Marine Biology

, Volume 153, Issue 1, pp 1–5 | Cite as

Annual density banding in massive coral skeletons: result of growth strategies to inhabit reefs with high microborers’ activity?

  • J. P. Carricart-GanivetEmail author


Porites and Montastraea are the major reef-building massive coral genera in the Indo-Pacific and Atlantic oceans, respectively. They are also the most commonly used genera in sclerochronological studies. Despite the marked differences in the way these genera use calcareous material to construct their skeletons (growth strategies) and in their skeletal architectural structure, they form annual high and low density bands in their skeletons, that result from the positive relationship of coral calcification rate with sea surface temperature and seasonal changes of the latter. Evidence in the literature suggests that the different growth strategies allow these organisms to construct denser skeletons far from terrigenous inputs, on reefs where microborers’ activity is high. It seems quite probable that this has consequences for the evolution, diversity, distribution and abundance of reef corals.


Great Barrier Reef Extension Rate Calcification Rate Skeletal Density Inshore Reef 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The manuscript was notably improved by the comments of Janice M. Lough, David J. Barnes and one anonymous reviewer. This research was supported by grants from CONACYT (project U48757-F).


  1. Barnes DJ, Lough JM (1993) On the nature and causes of density banding in massive coral skeletons. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 167:91–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes DJ, Lough JM (1996) Coral skeletons: storage and recovery of environmental information. Glob Change Biol 2:569–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruggemann J, van Kessel AM, van Rooj JM, Breeman AM (1996) Bioerosion and sediment ingestion by the Caribbean parrotfish Scarus vetula and Sparisoma viride: implications of size, feeding mode and habitat use. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 134:59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cairns SD (1999) Species richness of recent Scleractinia. Atoll Res Bull 59:1–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carricart-Ganivet JP (2004) Sea surface temperature and the growth of the West Atlantic reef-building coral Montastraea annularis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 302:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carricart-Ganivet JP, Merino M (2001) Growth responses of the reef-building coral Montastraea annularis along a gradient of continental influence in the southern Gulf of Mexico. Bull Mar Sci 68:133–146Google Scholar
  7. Carricart-Ganivet JP, Horta-Puga G, Ruiz-Zárate MA, Ruiz-Zárate E (1994) Tasas retrospectivas de crecimiento del coral hermatípico Montastrea annularis (Scleractinia: Faviidae) en arrecifes al sur del Golfo de México. Rev Biol Trop 42:517–523Google Scholar
  8. Carricart-Ganivet JP, Beltrán-Torres AU, Merino M, Ruiz-Zárate MA (2000) Skeletal extension, density and calcification rate of the reef building coral Montastraea annularis (Ellis and Solander) in the Mexican Caribbean. Bull Mar Sci 66:215–224Google Scholar
  9. Chazottes V, Le Campion-Alsumard T, Peyrot-Clausade M (1995) Bioerosion rates on coral reefs: interactions between macroborers, microborers and grazers (Moorea, French Polynesia). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 113:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clausen CD, Roth AA (1975) Effect of temperature and temperature adaptation on calcification rate in the hermatypic coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Biol 33:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coles SL, Jokiel PL (1978) Synergistic effects of temperature, salinity and light on the hermatypic coral Montipora verrucosai. Mar Biol 49:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cook CB, Mueller EM, Ferrier MD, Annis E (2002) The influence of nearshore waters on corals of the Florida Reef Tract. In: Porter JW, Porter KG (eds) The Everglades, Florida Bay and coral reefs of the Florida Keys: an ecosystem sourcebook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 771–778Google Scholar
  13. Cruz-Piñón G, Carricart-Ganivet JP, Espinoza-Avalos J (2003) Monthly skeletal extension rates of the hermatypic corals Montastraea annularis and Montastraea faveolata: biological and environmental controls. Mar Biol 143:491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dodge RE, Lang JC (1983) Environmental correlates of hermatypic coral (Montastrea annularis) growth on the East Flower Gardens Bank, northwest Gulf of Mexico. Limnol Oceanogr 28:228–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dodge RE, Brass GW (1984) Skeletal extension, density and calcification of the reef coral, Montastrea annularis: St Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. Bull Mar Sci 34:288–307Google Scholar
  16. Dodge RE, Szmant AM, García R, Swart PK, Forester A, Leder JJ (1992) Skeletal structural basis of density banding in the reef coral Montastrea annularis, vol 1. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Coral Reef Symposium, pp 186–195Google Scholar
  17. Druffel EM (1982) Banded corals: changes in oceanic carbon-14 during the Little Ice Age. Science 218:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edinger EN, Limmon GV, Jompa J, Widjatmoko W, Heikoop JM, Risk MJ (2000) Normal coral growth rates on Dying Reefs: are coral growth rates good indicators of reef health? Mar Poll Bull 40:404–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edmunds PJ (2005) The effect of sub-lethal increases in temperature on the growth and population trajectories of three scleractinian corals on the southern Great Barrier Reef. Oecol 146:350–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fang LS, Chen YWJ, Chen CS (1989) Why does the tip of stony coral grow so fast without zooxanthellae? Mar Biol 103:359–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goreau TF (1959) The ecology of Jamaican coral reefs I. Species composition and zonation. Ecology 40:67–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Highsmith RC, Lueptow RL, Schonberg SC (1983) Growth and bioerosión of three massive corals on the Belize barrier reef. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 13:261–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hudson JH (1981) Growth rates in Montastrea annularis: a record of environmental change in Key Largo Coral Reef Marine Sanctuary, Florida. Bull Mar Sci 31:444–459Google Scholar
  24. Jokiel PL, Coles SL (1977) Effects of temperature on the mortality and growth of Hawaiian reef corals. Mar Biol 43:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knutson DW, Buddemeier RW, Smith SV (1972) Coral chronometers: seasonal growth bands in reef corals. Science 177:270–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Le Campion-Alsumard T (1979) Les cyanophycées endolithes marines. Systématique, ultrastructure, écologie et biodestruction. Oceanol Acta 2:143–156Google Scholar
  27. Lough JM, Barnes DJ (1992) Comparisons of skeletal density variations in Porites from the Central Great Barrier Reef. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 155:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lough JM, Barnes DJ (2000) Environmental controls on growth of the massive coral Porites. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 245:225–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marshall AT, Clode P (2004) Calcification rate and the effect of temperature in a zooxanthellate and an azooxanthellate scleractinian reef coral. Coral Reefs 23:218–224Google Scholar
  30. Pari N, Peyrot-Clausade M, Le Campion-Alsumard T, Hutchings PA, Chazottes V, Golubic S, Le Campion J, Fontaine MF (1998) Bioerosion of experimental substrates on high islands and on atoll lagoons (French Polynesia) after two years of exposure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 166:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Potts DC, Done TJ, Isdale PJ, Fisk DA (1985) Dominance of a coral community by the genus Porites (Scleractinia). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 23:79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Risk MJ, Sammarco PW (1991) Cross-shelf trends in skeletal density of the massive coral Porites lobata from the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 69:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sammarco PW, Risk MJ (1990) Large-scale patterns in internal bioerosion of Porites: cross continental shelf trends on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 59:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tribollet A, Golubic S (2005) Cross-shelf differences in the pattern and pace of bioerosion of experimental carbonate substrates exposed for 3 years on the northern Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 24:422–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tribollet A, Decherf G, Hutchings PA, Peyrot-Clausade M (2002) Large-scale spatial variability in bioerosion of experimental coral substrates on the Great Barrier Reef (Australia): importance of microborers. Coral Reefs 21:422–432Google Scholar
  36. Tudhope AW, Lea DW, Shimmield GB, Chilcott CP, Scoffin TP, Fallick AE, Jebb M (1997) Climatic records from massive Porites in Papua New Guniea: a comparison of skeletal Ba/Ca, skeletal d18O and coastal rainfall, vol 2. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Coral Reef Symposium, pp 719–724Google Scholar
  37. Vago R, Dubinsky Z, Genin A, Ben-Zion M, Kizner Z (1997) Growth rates of three symbiotic corals in the Red Sea. Limnol Oceanogr 42:1814–1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Veron JEN (2000) Corals of the World, vol. 3. Australian Institute of Marine Science & CRR Qld Pty Ltd, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  39. Wellington GM, Dunbar RB (1995) Stable isotopic signature of El Niño-Southern Oscillation events in eastern tropical Pacific reef corals. Coral Reefs 14:5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad ChetumalChetumalMexico

Personalised recommendations