Trophic ecology of New Zealand triplefin fishes (Family Tripterygiidae)
In many vertebrate radiations, food partitioning among closely related taxa is a key factor in both the maintenance of species diversity and the process of diversification. We compared diet composition and jaw morphology of 18 New Zealand triplefin species (F. Tripterygiidae) to examine whether species have diversified along a trophic axis. These fishes predominantly utilised small, mobile benthic invertebrates, and interspecific differences in diet composition appeared to be mainly attributable to habitat- or size-dependent feeding behaviour. Although there were differences in the relative size of the bones comprising the oral jaw apparatus between species, the majority showed an apparatus consistent with a relatively high velocity, low force jaw movement indicative of a diet of evasive prey. Phylogenetic comparative analyses showed that the evolution of jaw lever ratios and diet breadth was best explained by a non-directional model in which character changes have occurred randomly and independent of phylogeny. The mode of diet breadth evolution was gradual and the tempo has not accelerated or slowed down over time. The mode of evolution for the jaw lever ratios has been gradual for the opening but punctuated for the closing levers, suggesting that evolutionary changes have occurred rapidly for the latter trait. The tempo of trait evolution for the jaw opening levers has not accelerated or slowed down over time, while the tempo for the jaw closing levers has accelerated towards the tips of the tree, which is suggestive of species level adaptation. The lack of phylogenetic signal in diet breadth and jaw lever ratios appears most likely to be a correlated response to the marked habitat diversification in this group, and is thus the passive outcome of prey availability in species-specific habitat types. Overall, the trophic ecology of New Zealand’s triplefin fauna parallels the generalist strategy typical of the family worldwide, suggesting that trophic resource partitioning has not been an important factor in the evolution of these fishes.
KeywordsDiet Composition Diet Breadth Mechanical Advantage Trophic Resource Gammarid Amphipod
We thank L. Jawad, R. Baker, G. Almany and two anonymous reviewers for providing helpful comments, B. Creese and J. Grieve for taxonomic assistance, M. Westneat for advice on jaw levers, and A. Stewart and D. Neale for providing triplefin samples. This study was funded by a Marsden grant to K.D. Clements.
- Castillo-Rivera M, Kobelkowsky A, Zamayoa V (1996) Food resource partitioning and trophic morphology of Brevoortia gunteri and B. patronus. J Fish Biol 49:1102–1111Google Scholar
- Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1994) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
- Clements KD (2003) Triplefins. In: Andrew NL, Francis MP (eds) The living reef. The ecology of New Zealand’s rocky reefs. Craig Potton Publishing, Nelson, pp 160–167Google Scholar
- Fricke R (1994) Tripterygiid fishes of Australia, New Zealand and the Southwest Pacific Ocean (Teleostei). Koeltz Scientific Books, KönigsteinGoogle Scholar
- Fricke R (1997) Tripterygiid fishes of the western and central Pacific, with descriptions of 15 new species, including an annotated checklist of world Tripterygiidae (Teleostei). Koeltz Scientific Books, KönigsteinGoogle Scholar
- Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology. Benjamin/Cummings, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Paulin CD, Roberts CD (1992) The rockpool fishes of New Zealand. Museum of New Zealand, Te Papa, Tongarewa, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
- Sale PF (2002) Coral reef fishes: dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Schluter D (2000) The ecology of adaptive radiations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Wellenreuther M (2006) Ecological factors associated with speciation in New Zealand triplefin fishes (Tripterygiidae). PhD. School of Biological Sciences, AucklandGoogle Scholar