Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 154, Issue 5, pp 911–918 | Cite as

Bilateral symmetry and locomotion: do elliptical regular sea urchins proceed along their longer body axis?

  • Kazuya Yoshimura
  • Tatsuo Motokawa
Original Paper

Abstract

Vagile animals usually have bilaterally symmetrical bodies and proceed with their mouth-end first. Regular sea urchins have, however, radially symmetrical bodies with their mouth facing the substratum and show no preference in which side of the body should be anterior in their locomotion. The elliptical sea urchins in the subfamily Echinometrinae are exceptional among regular sea urchins in having elongated bilateral bodies. We studied whether they showed the preference in the direction of locomotion using Echinometra sp. type A. Directional preference was not observed in the proceedings in an open space. However, they proceeded preferentially with their long axis coinciding with the direction of locomotion when they moved along the water surface or along the wall of the aquarium. The speed of locomotion was the same irrespective of the direction of proceedings and of whether sea urchins moved freely or moved along the water surface or along the walls. We suggest that the bilateral body form and the habit of long-axis lead of this sea urchin have adaptive significance to increase the protected body surfaces, not to facilitate the efficiency in locomotion.

Keywords

Drag Reduction Vertical Wall Bilateral Symmetry Directional Proceeding Symmetrical Body 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thanks the anonymous reviewer, Dr. H-A. Takeuchi of Shizuoka University and Dr. M. Hironaka of Hamamatsu University School of Medicine for the information on circular statistics. We would like to express thanks Dr. O. Ellers of Bowdoin College for improvement of statistical method description. We are grateful to Y. Nakano of Sesoko Marine Science Center and M. Obuchi of Tokyo Institute of Technology for collecting sea urchins. This work was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (No. 18916007) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, and the grant of Research Institute of Marine Invertebrates, Japan to K.Y.

References

  1. Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Beklemishev VN (1969) Principles of comparative anatomy of invertebrates. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Carpenter RC (1984) Predator and population density control of homing behavior in the Caribbean echinoid Diadema antillarum. Mar Biol 82:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cole LJ (1913) Direction and locomotion of the starfish (Asterias forbesi). J Exp Zool 14:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crook AC, Long M, Barnes DKA (2000) Quantifying daily migration in the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividis. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 80:177–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dance C (1987) Patterns of activity of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividis in the bay of Port-Cros. Mar Ecol 8:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Denny M, Gaylord B (1996) Why the urchin lost its spines: hydrodynamic forces and survivorship in three echinoids. J Exp Biol 199:717–729PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Domenici P, Gonzales-Calderon D, Ferrari RS (2003) Locomotor performance in the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividis. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 83:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fricke HW (1971) Fische als Feinde tropischer Seeigel. Mar Biol 9:328–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grabowsky GL (1994) Symmetry, locomotion, and the evolution of an anterior end: a lesson from sea urchins. Evolution 48:1130–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hyman LH (1955) The Invertebrates: Echinodermata, 4. Echinoidea. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Ito Y, Hayashi I (1998) Basic behavior of three species of sea urchins under experimental conditions. In: Mooi R, Telford M (eds) Echinoderms. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, p 694Google Scholar
  13. James DW (2000) Diet, movement, and covering behavior of the sea urchin Toxopneustes roseus in rhodolith beds in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Mar Biol 137:913–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kier PM (1987) Class Echinoidea. In: Boardman RS, Cheetham HC, Rowell AJ (eds) Fossil Invertebrates. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 596–611Google Scholar
  15. Linares C, Coma R, Dias D, Zabala M, Hereu B, Dantart L (2005) Immediate and delayed effects of a mass mortality event on gorgonian population dynamics and benthic community structure in the NW Mediterranean Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 305:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McClanahan TR (1995) Fish predators and scavengers of the sea urchin Echinometra mathaei in Kenyan coral-reef marine parks. Environ Biol Fishes 43:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McClanahan TR, Muthiga NA (1989) Patterns of predation on a sea urchin, Echinometra mathaei (de Blainville), on Kenyan coral reefs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 126:77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Millott N, Yoshida M (1957) The spectral sensitivity of the Echinoid Diadema antillarum Philippi. J Exp Biol 34:394–401Google Scholar
  19. Nelson BV, Vance RR (1979) Diel foraging patterns of the sea urchin Centrostephanus coronatus as a predator avoidance strategy. Mar Biol 51:251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nishihira M, Sato Y, Arakaki Y, Tsuchiya M (1991) Ecological distribution and habitat preference of four types of the sea urchin Echinometra mathaei on the Okinawan coral reefs. In: Yanagisawa T, Yasumasu I, Oguro C, Suzuki N, Motokawa T (eds) Biology of Echinodermata. A. A Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 91–104Google Scholar
  21. Parker GH (1936) Direction and means of locomotion in the regular sea urchin Lytechinus. Mém du Mus Roy d’Hist Nat de Bel, deu sér Fasc 3:197–208Google Scholar
  22. Rahman MA, Uehara T (2004) Interspecific hybridization and backcrosses between two sibling species of pacific sea urchins (genus Echinometra) on Okinawan intertidal reefs. Zool Stud 43:93–111Google Scholar
  23. Smith AB (1988) Phylogenetic relationship, divergence times, and rates of molecular evolution for Camarodont sea urchins. Mol Biol Evol 5:345–365Google Scholar
  24. Tuya F, Martin JA, Luque A (2004) Patterns of nocturnal movement of the long-spined sea urchin Diadema antillarum (Philippi) in Gran Canaria (the Canary Islands, central East Atlantic Ocean). Helgol Mar Res 58:26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Uehara T (1990) Speciation in Echinometra mathaei. Iden 44:47–53 (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  26. Wainwright SA (1988) Axis and circumference. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Peason Education, SingaporeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Bioscience & BiotechnologyTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations