Patterns of mtDNA diversity in North Atlantic populations of the mussel Mytilus edulis
- 255 Downloads
Patterns of (female) mitochondrial DNA diversity were investigated in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. Mytilus edulis is a ubiquitous member of contemporary North Atlantic hard-substrate communities and well represented in studies of this region. Mytilus edulis was surveyed in North America and Europe, as well as mid-Atlantic sites in Greenland, Iceland, and the Faroe Islands. Mitochondrial DNA sequences revealed considerable population structure but no monophyly of haplotypes between any major regions. Coalescent analyses suggest that migration across the Atlantic Ocean has prominently been from North American source populations and that Greenland was colonized recently and exclusively from North America. In North America, there was support for two regional groups along the North American coastline. Surprisingly, we also found evidence of recombination between some Mytilus edulis and Mytilus galloprovincialis female mtDNA sequences, particularly in northern Europe.
KeywordsMytilus Edulis North American Population Faroe Island Macoma Balthica Postglacial Colonization
We thank the anonymous reviewers and associate editor S. Uthicke along with C. W. Cunningham, P. D. Rawson, and T. Ridgway for comments. D. A. Methven and M. J. Dadswell kindly sent mussel samples. D. Wang, B.Y. Kong, and S. K. Huber assisted in the lab. Part of this work was carried out by using the resources of the Computational Biology Service Unit from Cornell University, which is partially funded by Microsoft Corporation. This project was funded by the Duke University program in Molecular Evolution and Comparative Genomics and the National Science Foundation DEB-0316814 to CR. In addition, this project was supported by funds from Duke University under an award from NSF. The findings, opinions, and recommendations expressed therein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of Duke University or NSF.
- Dorian CC, Balco GA, Kaplan MR, Kreutz KJ, Wright JD, Borns HWJ (2001) Stratigraphy, paleoceanography, chronology, and environment during deglaciation of eastern Maine. In: Weddle T, Retelle M (eds) Deglacial history and relative sea-level changes, Northern New England and adjacent Canada. Geological Society of America Special Paper 351. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 215–242Google Scholar
- Dyke AS, Dale JE, McNeely RN (1996) Marine molluscs as indicators of environmental change in glaciated North America and Greenland during the last 18, 000 years. Geogr Phys Quatern 50:125–184Google Scholar
- Feder HM, Norton DM, Geller JB (2003) A review of apparent 20th century changes in the presence of mussels (Mytilus trossulus) and macroalgae in Arctic Alaska, and of historical and paleontological evidence used to relate mollusc distributions to climate change. Arctic 56:391–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Felsenstein J (1993) PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package) version 3.573c. Distributed by the author. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- Norton DM, Feder HM (2006) Mytilus thermophily? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 309:301–303Google Scholar
- Paine RT (1976) Biological observations on a subtidal Mytilus californianus bed. Veliger 19:125–130Google Scholar
- Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2001) Arlequin version 2.001: a software for population genetic analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Seed R (1976) Ecology. In: Bayne B (ed) Marine mussels: their ecology and physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13–56Google Scholar
- Stea RR, Boyd R, Fader GBJ, Courtney RC, Scott DB, Pecore SS (1994) Morphology and seismic stratigraphy of the inner continental shelf off Nova Scotia, Canada: evidence for a -65 m lowstand between 11,650 and 11,250 C14 yr B.P. Mar Geol 117:135–154. doi: 10.1016/0025-3227(94)90011-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tamura K, Nei M (1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526Google Scholar