Metachronal swimming in Antarctic krill: gait kinematics and system design
- 338 Downloads
Metachronal swimming, in which adjacent appendages stroke in sequence, is widespread among crustaceans inhabiting the transitional flow realm in which both viscosity and inertia effects are important. However, the design and operation of this propulsion system in response to various hydrodynamic, energetic, and behavioral needs have not been well investigated. We examine free-swimming Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) as a model species and identify three distinct behavioral swimming gaits. The pleopod kinematics of these gaits, hovering, fast-forward swimming, and upside-down swimming, are quantified via image analysis of high-speed video. Pleopod stroke amplitude and frequency were found to vary significantly among these swimming modes. In order to increase swimming speed, krill were found first to increase stroke amplitude and secondarily to increase beat frequency. The kinematics of these distinct swimming modes provide insight as we consider multi-appendage metachronal swimming from a design standpoint. The ratio of the distance between adjacent appendage bases and appendage length is identified as a key parameter in metachrony, the value of which is constrained to a narrow range for a wide variety of species.
KeywordsBeat Frequency Antarctic Krill Power Stroke Recovery Stroke Maximum Flow Velocity
This work was supported by a National Science Foundation East Asia–Pacific Summer Institute Award to D.W.M. and by National Science Foundation grant OCE-0928491 to J.Y. and D.R.W. The authors thank Nadir Kabir and Morgan Stephenson for help with data digitization and Rachel Lasley for help with statistics. All experiments complied with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Alexander DE (1988) Kinematics of swimming in two species of Idotea (Isopoda: Valvifera). J Exp Biol 138:37–49Google Scholar
- Anker A (2010) The shrimp genus Salmoneus Holthuis, 1955 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Alpheidae) in the tropical western Atlantic, with description of five new species. Zootaxa 2372:177–205Google Scholar
- Campos EO (2009) Quick forward escape swimming in the stomatopod crustacean Odontodactylus havanensis. Berkeley McNair Res J 16:1–14Google Scholar
- Davis WJ (1968) Quantitative analysis of swimmeret beating in the lobster. J Exp Biol 48:643–662Google Scholar
- Ivanenko VN, Defaye D, Cuoc C (2007) A new calanoid copepod (Spinocalanidae) swarming at a cold seep site on the Gabon continental margin (Southeast Atlantic). Cah Biol Mar 48:37–54Google Scholar
- Kanda K, Takagi K, Seki Y (1982) Movement of the larger swarms of Antarctic krill Euphausia superba population off Enderby Land during 1976–1977 season. J Tokyo U Fish 68:25–42Google Scholar
- Kils U (1981) Swimming behaviour, swimming performance, and energy balance of Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba. BIOMASS Sci Ser 3:1–122Google Scholar
- Knight-Jones EW, Macfadyen A (1959) The metachronism of limb and body movements in annelids and arthropods. Proc XVth Int Cong Zool, pp 969–971Google Scholar
- Nicol S, Endo Y (1997) Krill fisheries of the world. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 367. FAO, Rome, pp 1–100Google Scholar
- Sleigh MA, Barlow DI (1980) Metachronism and control of locomotion in animals with many propulsive structures. In: Elder HY, Trueman ER (eds) Aspects of animal movement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 49–70Google Scholar