Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 156, Issue 9, pp 1739–1749 | Cite as

Intertidal slope of coral sand beach as a unique habitat for fish: meiobenthic diet of the transparent sand dart, Kraemeria cunicularia (Gobiidae)

  • Remi Tsubaki
  • Makoto Kato
Original Paper

Abstract

Coral sand beaches harbor gobiid sand darts (genus Kraemeria), the only fish known to live in the sand throughout their adult life. Despite the uniqueness of sand-dwelling habitat as a vertebrate, the biology of this fish remains unclear. To explore how this unique fish utilize an unusual habitat, we investigated diurnal patterns of microhabitat use and prey consumption by the transparent sand dart, Kraemeria cunicularia, at a sandy beach on Iriomote Island, the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan. Sand darts were found in sediment in the lower intertidal zone throughout the daytime regardless of changes in tidal level, whereas at nighttime these fish were found swimming. Gut content analyses revealed that the sand dart diet was dominated by harpacticoid copepods throughout the day. Analyses of meiobenthic distribution indicated that these copepods were most abundant at lower intertidal zones where highest numbers of sand darts were found during the daytime; thus, it is possible that microhabitat use of the fish is largely determined by food availability. An extensive distributional survey throughout the Ryukyu Archipelago further indicated that sand darts prefer sandy beaches with well-sorted, coarse sand. These results provide novel insights into how sand darts respond to the tidal rhythm and highlight putative key environmental factors that determine their distribution at both regional and microhabitat scales.

Keywords

Beach Meiofauna Sandy Beach Harpacticoid Copepod Beach Slope 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We appreciate H. Hata, A. Kawakita, T. Yamada and four anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on this study; Y. Kameda, M. Sawamura, K. Kawazoe, Y. Nakase and R. Goto for assistance in the field; T. Okamoto for technical advice on data analysis.

Supplementary material

227_2009_1207_MOESM1_ESM.doc (32 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 32 kb) S1 Beaches surveyed in the Ryukyu Archipelago for sediment granulometric data and the occurrence of the sand dart. Abbreviations are as follows: + present; − absent
227_2009_1207_MOESM2_ESM.doc (26 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 26 kb) S2 Summary table of sampling event. O = sampling carried out, X = sampling not carried out
227_2009_1207_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (532 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 532 kb) S3 Faunal compositions of meiobenthic community at each point in (a) September 2007 and (b) April 2008
227_2009_1207_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (487 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 486 kb) S4 The mean number of prey individuals ingested per gut at each tidal level in (a) September and (b) April. Bars indicate standard errors

References

  1. Ansell AD, Comely CA, Robb L (1999) Distribution, movements and diet of macrocrustaceans on a Scottish sandy beach particular reference to predation on juvenile fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 176:115–130. doi: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps176115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armonies W (1988) Active emergence of meiofauna from intertidal sediment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 43:151–159. doi: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps043151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bannet AC (1989) The fish community of a moderately exposed beach on the Southwestern Cape Coast of South Africa and an assessment of this habitat as nursery for juvenile fish. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 28:293–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(89)90019-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beyst B, Carttrijsse C, Mees J (1999) Feeding ecology of juvenile flat fishes of the surf zone of a sandy beach. J Fish Biol 55:1171–1186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1999.tb02068.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birdsong RS, Murdy EO, Pezold FL (1988) A study of the vertebral column and median fin osteology in gobioid fishes with comments on gobioid relationships. Bull Mar Sci 42:174–214Google Scholar
  6. Brown AC, McLachlan A (eds) (1990) Ecology of sandy shores. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  7. Chris JH (1998) Use of sandy beach habitat by Fundulus majalis, a surf zone fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 164:307–310. doi: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps164307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multidimentional analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Defeo O, Mclachlan A (2005) Patterns, precesses and regulatory mechanisms in sandy beach macrofauna: a multi-scale analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 295:1–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps295001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Field JG, Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1982) A practical strategy for analyzing multispecies distribution patterns. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 8:37–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps008037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Folk RL (1974) Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Hemphills, TexasGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibson RN (2003) Go with the flow: tidal migration in marine animals. Hydrobiologia 503:153–161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000008488.33614.62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibson RN, Robb L (1996) Piscine predation on juvenile fishes on a Scottish sandy beach. J Fish Biol 49:120–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb00009.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibson RN, Ansell AD, Robb L (1993) Seasonal and annual variations in abundance and species composition of fish and macrocrustacean communities on a Scottish sandy beach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 98:89–105. doi: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps098089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibson RN, Robb L, Burrows MT, Ansell AD (1996) Tidal, diel and longer term changes in the distribution of fishes on a Scottish sandy beach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 130:1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps130001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gibson RN, Robb L, Wennhage H, Burrows MT (2002) Ontogenetic change in depth distribution of juvenile flatfishes in relation to predation risk and temperature on a shallow-water nursery ground. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 229:233–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps229233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gosline WA (1955) The osteology and relationships of certain goby fishes, with particular reference to the genera Kraemeria and Microdesmus. Pac Sci 9:158–170Google Scholar
  18. Inoue T, Suda Y, Sano M (2005) Food habits of fishes in the surf zone of a sandy beach at Sanrimatsubara, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan. Ichthyol Res 52:9–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-004-0246-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inoue T, Suda Y, Sono M (2008) Surf zone fishes in an exposed sandy beach at Sanrimatsubara, Japan: does fish assemblage structure differ among microhabitats? Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 77:1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iwata A, Kobayashi T, Ikeo K, Imanishi T, Ono H, Umehara Y, Hamamarsu C, Sugiyama K, Ikeda Y, Sakamoto K, Fumihito A, Ohno S, Gojobori T (2000) Evolutionary aspects of gobioid fishes based upon a phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial cytochrome b genes. Gene 259:5–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00488-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lasiak TA (1984) Structural aspects of the surf zone fish assemblages at Kings Beach, Algoa Bay, South Africa: short-term fluctuations. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 18:347–360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(84)90076-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Macpherson E (1998) Ontogenetic shifts in habitat use and aggregation in juvenile sparid fishes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 220:127–150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(97)00086-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McLachlan A, Hesp P (1984) Faunal response to morphology and water circulation of sandy beach with cusps. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 19:133–144. doi: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps019133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McLachlan A, Young N (1982) Effects of low temperatures on the burrowing rates of four sandy beach mollusks. J Mar Biol Ecol 65:275–284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(82)90059-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McLachlan A, Wooldridge T, Dye AH (1981) The ecology of sandy beaches in southern Africa. S Afr J Zool 16:219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nanami A, Endo T (2007) Seasonal dynamics of fish assemblage structure in a surf zone on an exposed sandy beach in Japan. Ichthyol Res 54:277–286. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-007-0402-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pessanha ALM, Araujo FJ (2003) Spatial, temporal and diel variations of fish assemblages at two sandy beaches in the Septiba Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 57:813–828. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00411-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peters DJ (1984) Seasonality, residency and spatial distribution of juvenile surf zone fishes of the Florida east coast. M.Sc. thesis, Florida Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  29. Robertson AI, Lenanton RCJ (1984) Fish community structure and food chain dynamics in the surf-zone of sandy beaches: the role of detached macrophyte detritus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 84:265–283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(84)90185-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rofen RR (1958) Family Kraemeriidae sand fishes. A review of the fishes of the family Kraemeriidae. In: Wolff T (ed) The natural history of Rennell Island, British Solomon Islands: scientific results of the Danish Rennell Expedition, 1951, and the British Museum (Natural History) Expedition, 1953. v. 1 Danish Science Press, pp 178–194Google Scholar
  31. Ross ST, McMichael RH, Ruppel DL (1987) Seasonal and diet variation in the standing crop of fishes and macro invertebrates from a Gulf of Mexico surf zone. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 25:391–412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(87)90033-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schlacher TA, Shoeman DS, Dugan J, Lastra M, Jones A, Scapini F, McLachlan A (2008) Sandy beach ecosystems: key features, sampling issues, management challenges and climate change impacts. Mar Ecol (Berl) 29:70–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.2007.00204.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Senou H (2004) A photographic guide to the Gobioid fishes of Japan. Heibosha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  34. Takada Y, Kosuge T, Nishimura S, Katoh M (2002) Vertical distributions of Atactodea striata and Latona faba (bivalves) on a subtropical sandy beach in Ishigaki Island, Japan. Venus 61:203–213Google Scholar
  35. Thacker CE (2003) Molecular phylogeny of the gobioid fishes (Teleostei: Perciformes: Gobioidei). Mol Phylogenet Evol 26:354–368. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00361-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trueman ER (1970) The mechanism of burrowing of mole crab, Emeria. J Exp Biol 53:701–710Google Scholar
  37. Veen JF (1978) On selective tidal transport in the migration of North sea plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) and other flatfish species. Neth J Sea Res 12:115–147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(78)90001-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Whittaker RH (1952) A study of summer foliage insect communities in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecol Monogr 22:1–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1948527 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Human and Environmental StudiesKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations