Marine Biology

, Volume 154, Issue 5, pp 867–874 | Cite as

Relation of growth and condition with the Pan I locus in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) around Iceland

  • Ingibjörg G. JónsdóttirEmail author
  • Guðrún Marteinsdóttir
  • Christophe Pampoulie
Original Paper


Growth and condition (both somatic and hepatosomatic index) of Atlantic cod spawning at different locations around Iceland was studied in relation to the Pan I locus. South of Iceland cod carrying the Pan IAB and Pan IBB genotypes were more frequent while cod carrying the Pan IAA genotype was more frequent north of Iceland. Differences in growth were detected between cod spawning at different areas around Iceland. Cod spawning south of Iceland grew faster than cod spawning north of Iceland. Differences in growth rate were also observed among cod carrying different Pan I genotypes within a spawning area. The least frequent Pan I genotype expressed the highest growth in both south and north of Iceland. Cod carrying the Pan IAA grew fastest at spawning locations south of Iceland, while cod carrying the Pan IBB genotype grew fastest in north of Iceland. A consistent relationship between condition and the different Pan I genotypes was also observed in all the areas. Cod carrying the Pan IAA expressed the highest somatic condition and the lowest hepatosomatic index. Together, these results indicate that the relation of growth and condition with the Pan I locus is more complicated than earlier thought and is likely to be influenced by other factors, like size-selective fishing and food supply.


Fish Growth Fish Length Gill Filament Hepatosomatic Index Somatic Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to thank all the captains and crews of the vessels used for sampling, as well as the chief scientists and all the researchers working on board for assistance with sampling. Thanks to Þóra Dögg Jörundsdóttir for genetic analysis and Klara B. Jakobsdóttir for inspiring discussion on the subject. We thank three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. This project is partly funded by EU (METACOD—project no. Q5RS-2001-00953), the Icelandic Research Council and the Icelandic Ministry of Fisheries.


  1. Björnsson B, Steinarsson A, Oddgeirsson M (2001) Optimal temperature for growth and feed conversion of immature cod (Gadus morhua L.). ICES J Mar Sci 58:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brander K (2000) Effects of environmental variability on growth and recruitment in cod (Gadus morhua) using a comparative approach. Oceanol Acta 23:485–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brander K (2007) The role of growth in the decline and recovery of North Atlantic cod stocks since 1970. ICES J Mar Sci 64:211–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks CC, Scherer PE, Cleveland K, Whittemore JL, Lodish HF, Cheatham B (2000) Pantophysin is a phosphoprotein component of adipocyte transport vesicles and associates with GLUT4-containing vesicles. J Biol Chem 275:2029–2036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cardinale M, Doering-Arjes P, Kastowsky M, Mosegaard H (2004) Effects of sex, stock and environment on the shape of known-age Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) otoliths. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:158–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Case RAJ, Hutchinson WF, Hauser L, Buehler V, Clemmesen C, Dahle G, Kjesbu OS, Moksness E, Ottera H, Paulsen H, Svasand T, Thorsen A, Carvalho GR (2006) Association between growth and Pan I* genotype within Atlantic cod full-sibling families. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fevolden SE, Pogson GH (1997) Genetic divergence at the synaptophysin (Syp I) locus among Norwegian coastal and north–east Arctic populations of Atlantic cod. J Fish Biol 51:895–908Google Scholar
  8. Imsland AK, Jónsdóttir ODB (2003) Linking population genetics and growth properties of Atlantic cod. Rev Fish Biol Fish 13:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jennings S, Kaiser MJ, Reynolds JD (2001) Marine fisheries ecology. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  10. Jónsdóttir ODB, Imsland AK, Danielsdottir AK, Marteinsdottir G (2002) Genetic heterogeneity and growth properties of different genotypes of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) at two spawning sites off south Iceland. Fish Res 55:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jónsdóttir IG, Campana SE, Marteinsdottir G (2006a) Otolith shape and temporal stability of spawning groups of Icelandic cod (Gadus morhua L.). ICES J Mar Sci 63:1501–1512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jónsdóttir IG, Campana SE, Marteinsdottir G (2006b) Stock structure of Icelandic cod Gadus morhua L. based on otolith chemistry. J Fish Biol 69(Suppl C):136–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karlsson S, Mork J (2003) Selection-induced variation at the pantophysin locus (PanI) in a Norwegian fjord population of cod (Gadus morhua L.). Mol Ecol 12:3265–3274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lambert Y, Dutil JD (1997) Condition and energy reserves of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) during the collapse of the northern Gulf of St. Lawrence stock. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:2388–2400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Law R (2000) Fishing, selection, and phenotypic evolution. ICES J Mar Sci 57:659–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lloret J, Ratz HJ (2000) Condition of cod (Gadus morhua) off Greenland during 1982–1998. Fish Res 48:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Malmberg S-A, Valdimarsson H (2003) Hydrographic conditions in Icelandic waters, 1990–1999. ICES Mar Sci Symp 219:50–60Google Scholar
  18. Marteinsdottir G, Begg GA (2002) Essential relationships incorporating the influence of age, size and condition on variables required for estimation of reproductive potential in Atlantic cod Gadus morhua. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 235:235–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marteinsdottir G, Gudmundsdottir A, Thorsteinsson V, Stefansson G (2000) Spatial variation in abundance, size composition and viable egg production of spawning cod (Gadus morhua L.) in Icelandic waters. ICES J Mar Sci 57:824–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mello LGS, Rose GA (2005) Seasonal cycles in weight and condition in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) in relation to fisheries. ICES J Mar Sci 62:1006–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Otterlei E, Nyhammer G, Folkvord A, Stefansson SO (1999) Temperature- and size-dependent growth of larval and early juvenile Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua): a comparative study of Norwegian coastal cod and northeast Arctic cod. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:2099–2111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pálsson ÓK, Thorsteinsson V (2003) Migration patterns, ambient temperature, and growth of Icelandic cod (Gadus morhua): evidence from storage tag data. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:1409–1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pampoulie C, Ruzzante DE, Chosson V, Jorundsdóttir TD, Taylor L, Thorsteinsson V, Daníelsdóttir AK, Marteinsdóttir G (2006) The genetic structure of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) around Iceland: insight from microsatellites, the Pan I locus, and tagging experiments. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:2660–2674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pampoulie C, Jakobsdóttir K, Marteinsdóttir G, Thorsteinsson V (2008) Are vertical behaviour patterns related to the Pantophysin locus in the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.)? Behav Genet 38:76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pardoe H, Thórdarson G, Marteinsdóttir G (2008) Spatial and temporal trends in condition of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) on the Icelandic shelf. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. doi: 10.3354/meps07409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Petursdottir G, Begg GA, Marteinsdottir G (2006) Discrimination between Icelandic cod (Gadus morhua L.) populations from adjacent spawning areas based on otolith growth and shape. Fish Res 80:182–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pogson GH (2001) Nucleotide polymorphism and natural selection at the pantophysin (Pan I) locus in the Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua (L.). Genetics 157:317–330PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Pogson GH, Mesa KA (2004) Positive Darwinian selection at the pantophysin (Pan I) locus in marine gadid fishes. Mol Biol Evol 21:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sarvas TH, Fevolden SE (2005) The scnDNA locus Pan I reveals concurrent presence of different populations of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) within a single fjord. Fish Res 76:307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schluter D (2001) Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol Evol 16:372–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stokes K, Law R (2000) Fishing as an evolutionary force. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 208:307–309Google Scholar
  32. Svasand T, Jorstad KE, Ottera H, Kjesbu OS (1996) Differences in growth performance between Arcto-Norwegian and Norwegian coastal cod reared under identical conditions. J Fish Biol 49:108–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Swain DP, Sinclair AF, Castonguay M, Chouinard GA, Drinkwater KF, Fanning LP, Clark DS (2003) Density-versus temperature-dependent growth of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in the Gulf of St. Lawrence and on the Scotian Shelf. Fish Res 59:327–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wallace AR (1889) Darwinism: an exposition of the theory of natural selection, with some of its applications. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R (1991) Chelex–100 as a Medium for Simple Extraction of DNA for PCR-Based Typing from Forensic Material. Biotechniques 10:506–513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Windoffer R, Borchert-Stuhltrager M, Haass NK, Thomas S, Hergt M, Bulitta CJ, Leube RE (1999) Tissue expression of the vesicle protein pantophysin. Cell Tissue Res 296:499–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wootton RJ (1998) Ecology of teleost fishes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  38. Wright PJ (1991) The influence of metabolic rate on otolith increment width in Atlantic salmon parr, Salmo salar L. J Fish Biol 38:929–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yoneda M, Wright PJ (2005) Effects of varying temperature and food availability on growth and reproduction in first time spawning female Atlantic cod. J Fish Biol 67:1225–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingibjörg G. Jónsdóttir
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guðrún Marteinsdóttir
    • 2
  • Christophe Pampoulie
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine Research InstituteReykjavikIceland
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of IcelandReykjavikIceland

Personalised recommendations