Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 156, Issue 7, pp 1497–1505 | Cite as

Ontogeny of space use and diet of two temperate damselfish species, Parma microlepis and Parma unifasciata

  • Emily C. Buckle
  • David J. Booth
Original Paper

Abstract

Studies of reef fish herbivory have mainly focused on the impacts and behaviour of adults of tropical species. In this study, the ontogenetic shifts in home range, aggression, feeding rate, diet and gut morphology in juveniles and adults of two temperate territorial damselfishes, Parma microlepis and Parma unifasciata, were determined. Both P. microlepis and P. unifasciata juveniles under 80 mm TL exhibited no aggressive chases towards conspecifics or other species, while above 80 mm TL aggressive chase frequency increased in conjunction with an increase in home range, defended as a territory. Ontogenetic diet shifts, characterised by an increase in herbivory (P. unifasciata: juveniles: 64% plant material, adults: 95% plant material; P. microlepis: juveniles: 43% plant material, adults: 67% plant material) were observed for both species. The ratio of digestive tract length to body length, which often accompanies a switch to herbivory, increased significantly with ontogeny for both species. Compared to tropical confamilial grazers, these temperate damselfish species feeding rates were lower, and they had larger territories which were not as strongly defended (fewer aggressive chases).

Keywords

Coral Reef Home Range Polychaete Grazing Rate Bite Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge the Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney for supporting this project. Thanks to M. Gregson for assistance in the field and in preparation of this paper. The study was conducted under authorisation of NSW Fisheries Permit F94/696 and UTS/RNSH Ethics permit 0304-012A. This is contribution number 016 of Sydney Institute of Marine Science.

References

  1. Allen GR (1991) Damselfishes of the world. Melle, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen GR, Hoese DF (1975) A review of the pomacentrid fish genus Parma, with descriptions of two new species. Rec W Aust Mus 3:261–293Google Scholar
  3. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behaviour or sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853974X00534 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrew NL (1988) Ecological aspects of the common sea urchin, Everchinus chloroticus, in northeastern New Zealand: a review. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 22:415–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barneche D, Floeter S, Ceccarelli D, Frensel D, Dinslaken D, Mário D, Ferreira C (2009) Feeding macroecology of territorial damselfishes (Perciformes: Pomacentridae). Mar Biol (Berl) 156:289–0299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-008-1083-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bay L, Jones J, McCormick M (2004) Habitat selection and aggression as determinants of spatial segregation among damselfish on a coral reef. Coral Reefs 20:289–298Google Scholar
  7. Bellwood DR, Choat JH (1990) A functional analysis of grazing in parrotfishes (family Scaridae): the ecological implications. Environ Biol Fishes 28:189–214. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benavides AG, Cancino JM, Ojeda FP (1994) Ontogenetic changes in gut dimensions and macroalgal digestibility in the marine herbivorous fish, Aplodactilus punctatus. Funct Ecol 8:46–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2390110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Booth DJ (1998) Grazing pressure of roving and territorial fishes on patch reefs in One Tree Lagoon. In: Greenwood JG, Hall NJ (eds) Proceedings of the Australian coral reef society 75th anniversary conference. School of Marine Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, pp 29–42Google Scholar
  10. Cáceres CW, Fuentes LS, Ojeda FP (1994) Optimal feeding strategy of the temperate herbivorous fish Aplodactylus punctatus: the effects of food availability on digestive and reproductive patterns. Oecologia 99:118–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ceccarelli DM (2007) Modification of benthic communities by territorial damselfish: a multi-species comparison. Coral Reefs 26:853–866. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-007-0275-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapman RL (1981) Ultrastructure of Cephaleuros virescens (Chroolepidaceae, Chlorophyta). III. Zoospores. Am J Bot 68:544–556. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2443031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Choat JH (1982) Fish feeding and the structure of benthic communities in temperate waters. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 82:423–449. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.002231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choat JH (1991) The biology of herbivorous fishes on coral reefs. In: The ecology of fishes on coral reefs, pp 120–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Choat JH, Clements KD (1993) Daily feeding rates in herbivorous labroid fishes. Mar Biol (Berl) 117:205–211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Choat JH, Schiel DR (1982) Patterns of distribution and abundance of large brown algae and invertebrate herbivores in subtidal regions of northern New Zealand. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 60:129–162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(82)90155-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Choat JH, Clements KD, Robbins WD (2002) The trophic status of herbivorous fishes on coral reefs. Mar Biol (Berl) 140:613–623. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-001-0715-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dayton PK (1985) Ecology of kelp communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:215–245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.001243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doak W (1972) Fishes of the New Zealand Region. Hodder and Stoughton, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferreira CEL, Gonçalves JEA, Coutinho R, Peret AC (1998) Herbivory by the Dusky Damselfish Stegastes fuscus (Cuvier, 1830) in a tropical rocky shore: effects on the benthic community. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 229(2):241–264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(98)00056-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrold C, Reed DC (1985) Food availability, sea urchin grazing, and kelp forest community structure. Ecology 66:1160–1169. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1939168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hatcher BG (1983) Grazing in coral reef ecosystems. In: Manuka DJB (ed) Perspectives on coral reefs. Brian Clouston Publisher, Australia, pp 164–179Google Scholar
  23. Hatcher BG, Larkum AWD (1983) An experimental analysis of factors controlling the standing crop of the epilithic algal community on a coral reef. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 69:61–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(83)90172-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hixon MA (1983) Fish grazing and community structure of reef corals and algae: a synthesis of recent studies. In: Reaka ML (ed) The ecology of deep and shallow coral reefs. NOAA Symposia Series for Underwater Research 1(1), Rockville, pp 79–87Google Scholar
  25. Hixon MA, Brostoff WN (1982) Differential fish grazing and benthic community structure on Hawaiian reefs. In: Cailliet GM, Simenstad CA (eds) Fish food habitat studies. Proceeding of the 3rd Pacific Workshop, Washington Sea Grant Program, pp 249–257Google Scholar
  26. Hixon MA, Brostoff WN (1983) Damselfish as keystone species in reverse: intermediate disturbance and diversity of reef algae. Science 220:511–513. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4596.511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hixon MA, Brostoff WN (1996) Succession and herbivory: effects if differential fish grazing on Hawaiian coral-reef algae. Ecol Monogr 66:67–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2963481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horn MH (1989) Biology of marine herbivorous fishes. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 27:167–272Google Scholar
  29. Horn MH, Murray SN, Edwards TW (1982) Dietary selectivity in the field and food preferences in the laboratory for two herbivorous fishes (Cebidichthys violaceus and Xiphister mucosus) from a temperate intertidal zone. Mar Biol (Berl) 67:237–246. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones GP (1988) Ecology of rocky reef fish of north-eastern New-Zealand: a review. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 22:445–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones GP (1992) Interactions between herbivorous fishes and macro-algae on a temperate rocky reef. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 159(2):217–235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(92)90038-C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones GP, Andrew NL (1990) Herbivory and patch on rocky reefs in temperate Australasia: The role of fish and sea urchins. Aust J Ecol 15:515–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kingsford MJ, Gillanders BM (2000) Variation in concentrations of trace elements in otoliths and eye lenses of a temperate reef fish, Parma microlepis, as a function of depth, spatial scale, and age. Mar Biol (Berl) 137:403–414. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270000304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuiter RH (1993) Coastal fishes of South-Eastern Australia. Crawford House Press, BathurstGoogle Scholar
  35. Lassuy DR (1984) Diet, intestinal morphology, and nitrogen assimilation efficiency in the damselfish, Stegastes lividus, in Guam. Environ Biol Fishes 10:183–193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00001125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lawrence JM, Sammarco PW (1982) Effects of feeding on the environment: Echinoidea. In: Jangoux M, Lawrence LM (eds) Echinoderm nutrition. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam The Netherlands, pp 499–519Google Scholar
  37. Lobel PS (1980) Herbivory by damselfishes and their role in coral reef community ecology. Bull Mar Sci 30:273–289Google Scholar
  38. Losey GS Jr (1982) Ecological cues and experience modify interspecific aggression by the damselfish, Stegastes fasciolatus. Behaviour 81(1):14–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853982X00508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lubchenco J, Gaines SD (1981) A unified approach to marine plant-herbivore interactions. I. Populations and communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:405–437. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.002201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Millar AJK (1999) Marine benthic algae of Norfolk Island, South Pacific. Aust Syst Bot 12:497–547Google Scholar
  41. Montgomery WL, Gerking SD (1980) Marine macroalgae as foods for fishes: an evaluation of potential food quality. Environ Biol Fishes 5:143–153. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02391621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moran MJ, Sale PF (1977) Seasonal variation in territorial response and other aspects of the ecology of the Australian temperate pomacentrid fish Parma microlepis. Mar Biol (Berl) 39:121–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386997 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Munoz AA, Ojeda FP (2000) Ontogenetic changes in the diet of herbivorous Scartichthys viridis in a rocky intertidal zone in central Chile. J Fish Biol 56:986–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Norman MD, Jones GP (1984) Determinants of territory size in the pomacentrid reef fish, Parma victoriae. Oecologia 61:60–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Osorio R, Rosa IL, Cabral H (2006) Territorial defence by the Brazilian damsel Stegastes fuscus (Teleostei: Pomacentridae). J Fish Biol 69:233–242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01095.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Polunin NVC, Klumpp DW (1989) Ecological correlates of foraging periodicity in herbivorous reef-fishes of the Coral Sea. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 126:1–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(89)90121-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robertson GP (1982) Factors regulating nitrification in primary and secondary succession. Ecology 63:1561–1573. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1938880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sammarco PW (1983) Effects of fish grazing and damselfish territoriality on coral reef algae. 1. Algal community structure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 13(1):1–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps013001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schiel DR, Foster MS (1986) The structure of subtidal algal stands in temperate waters. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 24:265–307Google Scholar
  50. Schoener TW (1969) Models of optimal size for solitary predators. Am Nat 103:277–313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/282602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sibly RM, Calow P (1986) Physiological ecology of animals: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  52. Steneck RS (1988) Herbivory on coral reefs: a synthesis. In: Choat JH (ed) Proceedings of the 6th international coral reef symposium, vol 1, pp 37–49Google Scholar
  53. Taborsky M, Limberger D (1980) The activity rhythm of Blennius sanguinolentus Pallas, an adaptation to its food source? P.S.Z.N.I. Mar Ecol (Berl) 1:143–153. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.1980.tb00216.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tzioumis V (1995) Aspects of the reproductive biology and behaviour of the temperate damselfish, Parma microlepis Günther (Pisces: Pomacentridae). PhD thesis, University of Sydney, New South WalesGoogle Scholar
  55. Tzioumis V, Kingsford MJ (1995) Periodicity of spawning of two temperate damselfishes: Parma microlepis and Chromis dispilus. Bull Mar Sci 57(3):596–609Google Scholar
  56. Tzioumis V, Kingsford MJ (1999) Reproductive biology and growth of the temperate damselfish Parma microlepis. Copeia 199(2):348–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1447480 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vine PJ (1974) Effects of algal grazing and aggressive behaviour of the fishes Pomacentrus lividus and Acanthurus sohal on Coral-Reef ecology. Mar Biol (Berl) 24:131–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Werner EE, Gilliam JF (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:393–425. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. White TCR (1985) When is a herbivore not a herbivore? Oceologia 67:596–597. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00790034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilson DS (1975) The adequacy of body size as a niche difference. Am Nat 109:769–784. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/283042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zeller DC (1988) Short-term effects of territoriality on tropical damselfish and experimental exclusion of large fishes on invertebrates in algal turfs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 44:85–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps044085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zemke-White WL, Clements KD, Choat JH (2002) A re-evaluation of the diel feeding hypothesis for marine herbivorous fishes. Mar Biol (Berl) 141:571–579. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-002-0849-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zoufal R, Taborsky M (1991) Diel Foraging periodicity of Parablennius sanguinolentus Pall. (Teleostei: Pisces) Adjusts to daily changes in the nutritional quality of its staple diet, Chlorophyceae. Mar Biol (Berl) 108:193–196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01344333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of Technology, SydneySydney, BroadwayAustralia

Personalised recommendations