM, Vats V (2011) The protection and management of the Sargasso Sea: the golden floating rainforest of the Atlantic Ocean. Summary science and supporting evidence case. Sargasso Sea AlianceGoogle Scholar
  39. Lambert WJ (1991) Coexistence of hydroid eating nudibranchs: do feeding biology and habitat use matter? Biol Bull 181:248–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Monogr Popul Biol 1:202Google Scholar
  41. Macreadie PI, Bishop MJ, Booth DJ (2011) Implications of climate change for macrophytic rafts and their hitchhikers. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 443:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marmorino GO, Miller WD, Smith GB, Bowles JH (2011) Airborne imagery of a disintegrating Sargassum drift line. Deep Sea Res Oceanogr A 58:316–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin S, Rodolfo-Metalpa R, Ransome E, Rowley S, Buia M-C, Gattuso J-P, Hall-Spencer J (2008) Effects of naturally acidified seawater on seagrass calcareous epibionts. Biol Lett 4:689–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Metzger R, Sartoris FJ, Langenbuch M, Pörtner HO (2007) Influence of elevated CO2 concentrations on thermal tolerance of the edible crab Cancer pagurus. J Therm Biol 32:144–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morán XAG, LÓPez‐Urrutia Á, Calvo‐DÍAz A, Li WKW (2010) Increasing importance of small phytoplankton in a warmer ocean. Glob Change Biol 16:1137–1144Google Scholar
  46. Moser ML, Auster PJ, Bichy JB (1998) Effects of mat morphology on large Sargassum-associated fishes: observations from a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) and free-floating video camcorders. Environ Biol Fish 51:391–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Niermann U (1986) Distribution of Sargassum natans and some of its epibionts in the Sargasso Sea. Helgoland Mar Res 40:343–353Google Scholar
  48. Norton TA, Benson MR (1983) Ecological interactions between the brown seaweed Sargassum muticum and its associated fauna. Mar Biol 75:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Orr JC, Fabry VJ, Aumont O, Bopp L, Doney SC, Feely RA, Gnanadesikan A, Gruber N, Ishida A, Joos F, Key RM, Lindsay K, Maier-Reimer E, Matear R, Monfray P, Mouchet A, Najjar RG, Plattner GK, Rodgers KB, Sabine CL, Sarmiento JL, Schlitzer R, Slater RD, Totterdell IJ, Weirig MF, Yamanaka Y, Yool A (2005) Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature 437:681–686. doi:10.1038/nature04095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Parr AE (1939) Quantitative observations on the pelagic Sargassum vegetation of the Western North Atlantic: with preliminary discussion of morphology and relationships. Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale UnivGoogle Scholar
  51. Pinsky ML, Worm B, Fogarty MJ, Sarmiento JL, Levin SA (2013) Marine taxa track local climate velocities. Science 341:1239–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Piontkovski SA, Castellani C (2009) Long-term declining trend of zooplankton biomass in the Tropical Atlantic. Hydrobiol 632:365–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Powers SP, Hernandez FJ, Condon RH, Drymon JM, Free CM (2013) Novel pathways for injury from offshore oil spills: direct, sublethal and indirect effects of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill on pelagic Sargassum communities. PLoS One 8:e74802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rasband WS (2012) ImageJ. National Institutes of Health, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  55. Riemann L, Nielsen TG, Kragh T, Richardson K, Parner H, Jakobsen HH, Munk P (2011) Distribution and production of plankton communities in the subtropical convergence zone of the Sargasso Sea. I. Phytoplankton and bacterioplankton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 426:57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rodolfo-Metalpa R, Lombardi C, Cocito S, Hall-Spencer JM, Gambi MC (2010) Effects of ocean acidification and high temperatures on the bryozoan Myriapora truncata at natural CO2 vents. Mar Ecol 31:447–456. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0485.2009.00354.x Google Scholar
  57. Rothäusler E, Gutow L, Thiel M (2012) Floating seaweeds and their communities. In: Wiencke C, Bischof K (eds) Seaweed biology, ecological studies 209, vol 17. Springer, Berlin, pp 359–380Google Scholar
  58. Ryland JS (1974) Observations on some epibionts of gulf-weed, Sargassum natans (L.) Meyen. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 14:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Saderne V, Wahl M (2012) Effect of ocean acidification on growth, calcification and recruitment of calcifying and non-calcifying epibionts of brown algae. Biogeosci Discuss 9Google Scholar
  60. Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric stats for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Siegel DA, Karl DM, Michaels AF (2001) Interpretations of biogeochemical processes from the US JGOFS Bermuda and Hawaii time-series sites. Deep Sea Res II 48:1403–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smetacek V, Zingone A (2013) Green and golden seaweed tides on the rise. Nature 504:84–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (2002) Fishery management plan for pelagic Sargassum habitat of the South Atlantic region: South CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  64. Stefansdottir L, Solmundsson J, Marteinsdottir G, Kristinsson K, Jonasson JP (2010) Groundfish species diversity and assemblage structure in Icelandic waters during recent years of warming. Fish Oceanogr 19:42–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Steinberg DK, Lomas MW, Cope JS (2012) Long-term increase in mesozooplankton biomass in the Sargasso Sea: linkage to climate and implications for food web dynamics and biogeochemical cycling. Glob Biogeochem Cy 26. doi:10.1029/2010gb004026
  66. Stoner AW, Greening HS (1984) Geographic variation in the macrofaunal associates of pelagic Sargassum and some biogeographic implications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 20:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tanaka MO, Leite FPP (1998) The effect of sieve mesh size on the abundance and composition of macrophyte-associated macrofaunal assemblages. Hydrobiol 389:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thiel M, Gutow L (2005a) The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. I. The floating substrata. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 42:181–264Google Scholar
  69. Thiel M, Gutow L (2005b) The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. II. The rafting organisms and community. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 43:279–418Google Scholar
  70. Trott TM, McKenna SA, Pitt JM, Hemphill A, Ming FW, Rouja P, Gjerde KM, Causey B, Earle SA (2010) Efforts to enhance protection of the Sargasso Sea. Proceedings of the 63rd Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute. Nov 1–5, 2010, San Juan, Puerto Rico, pp 282–286Google Scholar
  71. Watanabe Y, Yamaguchi A, Ishida H, Harimoto T, Suzuki S, Sekido Y, Ikeda T, Shirayama Y, Mac Takahashi M, Ohsumi T (2006) Lethality of increasing CO2 levels on deep-sea copepods in the western North Pacific. J Oceanogr 62:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weis JS (1968) Fauna associated with pelagic Sargassum in the Gulf Stream. Am Mid Nat 80:554–558. doi:10.2307/2423550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Winge Ø (1923) The Sargasso Sea, its boundaries and vegetation. Report of the Danish Oceanographic Expedition, 1908–1910. AF Høst & søn, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  74. Wootton JT, Pfister CA, Forester JD (2008) Dynamic patterns and ecological impacts of declining ocean pH in a high-resolution multi-year dataset. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:18848–18853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wu H, Zou D, Gao K (2008) Impacts of increased atmospheric CO2 concentration on photosynthesis and growth of micro-and macro-algae. Sci China Ser C Life Sci 51:1144–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yamada Y, Ikeda T (1999) Acute toxicity of lowered pH to some oceanic zooplankton. Plankton Biol Ecol 46:62–67Google Scholar
  77. Young IR, Zieger S, Babanin AV (2011) Global trends in wind speed and wave height. Science 332:451–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. L. Huffard
    • 1
  • S. von Thun
    • 1
  • A. D. Sherman
    • 1
  • K. Sealey
    • 2
  • K. L. SmithJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Monterey Bay Aquarium Research InstituteMoss LandingUSA
  2. 2.Coastal Ecology Laboratory, Biology DepartmentUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA

Personalised recommendations