Marine Biology

, Volume 152, Issue 4, pp 745–756 | Cite as

Intraguild predatory interactions between the jellyfish Cyanea capillata and Aurelia aurita

  • Josefin TitelmanEmail author
  • Laurianne Gandon
  • Anne Goarant
  • Trygve Nilsen
Research Article


While qualitative observations of jellyfish intraguild predation abound in the literature, there are only few rate measurements of these interactions. We quantified predation rates among two common jellyfish in northern boreal waters, Cyanea capillata and its prey Aurelia aurita, both of which also feed on crustacean zooplankton and fish larvae. A series of incubation experiments using a wide range of prey concentrations (0.38–3.8 m−3) in large containers (2.6 m3) was carried out. By replenishing the prey continuously as they were captured we maintained a nearly constant prey concentrations. Ingestion rates increased linearly up to prey concentrations of 1.92 m−3, yielding maximum clearance rates of ∼2.37 ± 0.39 m3 predator−1 h−1 for C. capillata predators 16 ± 2.3 cm in diameter. Mean ingestion rate at saturated prey concentrations (1.92–3.85 m−3) was 4.01 ± 0.78 prey predator−1 h−1. Behavioral observations suggested that predators did not alter their swimming behavior during meals, and thus that feeding rates were generally handling limited rather than encounter limited. Predators captured more prey than needed, and semi-digested prey was often discarded when fresh prey was encountered.


Intraguild Predation Digestion Rate Maximum Ingestion Rate Prey Concentration Predator Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work formed part of the EUROGEL project (EVK3-CT-2002–00074; U Båmstedt). JT received additional support from a grant from the Norwegian Research Council to U Båmstedt (146994/120), and LG and AG were supported by fellowships from ENSAT-Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Toulouse. We thank T Sørlie and H Hjertsen for assistance with setting up the flow in the tanks. Aino Hosia and Jon Egil Skjæraasen kindly commented on earlier drafts. The experiments comply with the current laws of Norway, where the experiments were performed.


  1. Arai MN (2005) Predation on pelagic coelenterates: a review. J Mar Biol Ass UK 85:523–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Båmstedt U (1990) Trophodynamics of the scyphomedusae Aurelia-aurita—predation rate in relation to abundance, size and type of prey organism. J Plankton Res 12:215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Båmstedt U, Martinussen MB, Matsakis S (1994) Trophodynamics of the 2 scyphozoan jellyfishes, Aurelia aurita and Cyanea capillata, in western norway. ICES J Mar Sci 51:369–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Båmstedt U, Ishii H, Martinussen MB (1997) Is the scyphomedusa Cyanea capillata (L.) dependent on gelatinous prey for its early development? Sarsia 82(3):269–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Båmstedt U, Martinussen MB, Fyhn HJ, Grahl-Nielssen O (2007) Biometrics and biochemical composition of the scyphomedusae Aurelia aurita, Cyanea capillata, and Periphylla periphylla, and the lobate ctenophore Bolinopsis infundibulum (in preparation)Google Scholar
  6. Berggreen U, Hansen B, Kiørboe T (1988) Food size spectra, ingestion and growth of the copepod Acartia tonsa during development: implication for determination of copepod production. Mar Biol 99:341–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carre D, Carre C, Mills CE (1989) novel cnidocysts of narcomedusae and a medusivorous ctenophore, and confirmation of kleptocnidism. Tissue Cell 21:723–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costello JH, Colin SP (2002) Prey resource use by coexistent hydromedusae from Friday Harbor, Washington. Limnol Oceanogr 47:934–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costello JH, Klos E, Ford MD (1998) In situ time budgets of the scyphomedusae Aurelia aurita, Cyanea sp., and Chrysaora quinquecirrha. J Plankton Res 20:383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donaldson S, Mackie GO, Roberts A (1980) Preliminary observations on escape swimming and giant neurons in Aglantha digitale (Hydromedusae:Trachylina). Can J Zool 58:549–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Falkenhaug T (1996) Distributional and seasonal patterns of ctenophores in Malangen, northern Norway. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 140:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falkenhaug T, Stabell OB (1996) Chemical ecology of predator-prey interactions in ctenophores. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 27:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gröndahl F (1988) A comparative ecological study on the scyphozoans Aurelia aurita, Cyanea capillata and Cyanea lamarckii in the Gullmar fjord, western Sweden, 1982 to 1986. Mar Biol 97:541–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haddock SHD, Rivers TJ, Robison BH (2001) Can coelenterates make coelenterazine? Dietary requirement for luciferin in cnidarian bioluminescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11148–11151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansson LJ (1997) Capture and digestion of the scyphozoan jellyfish Aurelia aurita by Cyanea capillata and prey response to predator contact. J Plankton Res 19:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansson LJ, Kiørboe T (2006) Effects of large gut volume in gelatinous zooplankton: ingestion rate, bolus production and food patch utilization by the jellyfish Sarsia tubulosa. J Plankton Res 28:937–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansson LJ, Kultima K (1995) Behavioural response of the scyphozoan jellyfish Aurelia aurita (L) upon contact with the predatory jellyfish Cyanea capillata (L). Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 26:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hansson LJ, Norrman B (1995) Release of dissolved organic-carbon (DOC) by the scyphozoan jellyfish Aurelia-aurita and its potential influence on the production of planktic bacteria. Mar Biol 121:527–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansson LJ, Moeslund O, Kiørboe T, Riisgard HU (2005) Clearance rates of jellyfish and their potential predation impact on zooplankton and fish larvae in a neritic ecosystem (Limfjorden, Denmark). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 304:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harbison GR, Madin LP, Swanberg NR (1978) On the natural history and distribution of oceanic ctenophores. Deep Sea Res 25:233–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnsen S (2001) Hidden in plain sight: the ecology and physiology of organismal transparency. Biol Bull 201:301–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kremer P (1979) Predation by the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi in Narragansett Bay, Rhode-Island. Estuaries 2:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kreps TA, Purcell JE, Heidelberg KB (1997) Escape of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi from the scyphomedusa predator Chrysaora quinquecirrha. Mar Biol 128:441–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lenhoff HM (1964) Reversible inhibition of swimming in stomatoca atra by mesogleal extracts of some other medusae. Biol Bull 126:115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mackie GO (1995) Defensive strategies in planktonic coelenterates. Mar Freshw Behav Phys 26 (2–4):119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin VJ (2002) Photoreceptors of cnidarians. Can J Zool 80:1703–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martinussen MB, Båmstedt U (1995) Diet, estimated daily food ration and predator impact by the schyphozoan jellyfishes Aurelia aurita and Cyanea capillata. In: Skjoldal HR, Hopkins C, Erikstud KE, Leinaas HP (eds) Ecology of fjords and coastal waters. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 127–145Google Scholar
  28. Martinussen MB, Båmstedt U (1999) Nutritional ecology of gelatinous planktonic predators. Digestion rate in relation to type and amount of prey. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 232:61–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martinussen MB, Båmstedt U (2001) Digestion rate in relation to temperature of two gelatinous planktonic predators. Sarsia 86:21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matanoski JC, Hood RR, Purcell JE (2001) Characterizing the effect of prey on swimming and feeding efficiency of the scyphomedusa Chrysaora quinquecirrha. Mar Biol 139:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matsumoto GI, Harbison GR (1993) In-situ observations of foraging, feeding, and escape behavior in 3 orders of oceanic ctenophores—lobata, cestida, and beroida. Mar Biol 117:279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mills CE, Miller RL (1984) Ingestion of a medusa (Aegina citrea) by the nematocyst-containing ctenophore Haeckelia rubra (formerly Euchlora rubra): phylogenetic implications. Mar Biol 78:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Møller LF, Riisgård (2007) Respiration in the scyphozoan jellyfish Aurelia aurita and two hydromedusae (Sarsia tubulosa and Aequorea vitrina): effect of size, temperature and growth. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 330:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ohman MD (1988) Behavioral responses of zooplankton to predation. Bull Mar Sci 43:530–550Google Scholar
  35. Pennington JT (1990) Predation by hydromedusae on hydrozoan embryos and larvae: planktonic kin selection? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 60: 247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D (2005) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models, R package version 3.1–65Google Scholar
  38. Polis GA, Myers CA, Holt RD (1989) the ecology and evolution of intraguild predation—potential competitors that eat each other. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:297–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Purcell JE (1991a) A review of cnidarians and ctenophores feeding on competitors in the plankton. Hydrobiology 216:335–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Purcell JE (1991b) Predation by Aequorea victoria on other species of potentially competing pelagic hydrozoans. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 72:255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Purcell JE, Arai MN (2001) Interactions of pelagic cnidarians and ctenophores with fish: a review. Hydrobiology 451:27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Purcell JE, Cowan JH (1995) Predation by the scyphomedusan Chrysaora quinquecirrha on Mnemiopsis leidyi ctenophores. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 129:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Purcell JE, Decker MB (2005) Effects of climate on relative predation by scyphomedusae and ctenophores on copepods in Chesapeake Bay during 1987–2000. Limnol Oceanogr 50:376–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. R Development Core Team (2005) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051–07-0. URL
  45. Raskoff KA (2002) Foraging, prey capture, and gut contents of the mesopelagic narcomedusa Solmissus spp. (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa). Mar Biol 141:1099–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reeve MR, Walter MA (1978) Laboratory studies of ingestion and food utilization in lobate and tentaculate ctenophores. Limnol Oceanogr 23:740–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Riemann L, Titelman J, Båmstedt U (2006) Links between jellyfish and microbes in a jellyfish dominated fjord? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 325:29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schneider G (1992) A comparison of carbon-specific respiration rates in gelatinous and non-gelatinous zooplankton—a search for general rules in zooplankton metabolism. Helgolander Meeres 46:377–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shanks AL, Graham WM (1987) Orientated swimming in the jellyfish Stomolopus-meleagris l-agassiz (Scyphozoan, Rhizostomida). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 108:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shanks AL, Graham WM (1988) Chemical defense in a scyphomedusa. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 45:81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sørnes TA, Aksnes DL (2004) Predation efficiency in visual and tactile zooplanktivores. Limnol Oceanogr 49:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stibor H, Vadstein O, Diehl S, Gelzleichter A, Hansen T, Hantzsche F, Katechakis A, Lippert B, Loseth K, Peters C, Roederer W, Sandow M, Sundt-Hansen L, Olsen Y (2004) Copepods act as a switch between alternative trophic cascades in marine pelagic food webs. Ecol Lett 7:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strand SW, Hamner WM (1988) Predatory behavior of Phacellophora camtschatica and size-selective predation upon Aurelia aurita (scyphozoa, cnidaria) in Saanich inlet, British-Columbia. Mar Biol 99:409–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tamburri MN (2000) Chemically regulated feeding by a midwater medusa. Limnol Oceanogr 45:1661–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Titelman J, Hansson LJ (2006) Feeding rates of the jellyfish Aurelia aurita on fish larvae. Mar Biol 149:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Titelman J, Kiørboe T (2003) Predator avoidance by nauplii. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 247:137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Titelman J, Riemann L, Sørnes T, Nilsen T, Griekspoor P, Båmstedt U (2006) Turnover of dead jellyfish: stimulation and retardation of microbial activity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 325:43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josefin Titelman
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Laurianne Gandon
    • 1
  • Anne Goarant
    • 1
  • Trygve Nilsen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  3. 3.Department of Marine EcologyGöteborg UniversityFiskebäckskilSweden

Personalised recommendations