Marine Biology

, Volume 155, Issue 3, pp 273–280 | Cite as

Macroalgal morphology mediates particle capture by the corallimorpharian Corynactis californica

  • Kathleen M. MorrowEmail author
  • Robert C. Carpenter
Original Paper


The shallow kelp forest at Santa Catalina Island, California (33.45 N, −118.49 W) is distinguished by several canopy guilds ranging from a floating canopy (Macrocystis pyrifera), to a stipitate, erect understory canopy (Eisenia arborea), to a short prostrate canopy just above the substratum (Dictyopteris, Gelidium, Laminaria, Plocamium spp.), followed by algal turfs and encrusting coralline algae. The prostrate macroalgae found beneath E. arborea canopies are primarily branching red algae, while those in open habitats are foliose brown algae. Densities of Corynactis californica, are significantly greater under E. arborea canopies than outside (approximately 1,200 versus 300 polyps m−2 respectively). Morphological differences in macroalgae between these habitats may affect the rate of C. californica particle capture and serve as a mechanism for determining polyp distribution and abundance. Laboratory experiments in a unidirectional flume under low (9.5 cm s−1) and high (21 cm s−1) flow speeds examined the effect of two morphologically distinct macroalgae on the capture rate of Artemia sp. cysts by C. californica polyps. These experiments (January–March 2006) tested the hypothesis that a foliose macroalga, D. undulata, would inhibit particle capture more than a branching alga, G. robustum. G. robustum, found predominantly under the E. arborea canopy did not affect particle capture. However, D. undulata, found predominantly outside of the canopy, inhibited particle capture rates by 40% by redirecting particles around C. californica polyps and causing contraction of the feeding tentacles. These results suggest that the morphology of flexible marine organisms may affect the distribution and abundance of adjacent passive suspension feeders.


Macroalgae Flow Speed Capture Rate Suspension Feeder Particle Capture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study was supported with funding by the PADI foundation, PADI AWARE, and the California State University, Northridge Graduate Student Association. I am grateful to K. Benes for dive support and Gerry Smith for technical support at the University of Southern California (USC) Wrigley Institute for Environmental Studies on Santa Catalina Island. Thank you to Myron and Rich at the California State University, Northridge Science Shop for maintenance and construction of necessary equipment. Discussions with N. Chadwick, S. Dudgeon, P. Edmunds, M. Steele, R. Ritson-Williams, and P. Wilson were essential to the development of this study. The friendship of K. Benes, C. Chabot, R. Elahi, A. Hettinger, B. Kordas, and D. Wang made this project more enjoyable. The experiments described in this study comply with the laws of the United States of America. This is contribution number 146 of the Marine Biology Program of California State University, Northridge.


  1. Anderson SM, Charters AC (1982) A fluid dynamics study of seawater flow through Gelidium nudifrons. Limnol Oceanogr 27:399–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthony KRN (1997) Prey capture by the sea anemone Metridium senile (L.): effects of body size, flow regime, and upstream neighbors. Biol Bull 192:73–86. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chadwick NE (1987) Interspecific aggressive behavior of the corallimorpharian Corynactis californica (Cnidaria: Anthozoa): effects of sympatric corals and sea anemones. Biol Bull 171:110–125. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chadwick NE, Adams C (1991) Locomotion, asexual reproduction, and killing of corals by the corallimorpharian Corynactis californica. Hydrobiology 216/217:263–269. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charters AC, Neushul M, Barilotti C (1968) The functional morphology of Eisenia arborea. In: Margalef R (ed) Proceedings of 6th International Seaweed Symposium. Santiago de Compostela, Spain, pp 89–105Google Scholar
  6. Chen CA, Chen CP, Chen IM (1995) Sexual and asexual reproduction of the tropical corallimorpharian Rhodactis (=Discosoma) indosinensis (Cnidaria: Corallimorpharia) in Taiwan. Zool Stud 34:29–40Google Scholar
  7. Connell SD (2003a) Negative effects overpower the positive of kelp to exclude invertebrates from the understorey community. Oecologia 137:97–103. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connell SD (2003b) The monopolization of understorey habitat by subtidal encrusting coralline algae: a test of the combined effects of canopy-mediated light and sedimentation. Mar Biol (Berl) 142:1065–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coyer JA, Ambrose RF, Engle JM, Carroll JC (1993) Interactions between corals and algae on a temperate zone rocky reef: Mediation by sea urchins. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 167:21–37. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eckman JE, Duggins DO (1991) Life and death beneath macrophyte canopies: effects of understory kelps on growth rates and survival of marine benthic suspension feeders. Oecologia 87:473–487. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eckman JE, Duggins DO (1993) Effects of flow speed on growth of benthic suspension feeders. Biol Bull 185:28–41. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eckman JE, Duggins DO, Sewell AT (1989) Ecology of understory kelp environments I. Effects of kelp on flow and particle transport near the bottom. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 129:173–187. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fonseca MS, Fisher JS, Zieman JC, Thayer GW (1982) Influences of the seagrass Zostera marina L on current flow. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 15:351–354. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graham LE, Wilcox LW (eds) (2000) Algae. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  15. Helmuth ST, Sebens KP (1993) The influence of colony morphology and orientation to flow on particle capture by the scleractinian coral Agaricia agaricites (Linnaeus). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 165:251–278. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holts LJ, Beauchamp KA (1993) Sexual reproduction in the corallimorpharian sea anemone Corynactis californica in a central California kelp forest. Mar Biol (Berl) 116:129–136. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunter T (1989) Suspension feeding in oscillatory flow: The effect of colony morphology and flow regime on plankton capture by the hydroid Obelia longissima. Biol Bull 176:41–49. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hurd CL, Stevens CL (1997) Flow simulation around single- and multiple-bladed seaweeds with various morphologies. J Phycol 33:360–367. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Irving AD, Connell SD (2006) Predicting understorey structure from the presence and composition of canopies: An assembly rule for marine algae. Oecologia 148:491–502. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson JBC (1977) Competition on marine hard substrata: the adaptive significance of solitary and colonial strategies. Am Nat 111:743–767. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson AS (2001) Drag, drafting, and mechanical interactions in canopies of the red alga, Chondrus crispus. Biol Bull 201:126–135. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jompa J, McCook (2002) Effects of competition and herbivory on interactions between a hard coral and a brown alga. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 271:25–39. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kennelly SJ (1989) Effects of kelp canopies on understorey species due to shade and scour. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 50:215–224. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knowlton N, Jackson JBC (2001) The ecology of coral reefs. In: Bertness MD, Gaines SD, Hay ME (eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, pp 395–422Google Scholar
  25. Koehl MAR (1977) Effects of sea anemones on the flow forces they encounter. J Exp Biol 69:87–105Google Scholar
  26. Koehl MAR, Alberte RS (1988) Flow, flapping, and photosynthesis of Nereocystis leutkeana: a functional comparison of undulate and flat blade morphologies. Mar Biol (Berl) 99(3):435–444. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koehl MAR (1996) When does morphology matter? Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:501–542. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McFadden CS (1986) Colony fission increases particle capture rates of a soft coral: advantages of being a small colony. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 103:1–20. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morrow KM (2006) Shallow kelp canopies regulate macroalgal and invertebrate interactions. M.S. Thesis, California State University Northridge, NorthridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Morrow KM, Carpenter RC (2008) Shallow kelp canopies mediate macroalgal composition. Effects on the distribution and abundance of Corynactis californica. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, Corallimorpharia. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Okamura B, Partridge JC (1999) Suspension feeding adaptations to extreme flow environments in a marine bryozoan. Biol Bull 196:205–215. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Patterson M (1984) Patterns of whole colony prey capture in the octocoral, Alcyonium siderium. Biol Bull 167:613–629. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Patterson M (1991) The effects of flow on polyp-level prey capture in an octocoral, Alcyonium siderium. Biol Bull 180:93–102. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Piniak GA (2002) Effects of symbiotic status, flow speed, and prey type on prey capture by the facultatively symbiotic temperate coral Oculina arbuscula. Mar Biol (Berl) 141:449–455. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rubenstein DI, Koehl MAR (1977) The mechanisms of filter feeding: some theoretical considerations. Am Nat 111:981–994. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sebens KP (1981) The allometry of feeding, energetics, and body size in three sea anemone species. Biol Bull 161:152–171. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sebens K, Johnson AS (1991) Effects of water movement on prey capture and distribution of reef corals. Hydrobiology 226:91–101. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sebens KP, Witting J, Helmuth B (1997) Effects of water flow and branch spacing on particle capture by the reef coral Madracis mirabilis (Duchassing and Michelotti). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 211:1–28. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sebens KP, Grace SP, Helmuth B, Maney EJ Jr, Miles JS (1998) Water flow and prey capture by three scleractinian corals, Madracis mirabilis, Montastea cavernosa, and Porites porites in a field enclosure. Mar Biol (Berl) 131:347–360. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trager G, Achituv Y, Genin A (1994) Effects of prey escape ability, flow speed, and predator feeding mode on zooplankton capture by barnacles. Mar Biol (Berl) 120(2):251–259. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vogel S, LaBarbera M (1978) Simple flow tanks for research and teaching. Bioscience 23:638–643. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyCalifornia State University NorthridgeNorthridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations